We Dissect Protocols

Nitric acid

Manufactured by Merck Group
1 699 citations
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Italy, India, France, Australia, Belgium, Spain, Poland, Switzerland, China, Japan, Brazil, Singapore, Sao Tome and Principe, Chile, Canada, Mexico, Israel, Ireland, Sweden, Czechia, Argentina
About the product

Nitric acid is a highly corrosive, strong mineral acid used in various industrial and laboratory applications. It is a colorless to slightly yellow liquid with a pungent odor. Nitric acid is a powerful oxidizing agent and is commonly used in the production of fertilizers, explosives, and other chemical intermediates.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Nitric acid is a commercially available product from Merck Group. It is offered in various concentrations and packaging sizes through authorized distributors. For example, a 1-liter bottle of 65% Suprapur® nitric acid is priced at approximately $358.00. Customers should consult official distributors for the most up-to-date pricing and availability information.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

1 699 protocols using «nitric acid»

1

SARS-CoV-2 N-Protein Immunoassay Development

2025
The following reagents were used: nitric acid (H2NO3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), monosodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4), disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4), potassium chloride, N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (NHS), 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-carbodiimide (EDC), and bovine serum albumin (BSA), all sourced from Sigma-Aldrich and Merck (Rahway, NJ, USA). Graphene nanoplatelets were obtained from XG Sciences (East Lansing, MI, USA), and the 1-Step™ Ultra TMB-ELISA substrate was procured from Thermo Fisher™ Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The N-protein was synthesized and purified at the Federal University of Amazonas. Additionally, a solution of 5 mmol L⁻¹ K₃Fe(CN)6/K4Fe(CN)6 prepared in 0.1 mol L⁻¹ KCl was utilized as a redox probe for electrochemical measurements. All electrochemical experiments were performed at room temperature (22 ± 0.5 °C) without stirring. The Federal University of Amazonas provided human blood serum samples, and the study received approval from The Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Amazonas (CAAE: 34906920.4.0000.5020), adhering to Brazilian law and the Declaration of Helsinki.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Trace Element Analysis via ICP-OES

2025
All reagents were of a high analytical grade. Deionized water of level I (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), as defined in ISO 3696:1987 [33 ] and hydrogen peroxide (30%; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) solutions of ultrapure grade were used. Also, concentrated nitric acid (65%; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), first distilled in an acid distillation system (model subPUR; Milestone, Shelton, CT, USA), was used.
Working multi-element standard solutions were prepared from mono-element high purity ICP stock standards (Cu, Mn, Fe, Zn, Mg, Ca, P, Na, and K) containing 1000 mg/L of each element (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
Working standard solutions, sample dilutions, and blanks were prepared with a 2% concentration solution of nitric acid. A nitric acid solution (2–4%) concentration was used to wash up the ICP-OES sample introduction system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis of Phosphate Buffer Solutions

2025
Potassium hydroxide (KOH, 86.2%) was purchased
from VWR Chemicals
(USA). Sodium phosphate monobasic (NaH2PO4,
≥98.0%), sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate (Na2HPO4·7 H2O, ≥98.0%), d-glucose (C6H12O6, ≥99.5%),
potassium chloride (KCl, ≥99.0%), sulfuric acid (H2SO4, ≥95.0%), and nitric acid (HNO3,
70%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). All chemicals were
used as received without further purification. Aqueous solutions were
prepared using ultrapure water with a resistivity higher than 18 MΩ·cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gold(III) Chloride Hydrate Cytotoxicity Assay

2025
Gold (III) chloride hydrate (99.995 %) was obtained from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). Perchloric acid, terephthalic acid (TA), dimethyl sulfoxide, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and nitric acid were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The Apoptosis Detection Kit (Annexin V labeled with FITC/propidium iodide [PI]) was obtained from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640) cell culture medium, penicillin-streptomycin, trisodium citrate dihydrate, and trypsin-ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich Company (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Wastewater Decontamination using Clay-Based Composites

2025
The clay was used as the main base material, sourced from the city of Hamadan, Iran, with its physical and chemical properties outlined in Table 1. The cow leg used in this study was purchased from a butcher named Mr Reza Naderi in the city of Ben. Cow leg bones were used for the synthesis of hydroxyapatite. First, the meat and fat tissue were removed from the bones, and then, to ensure the removal of all surface and interstitial fat, the bones were boiled for 1 h at 135 °C, repeated three times. After boiling, the bones were fragmented into approximately 6 mm pieces by using a 5 kg hammer. The human hair samples used in this study were collected from Mehdi Akbari, a local barbershop named Javanan Barbershop in the city of Ben; washed at 100 °C for 10 min, and dried at room temperature under a chemical hood. The hair strands were then cut into pieces approximately 10–15 mm in length. Ofloxacin, tetracycline, and sulfadiazine were purchased from Iran Daru Company. Nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, and sodium hydroxide were obtained from Merck. Deionized water was used in all experiments whenever water was required.
Three types of wastewater containing antibiotics ofloxacin (125 mg L−1, pH: 6.52, turbidity: 112 NTU), tetracycline (110 mg L−1, pH: 7, turbidity: 100 NTU), and sulfadiazine (101 mg L−1, pH: 7, turbidity: 92 NTU) were collected from a pharmaceutical company located in Alborz Province, Iran. The required concentrations for the study were obtained by diluting the wastewater samples received from the factory to the desired levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «nitric acid»

1

Thermal and Rheological Properties of Graphene Nanofluids

Exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets
(xGnPs) grade C were supplied by XG Sciences, Inc. The declared surface
area is approximately 750 mm2·g–1, and the nominal flake thickness is 1–5 nm. Nitric acid (HNO3, analytical grade) was supplied by Aldrich (99%). Aqueous
solutions were prepared with Milli-Q-grade water. Exfoliated graphite
oxide nanosheets (xGOnPs) were synthesized from xGnP through reaction
with Nitric acid, as detailed in a previous work.25 (link) Using these nanoplatelets, homogeneous and stable suspensions
of xGnP/H2O and xGOnP/H2O were prepared. The
nanopowder was weighed using a Mettler AE-240 electronic balance with
an accuracy of 5 × 10–5 g and then dispersed
into a predetermined volume of the base fluid to obtain the desired
weight fraction of up to 1 wt %, and the particles were dispersed
using an ultrasonic bath (Clifton, 80 W). The stability of the suspensions
prepared using different sonication times was evaluated using an Agilent
HP 8453 UV–vis spectrophotometer.
The thermal conductivity
of the samples has been determined by a device based on transient
hot-wire technology at 293.15 K for concentrations up to 1% by weight
using a Decagon-compatible KD2 thermal conductivity meter. This device
is based on the transient hot-wire technology,40 (link) which is widely used in the field of NFs because it minimizes
the problems of natural convection and the influence of the conductive
final effects and presents a reduced measurement time, much lower
than the characteristic sedimentation times. Further details regarding
the measurement procedure can be found in previous works.41 (link),42 (link) Despite the fact that this device is widely used for NF measurements,
the limitations of the technique must be kept in mind. In a recent
paper, Antoniadis et al.43 (link) have presented
a comprehensive and rigorous analysis of the use of this technique
for the case of biphasic systems obtained from the dispersion of nanometer-sized
material in a fluid medium. The conclusions of the authors reveal
some reasons that offer insight into the often surprising scattering
observed in NF experimental thermal conductivity. Their conclusions
lead to the presentation of a number of recommendations necessary
to maximize data reliability. The use of double-wire probes is recommended
to avoid boundary effects at the ends of the heating wire, and also
the diameter of the wires should be lower than 30 μm. These
two conditions are not fulfilled by the probe used in this case, but
the other two recommendations (temperature rise values below 4 K and
the use of insulated wires) have been respected. The device calibration
performed for the base fluid yielded accurate results for the base
fluid, and the result is that the thermal conductivity value determined
for pure water is very accurate (κexp (293 K) = 0.59920
W·m–1·K–1), whereas
the NIST Chemistry Webbook44 recommended
value is κNIST (293 K) = 0.59846 W·m–1·K–1. Concerning the NF thermal conductivity
values in the Results and Discussion section,
the obtained data are compared to other recent references.
Rheological
properties were determined using a Physica MCR 101
rheometer (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) equipped with a cone-plate geometry
(CP 25-1) with a constant gap of 0.048 mm, allowing to control torques
between 0.5 μN·m and 125 mN·m and normal force from
0.1 to 30 N. Different series of experiments were carried out to investigate
the NF rheological behavior, following the procedure used previously
for the characterization of other NFs.19 (link),45 (link),46 (link) Nonlinear viscoelastic experiments, or flow curves,
were first determined, where shear viscosity variation with a shear
rate of up to 10 000 s–1 is measured. Then,
linear viscoelastic measurements followed, where the linear viscoelastic
regime (LVR) was determined by measuring store (G′)and loss (G″) moduli in the strain
range of 0.01–1000% at a constant angular frequency of 10 rad·s–1, different weight fractions of up to 20 wt %, and
293.15 K. Frequency sweep measurements were also carried out from
0.1 to 600 rad·s–1 by applying a strain of
0.1% at different concentrations and 293.15 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Universidade de Vigo, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rede de Química e Tecnologia

2

Sheep Brain Metal Content Quantification

The metal content in six regions of the sheep brain was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS) as previously described [30] (link). Weighed tissue pieces were lyophilized, digested in 150–400 µl of 65% nitric acid (Merck, Kilsyth, Victoria, Australia) overnight, and heated for a further 20 min at 90°C. Then 400 µl of BDH prolabo 30% hydrogen peroxide (VWR, Murrarie, QLD, Australia) was added to each sample and incubated at room temperature for 30 min, then for a further 15 min at 70°C. All samples were diluted 1∶20 with 1% nitric acid before being measured in an Agilent 7700 series ICP-MS instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a helium reaction gas cell. The instrument was calibrated using 0, 5, 10, 50, and 100 ppb of certified multi-element ICP-MS standard calibration solutions (Accustandard, New Haven, CT, USA) for a range of elements. 200 ppb of yttrium (Y89) was used as an internal control. Samples were analyzed in triplicate and median values were used for analyses. The results are expressed as micrograms of metal per gram of wet weight (µg/g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Melbourne, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Sydney, Lincoln University

3

Magnetically Functionalized Nanoparticles for Enzyme Immobilization

Materials: Ammonium hydroxide aqueous solution (Fluka, 25%), Nα-benzoyl-D,L-arginin-4-nitroanilide hydrochloride (BAPNA) (Sigma, 98%), benzylamine (BzA) (Janssen Chimica), 2,2´-bipyridine (bpy) (Aldrich, 99%), citric acid monohydrate (Grüssing GmbH, 99,5%), (4-(chloromethyl)phenyl)trimethoxysilane (CPS) (ABCR, 95%), copper(I) bromide (CuBr) (Aldrich, 98%), 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) (ABCR, 98%), N-hydroxy succinimide (NHS, Fluka), iron(III) chloride hexahydrate, iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate (Fluka, 98%), ninhydrin (Riedel-de-Haen), oligo(ethylene glycol) methylether methacrylate (OEGMA, Aldrich, Mn = 290 g·mol−1), 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl methacrylate (MEEMA), porcine pancreas trypsin type IX-S (Aldrich), tetramethylammonium hydroxide aqueous solution (25%) were used as received without further purification. Ethanol, diethyl ether and acetone were purified by distillation before use. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; min. 99.5%, Riedel-de-Haen) was distilled under reduced pressure from calcium hydride and stored under argon and molecular sieve (3A). HEPES buffer was prepared from 11 mM HEPES (Sigma), 140 mM NaCl (Merck), 4 mM KCl (Merck), 10 mM D(+)-glucose, and dissolved in deionized water. 2-Methoxyethyl methacrylate (MEMA, Aldrich, 99%) was distilled under reduced pressure and stored under argon. Nitric acid (conc., p.a., Merck) was diluted with distilled water resulting in a 2 N solution. Succinimidyl methacrylate (SIMA) was synthesized by a method by Gatz et al [26 ,60 (link)].
Synthesis and stabilization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles: The synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles on the gram scale was carried out by alkaline precipitation of iron(III) and iron(II) chloride following a method of Cabuil and Massart and is described in detail elsewhere [43 ]. For stabilization, the freshly synthesized nanoparticles were stirred with 420 mL 2 N Nitric acid for 5 min. After washing with distilled water, 90 mL 0.01 N citric acid (CA) was added to the nanoparticles and stirred for 5 min. The particles were magnetically separated from the supernatant and 15 mL of tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide aqueous solution was added to obtain 3.32 g magnetic nanoparticles Fe3O4@CA in 92 mL of a stable dispersion at pH 8–9 (yield: 42.5%).
The Fe3O4 content µ(Fe3O4) in dispersion and the magnetic core diameter dc were determined via VSM (µ(Fe3O4) = 2.55 mass%, dc = 11.7 nm). DLS: dh,n = 14.3 nm (25 °C in H2O). FT-IR (Diamond): ν (cm−1) = 2357, 2335 (C-N), 1247 (OH), 1098 (C-O), 1080 (OH).
Surface modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles: For the immobilization of initiator sites on the particle surface of Fe3O4@CA, the dispersion was diluted with ethanol to a mass content of 1.0 g·l−1, and 1.80 mmol CPS per gram of Fe3O4 was added. After stirring for 24 h at ambient temperature, ethanol was removed under reduced pressure at 40 °C and the particles were washed with ethanol/acetone (1:1) five times. The particles were then redispersed in DMSO, resulting in a Fe3O4 content µ(Fe3O4) of 6.44 mass % (VSM) in dispersion (yield: 46.4%). The magnetic core diameter dc was measured to be 11.1 nm (VSM). The functionalization degree of CPS was determined by EA to be 0.87 mmol CTS on 1.94 g Fe3O4@CPS. FT-IR (Diamond): ν (cm−1) = 2357, 2335 (C–N), 1241 (OH), 1115 (Si–O), 1011, 948 (Si–C).
Surface-initiated ATRP of functional polymer shells: The obtained CPS coated particles served as a macroinitiator for the following ATRP. The synthesis of Fe3O4@P(O100) is described, representatively. Therefore 6 mL of the DMSO-based particle dispersion (0.65 g Fe3O4@CPS) was mixed with 5 mL of a DMSO solution of 37.3 mg (0.26 mmol) CuBr and 101 mg (0.65 mmol) bpy. The polymerization was started by adding 5.83 mmol of the monomer (here: OEGMA). The mixture was stirred for 24 h at ambient temperature. The obtained viscous magnetic fluid was diluted with 10 ml DMSO to the final ferrofluid. The Fe3O4 content µ(Fe3O4) in dispersion and the magnetic core diameter dc were determined via VSM. The polymer content χPol in the dried particles was obtained from EA and TGA.
Particle transfer to water/buffer: The DMSO-based particle dispersion was added dropwise to diethyl ether (Et2O). The precipitate was washed five times with Et2O/Acetone (1:1) and was redispersed in distilled water or buffer to obtain an aqueous magnetic fluid.
Immobilization of trypsin: 30 mg trypsin was dissolved in 6 mL HEPES buffer and mixed with 6 mL of a HEPES buffer-based Fe3O4@P(O85S15) particle dispersion (µ(FeOx) = 0.15 mass %). In order to allow reactivation of active ester functions that may have hydrolyzed during storage, 6 mL of 2.21 μM EDC/NHS solution was added. The binding reaction was carried out for 6 h at ambient temperature on a shaker. The obtained trypsin functionalized particles were separated and washed carefully with water to remove any residues of free trypsin, and redispersed in HEPES buffer.
Determination of immobilized enzyme kinetics and activity: BAPNA was used as the model substrate. Four HEPES buffered BAPNA solutions with concentrations between 2.0 mM and 0.5 mM, and a 6.0 μM trypsin solution were prepared and tempered to the desired temperature. The respective BAPNA solution was added to a cuvette and mixed with 100 μL of FeOx@POEGMA-trypsin nanoparticle dispersion or with 50 μL trypsin solution. The cuvette was placed into the spectrophotometer and tempered. Starting with the addition of the enzyme, the change in absorption at 410 nm was detected over a period of up to 20 min by UV–vis spectroscopy.
Analytic methods and instrumentation: ATR-IR spectra were measured on a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed on a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN analyzer. The organic content was calculated through C content. For TGA, a Netzsch STA 449c in a He atmosphere was used with a heating rate of 10 K·min−1 between 30 and 600 °C. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) elugrams were collected on THF (300 × 8 mm2 MZ Gel Sdplus columns, Waters 410 RI-detector) relative to polystyrene standards. NMR spectroscopy was performed on a Bruker DRX500 at 500 MHz and ambient temperature. DLS experiments and zeta potential measurements were performed on a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS at 25 °C. The particle size distribution was derived from a deconvolution of the measured intensity autocorrelation function of the sample by the general purpose mode (non-negative least-squares) algorithm included in the DTS software. Each experiment was performed at least three times. Cloud point photometry of aqueous particle dispersions was performed on a Tepper TP1 cloud point photometer at 1 K·min−1 in HEPES buffer. From the turning point of the turbidity curves, the cloud point temperature Tc was obtained. Vibrating sample magnetization (VSM) measurements were implemented on an ADE Magnetics vibrating sample magnetometer EV7. Induction heating experiments were performed on a Hüttinger HF generator Axio 5/450T equipped with a copper inductor (l = 50 mm, dI = 35 mm, n = 5), and operating at 250 kHz and at a magnetic field of 31.5 kA·m−1. The experiments were performed in a vacuum-isolated glass sample container. Different samples with varying magnetite concentrations μ(Fe3O4) of Fe3O4@P(O100)-based magnetic fluid in water were exposed to the oscillating magnetic field. Via a fiber-optical sensor the fluid temperature T was measured against time t. For UV–vis spectroscopy, a Nicolet UV 540 spectroscope, a Unicam UV 500 or a Perkin Elmer Lambda19 with a thermostat Colora NBDS was used. Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms were collected on a Mettler-Toledo DSC 822e at 5 K·min−1. TEM pictures were taken on a Hitachi H 600.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, University of Cologne

4

Synthesis of Chitosan-TiO2 Composite Membranes

Titanium isopropoxide, having ≥ 97.0% purity, was acquired from Sigma Aldrich (Merck, Burlington, MA, USA). Isopropanol (2-propanol) with 99.99% purity was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Merck, Burlington, MA, USA). Nitric acid 65% was from Sigma Aldrich (Merck, Burlington, MA, USA). Chitosan (CS) (molecular weight 100.000–300.000, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), glacial acetic acid (AcA) (Chimreactiv, Bucharest, Romania) and sodium hydroxide ≥ 97.0% were from Sigma Aldrich (Merck, Burlington, MA, USA). Glutaraldehyde (GA) (50% in water) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Merck, Burlington, MA, USA) and distilled water was used. All chemicals used in the present study were of analytical grade without further purification.
The microbiological activity was performed using Nutrient Broth No. 2 and agar, acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). All strains tested in this study were provided by the Microorganisms Collection of the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Research Institute of the University of Bucharest.
TiO2 was synthesized using a simple sol-gel method as described in [64 ]. Briefly, Titanium isopropoxide was added drop by drop into a solution containing isopropanol and distilled water to obtain titanium dioxide nanoparticles. The obtained solution was magnetically stirred on a hot plate at almost 80 °C. After 1 h of stirring, a solution containing concentrated Nitric acid and distilled water was added to the previous solution and kept under constant stirring on a hot plate at 60 °C for 6 h until a white sol-gel appeared. The appearance of the white sol-gel indicates the formation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. After the precipitate was washed several times for residual removal, it was heated in an electric oven at 300 °C for 2 h. The powders were then placed in a furnace at 550 °C for 5 h. The as-obtained TiO2 nanoparticles were further used to develop the composite membranes described below.
Figure 1 illustrates a schematic chart of the preparation of chitosan/TiO2 composite membranes through a simple casting method. First, chitosan (2 g) was dissolved in a 1% acetic acid solution. Then, TiO2 was added to the as-obtained chitosan solution previously synthesized through the sol-gel method; afterwards, the mixture was magnetically stirred at room temperature for 24 h and then sonicated for 4 h at 35 °C to obtain a homogenous solution. For this experiment, two polymer solutions with 1% and 5% (w/w) TiO2 nanoparticles were obtained. The solutions were cast into Petri dishes and dried in an electric oven at 50 °C overnight. The obtained membranes were treated with NaOH solution for 24 h to coagulate the chitosan; afterwards, they were washed with distilled water to remove side products and excess NaOH. To cross-link the obtained membranes, they were placed in a diluted glutaraldehyde solution (200 mL, 2% v/v) for 24 h under magnetic stirring. This was followed by washing with distilled water to remove any remains from the glutaraldehyde. The synthesized composite membranes were further lyophilized and analyzed through proper techniques.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București, Academy of Romanian Scientists, University of Bucharest

5

Graphene Oxide Functionalization with Silanes

3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MaPTMS, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), nitric acid (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), toluene (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), ethanol (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and acetone (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were used as received. Graphene powder (G, COMETOX s.r.l. (Milan, Italy)) with an average diameter of 25 µm was provided by COMETOX s.r.l. The graphene oxide aqueous dispersion (0.4 wt.% concentration, Graphenea Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) was supplied by Graphenea (Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain).
Graphene oxide powders (GO) were obtained by the reaction of G with nitric acid, according to [12 (link)]. GO powders were reacted in a 1:0.1 molar ratio with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane, 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane, and 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane [12 (link)], and the functionalized samples were labeled GO-N, GO-S, and GO-M, respectively.
The Ga sample was obtained by drying the graphene oxide aqueous dispersion at 60 °C for 24 h and grinding the solid residues with a mortar. Ga powders were then subjected to the functionalization process with APTMS, MPTMS, and MaPTMS in a 1:0.1 molar ratio under the same conditions employed for the GO powders. The functionalized samples were labeled Ga-N, Ga-S, and Ga-M, respectively. Scheme 1 shows the structures of both Ga and trialkoxysilanes used for the functionalization.
Solid state NMR analyses were carried out with a Bruker 400WB spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, US) operating at a proton frequency of 400.13 MHz. The magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectra were acquired with cross-polarization (CP) and noise dephasing single pulse (SP) pulse sequences under the following conditions: 13C frequency, 100.48 MHz; π/2 pulse 3.5 μs; decoupling length 5.9 µs; 7 k scans and recycle delay 15 s. For CP: recycle delay 5 s and 20 k scans; contact time 0.5 ms; proton decoupled pulse π/4; pulse 2.5 μs; recycle delay 10; and 128 scans. 29Si frequency, 79.49 MHz; π /2 pulse 4.1 μs; contact time 5 ms; decoupling length 5.9 µs; 10 k scans; and recycle delay 10 s. The samples, diluted with KBr in order to avoid skin depth effect (RF penetration) and probe tuning problems [14 (link)], were packed in 4 mm zirconia rotor and spun at 10 kHz under air flow. 15N frequency 40.54 MHz; π /2 pulse 2.2 μs; contact time 2 ms; decoupling length 5.9 µs; 80 k scans; and recycle delay 3 s. Adamantane, Q8M8, and glycine were used as external secondary references. The silicon sites were labeled according to the usual Tn notation, where T represents the trifunctional SiCO3 unit and n (n = 0 ÷ 3) is the number of bridging oxygen atoms. The lineshape analysis was performed using Bruker TopSpin software and the fitting was considered acceptable with a confidence level of 90%.
The ESR (Bruker, Billerica, MA, US) spectra were acquired at room temperature with a Bruker EMX cw spectrometer equipped with a rectangular cavity working in the X band at 9.77 GHz microwave frequency with a modulation frequency of 100 kHz. The intensity of the signal was normalized with respect to the weight of the powder sample. The magnetic field and g-value were calibrated with the DPPH powder sample (diphenyl picrylhydrazyl free radical, g = 2.0036).
Powder x-ray diffraction spectra were collected by means of a Rigaku D-Max III-D powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.154056 nm) and a graphite monochromator in the diffracted beam. A θ–2θ Bragg-Brentano configuration was adopted with the following scan conditions: scan range 3–80° (in 2θ); and a sampling interval and counting time of 0.05° and 5 s, respectively. Jade8® software (MDI, Livermore, CA, USA) was used for the fitting procedure of the experimental peaks in order to evaluate the peak position and full width at half maximum (FWHM) values, after the background correction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Trento

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.