Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Piston gradient fractionator

Manufactured by BioComp Instruments
Sourced in Canada, United States, Germany
About the product

The Piston Gradient Fractionator is a laboratory instrument designed for the separation and purification of complex biological samples. It utilizes a piston-driven system to generate a continuous gradient, which allows for the efficient fractionation of various macromolecules, such as proteins, nucleic acids, and cellular organelles. The core function of the Piston Gradient Fractionator is to enable researchers to isolate and concentrate specific components of their samples for further analysis or purification.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The Piston Gradient Fractionator is officially listed by BioComp Instruments and available through authorized distributors. The manufacturer's website does not provide specific pricing information, but authorized distributors offer the product with prices typically ranging from $3,192 to $3,839.98.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

259 protocols using «piston gradient fractionator»

1

Polysome Profiling of Colorectal Cancer Cells

2025
Polysome profiling assay was performed as previously described33 (link). Colorectal cancer cell line HT29, either MG-132 treated or untreated, were harvested and lysed on ice with lysis buffer (20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 100 µg/mL cycloheximide, 1% Triton X-100, 40 U/mL RNasin and protease inhibitor cocktail). The cell extracts were centrifuged at 12,000 g 4 °C for 10 min, and then layered on a 10–50% sucrose gradient (composed of 25 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2 and 100 mM NaCl) and centrifuged at 4 °C in a SW41Ti Beckman rotor for 3.5 h at 35,000 rpm. Absorbance at 260 nm was recorded by using Piston Gradient Fractionator (Biocomp, USA). Polysomal fractions (fractions 13–22) were pooled, and RNA was isolated using the RNA extraction Kit as described above for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Isolation and Purification of Rabbit Ribosomes

2025
Nuclease-treated bulk rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Green Hectares) was spun down at 20,000 RPM for 15 min to remove debris, nuclei, and mitochondria.60 Clarified lysate was filtered with a 0.22 μm filter (Millipore). The supernatant was loaded on to a 30% sucrose cushion (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 2 mM MgOAc2, 150 mM KCl, 30% w/v sucrose) and ultracentrifuged for 17.5 h at 36,000 RPM (50.2 Ti rotor) at 4°C to obtain a ribosomal pellet.61 (link) The pellet was washed and resuspended in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 6 mM MgOAc2, 150 mM KCl, 6.8% w/v sucrose, 1 mM DTT, 1 μL RNasin from Promega (Cat N2618). To remove non-resuspended particles, the resuspended pellet was centrifuged again at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant was isolated. 15–30% sucrose gradients were prepared using a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 2 mM MgOAc2, 150 mM KCl, and either 15% or 30% w/v sucrose using the Gradient Master (Biocomp). Gradients were cooled to 4°C before use. Pellet supernatant was loaded onto gradients and ultracentrifuged at 19,100 RPM for 17.5 h (SW-28 rotor) at 4°C. Gradients were fractionated using the Piston Gradient Fractionator and Fractionator Software v8.04 (Biocomp), monitoring for absorption at 260 nm. Fractions corresponding to pure 80S ribosomes were pooled and concentrated to an A260 of 95 using an Ultra-15 centrifugal filter unit with a nominal molecular weight limit of 100 kDa (Amicon). This concentrated stock was subsequently diluted to 250 nM using buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 2 mM MgOAc2, 150 mM KCl and 20 μL aliquots were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Isolation of Mitochondrial Monosomes

2025
Frozen mitochondria were thawed on ice and resuspended in 2 volumes of mitochondrial lysis buffer [25 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.4, 150 mM KCl, 50 mM MgOAc, 2% Triton (v/v) X-100, 2 mM DTT, EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Pierce), 50 μg/ml LZD] and mixed via inversion, followed by homogenization with 5 strokes of a Dounce homogenizer. The sample was then rotated on a nutator at 4°C to complete the lysis. The lysed sample was then clarified by centrifugation at 30 000 × g, 4°C, for 20 min in a TLA 100.3. The supernatant was carefully removed and the pellet discarded. This centrifugation step was then repeated to ensure clarification. The clarified mitochondrial lysate was then loaded onto a sucrose cushion [1 M sucrose (34%, w/v); 20 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.4, 100 mM KCl, 20 mM Mg(OAc)2, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 2 mM DTT, 50 μg/ml LZD] in a 2.5:1 ratio of lysate to sucrose cushion. The samples were then centrifuged at ∼231 550 × g in a TLA 100.3 rotor (66 000 rpm) to pellet the mitoribosomes. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets rinsed gently several times with resuspension buffer (50 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.4, 250 mM KCl, 12.5 mM Mg(OAc)2, 5 mM DTT, 50 μg/ml LZD). The pellets were then resuspended in a total of 170 μl of resuspension buffer and loaded onto a 15%–30% sucrose gradient (prepared in resuspension buffer using a BioComp Gradient Master) to isolate mitomonosomes. The samples were centrifuged at 19 500 rpm for 18.5 h in an SW41 rotor. The gradient was then fractionated using a BioComp Piston Gradient Fractionator with UV260 monitoring. Two hundred microliter fractions were collected and the fraction corresponding to the 55S peak was collected and used for cryo-EM sample preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Purification and Analysis of Recombinant Proteins

2025
The overexpression of ratA–His and the corresponding mutants was induced in exponentially growing cells with 0.2% arabinose for 1.5 h before increasing the chloramphenicol concentration to 200 µg/mL and pouring 150 mL of each culture over 100 mL or frozen 1× PBS. The cells of the cooled down cultures were then harvested at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C before being resuspended in cold 1× TMN buffer (10 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NH4Cl, 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol, pH 7.6) supplemented with 200 µg/mL of chloramphenicol, 1 mg/mL of lysozyme, and 1 U/mL of DNase I. The cells were then lysed using several freeze and thaw cycles. The resulting cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 30,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. Of the collected supernatant, 10 A260 units were loaded onto a 10–40% sucrose gradient in 1× TMN buffer and centrifuged at 34,000 rpm for 3 h at 4 °C using a SW40 Ti rotor. Following centrifugation, the gradients were fractionated using a piston gradient fractionator (Biocomp Instruments, Fredericton, NB, Canada), collecting 13 fractions of 930 µL each while monitoring the absorbance at 254 nm. The proteins in the collected fractions were precipitated by the addition of 190 µL of 100% trichloroacetic acid to each fraction, followed by incubation on ice for 1 h. The precipitated proteins were collected at 18,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C and washed with 400 µL of 80% acetone solution in water. The final pellets were air-dried and resuspended in 2× Laemmli buffer for western blot analysis, as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Polysome Profiling in U-2 OS Cells

2025
A modified version of the protocol from (65 (link)) was used for polysome profiling. Briefly, after treatment a 15 cm dish of U-2 OS cells was treated with 100 μg/mL cycloheximide for 10 minutes. Media was aspirated and cells were then washed in ice cold PBS with 100 μg/mL cycloheximide. Cells were then scraped into ice cold lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 1 mg/mL cycloheximide, 80 U/mL Ribolock RNase inhibitor (Thermo Scientific), and 50 U/mL DNase I (Zymo Research). After lysis on ice for 10 minutes, lysates were centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 minutes at 4°C to remove cell debris, and then snap frozen in ethanol-dry ice and stored at −80°C. For separation of polysomes, lysates were thawed on ice and loaded onto a 10–50% sucrose gradient in 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl and 5 mM MgCl2. Gradients were spun at 36,000 RPM for 3 hours at 4°C, and polysome profiles collected using a Biocomp Piston Gradient Fractionator. Absorbance at 260 nm was normalized to 1 for the highest point in each profile. Data were graphed in GraphPad Prism 10.4.0 (GraphPad Software, Boston, Massachusetts USA), exported as .tif files, and the area under the curve measured using the ImageJ wand tracing tool (169 (link)). The peaks after the free RNP fraction were defined in order as 40S, 60S, and 80S, and all peaks to the right of the 80S were considered as polysomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «piston gradient fractionator»

1

Sucrose Gradient Fractionation of Cellular RNA and Protein

Cells were grown to ~70% confluency and then treated with indicated antibiotic for 15 min. Following treatment, cells were rinsed once with PBS and lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8], 150 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X100, 1mM DTT, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail [Cell Signaling, 5870], EDTA-free Protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche Diagnostics, 5056489001]). Lysates containing 200 ĝ of total RNA were run through 10–50% sucrose gradients using Beckmann Coulter SW41 Ti rotor at 40,000 rpm for 4°C for 3 hr. For RNase-digested profiles, lysates containing 100 μg of total RNA were treated with RNase A (Thermo Fisher Scientific, EN0531) at 4 mg/L for 15 min at RT and quenched by adding 200 U of SUPERaseIn (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AM2694). Digested lysates were run through 10–35% sucrose gradients (20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8], 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2) using Beckmann Coulter SW41 Ti rotors at 40,000 rpm for 4°C for 2 hr. For Figure 4F, cells were rinsed once with PBS and treated with 0.5 mM DSP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 22585) in PBS for 10 min at RT. After crosslinking, cells were lysed in HEPES lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 150 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X100, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail, EDTA-free Protease inhibitor cocktail). Digested lysates were run through 10–35% sucrose gradients (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2). Gradients were fractionated using a Biocomp piston gradient fractionator. The absorbance at 254nm was recorded. Protein was TCA-precipitated from the fractions and methanol- precipitated to remove residual sucrose. Pellets were resuspended in Laemmli loading buffer containing DTT and boiled at 99°C for 5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Quantification of Translational Regulation

12 x 106 SW480 cells were plated on 3x15 cm cell culture dishes for 16 hours and then treated as indicated for 24 hours. Cell lysis was performed on ice in 100μl gradient buffer (1mM DTT; 100mM KCl, 20mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP40, 20μl 0.1mg/ml cycloheximide containing protease and RNAse inhibitors). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation. Lysates were layered on top of 5-45% sucrose gradients and centrifuged in an SW41-Ti rotor at 34.500 rpm for 1 hour at 4°C. Profiles were fractionated using a Piston gradient fractionator (BioComp). RNA was analyzed by quantitative RQ-PCR. CAP pull-downs were performed as described (44 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Polysome Profiling During Cellular Stress

Sucrose gradients ranging from 10 to 50% in a solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 50 μg/ml cycloheximide were used for polysome analysis as previously described using a tilted tube rotation method on a gradient station equipped with a Piston Gradient Fractionator and a Gradient Master from BioComp (Fredericton, Canada; Palam et al., 2011 (link); Teske et al., 2011a (link)). MEF cells were cultured in DMEM in the presence or absence of 1 μM TG for 6 h. Before harvesting, cells were incubated in culture media containing 50 μg/ml cycloheximide for 10 min at 37°C. Cells were rinsed twice with chilled phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 50 μg/ml cycloheximide and then lysed with 500 μl of cold lysis buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.4% Nonidet P-40, 50 μg/ml cycloheximide, and EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). The lysates were sheared with a sterile syringe with a 23-gauge needle, incubated on ice for 10 min, and clarified at 8000 × g for 10 min. A 400-μl amount of supernatant was layered atop the sucrose gradients, which were subjected to centrifugation in a Beckman SW41Ti rotor at 40,000 rpm for 2 h at 4°C. Sucrose fractions and the resulting polysome profiles for each sample were then collected using a Piston Gradient Fractionator and a 254-nm ultraviolet monitor with Data Quest software.
To investigate specific mRNA transcript shifts during stress, 10 ng/ml firefly luciferase control RNA (Promega, Madison, WI) was added to each pooled sample before RNA isolation, allowing for measurements of the relative amounts of the transcript of interest to be normalized to an exogenous RNA control (Palam et al., 2011 (link); Teske et al., 2011a (link)). Samples were then immediately mixed with 750 μl of TRIzol Reagent LS and RNA isolation and cDNA generation performed as described later. To calculate percentage total gene transcript for the seven fractions, 2(−ΔΔCT) was summed for each treatment group, and the 2(−ΔΔCT) value for each fraction was considered as a percentage of the total. This calculation serves to omit changes in the levels of transcript abundance between treatment groups. All polysome profiles and mRNA shifts depicted are representative of three independent biological replicates. The percentage shift was calculated as (percentage total mRNA in fractions 5–7 during ER stress) – (percentage total mRNA in fractions 5–7 during no stress).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Large-Scale Purification of Bacteriophage Proheads

Plasmids were co-transformed into strain BL21(DE3) with pLysS [45 (link)] for expression. Large-scale purification of proheads were done essentially as described in previous publications [27 (link), 46 (link)]. After cell lysis and DNase I digestion, cell debris was removed and proheads were precipitated with 0.5 M salt and ~6% (w/v) PEG 8000. The proheads were suspended in buffer G (20mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl), clarified by high speed centrifugation (~12,000 x g), pelleted by centrifuging at 140,000 x g for 2 hr in a Type 45 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), and suspended overnight in Buffer G. After removal of insoluble material by high speed centrifugation, the preparations were loaded onto 10-30% (v/v) glycerol gradients made in the same buffer and centrifuged in an SW27 rotor at 27,000 rpm for 1 hr 45 min, an SW32 rotor at 32,000 rpm for 1 hr 30 min, or for 42 min at 41,000 rpm in an SW44 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Gradients were formed using a Gradient Master (BioComp Instruments, Fredericton, NB, Canada). Photographs of gradients were done with illumination from the bottom with gradient tubes mounted in a Piston Gradient Fractionator (BioComp Instruments, Fredericton, NB, Canada). Prohead bands were collected and either pelleted again in the ultracentrifuge, or further purified. For further purification, the collected gradient fractions were dialyzed briefly against 20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5 plus 40 mM NaCl and applied to a 6.67 mL Poros HQ20 ion exchange column using a BioCad Sprint system (Applied Biosystems, CA). After eluting with a 20-column-volume gradient from 20 mM to 1 M NaCl in 20 mM of pH 7.5 Bis-Tris-Propane-Tris-HCl buffer, the prohead-containing fractions from multiple injections were pooled and concentrated by ultracentrifugation as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Purification and Characterization of Mitochondrial Ribosomes

Mitochondrial EF-G and EF-Tu/Ts were prepared from bovine liver mitochondria, as described (22 (link)). Escherichia coli EF-Tu/Ts was prepared by standard methods (23 (link)). Ribosomes were prepared from E. coli strain A19 and mitochondria as reported (35 ,36 (link)), and were stored in the following ribosome buffers. E. coli 70S ribosome buffer: 20 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.6), 6 mM Mg(OAc)2, 30 mM NH4Cl and 6 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; mt 55S ribosome buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 20 mM MgCl2, 80 mM KCl and 6 mM 2-mercaptoethanol.
To check the purity of the mitochondrial ribosomes, samples were analyzed by sucrose density gradient centrifugation using linear sucrose gradients (38 ml, 6–38% in the mt ribosome buffer). Gradients were prepared using the Gradient Mate model 117 (BioComp), according to the user's manual. The ribosomes (80 A260 units), dissolved in 0.6 ml of the ribosome buffer without sucrose, were layered onto the gradients. The centrifugation was carried out at 20 000 r.p.m. for 16 h in an SW28 rotor using an XL-7 rotor (Beckman) at 4°C. Fractions (0.45 ml) were collected from top to bottom, using the Piston Gradient Fractionator (BioComp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.