Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Quantity one software

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Italy, United Kingdom, Spain, Japan, Canada, France, Sweden, Australia, Belgium, Netherlands, Morocco, Switzerland, Israel, Poland
About the product

Quantity One software is a powerful and versatile tool for analyzing and quantifying data from gel electrophoresis and imaging experiments. It provides a suite of analytical tools for researchers to accurately measure and compare the size, intensity, and other properties of bands or spots in their samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The Quantity One software by Bio-Rad Laboratories is a product used for imaging and analyzing 1-D electrophoresis gels, dot blots, arrays, and colonies. It supports various data types, including radioactive, chemiluminescent, fluorescent, and color-stained samples.

As of June 2025, there is no official confirmation from Bio-Rad regarding the current commercial status of the Quantity One software. The software is not prominently featured on Bio-Rad's official website or in their latest product catalogs. However, it is included with certain Bio-Rad imaging systems, such as the Gel Doc XR+ UV Gel Documentation Imaging System, which comes with Quantity One Basic software.

In the absence of official pricing information, second-hand or refurbished versions of the Quantity One software may be available on various marketplaces. Potential users are advised to contact Bio-Rad directly or consult authorized distributors for the most current information regarding the availability and recommended replacement, if any.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

8 308 protocols using «quantity one software»

1

Quantification of 4-HNE Levels by Western Blot

2025
We employed western blot to identify and quantify 4-HNE levels in the protein extracts from the hearts. One aliquot of the ground tissue was washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on the analysis day and quickly spun at 4 °C to remove blood. The protein lysis buffer with Halt protease and phosphatase single-use inhibitor cocktail at 2X final concentration (Thermo Scientific) was added to the homogenate and placed on ice for 20 min, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm or 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, and the total protein concentration was determined using the Bradford protein estimation assay (Bio-Rad, Cat# 23200) reagent. Extracted proteins (30 μg) were electrophoretically separated using 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Confirmation of protein transfer was ensured by Ponceau staining, followed by the membrane being de-stained by washing with deionized water (DI) and PBS. The membrane was blocked with 3% blocking buffer (15 g of dry milk powder in 500 mL of 1X PBS) for 60 min, followed by incubating at 4 °C overnight with anti-4HNE (ab46545, Abcam) primary antibody diluted at 1:1,000 μL in 1X TBST (Tris-Buffered Saline with Tween 20). The next day, the membrane was washed with PBS for 1 h, followed by incubation with an anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase in a blocking buffer of 3% milk in PBS. The immunoblotted membrane was developed using enhanced chemiluminescent Western Bright ECL spray (cat# K-12049-D50, Advansta) and imaged using the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc imaging system. The intensity of 4HNE bands was quantified using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad). The units were expressed as arbitrary. The original blot is provided in Supplementary Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Hippocampal Protein Expression Analysis

2025
The hippocampal tissue was isolated from the mice brain, and the proteins (30–50 μg) were separated using SDS-PAGE (8%–15%) and transferred onto a PVDF membrane, as we reported (Garg and Bandyopadhyay, 2024 (link)). The blots were probed with p53, p21, p16, NeuN, Wnt3a, p-LRP6, LRP6, Fz, Dishevelled, Axin1, GSK-3β, β-catenin and TCF3 antibodies for overnight (1:1000 dilution; 4°C), and HRP-conjugated β-actin antibody (loading control) for 2 h (1:5000; room temperature). Except for the β-actin-probing, the blots were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h (1:5000 dilution; room temperature) and developed using Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate in Amersham Imager 600 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania). Relative protein levels were determined by densitometric quantification by applying the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Western Blot Analysis of RA-FLS

2025
Cultured RA-FLS were lysed in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipi-tation assay buffer (BestBio, Shanghai, China). The proteins in the cell lysates were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by electroblotting onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The signals from the immunoreactive proteins were quantified using Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The details about western blotting analysis are listed in Supplementary Methods and Materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Evaluation of Inflammatory Mediators in Knee Osteoarthritis

2025
Protein samples of knee homogenate and primary chondrocytes were extracted with RIPA lysis buffer with 1% protease inhibitor (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) at 4°C for 30min. Protein concentrations were determined using the Pierce™ BCA protein Assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Equal amounts of protein (30 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose filter membrane (PALL Life Sciences, Port Washington, NY, USA). After blocking with 5% non-fat milk for 1 hour, the membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-MMP3 (1:1000), MMP13 (1:1000), β-Actin (1:1000), IL-1β (1:1000), IL-6 (1:1000), IL-18 (1:1000) NLRP3 (1:1000), AGGRECAN (1:1000), COL II (1:1000), ADAMTS-5 (1:500), GAPDH (1:1000), and p-NRF-2 (1:1000) at 4°C overnight. Then the membranes were treated with IRDye 680 or 800 secondary antibody (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) for 1 hour. Protein bands were visualized using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR), and band intensities were quantified by Quantity ONE software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). GAPDH and β-actin were used as loading controls for normalization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Targets

2025
30 µg protein were dissolved in 5X SDS loading buffer, and the metal bath was heated to 100 °C for 5 min. Proteins were isolated on 6% or 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, moved onto PVDF layers (0.22 μm), which were hindered in 5% BSA in 1X TBST. The hydrogel we used for WB testing can be added with 12 or 15 samples. Because our another ongoing research also requires this test, we used the same piece of hydrogel when adding samples to save costs. All samples were colored by the loading buffer and the mark indicated the molecular weight of the target protein, so we trimmed the membrane before incubating it with the primary antibody. Primary antibodies against the following antigens: FN, COLI, LC3 (#12741, CST, USA), p62 (#39749S, CST, USA), TP53INP1 (#ab202026, Abcam, USA), C/EBPβ ((#3087, CST, USA) and β-actin (#4970, CST, USA), MYOC(#ab41552, Abcam, USA), GAPDH(#ab8245, Abcam, USA)were incubated at 4℃ overnight, respectively. After washing with TBST, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (#ab6721, Abcam, USA) was used for a one-hour incubation. Responses were imagined utilizing an ECL identification kit (GE Healthcare). The Quantity One software was used to conduct quantitative band analysis (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «quantity one software»

1

Membrane Protein Extraction and Western Analysis

For normalization in Western analysis, all fractions were compared on the basis of equal amounts of original starting material (e.g., 3-mg roots). This method of comparison was used because our aim was to analyze the yield of total membranes from a fixed amount of material. Also, to follow the sedimentation of membranes during successive centrifugation steps (e.g., preclearance and final), this was the only valid way of comparing the yield at each step from the same sample.
Membrane pellets were resuspended (0.5–1 μl/mg material) in storage buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl [pH 7.5], 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 20% glycerol, and protease inhibitors without casein) or solubilized directly into sample buffer (SB: 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 125 mM Tris–HCl [pH 6.8], 40 mM DTE, and either 20% glycerol or 8 M urea). If in storage buffer, 2- to 7-μl membranes (containing 2–10 μg protein) were added to 2× SB. Samples were left at room temperature or heated (50 °C, 10 min). The 600g pellets were extracted by heating in 2× SB (90 °C, 3 min). Samples were cleared (10,000g, 2 min) and separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) [23] (link) with 3 M urea in the stacking gel.
Gels were blotted and Western analysis was performed using standard procedures. Detection was performed using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (SuperSignal Pico or Femto, Pierce). Blots were exposed to X-ray film and/or recorded on a ChemiDoc XRS Imager (Bio-Rad). Quantitation was performed only for the latter using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad). Comparisons and quantitation of data were performed only between samples that were run on the same blot. The presence of a white space between the lanes in a panel (e.g., Fig. 3) indicates that the samples were on the same blot but were not in contiguous lanes. Figures presented here have been cropped from full-length blots, examples of which are presented in Fig. S1 in the supplementary material. All experiments were repeated at least twice, and the UC and preclearance validations were performed four to six times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay

The ChIP analysis was performed as recommended by the Upstate ChIP assay kit. Briefly, we crosslinked the cells with 1% formaldehyde and used 1×106 cells for one histone ChIP and 3×106 cells for the other ChIP assays. Protein A beads were preincubated with 1 mg/ml BSA and 0.2 mg/ml ssDNA for 20 min at 4°C. Typically, 4–8 µg of affinity-purified IgG was used per assay. The mixtures of antibody and nuclear extracts pre-cleared with protein A beads were incubated at 4°C overnight followed by precipitation with protein A beads. After washing, immunoprecipitated materials were eluted with 0.1 M NaHCO3 and 1% SDS, and crosslinks were reversed at 65°C for 4–6 hrs. Primer sequences are listed in Table S2. PCR primers specific for chromosome 1 α-satellite (α-sat) and satellite 2 (sat2), chromosome 4 α-satellite (α-sat), DXZ4, RS447, and NBL2 sequences were used [6] (link),[12] (link),[62] (link). In addition, a PCR primer pair specific for the c-Myc region was used as a control for G9a depletion as previously described [28] (link). The primers for rDNA are located in the intergenic region. All of the end-point PCR experiments were repeated at least three times. The endpoint gel quantitation of the ChIP-PCR products was carried out using the Gel-Doc Imager and Quantity One software (Bio-Rad). Real-time Q-PCR primers were designed using Lasergene software. Q-PCR was performed using the iCycler iQ Real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) with iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). The ChIP PCR signal was normalized by the subtraction of the preimmune IgG ChIP PCR signal, which was further divided by input genomic PCR (for normalization of different D4Z4 repeat numbers in different cells) minus PCR with no template. Results were an average of three PCR reactions, and the arbitrary value of 1.0 was assigned to the normal control sample. Double-ChIP analysis was performed according to the published protocol [63] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Protein extraction and western blotting

After harvesting, the cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 150 mM NaCl, 1% nonidet P-40, protease inhibitor cocktail, 1 mM phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride, 25 mM sodium fluoride, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate. Protein concentrations were determined using BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Subsequently, cellular extracts (45~60 μg) were separated with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Non-specific binding was blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 for 30 min at room temperature. The membranes were then incubated with the primary antibody (1 : 1,000) overnight at 4°C and continually with the secondary antibody (1 : 5,000) at room temperature for 30 min. After incubation, the membranes were washed three times for 10 min each. Proteins were visualized using ECL reagent, and the band intensity was measured using a Chemidoc XRS densitometer system and quantified by Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Western Blot Protein Detection Protocol

Western blot was performed as described previously [11] (link), [12] (link). Briefly, an equal amount of total protein extracted from cultured cells was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated appropriate secondary antibodies were used to detect the designated proteins. The bounded secondary antibodies on the PVDF membrane were reacted to the ECL detection reagents and exposed to X-ray films (Kodak, Japan). The x-ray film exposure was scanned and digitalized using a high-resolution scanner. The density of desired bands was quantified with the Quantity One software (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Immunoblot and Dot-Blot Analysis of Brain Tissues

Immunoblot and dot-blot analysis of mice and human brain tissues were performed as previously described (Lee et al., 2002 (link); Li et al., 2004 (link); Li et al., 2005 (link); Martin et al., 2006 (link); Wang et al., 2008 (link)). For dot-blot analysis, lysates were spotted directly on the nitrocellulose membrane and let it dry completely. Immunoreactivity was visualized using chemiluminescence detection (Pierce, Rockford, IL) after incubations with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, using a CCD based Biorad Molecular Imager ChemiDoc XRS+ System (Biorad, Hercules, CA) or X-ray films. The immunoreactive band intensities were determined by densitometry or the Quantity One software (Biorad, Hercules, CA).
Following antibodies were used: grp78, grp94, (Stressgen, Ann Arbor, MI); Syn-1, cytochrome C (BD Transduction Laboratories, Franklin Lakes, NJ); A11 (Kayed et al., 2003 (link)); pser129-αS (Fujiwara et al. 2002 (link)); syn303 (Duda et al., 2000 (link)); FILA-1 (Lindersson et al., 2004 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.