Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Ammonia solution

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany, United States, India, United Kingdom, China, Switzerland, Italy, Australia, Belgium, Poland
About the product

Ammonia solution is a clear, colorless liquid composed of ammonia (NH3) dissolved in water. It is a common laboratory chemical used to adjust the pH of solutions, as a cleaning agent, and in various chemical reactions. Ammonia solution has a distinctive pungent odor.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Ammonia solution 25% is a commercialized product offered by Merck Group and available through authorized distributors. Pricing for this product varies depending on packaging and distributor. For example, a 1-liter bottle is priced at approximately $38, while a 2.5-liter bottle is listed at around $82.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

356 protocols using «ammonia solution»

1

LC-MS Analysis of Alkaloid Standards

2025
LC‐MS grade acetonitrile (ACN), LC‐MS grade methanol (MeOH), MS grade formic acid (FA, 98%), HPLC grade hexane 97%, and LC‐MS grade ammonium acetate were purchased from Fluka, and ammonia solution 25% was purchased from Merk Millipore. For mass calibration, a standard mix of n‐butylamine, caffeine, methionine‐arginine‐phenylalanine‐alanine (MRFA), and Ultramark 1621 (Pierce ESI Positive Ion Calibration Solution) was used. Deionised water (H2O) was produced with an Arium Pro Lab Water System (Sartorius AG). Alk standards aconitine, atropine, coniine, echimidine, erucifoline, erucifoline‐N‐oxide, gramine, heliotrine, hyoscyamine, jacobine, jacobine‐N‐oxide, jervine, monocrotaline, lasiocarpine, lycopsamine, protoveratrine A, retrorsine, retrorsine N‐oxide, scopolamine, seneciphylline, senecionine, senecionine N‐oxide, senecivernine, senkirkin, sipeimine, alpha‐solamargine, solasodine, alpha‐solasonine tomatidine, tomatine, veratramine, and veratridine were purchased from PhytoLab GmbH & Co. KG, while caffeine, harmaline, nicotine, quinine, quinidine, strychnine, theobromine, and theophylline were purchased from Sigma.
A mix solution (1 mg L−1 each single alk) was set out starting from individual stock solutions of each alk (100 mg L−1) prepared by dissolving the standard powder in an aqueous methanol solution (50:50, by vol) and used for calibration in the range 0.02–500 µg L−1, injecting 1 µL for each level. The mix solution was prepared freshly before each analysis, while stock solutions were stored at −4°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Electrochemical Biosensing of Bacterial LPS

2025
The reagents were purchased from the following suppliers. Screen-printed electrodes (SPE, 110SWCNT, Metrohm DropSens, Oviedo, Spain). LPS from salmonella enterica typhimurium, ammonia solution (28–30%), dopamine hydrochloride, ethanol (99.9%), 4-formylphenylboronic acid, sodium cyanoborohydride, acetic acid (glacial, 99.9%), acetonitrile (99.9%), potassium ferricyanide, and potassium ferrocyanide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 8.5) and Tris buffer (10 mM, pH 8.5) were purchased from Biosesang (South Korea). The morphology of the MIP was measured using an S-4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; Hitachi, Japan) and a JEM-2100 F analytical scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM; JEOL Co., Japan). Electrochemical measurements were performed using a CHI627b analyzer (CH Instruments Inc., Austin, TX, USA). Size and composition analyses were performed using an ELSZneo dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyzer (Otsuka Electronics Co., Ltd., Japan) and a Nicolet iS50 Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). NanoDrop One/OneC (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) was used to measure the optical density of bacterial solutions at a wavelength of 600 nm (OD600).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Sustainable Mullite Ceramics from Waste

2025
The following two different synthesis routes were used: (i) solid-state reactions involving a sand and bauxite mixture (NB and SB compositions), and (ii) precipitation synthesis, where alumina was deposited on sand particle surfaces (NA and SA compositions); the sintering process was performed at temperatures ranging from 1300 °C to 1400 °C.
For the NB and SB compositions, wastes N or S and bauxite (B) were dosed based on their silica and alumina contents to obtain mullite and then milled (using a planetary ball-mill—Fritsch Pulverisette planetary ball-mill, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) until total pass through a 100 μm mesh sieve, weighed, homogenized and shaped. The mixing was carried out using isopropyl alcohol (using same planetary ball-mill) for better homogenization, thus promoting the precursors’ reaction from the early stages of the sintering process. After homogenization, the powders were dried in an oven (at 60 °C for 24 h) and then uniaxially pressed at 150 MPa into cylinders (with diameters of 13 mm and heights of 12 mm).
A different procedure was used for the NA and SA compositions. The N and S particles were coated with Al2O3 on the assumption that this procedure would increase the rate of the chemical reaction between the silica and alumina during the thermal treatment. Thus, the S and N wastes were mixed with an adequate volume of aqueous solutions of AlCl3 (1 mol⸱L−1 aluminum chloride solution obtained from aluminum chloride hexahydrate, chemically pure, Sigma Aldrich, Saint Luis, MI, USA) in order to obtain an alumina–silica molar ratio of 3:2. To avoid waste sedimentation, DARVAN C (high-molecular-weight ammonium polymethacrylate solution, R.T. Vanderbilt Co., Norwalk, CT, USA) was added as a dispersing agent. For aluminum hydroxide precipitation, a 25% ammonia solution (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Luis, MI, USA) was added to these suspensions until the pH reached 12.
The obtained particles covered by precipitate were filtrated and washed until pH = 7. The filtrate was dried at 80 °C for 24 h in an oven, calcined at 350 °C [31 ] and shaped by uniaxial pressing at 150 MPa into cylinders (with diameters of 13 mm and heights of 12 mm). The ceramics obtained by this method were denominated as NA and SA.
For both synthesis routes, the thermal treatment was performed in an electric kiln (heating rate 10 °C/min) at three different temperatures, i.e., 1300 °C, 1350 °C and 1400 °C, with a plateau of two hours followed by rapid cooling (20 °C/min) to normal temperature. The selected sintering temperatures were lower as compared with those currently used for the sintering of mullite ceramics [4 (link)] and were chosen considering the sustainability goal, i.e., to reduce the carbon footprint of the obtained ceramics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Comprehensive Lipid Profiling of Crab Samples

2025
PL standards, including phosphatidylcholine (12:0/12:0 PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (18:0/18:1 PE, ), phosphatidylserine (16:0/16:0 PS), phosphatidylinositol (18:0/18:0 PI), and triacylglycerol (16:0/16:0/18:1 TG) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. (Alabaster, USA). Isopropanol and n-hexane (MS grade) were purchased from Honeywell Riedel-de Haen (MO, USA). Ammonia solution, triethylamine, and formic acid were purchased from Sig-ma-Aldrich (MO, USA). The ultrapure water was obtained using a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, MA, USA). Chloroform and methanol (analytical grade) were purchased from Vekton (St. Petersburg, Russia).
Total lipids were extracted with a Chloroform/methanol mixture (1:2 v/v) according to procedure of Bligh and Dyer50 (link). A sample (~ 200 mg) of crab eggs, larvae and juveniles was homogenized on a disperser (IKA T25 digital Ultra-Turrax, Germany) in 2 mL of a Chloroform/methanol mixture (1:2 v/v) and filtered. The residues were extracted twice with 2 mL of a Chloroform/methanol mixture (1:2 v/v) and three times of Chloroform (2 ml). The extracts were combined, mixed water (6 mL), and then left overnight for phase separation at 4 °C. Then the near-bottom layer was separated and evaporated evaporated under reduced pressure, weighed, dissolved in Chloroform, and stored at − 40 °C. Internal standards 12:0/12:0 PC and 16:0/16:0/18:1 TG were added to each lipid sample for further quantitative analysis.
To analyze the content and structure of the molecular species of phosphorus-containing lipids, total lipids were separated on a Shim-Pack diol column (4.6 × 50 mm, particle size 5 μm) (Shimadzu, Japan) using a Nexera-e chromatography system (Shimadzu, Japan). Solvent system A (2-propanol / hexane / H2O / HCOOH / 28% NH4OH / Et3N, 28/72/1.5/0.1/0.05/0.02, v/v) and solvent system B (2-propanol / H2O / HCOOH / 28% NH4OH / Et3N, 100/1.5/0.1/0.05/0.02, v/v) were used as eluents. The content of System B was programmed as follows: 0% (8 min), 0 to 20% (7 min), 20 to 100% (5 min), 100% (15 min), 100 to 0% (0.1 min), and 0% (12 min). The elution rate was 0.2 mL/min. To detect lipids, a LCMS-IT-TOF high-resolution tandem mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan) was used. The analysis was performed under the electro-spray ionization (ESI) mode with simultaneous registration of signals of positive and negative ions. Scanning was performed in a m/z range of 100–1400. Source voltage was − 3.5 kV in the case of negative ion formation and 4.5 kV in the case of positive ion formation. The temperature of the ion source was 200 °C; the dry gas (N2) pressure, 150 kPa; the flow rate of nebulizing gas (N2), 1.5 L/min. Argon (0.003 Pa) was used in the collision chamber of the mass spectrometer. The structural identification of each lipid molecular species was carried out by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). For this, the retention times, ion forms, and specific fragmentation behaviors of the phospholipid subclasses were compared to those of the commercially available lipid standards. The identification procedure was described in detail earlier51 (link). Percentages of the individual molecular species of each lipid subclass were calculated on the basis of peak area of negative ions [M–H], except for PC that were estimated on the basis of peak area of negative ions [M + HCOOH]. The peak areas of lipid molecular species were inferred from mass spectrometry data with an accuracy of 5–7 ppm. The difference in the phospholipids ionizations was taken into account using a correction coefficient. The coefficients were calculated as the ratio of the areas of individual PL standards to the area of the internal standard (PC 12:0/12:0). The peak areas of the molecular species of analyzed crab lipids were calculated using the obtained coefficients. The PL subclass content was calculated as sum of contents of all molecular species of each PL subclass.
The molecular species of TG were separated by supercritical fluid chromatography on a Nexera UC system (Shimadzu, Japan) using two sequential Shim-pack XR-ODSII (2.0 × 150 mm) columns (Japan) under isocratic elution (0.6 mL min–1) with supercritical CO2 supplemented with 35% methanol; the maximum column pressure was 50 MPa; and the column temperature was 17 °C. To measure amounts of the molecular species of TG, an ELSD LT II (Shimadzu, Japan) light scattering detector was used (the evaporating tube temperature was 40 °C; the spraying gas (N2) pressure was 0.4 MPa). The structures of the molecular species were determined on a LCMS-IT-TOF high-resolution tandem mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan); HCOOH (0.1% in MeOH) was added to the eluent flowing out of the chromatographic column using a pump-through post column micromixer (0.2 mL min–1). The analysis was performed under atmospheric pressure with chemical ionization (APCI) in the positive ion mode. Spectra were recorded at m/z 150–1100. The interface temperature was 350 °C; the desolvation line temperature, 200 °C. The rates of nebulizing (N2), heating (air), and dry (N2) gas supplies were 3, 10, and 10 L/min, respectively. Mass spectra were interpreted according to the fragmentation schemes published previously52 (link). To measure amounts of the molecular species of TG was used 16:0/16:0/18:1 TG internal standard. TG content was calculated as sum of contents of all molecular species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Synthesis of Iron Chloride Complexes

2025
Iron (II) and (III) chloride, ammonia solution, L-Cysteine and ethanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Doxorubicin was acquired from AvaChem Scientific (San Antonio, TX, USA). All chemicals were used without purification and all the aqueous solutions were prepared using deionized water produced with a TKA-GenPure Water Purification System (TKA Wasseraufbereitungssysteme GmbH, Niederelbert, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «ammonia solution»

1

Synthesis of Magnetite Nanoparticles

In order to obtain the (un) functionalized magnetite nanoparticles, the following substances were purchased from Sigma Aldrich ChemieGmbh (Saint Louis, MO, USA): ferrous sulfate 7-hydrate (FeSO4·7H2O), ferric chloride (FeCl3), 25% ammonia solution (NH3) and Gemcitabine (GEM). All chemicals were of analytical purity and used with no further purification. For the synthesis of the (un) functionalized magnetite nanoparticles, a derived chemical co-precipitation method was employed: FeSO4·7H2O (1.2 g) and FeCl3 (2 g) were dissolved in ultrapure water (400 mL) to form the precursor solution and 25% NH3 solution (5 mL) was mixed with ultrapure water (200 mL) to obtain the precipitation medium; in order to obtain functionalized nanoparticles, 100 mg Gemcitabine were also dissolved into the ammonia solution; the precursor solution was added dropwise into the precipitation medium, under magnetic stirring. The resulted colloids (Gemcitabine functionalized, respectively unfunctionalized magnetite nanoparticles-Fe3O4@GEM and Fe3O4) were magnetically separated and washed several times with ultrapure water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Extraction of Antioxidant Compounds from Parsley

Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3 6H2O; 98%), ferrous sulphate heptahydrate (FeSO4 7H2O; 98%) and ammonia solution 25% were supplied by Sigma Aldrich, USA. Other reagents and buffers were of the highest purity and analytical grade. Double-distilled water was used for extraction and solution preparation purposes. Fresh Petroselinum crispum leaves were collected from the premises of Benha University, Egypt. The fresh leaves were washed multiple times with tap water followed by double-distilled water. The leaves were then dried in an oven for an hour and ground to form a fine powder. Five grams of the fine powder was boiled with 100 mL of double-distilled water while being continuously stirred for 15 min. The extract was then filtered using Whatman no. 42 filter paper. The filtrate was stored at −4 °C for further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Extraction and Characterization of Antioxidants from Muehlenbeckia volcanica

The organic solvents used for extraction and CCC separation were of analytical grade (Samchun Pure Chemical Co., Ltd., Pyeongtaek-si, Korea). The methanol used for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and preparative HPLC was of HPLC grade (J.T.Baker®, Avantor Performance Materials, LLC, Center Valley, PA, USA). The water used in this study was ultrapure water generated by a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Ammonium sulfate was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany). Quercetin, aminoguanidine hydrochloride, Trolox, DL-glyceraldehyde (dimer), β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2′-phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt hydrate (NADPH), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), fluorescein sodium salt, 2,2′-Azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH), sodium azide, fructose, potassium persulfate, 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), potassium phosphate monobasic, sodium hydroxide, sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate, sodium phosphate dibasic dodecahydrate, rutin hydrate, dimethyl sulfoxide, trifluoroacetic acid (99%), and ammonia solution (28–30%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Bovogen Biologicals (Bovostar #BSA100; East Keilor, Australia). Notably, all the n-butanol used in this study was pre-saturated with water.
The dried leaves of M. volcanica were obtained from the department of La Libertad in Peru in a local market and deposited at the Center for Efficacy Assessment and Development of Functional Foods and Drugs, Hallym University as described in our previous study (synonym Muehlenbeckia volcanica Meisn.) [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Synthesis of Dye-Labeled Silica Particles

Dye-labelled silica particles were produced by adapting the Stöber method.71 (link) Labelling of silica particles with dye was achieved by reacting a N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester bearing fluorescent dye with an amine-terminated organosilane (APTES). 2.3 mg of sulfo-cyanine5 (Cy5) NHS ester (Lumiprobe, Germany) was dissolved in 200 μL dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (>99.9%, sterile-filtered, Sigma Aldrich, Germany) to which 3 μL of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) (99%, Sigma Aldrich, Germany) was added and allowed to react overnight. For small (120 nm) silica particles, 29 mL H2O, 81 mL ethanol (>99.8%, analytical grade, VWR, United Kingdom) and 2.9 mL of ammonia solution (25% for analysis, Merck, Germany) were mixed in a reflux condenser and heated to 60 °C. Subsequently 10 mL of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) (>99.0%, Sigma Aldrich, Germany) was added and stirred for two minutes after which 200 μL of Cy5–APTES was added and the mixture was allowed to react for five hours. The suspension was centrifuged three times at 2000g for 40 minutes and dispersed in ultrapure water. Large (360 nm) silica particles labelled with Cy5 were prepared with 13.5 mL H2O, 174 mL ethanol and 45 mL ammonia solution were heated to 60 °C. Following, 22.5 mL of TEOS was added to the reaction vessel and reacted for two minutes prior to the addition of the dye-conjugated silane and reacted for three hours before three centrifugation cycles at 2000g for 20 minutes and redispersion in ultrapure water. Green BODIPY fluorescent dye NHS ester (BDP) (Lumiprobe, Germany) was conjugated to APTES overnight in DMSO. BDP-labelled silica was prepared by mixing 13.5 mL H2O, 174 mL ethanol and 40.9 mL ammonia solution. The reaction mixture was brought to 55 °C and equilibrated for 30 minutes. Then, 22.5 mL of TEOS was added and stirred for three minutes, before addition of 200 μL of BDP–APTES. Mixture was allowed to react for three hours followed by three centrifugation cycles at 2000g for 20 minutes each.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Silane-Functionalized PEG Synthesis

Ammonia solution (2.0 M in ethanol), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), (3-mercaptopropyl) trimethoxysilane (MPTMS), tetramethyl orthosilicate (TMOS), and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, ≥99%), were purchased from Sigma−Aldrich. Methoxy-terminated poly(ethylene glycol)-silane (mPEG-silane, molar mass of ~0.5 kg/mol) was purchased from Gelest. Cy5-meleimide florescent dye and Cy3-meleimide florescent dye were purchased from GE Healthcare. All chemicals were used as received. Deionized (DI) water (18.2 MΩ·cm) was generated using a Millipore Milli-Q system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.