The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

194 protocols using hexadecane

1

Bacterial Adhesion to Hexadecane

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The adhesion to hexadecane was assessed by a protocol modified as follows (5): bacterial cells were suspended in PUM buffer (9 mM K 2 HPO 4 , 50 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 30 mM urea, 0.8 mM MgSO 4 .7H 2 O, pH 7.1) to an OD 500 nm ~0.85 corresponding to 1 x 10 9 CFU mL 1 , added with hexadecane (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After phase separation, the fraction of adherent cells to hexadecane was estimated according the aqueous phase absorbance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Bacterial Hydrophobicity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrophobicity was assessed utilizing the hexadecane method, as reported previously (Rosenberg et al., 1980 (link)). Specifically, glass tubes were loaded with 1 mL of bacteria (OD530 = 1.0) and supplemented with 100 μL of hexadecane (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The mixtures underwent vigorous vortexing for 2 min, followed by an incubation period of 10 min at ambient temperature to allow for phase separation. The OD530 of the lower, aqueous phase was subsequently measured. In select cases, bovine testicular hyaluronidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was used to treat the bacteria at a concentration of 2 Mg/mL at 37°C for 15 min prior to testing for adhesion to hexadecane. The percentage of hydrophobicity was determined by the following formula: % hydrophobicity = [1 − (OD530 after vortexing/OD530 before vortexing)/×100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single-molecule MspA nanopore real-time RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The two wells and tubing were first filled with standard experiment buffer (40 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 400 mM KCl). 180 mV was applied to the system. Dry Lipid (4ME 16:0 DIETHER PC 10MG, Avanti polar lipids) was mixed with hexadecane (Sigma-Aldrich) until the consistency resembled that glue, followed by application of the lipid-hexadecane mixture to the tip of the Teflon tubing in the cis well. Lipid bilayer was generated by introducing an air bubble via a pipette to the surface of the tubing. Afterwards, MspA protein (the M2-NNN MspA mutant8 (link)) was added to the well to a final concentration of about 0.02 μg/ml. After successful insertion of a single backwards pore, we reduced the system’s voltage to 140 mV and buffer-exchanged the cis well to RT experiment buffer (40 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 320 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 24 μM dNTP), heated up the system to 36°C, and added the RNA/DNA primer complex to the well to a final concentration of about 15 nM RNA. Afterwards, we added the RT to a final concentration of about 150 nM and started data acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Emulsion Clearance Assay for M. xanthus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight M. xanthus cultures (50 mL CYE in 250 mL flasks) were inoculated at an initial OD600 of 0.05 and grown at 32°C with shaking (220 rpm) to saturation (OD600, approximately 5.0–7.0). Cultures were transferred to a 50-mL conical tube and sedimented at 7,000g (25 minutes, 22°C, JA-17 rotor). Supernatants were decanted into a syringe, passed through a 0.22- μm filter to remove remaining cells, and transferred (4 mL) to a quartz cuvette, followed by addition of 300 μL hexadecane (Sigma) colored with Sudan Black dye (0.1 g of Sudan Black powder per 50 mL of hexadecane). Each cell-free supernatant sample was vigorously mixed with the colored hexadecane 250 times over 2 minutes (via aspiration/ejection with a p1000 micropipette). Cuvettes were then immediately inserted into a spectrophotometer, with continual, rapid manual attempts made to obtain an initial OD600 reading, with this time recorded. After obtaining an initial OD600 reading, subsequent OD600 readings were manually carried out at 20-second intervals over 10 minutes to monitor the rate of emulsion clearance. All OD600 readings for each time course were normalized with respect to the initial OD600 value detected for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hydrocarbon Retention Indices for EOs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For determination of the retention indices (RI), the following hydrocarbons were used: octane (≥99%), nonane (99%), decane (≥99%), undecane (≥99%), dodecane (99%), tridecane (≥99%), tetradecane (≥99%), hexadecane (≥99%), heptadecane (99%), octadecane (99%), nonadecane (99%), eicosane (99%), heneicosane (≥99.5%), docosane (99%), tricosane (99%), tetracosane (99%), pentacosane (99%), hexacosane (99%), octacosane (99%), and triacontane (99%) purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Hexane (GC grade) purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH (Bremen, Germany) was used for dilution of the EOs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Determination of Retention Indices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the retention indices (RI), the following hydrocarbons were used: nonane (≥99%), decane (≥99%), undecane (≥99%), dodecane (99%), tridecane (≥99%), tetradecane (≥99%), and hexadecane (≥99%), purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Dichloromethane (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was used for the dilution of the EO.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lipidomics Analysis: Detailed Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis, LC-MS-grade solvents and reagents were used. Formic acid, ammonium formate, tert-Butyl methyl ether, BSTFA, methoxyamine, Hexadecane, and tridecanoic acid were procured from Merck (Darmstad, Germany), pyridine, water and acetonitrile were from VWR (Milano, Italy), and methanol and isopropanol were from Scharlab (Barcelona, Spain). As internal standards for lipidomics analysis we employed the SPLASH Lipidomix® [PC 15:0-18:1(d7); PE 15:0-18:1(d7); PS 15:0-18:1(d7); PG 15:0-18:1(d7); PG 15:0-18:1(d7); PA 15:0-18:1(d7); LysoPC 18:1(d7); LysoPE 18:1(d7); Chol Ester 18:1 (d7); 18:1(d7) MG; DG 15:0-18:1(d7); TG 15:0-18:1(d7)-15:0; SM 18:1(d9); Cholesterol (d7)]; DG 12:0-12:0 (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA); and 12-[[(cyclohexylamino)carbonyl]amino]-dodecanoic acid (CUDA) (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Pharmaceutical Excipients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol, acetonitrile and hexadecane (HD) were obtained from Merck chemicals, Darmstadt, Germany; orthophosphoric acid from Riedel-de-Haen Chemical, Seelze, Germany; potassium hydroxide from Scharlau Chemical, Barcelona, Spain; methyl paraben (MP), butyl paraben (BP), caffeine (CF) and triethylamine from Sigma Chemical Co., Gillingham, UK; oleic acid (OA) and liquid paraffin (LP) from Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany; isopropanol from BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, UK; isopropylmyristate (IPM) and isohexadecane (IHD) from Uniqema, Klang, Malaysia; and silicone membrane from Samco Ltd., Nuneaton, UK. Whatman no. 1 filter paper was purchased from Whatman International Ltd, Maidstone, UK. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) membrane (pharmaceutical grade package material) and polyurethane (PU) membrane were donated by TQ pharma, Amman, Jordan and Exopack, Wrexham, UK, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flaxseed Oil Cake Characterization and Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flaxseed oil cake (FOC) was purchased from ACS Sp. z o.o. (Bydgoszcz, Poland). The proximate composition of FOC (based on supplier information) was: solids—80.50%, including: proteins—41.97%; carbohydrates—27.99%; fiber—6.29%; fat—6.11%; ash—4.50%. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC53103), was procured from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Buffered peptone water, microbiological agar, MRS agar and broth were purchased from Oxoid (Basingstoke, UK). Potassium chloride, sodium chloride, potassium thiocyanate, disodium hydrogen phosphate, monosodium dihydrogen orthophosphate, calcium chloride, sodium hydrogen carbonate, hydrochloric acid, ammonium chloride, sodium peroxide, urea, α-amylase, uric acid, mucin from porcine stomach (type II), glucose, glucuronic acid, glucosamine hydrochloride, bovine serum albumin (BSA), pepsin, pancreatin, oxgall, Triton X-100, cholesterol, ethanol, ninhydrin, glacial acetic acid, cadmium chloride and hexadecane were purchased from Merck Chemical (Saint Louis, MI, USA). All reagents were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Vitro Dissolution and Permeation Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetonitrile (≥ 99.9%), methanol (99.9%), fenofibrate, warfarin, porcine pancreatin (8 x USP specifications), bovine serum albumin, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, ≥ 99.9%) D-α-Tocopherol polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS), hexadecane (anhydrous, 95%), Tris-maleate, 4-bromophenol boronic acid, olive oil, Kolliphor EL (macrogolglycerol ricinoleate), Kolliphor RH40 (macrogolglycerol hydroxystearate), Tween 85, and Carbitol (diethylene glycol monoethyl ether) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Felodipine was kindly donated by Lundbeck Pharma (Valby, Denmark). Captex 355 and Capmul MCM EP (Abitec, Janesville, WI, USA) were kindly donated by Barentz (Odense, Denmark). Miglyol 812 N was obtained from IOI Oleo (Wittenberge, Germany). FaSSIF/FeSSIF/FaSSGF powder were bought from Biorelevant.com (Croydon, UK). Lucifer Yellow CH dilithium salt was obtained from Biotium (Fremont, CA, USA). Lecithin 20% soy PC extract was obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). GIT-0 lipid solution and Acceptor Sink Buffer were purchased from Pion (Billerica, MA, USA). N-dodecane (≥ 99%) was obtained from Alfa Aesar (Lancashire, UK). Ethanol (99.5%, denatured with 0.4% isopropyl alcohol) was obtained from Solveco (Rosersberg, Sweden). All water used was of grade I from a Milli-Q lab water purification system (Merck).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!