Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

The Gafchromic™ EBT3 radiotherapy films are officially available from Ashland and its authorized distributors. These films are designed for machine quality assurance in radiation therapy applications such as IMRT, VMAT, brachytherapy, and various testing procedures. The EBT3 films are offered in 8"x10" and 12.8"x17" sheet sizes. Pricing information can be obtained directly from Ashland or its authorized distributors.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

55 protocols using «gafchromic ebt3»

1

Precise Dosimetry Using Gafchromic Films

2024
Owing to their superior spatial resolution and established DR independence1 (link),22 (link), EBT3 Gafchromic® (Ashland Advanced Materials, Bridgewater, NJ) films were employed for the dose measurements used throughout the experimental campaign at TRIUMF. Prior to their first use for absolute dosimetry, the film batch was cross-calibrated against a reference 0.6cc ionization chamber (Farmer TN30010, PTW, Freiburg, Germany) and SuperMAX electrometer (Standard Imaging, Middleton, USA) whose calibration is traceable to the standard laboratories of the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). The film calibration was handled according to supplier recommendations and TG-235 guidelines30 (link) while the reference dose measurement was conducted according to the procedure set out by AAPM’s TG-51 protocol41 (link). The films were located at a depth of 10 cm from the phantom surface at 100 cm SAD and the chamber reading was therefore scaled to the film depth by applying a previously measured tissue-maximum ratio conversion that was also verified at the time of irradiation.
In all, 18 calibration films were irradiated to equally-separated doses between 0 and 35 Gy using a 10 MV clinical photon beam delivered on a Varian TrueBeam STx (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). The feasibility of using EBT3 film beyond 20 Gy has been previously demonstrated42 (link),43 (link) though future work would benefit from the use of EBT-XD with enhanced dose sensitivity and accuracy out to 30-40  Gy42 (link),44 (link). The energy independence of EBT3 films in the MV energy range was exploited to enable their use in our experimental beam despite the differences in beam quality as compared to the clinical 10 MV calibration beam29 (link),45 (link).
Irradiated films were scanned approximately 24 h after exposure on an EPSON® 10000XL flatbed scanner (Epson America, Long Beach, CA) using the central-axis to minimize lateral response artifacts and a resolution of 200 dpi. A Matlab® (Mathworks, Nattick, MA) script was written to process the scanned films using both red and green color channels, from which the absorbed dose was interpolated for each channel independently. Red channel responses were used for 15Gy dose to exploit the improved dynamic range and reduced variance while for > 15Gy irradiations the green channel was instead used29 (link),30 (link),46 (link),47 (link). Our film uncertainty budget follows from the prescription of TG-235 and was ascribed to be ±5% , consistent with the literature comparing the red and green channels47 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Gafchromic EBT3 Film Dosimetry for Cardiac Gating

2024
Measurements using Gafchromic EBT3 (Ashland Specialty Ingredients G. P., Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA) dosimetric films were conducted to evaluate the performance of the beam gating with motion synchronization in the following scenarios: (i) static delivery (used as reference); (ii) cardiac motion only (no respiratory component) with cardiac gating; (iii) cardiac motion only without gating; and (iv) cardiac and respiratory motions without gating. For each of the four scenarios, three irradiations were performed corresponding to the three different orientations of the film cartridge box with the film in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. Prescription dose was reduced to 10 Gy to fit within the dynamic dose range of the gafchromic film. All films were scanned and digitized 24 h after irradiation using an Epson Expression 10000XL flatbed scanner (Epson Canada, Ontario, Canada) with a resolution of 72 dpi. Processing of the digitized films was then performed using triple‐channel dosimetry analysis with FilmQA Pro 2013 (Ashland Specialty Ingredients G. P., Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA) software. Final dose map files were read using the implemented MATLAB code and dose distributions were compared against the static delivery by performing a local gamma analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Microbeam Radiation Therapy Dose Profiling

2024
In a calibration process of the dose calculation engine, we adjusted the focal spot width σ such that calculated and measured dose profiles matched. The peak doses, valley doses, and dose profiles were assessed in a 100 × 54 × 54 mm3 PMMA phantom at different depths using GafChromic™ EBT3 (Ashland, Wilmington, DE, USA) films. The entire 20 × 20 mm2 microbeam field was used for the irradiation. The same phantom and field were defined in the hybrid algorithm, and the resulting doses were compared against the experimental results.
For quantitative dosimetry, the films were calibrated with uniform doses in a RS225 X-ray irradiator (Xstrahl, Suwanee, GA, USA). Its dose rate was measured using a Farmer TM30010 ionization chamber (PTW Freiburg GmbH, Freiburg, Germany), and six different films were irradiated with a dose in the range of (0–10) Gy. After irradiation, the films were scanned with a Reflecta ProScan 10T (Reflecta GmbH, Eutingen, Germany) film scanner, and their gray values were correlated to the irradiated dose by fitting the data points with: D(gv)=a+bgv+c,
where D is the dose, gv is the grey value and a, b, and c are the fit parameters. More details about film handling are provided in [26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Radiation Measurements with Electron Beam

2024
Irradiation measurements were performed with a 9 MeV electron beam from an electron linear accelerator (Mobetron, IntraOp, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) capable of both CDR and UHDR radiation delivery. For all measurements, the probe was placed between two 1-cm sheets of water-equivalent, flexible bolus material, with the active region of the probe centered in the radiation field (Figure 1b). At least 7 cm of backscatter solid water material was placed underneath the bolus sheets.
Before measurement, the spectrometer was left powered on for a few minutes until it reached a stable temperature, which was indicated by the system's software. Unless otherwise specified, each UHDR measurement comprised the delivery of 3 pulses at 30 Hz, whereby the average signal per pulse was recorded. Each 3-pulse measurement was performed in triplicate, the average of which is reported with an error bar representing one standard deviation. Some graphs contain error bars that are smaller than the symbols used to represent the values and thus are not visible.
IW was set to 4.1 ms fs=244Hz to exceed the Nyquist frequency of the highest possible beam delivery PRF of 120 Hz, and the number of samples per measurement was set to 800, resulting in a measurement length of 3.28 s. The start of each measurement was timed to coincide with the delivery of the beam.
To determine the dose delivered to the probe for each measurement, each setup was calibrated using dose rate-independent radiochromic film (Gafchromic EBT3, Ashland Inc., Covington, KY, USA) applying a previously described protocol [21 ]. For CDR measurements, the dose was monitored using an Advanced Markus ionization chamber (PTW-Freiburg GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) placed at a set location below the probe (embedded in the solid water [Figure 1b]). For UHDR measurements, inline beam current transformers (BCTs) (Bergoz Instrumentation, Saint-Genis-Pouilly, France) were used as previously described [22 (link)]. The BCTs yield highly time-resolved measurements of the beam current for each individual pulse delivered and were used as the reference against which the scintillator system's response was compared. Both the ion chamber (in CDR mode) and the BCTs (in UHDR mode) were calibrated to the film dose at the probe location. The statistical errors across triplicate film dose measurements were propagated to the final reported values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Proton Irradiation of Cell Monolayers

2023
Cell irradiation was carried out on proton therapy complex “Prometheus” (JSC «Protom», Protvino, Russia). To irradiate cells at the Bragg peak, a rectangular field of homogenous proton irradiation 50 × 60 mm in size was formed. The energy of the protons in the beam was 160.5 MeV. To place a monolayer of cells in the position of the Bragg peak, a 151.8 mm thick polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) moderator was installed in the beam path. The dose uniformity over the field was measured using a Gafchromic EBT3 (Ashland Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) dosimetry film, and the absorbed dose was monitored using a PTW Unidos webline electrometer with a PTW PinPoint 3D TM31022 ionization chamber (PTW-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany). For dosimetry at the Bragg peak, an additional PTW Bragg Peak TM34073 ionization chamber was used. The homogeneity was not less than 98% at the 95% isodose level. The accuracy of the absorbed dose determination was less than 10% for cells irradiated at the Bragg peak due to high gradients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.