The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

48 protocols using erythromycin

1

Detecting Inducible Clindamycin Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The test for inducible clindamycin resistance was performed by the D-test [20 (link)]. The isolates showing erythromycin resistance were lawn cultured over the MHA plate (HiMedia Pvt. Ltd., India). erythromycin (15 µg) and clindamycin (2 µg) disks (HiMedia Pvt. Ltd., India) were placed at a 15-mm edge-to-edge distance. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, different phenotypes were interpreted as follows: (Additional file 1: Photograph S1D).

Moderate-sensitive (MS) phenotype: resistant to erythromycin (zone size ≤ 13 mm), but sensitive to clindamycin (zone size ≥ 21 mm) and giving a circular zone of inhibition around clindamycin (D-test negative).

Constitutive MLSB (cMLSB) phenotype: resistant to both erythromycin (zone size ≤ 13 mm) and clindamycin (zone size ≤ 14 mm) with the circular shape of the zone of inhibition around clindamycin.

Inducible MLSB (iMLSB) phenotype: resistant to erythromycin (zone size ≤ 13 mm), but sensitive to clindamycin (zone size ≥ 21 mm) and giving a D-shaped zone of inhibition around clindamycin with flattening toward erythromycin (D-test positive).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Enterococcus Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The present study was conducted at Vinayaka Mission's Medical College and Hospitals, Salem Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) Clearance (MICROBIOLOGY/Ph.D/01/2015) was obtained prior to this study A total of 1200 clinical samples received at the Department of Microbiology for routine culture and sensitivity were included. A total of 774 isolates of Enterococci obtained from 1200 clinical samples were processed for species identification and antimicrobial sensitivity testing. Identification of isolates to the species level was performed by the sugar utilization test using brain heart infusion broth incorporated with 1% sugar and bromothymol blue indicator.[9 (link)] Isolates of Enterococci were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines[10 ] using the following drugs: penicillin (10 U), erythromycin (15 μg), high-level gentamicin (120 μg), linezolid (30 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and nitrofurantoin (300 μg).(Himedia Laboratories Ltd.) The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for these antibiotics were also determined bythe Vitek automated system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Sensitivity Patterns of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro antibiotic sensitivity patterns of the isolates were conducted as per the method of Bauer et al., (1966) . Antibiotics disc (Hi Media Ltd., Mumbai, India) used in the present study were Amikacin (30 mcg), Amoxyclav (30 mcg), Ampicillin (10 mcg), Ciprofloxacin (5 mcg), Colistin (10 mcg), Ceftriaxone (30 mcg), Erythromycin (15 mcg), Enrofloxacin (10 mcg), Gentamicin (10mcg), Neomycin (30 mcg), Penicillin-G (10IU), Streptomycin (10 mcg), Sulphadiazine (300 mcg) and Tetracycline (30 mcg). Diameters of the clear zone of inhibition were measured and the interpretation of the results was made in accordance with the instructions supplied by the manufacturer (Hi Media Ltd., Mumbai, India). Multiple Antibiotic resistance index (MARI) were also determined for each isolates by dividing the number of antibiotics to which the isolate is resistant to by the total numbers of antibiotics tested (Adenaike, 2016) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Screening of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic drug susceptibility was determined by spreading overnight grown culture of the isolates on MRS agar plates as a lawn. Standard antibiotic discs (tetracycline, erythromycin, ampicillin, gentamycin, penicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime, cefoperazone, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, Hi-Media, Mumbai) were placed on the surface of the MRS agar medium aseptically. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and observed for zones of inhibition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial agents tested included penicillin (P) (10 units), gentamicin (GEN) (10 µg), tetracycline (TE) (30 µg), levofloxacin (LE) (5 µg), cotrimoxazole (COT) (25 µg), erythromycin (E) (15 µg), clindamycin (CD) (2 µg) and linezolid (LZ) (30 µg) (Himedia, India). A D test was used to detect inducible clindamycin resistance. The sensitivities were analyzed based on CLSI breakpoints [11 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Source Verification for Bacterial Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotics for preparation of test plates were procured from the suppliers shown in parentheses: Amikacin, Ampicillin, Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, CiprOfloxacin, Gentamicin, Nitrofurantoin, Norfloxacin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Ofloxacin, (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), Amoxycillin/clavulanate (GlaxoSmithKline; Thane, India), Ceftazidime (VHB; Mumbai, India), Cefepime (Biocon; Bengaluru, India), Cefixime (GlaxoSmithKline; Thane, India), Colistin (Cipla; Pune, India), Erythromycin (Himedia; Mumbai, India), Imipenem (MSD; Mumbai, India), LevOfloxacin (Alkem; Chennai, India), Meropenem (Cipla; Pune, India), Tetracycline (GlaxoSmithKline; Thane, India), Tigecycline (Natco; Chennai, India), Vancomycin (Himedia; Mumbai, India).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility of E. coli and Salmonella

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic sensitivity testing of isolated E. coli and Salmonella spp. was carried out using the disk diffusion assay as previously described [63 (link)]. Antibiotic classes included fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, LEV—5 μg; ciprofloxacin, CIP—5 μg), aminoglycosides (gentamicin, GEN—10 μg; streptomycin, S—10 μg), carbapenems (Meropenem, MEM—10 μg; imipenem, IMP—10 μg), amphenicols (chloramphenicol, C—10 μg), macrolides (erythromycin, E—15 μg), and tetracyclines (tetracycline, TE—30 μg) purchased from Hi Media (India). Sensitivity tests were performed on freshly grown isolates having a concentration equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard using Mueller-Hinton agar media (Hi Media, India). All results were interpreted according to the guidelines provided by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [64 ]. Furthermore, isolates showing resistance against three or more different classes of antibiotics were defined as MDR [65 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotics selected in this study were as follows: penicillin-G 10 units/disc, ampicillin 10 μg/disc, cefotaxime 30 μg/disc, cephalothin 30 μg/disc, erythromycin 15 μg/disc, cefazolin 30 μg/disc, chloramphenicol 30 μg/disc, and methicillin 5 μg/disc (HiMedia). A single colony was picked from 24-h culture BHI agar plate and inoculated into BHI broth. [ 17 ] The test tubes were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The inoculum was then adjusted to match the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standards (HiMedia). The test organism was aseptically swabbed on BHI agar using a sterile cotton swab. [ 18 ] The plates were kept for 10 min to dry, and then antibiotic discs were aseptically placed on the inoculated BHI agar. The plates were anaerobically incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The inhibition zones were measured in millimeter (mm). The experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated to confirm the reliability and reproducibility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacteriological Analysis and Antibiotic Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The swabs collected were directly inoculated in duplicate on blood agar, (Oxoid) Mac Conkey agar and Muller Hinton agar (Oxoid). The pairs of inoculated media were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h and then examined for bacteria growth according to standard protocol [14 ]. The positive culture growths were examined for colony characteristics, Gram-reaction and biochemical characteristics as described by Cheesbrough (2000) [14 ]. The biochemical characteristics tested were: (i) catalase, (ii) coagulase, (iii) oxidase, (iv) hemolysis, (v) sugar fermentation, (vi) indole production, (vii) citrate utilization, (viii) urease activity, (ix) triple sugar iron and (x) hydrogen sulphide production.
Purified bacterial isolates were subjected to drug susceptibility tests using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method [14 ]. Commercially available antibiotic discs that were used include: ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, gentamycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, cephalexin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, cefoxitin, ampicillin, vancomycin and chloramphenicol (Hi Media Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India). These antibiotics were chosen based on the type of microorganisms frequently isolated and their availability at University Teaching Hospital.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the identified S. aureus isolates were subjected to an in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test by employing the modified Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines [19 ]. The antimicrobial disks used were ampicillin (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (25 μg), clindamycin (31 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), erythromycin (26 μg), gentamycin (28 μg), linezolid (30 μg), oxacillin (10 μg), tetracycline (20 μg), and penicillin (10 μg) from HiMedia, India.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!