The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Biorobot ez1

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Germany, France, United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, Japan

The BioRobot EZ1 is a compact, fully automated nucleic acid purification workstation designed for use in molecular biology laboratories. It utilizes magnetic-particle technology to perform fast and efficient extraction of DNA, RNA, or viral nucleic acids from a variety of sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

164 protocols using biorobot ez1

1

Viral RNA Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EZ1 mini virus 2.0 kit and the EZ1 Biorobot (both from Qiagen, Hilden, Allemagne) were employed to extract viral RNA from cell supernatant according to the manufacturer’s instructions. As previously described, to assess the production of viral particles in cell supernatant, we quantified viral RNA yields using the GoTaq Probe One-Step RT-qPCR System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and we detected any amount of remaining DNA using the Takyon qPCR kit (Eurogentec Liège, Belgique) [7 (link)]. Primers and probe sequences are listed in Table S2. After two passages, amounts of remaining DNA were negligible compared to RNA thresholds (more than 106 times lower). Viral RNA yields were assessed from standard curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SARS-CoV-2 RNA Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic acids extraction was performed using 200 µL of clarified cell supernatant medium with the EZ1 mini virus 2.0Kit and the EZ1 Biorobot (both from Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative quantification of viral RNA was performed using the GoTaq probe 1-step RT-qPCR system kit (Promega). The mixture (final volume: 20 µl) contained 10 µl of GoTaq probe qPCR Master Mix, 0.5 µL of each primer (10 µM working solution were used), 0.2 µl of probe (10 µM working solution were used), 0.5 µl of Go script RT mix, 0.3 µl of nuclease-free water and 8 µl of extracted nucleic acids. Assays were performed using the CFX96 Touch real-time PCR machine (Bio-Rad) with the following conditions: 50 °C for 15 min, 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 40 s. Data collection occurred during the 60 °C step. The amount of viral RNA was calculated from standard curves using synthetic RNA. Primers used are described in the Supplementary Table S3 or are previously described in18 (link),21 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genome Sequencing and Comparative Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using the EZ1 biorobot and the EZ1 DNA tissue kit (Qiagen) and then sequenced on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, France) with the Nextera Mate Pair sample prep kit (Illumina) and Nextera XT Paired End (Illumina), as previously described [46 (link)]. The assembly was performed using Spades V. 3.15 [47 (link)] and trimmed (using Trimmomatic v. 0.36) [48 (link)]. Scaffolds of < 800 bp and scaffolds with a depth value < 25% of the mean depth were removed. The best assembly was selected using criteria such as the number of scaffolds, N50, and number of N. All assembled genomes were annotated using Prokka v 1.14.5 (Fontainebleau, France) [49 (link)]. The gff3 output files were used to construct a core genome alignment using Roary v3.13.0 (USA) using default parameters [50 (link)]. Comparative analysis was performed for the five placental isolates and reference strains such as RSA493 (Genbank: NC_002971.4), Z3055 9Genbank: NZ_LK937696), NL3262 (Genbank: NZ_CP013667), and Guiana (Genbank: HG825990.30). The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed by using FastTree (Berkeley, CA, USA) [51 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Hybrid Genome Sequencing Approach

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using the EZ1 biorobot (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, Les Ulis, France) with the EZ1 DNA tissue kit and then sequenced on the MiSeq technology (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with the Nextera Mate Pair sample prep kit and Nextera XT Paired end (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), as previously described [23 (link)]. In order to improve the genome sequence, an Oxford Nanopore approach was performed on 1D genomic DNA sequencing for the MinIon device using an SQK-LSK109 kit. The library was constructed from 1 µg genomic DNA without fragmentation and end repair. Adapters were ligated to both ends of genomic DNA. After purification on AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter Inc, Fullerton, CA, USA), the library was quantified by a Qubit assay with the high sensitivity kit (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A total of 1047 active pores were detected for the sequencing and the WIMP workflow was chosen for bioinformatic analysis in real time. After 1 h of run time and end life of the flowcell, 617,960 reads were generated as raw data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Targeted NGS for Thrombosis Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA of a thrombosis patient was isolated from EDTA-blood using EZ1 BioRobot (Qiagen). Targeted NGS using HaloPlex Target Enrichment reagents for library preparation (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was applied to sequence coding sequences of 15 loci involved in haemostasis (Table 1). DNA library was sequenced on a miSeq instrument with v2 reagent kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), following the suppliers’ recommendations. Sequence reads were mapped to the human reference genome (GRCh37/hg 19).

A panel of 15 loci involved in haemostasis that were sequenced by next generation sequencing in DNA from a patient with deep venous thrombosis

Gene nameApproved symbolChromosome location
Protein C, inactivator of coagulation factors Va and VIIIaPROC2q14.3
Protein S (alpha)PROS13q11.1
Serpin family C member 1 (antithrombin-III)SERPINC11q25.1
Von Willebrand factorVWF12p13.31
Coagulation factor II, thrombinF211p11.2
Coagulation factor VF51q24.2
Coagulation factor VIIF713q34
Coagulation factor VIIIF8Xq28
Coagulation factor IXF9Xq27.1
Coagulation factor XIF114q35.2
Fibrinogen alpha chainFGA4q31.3
Fibrinogen beta chainFGB4q31.3
Fibrinogen gamma chainFGG4q32.1
Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1VKORC116p11.2
Gamma-glutamyl carboxylaseGGCX2p11.2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Extraction and Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each patient donated a sample of blood (~4 mL) for research, collected to EDTA-Vacutainer tubes, at the same time of blood collection for routine analytic follow-up. The collected blood was centrifuged to obtain the buffy coat, which was used to isolate and purify DNA by the EZ1 DNA Blood kit in the EZ1 BioRobot (QIAgen, Hilden, Germany). The selected SNPs were genotyped using the Sequenom Mass ARRAY matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). Primers were designed using semi-automated Assay Design 3.1 Software (Sequenom). The global genotyping success rate was 99.85% with 100% replication agreement among one third of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures of E. coli were grown in BHI broth and genomic DNA extraction was extracted using the Qiagen EZ1 biorobot using the EZ1 DNA tissue kit. Sequencing libraries were prepared using Illumina Nextera XT library preparation kit and were sequenced on Illumina MiSeq using the MiSeq 600 cycle reagent version 3 kit according to standard manufacturer’s protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Competitive Passage of Chikungunya Virus Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As described previously for chikungunya virus WT_IC virus was competed with NS5_Reenc_IC virus [27 (link)]: five initial TCID50 ratios (WT_IC/NS5_Reenc_IC virus: 1/99, 20/80, 50/50, 80/20, 99/1) were used to infect a 25cm2 culture flask of confluent BHK21 cells at a calculated moi of 0.5. Cells were washed twice with HBSS and then incubated for 48h after addition of 7mL of medium. Recovered infectious cell supernatant was then sequentially passaged 10 times in the same manner with the clarified cell supernatant medium from the previous passage. At each passage, a calculated moi of 1 was used. Aliquots of cell supernatant from each passage were clarified by centrifugation and stored at -80°C. Viral RNA was extracted from clarified culture supernatant medium using the EZ1 Virus Mini Kit v2 on the EZ1 Biorobot (both from Qiagen). Using two specific quantitative real time RT-PCR assays targeting the re-encoded NS5 coding region (see the quantitative real time RT_PCR assays section for more details), the amount of viral RNA was assessed for each virus (WT_IC and NS5_Reenc_IC) and the ratio of the two values (WT_IC/NS5_Reenc_IC) was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Complete Genome Sequencing of Viral Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell supernatant media were clarified and treated with viral lysis buffer AVL (Qiagen). Following RNA extraction using an EZ1 mini virus 2.0 kit and an EZ1 Biorobot (both from Qiagen), a set of specific primer pairs was used to generate overlapping amplicons covering the full-length genome (excluding the 41 nt upstream polyA tail) with the RT-PCR Taq HIFI System (Invitrogen). The amplified DNA was analyzed using an Ion PGM Sequencer23 (link) (Life Technologies) to perform complete genome sequencing. The read sequences obtained were analyzed with CLC Genomics Workbench 6 software. They were trimmed, first using the quality score, then by removing the primers used during the amplification and finally at the 5′ and 3′ termini by systematically removing 6 nucleotides. Reads with a length greater than 29 nucleotides were used and mapped to the original genome sequence, which was used as a reference. To assess the intra-population genetic diversity, the mutation frequencies for each position were calculated as the number of reads with a mutation compared to the reference divided by the total number of reads at that site. Only substitutions with a frequency of at least 1% were taken into account for the analysis (Supplementary Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multilocus Sequence Typing and Virulence Profiling of Foodborne Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Colony mass was collected from plates and used for DNA extraction with the Qiagen blood and tissue kit, automated on a Qiagen EZ1 Biorobot. Extracted DNA was used for Illumina Nextera XT library preparation according to the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced to >50x coverage paired-end 2 × 250bp on an Illumina MiSeq instrument. Sequence data were uploaded to the European Nucleotide Archive (ebi.ac.uk/ena) and are publicly available under project accession number PRJEB34530. MLST for Yersinia [19] was performed using tools at EnteroBase [20], whereas Campylobacter and E. coli MLST was performed using the Center for genomic epidemiology (CGE) MLST tool [21]. New loci and sequence types found were submitted to the databases. Reference data for C. jejuni MLST was downloaded from pubMLST including all available profiles from isolates from humans (n = 457), chickens (n = 415) and wild birds (n = 446, of which 6 from corvids). Sequence-based E. coli serotyping was performed using the CGE SerotypeFinder tool [22]. In silico PCR was used to determine the presence of Yersinia virulence genes ail, ystA, ystB, inv, yadA, virF/lcrF [23] and irp2 [24], on assemblies created using SPAdes 3.5.0 [25] run with the – careful flag. Resistance genes were detected using ARIBA and the ResFinder database (2019-03-29) [26].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!