Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Poly allylamine hydrochloride

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Australia, Poland
About the product

Poly(allylamine hydrochloride) is a water-soluble, cationic polymer. It is used as a flocculating agent and in the manufacture of various laboratory and industrial products.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

132 protocols using poly allylamine hydrochloride

1

Electrochemical Detection of Biotin-Avidin Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified milli‐Q water (resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm1) was utilized to prepare all the buffers and solutions. Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin T1 was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA. Sodium chloride, methylene blue (MB), 2‐propanol, 25% ammonium solution, 28%–30% ammonium hydroxide, acetone, and 95% ethanol were purchased from Merck, Germany. Poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAA MW ~ 56 000), poly(sodium 4‐styrenesulfonate) (PSS, MW ~ 70 000), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), acridine orange (AO), and avidin from egg white were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich, USA. NanoDrop 2000 from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc was used for spectrophotometric measurements. Two‐electrode screen‐printed carbon electrodes (SPCE) was obtained from Quasense, Thailand and the PalmSens4 potentiostat with PSTrace5.10 software from PalmSens, Netherlands was used for electrochemical measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Modular Biocompatible Hydrogel Platform

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alginate (Cat no. A2158, 75–100
kDa), EC (Cat no. 200697, 48% ethoxy), TRIS base (Cat no. T1503),
[2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride (TMA, Cat. no.
408107, 80% in water), catalase (CAT, from bovine liver, Cat. no.
C9322), calcium chloride (Cat no. 22350), pluronic F 68 (PF68, Cat.
no. P1300), poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, Cat no.71550-12-4,
17.5 kDa), poly(sodium-4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS, Cat no. 25704-18-1,
70 kDa), 2,2- dimethoxy-2-phenyl acetophenone (C6H5COC(OCH3)2C6H5, >99%), 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone
(C6H9NO, >99%), and tetrahydrofuran (THF,
Cat
no. 401757) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO,
USA. PdBP (Cat no. T13343) was purchased from Frontier Specialty Chemicals,
Logan, UT, USA. Iso-octane (Cat no. 94701) was purchased from Avantor
performance materials, LLC, Randor, PA, USA. Glucose oxidase (GOx,
Cat no. 9001-37-0, Activity—76.8 unit/mg) from Aspergillus niger was purchased from Tokyo Chemical
Industries Co. (Tokyo, Japan). PEGDA (average Mw ∼ 3.4 kDa) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill,
MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biomaterial Synthesis Using Polyallylamine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Poly(allylamine hydrochloride)
(PAH·HCl, 17.5 kDa), sodium silicate solution (Si, ((NaOH)x(Na2SiO3)y·zH2O, 27% SiO2)), Na2HPO4, NaHCO3, Na2SO4, and GeO2 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Ultrapure water from the Milli-Q IQ 7003 Ultrapure Lab Water System
(Merck) was used for solution preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis and Characterization of TPY-Modified Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2,2′:6′,2″-Terpyridine-4′-thiol
(TPY) was purchased from ALFA Chemistry. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP,
MW: 10,000), 2,2′-azobis (2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride
(AIBA), styrene, polysodium(styrenesulfonate) (PSS, MW: 70,000), poly(allylamine
hydrochloride) (PAH, MW: 50,000), tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium
chloride solution (THPC), Gold(III) chloride trihydrate, ammonia solution,
tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), phosphoric acid, sodium phosphate
monobasic, sodium phosphate dibasic, zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO4·7H2O), calcium chloride (CaCl2), and Zinquin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Sodium hydroxide,
puromycin, and the cell counting chamber slide were purchased from
Thermo Fisher. Chloroform was purchased from Scharlau. The ibidi glass
bottom dish (35 mm) was purchased from ibidi GmbH. All of the chemicals
were used without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Polyelectrolyte Complexes for Cell Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, Mw = 17.5 kDa), poly(4-styrene sulfonate) sodium salt (PSS, Mw = 70 kDa), calcium chloride dihydrate, sodium carbonate, sodium chloride, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), dextran sulfate sodium salt (DS, Mw = 40 kDa), rhodamine B, rhodamine 6G, pyronin B, fluorescein, acridine yellow, acridine orange, thiazine red, and polyvinyl alcohol were purchased from Sigma.
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium F12 (DMEM F12), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin EDTA, bovine serum albumin (BSA), calcein-AM fluorescent dye, hoechst 33258 dye, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and MTT cell proliferation assay ((3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay) kit were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
Deionized (DI) water (resistivity 18.2 MΩ cm at 25 °C) from the Direct-Q water purification system was used to prepare all solutions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fabrication of Fluorescent Polyelectrolyte Microcapsules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent polyelectrolyte microcapsules (PMs) were fabricated as described in detail previously [35 (link)]. The microcapsules were composed of, in total, 12 layers of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes: poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (#283215; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and poly(sodium 4−styrenesulfonate) (#243051; St. Louis, MO, USA), and covered by the final 13th layer of poly(L−lysine)−graft−poly (ethylene glycol) co−polymer (#SZ34−67; SuSoS, Dübendorf, Switzerland). Microcapsules were loaded with a conjugate of the fluorescein isothiocyanate with albumin (#FD20S; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; Ex 494 nm, Em 512 nm) as a fluorescent probe. Concentration and size distribution of prepared fluorescent microparticles were determined using a Mikmed−2 fluorescent microscope (LOMO, St. Petersburg, Russia) with a hemocytometer followed by analysis in the Fiji 2.1.0. software [36 (link),37 (link)]. Obtained 2.7 ± 0.6 µm microcapsules were washed with saline by multiple cycles of sedimentation−resuspension. The stock solution of the capsules was adjusted to a concentration of 1 million/μL and stored with antibiotic solution (50 µg/mL streptomycin with 50 U/mL penicillin) at 4 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and Characterization of Fluorescent Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, ≥99%), iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O, 99%), hydrazine hydrate (N2H4, 64%), sodium chloride (NaCl, 99%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37 wt%), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH, 28–30 wt%), tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH, 30 vol%), polyallylamine hydrochloride MW ≈17 500 (PAH), poly(sodium 4‐styrene sulfonate) MW ≈70 000 (PSS), poly(fluorescein isothiocyanate allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH‐FITC), phosphate‐buffered solution (PBS, 10×), and ethanol anhydrous were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich. Opti‐MEM (1×) was supplied by Gibco, Thermo Fischer Scientific. Polystyrene spheres (PS, 1400 nm, 100 mg mL−1) were purchased from Thermo Fischer Scientific, µ‐Slides VI 0.4 were purchased from Ibidi GmbH (Germany), Precision Plus Protein Dual‐color standards (1610374), and Oriole fluorescent gel stain solution (1×) were purchased from BIO‐RAD in Germany, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)‐high glucose (Thermofisher, 11965092), Opti‐MEM reduced serum medium (Thermofisher, 31985070), fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma, F7524), penicillin‐streptomycin (Thermofisher, 15070063), trypsin‐EDTA solution (Merck, 59417C), formalin solution 10% neutral buffered (Sigma, HT501640). The following reagents were used for labeling subcellular components: LysoTracker Red DND‐99 (Thermofisher, L7528), mouse anti‐CD44 (GeneTex, GT981), rabbit anti‐Rab 7 (Abcam, ab137029), goat anti‐Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 594 (Thermofisher, A‐11012), goat Anti‐Mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 647) (Abcam, ab150115), and 4′, 6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) (Invitrogen, D1306). ProLong Gold Antifade Reagent (Thermofisher, P36930) were used as mounting medium for confocal microscopy. Cell proliferation studies were performed with 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) (MTT) Assay Kit (Abcam, ab211091) and Oriole Fluorescent Gel Stain (BioRad 1610496). Milli‐Q water (18.2 MΩ cm−1 resistance) was used in all aqueous preparations and washes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Lipid-based Carrier Preparation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For preparation and characterization of the lipid-based carriers, the following materials were used: asolectin (25% phosphatidylcholine, Sigma, Budapest, Hungary), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (≥99.0%, Sigma), poly(ethylenimine) (PEI, 30% wt % aqueous solution, Tokyo Chemicals) (the mean molecular weight of PEI was determined in a previous work using dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements as Mw ≈ 139 ± 1 kDa [24 (link)]), trimethylamine ((C2H5)3N, 99%, Sigma), cholesteryl chloroformate (C28H45ClO2, 95%, Sigma), chloroform (CHCl3, 99.9%, Molar, Halásztelek, Hungary), methanol (CH3OH, 99.9%, Molar), poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, Mw = 17,500 g/mol, Sigma), methylene chloride (CH2Cl2, anhydrous, >99.8%, Sigma), diethyl ether ((CH3CH2)2O, anhydrous, >99.7%, Sigma), acetone (CH3COCH3, >99%, Molar), and kynurenic acid (KYNA, C10H7NO3, >98%, Sigma). For adjustment of the pH, sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (NaH2PO4 × H2O; 99%; Sigma), sodium phosphate dibasic dodecahydrate (Na2HPO4 × 12 H2O; 98.5%; Sigma), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 99.8%, Molar), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%, Molar), and sodium chloride (NaCl, 99.9%, Molar) were applied. All the chemicals were analytical grade and were used without further purification. In all cases, the stock solutions were freshly prepared using Milli-Q (Millipore, Milli-Q Integral3, Merck, Budapest, Hungary) ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm at 25 °C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tetrachloroauric acid (HAuCl4·3H2O, 99.9%), sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate (C6H5Na3O7·2H2O, 99.5%), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; ACS reagent; NaC12H25SO4; 99.9%), (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES; C9H23NO3Si; 99%), poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH; [CH2CH(CH2NH2·HCl)]n; average Mw 17 500), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF; HCON(CH3)2; anhydrous, 99.8%), m-xylene (C8H10; >99%), PP (isotactic; [C3H6]n) pellets, and styrene (ReagentPlus® reagent; C8H8; 99.9%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland. Toluene (C6H5CH3; AR certified for analysis) was purchased from Fisher Scientific, Switzerland. Absolute ethanol (C2H6O; 99.9%) was purchased from VWR chemicals, Switzerland. PE (low density; [C2H4]n) pellets were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, USA. Sodium chloride salt (NaCl; >99.5%) was purchased from Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany. PET ([C10H8O4]n) pellets were purchased from Goodfellow Cambridge Ltd., UK. Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH2OH·HCl, 99.0%) and potassium peroxodisulfate (KPS; ACS reagent; K2S2O8, 99.9%) were purchased from Fluka, Switzerland. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP; [C6H9NO]n; Mw 10 000) and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP; C3H2F6O; >99%) were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (TCI) in Japan. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30 wt% in H2O) was purchased from Reactolab SA, Switzerland. Sulfuric acid (ISO + Ph. Eur. Reagent; H2SO4, 95%) was obtained from Honeywell, Germany. All water referred to as Milli-Q within the manuscript was purified with an 18.2 MW cm arium 611DI Milli-Q system (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Germany) prior to use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Polyphenol-Based Cytoprotection Against UV Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents. Quercetin (Qr), polystyrene sulfonate sodium, 70 kDa (PSS), polyallylamine hydrochloride, 58 kDa (PAH), chitosan of medium molecular weight, 450 kDa, degree of deacetylation 75-85% (CH), dextran sulfate, > 500 kDa (DexS), Dulbecco's modi ed Eagle's medium (DMEM), ethidium bromide (EB), practically all solvents, salts, and reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich. In addition, resveratrol (Res) from Biomol (Research Lab, Plymouth, MA), isotonic phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (PBS) from Lonza (Belgium), antibiotics from Gibco (USA), fetal bovine serum (FBS) from Capricorn (Poland) were used. Other reagents are mentioned herein below in the appropriate subsections.
Cell line. The immortalized human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT was a gift from N. E. Fusenig (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany) and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, at 37°C in a humidi ed atmosphere containing 5% CO 2 .
Preparation of layer-by-layer shell on polyphenol microcrystals. A multilayer polyelectrolyte shell on polyphenol microcrystals was prepared using the layer-by-layer assembly method [27, 28] . Brie y, polyphenol powder was dispersed in distilled water to obtain a 10 mg/mL suspension. An aliquot of a 5 mg/mL PAH or chitosan solution was added in the amount of 0.2 mL per 1 mL of the initial suspension and thoroughly dispersed for 5 min in an ultrasonic bath. After the adsorption of the polymer layer for 15 min, the microcrystals were washed with water twice to remove unadsorbed polyelectrolyte and redispersed in a volume of water equal to the initial one. The next PSS or DexS layer was deposited on the surface of microcrystals in a similar way. The adsorption of positive and negative polymers was repeated n times to obtain n bilayers. Finally, shell-coated microcrystals were redispersed in 0.9% NaCl solution in a concentration of 10,0 mg/mL. The concentration of quercetin or resveratrol in a suspension of coated microcrystals (polyphenol/(CH/DexS) 4 and polyphenol/(PAH/PSS) 4 ) was determined spectrophotometrically, after extraction with ethanol.
UV irradiation. A germicidal lamp (G 30W, Sylvania), 95% of whose radiation is UV-C with a wavelength of 253.7 nm was used. The lamp was located at a distance of 10 cm from the cell plate, providing an irradiation intensity of 1.0 mW/cm 2 . Before irradiation, the medium was replaced with PBS. Immediately after irradiation, PBS was replaced with serum-free DMEM (Sham-irradiated control and UV-C series), native and particulate polyphenols at a dose of 50 µmol/L (UV-C + polyphenols series).
Analysis of cells viability. The study of the effect of UV-C on the viability of cultured cells was carried out in 96-well plates. After 20 h the viability of cells was determined using the PrestoBlueTM Reagent (Introvigen, USA) according to the instructions. The uorescence of resoru n was quanti ed on a microplate reader using an excitation of 560 nm and emission of 590 nm. The average uorescence intensity of wells containing control cells was taken as 100%.
Cell integrity was evaluated by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage. In these experiments, cells were grown in 24-well plates. The activity of LDH was measured using the direct spectrophotometric assay in 1 ml of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 30 µmol/L pyruvate and 30 µmol/L NADH. 100 µl of culture medium were added and changes in optical density were measured at 340 nm for 2 min. The percentage of LDH release was calculated by dividing the activity of LDH in the medium by the LDH activity measured after complete cell lysis. None of the detergents and drugs affected LDH activity, when added directly to the reaction mixture at the concentrations used in whole cell experiments.
Analysis of DNA damage by comet assay. Cells plated in 24-well plate were cultured for 2 h after UV irradiation. Alkaline Comet-assay was performed according to Singh and Tice [29] (link)[30] (link)[31] (link). Brie y, cells were trypsinized, 50 µl of the cell suspension of each experimental series was added to 300 µl of 0.7% lowmelting agarose, and the mixture was applied to glass slides pre-coated with normal-melting agarose. The preparations were placed in a lysis buffer and kept in the dark for 20 h (4°C). Slides were then incubated with alkaline electrophoresis buffer pH 13 (0.3 M NaOH and 1 mM EDTA) for 20 min.
Subsequently, electrophoresis was carried out for 20 min at 300 mA. The samples were washed twice in a neutralizing solution (pH 7.4, 4°C). Next, the slide was immersed in 70% ethanol for 5 min and 5 min in 96% ethanol then air dried, and stained with EB dye for 5 min. Comets were observed at 200 magni cation using a uorescence microscope Axiovert 25 (Zeiss, Germany) and documented using a digital camera. Percentage of DNA in the tail (damaged) was calculated for each comet using the histogram tool of Photoshop software. Data from three independent experiments were averaged for each experimental condition (n ≈ 150 cells).
Statistical analysis. The obtained data were tabulated and analyzed by Excel program. Results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Since the data were normally distributed statistical signi cance was evaluated using a two-tailed unpaired by Student's t-test and P values < 0.05 were considered to be signi cant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.