Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

5 protocols using «easy3d module»

1

3D-STED Microscopy Setup and Characterization

2023
We used a home-built 3D-STED setup (for details, see Inavalli et al., 2019) (link) constructed around an inverted microscope body (DMI 6000 CS, Leica Microsystems), which was equipped with a TIRF oil objective (x100, 1.47 NA, HXC APO, Leica Microsystems) and a heating box (Cube and Box, Life Imaging Services) to maintain a stable temperature of 32°C. A pulsed-laser (PDL 800-D, PicoQuant) was used to deliver excitation pulses (90 ps at 80 MHz) at 485 nm and a synchronized de-excitation laser (Onefive Katana 06 HP, NKT Photonics) operating at 592 nm was used to generate the STED light pulses (500-700ps). The STED beam was reflected on a spatial light modulator (Easy3D Module, Abberior Instruments) to generate a mixture of doughnut-and bottle-shaped beams for 2D and 3D-STED respectively. Image acquisition was controlled by the Imspector software (Abberior Instruments). The performance and spatial resolution of the microscope was checked and optimized by visualizing and overlapping the PSFs of the laser beams using 150 nm gold nano-spheres and correcting the main optical aberrations.
Usually, the spatial resolution was 175 nm (lateral) and 450 nm (axial) in confocal mode and 60 nm (lateral) and 160 nm (axial) in STED mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

3D Super-Resolution Microscopy with Home-Built STED Setup

2023
We used a home-built 3D-STED setup (for details, see Inavalli et al., 2019 (link)) constructed around an inverted microscope body (DMI 6000 CS, Leica Microsystems), which was equipped with a TIRF oil objective (100×, 1.47 NA, HXC APO, Leica Microsystems) and contained within a heating box (Cube and Box, Life Imaging Services) to maintain a stable temperature of 32°C. A pulsed-laser (PDL 800-D, PicoQuant) was used to deliver excitation pulses (90 ps at 80 MHz) at 485 nm and a synchronized de-excitation laser (Onefive Katana 06 HP, NKT Photonics) operating at 592 nm was used to generate the STED light pulses (500–700 ps). The STED beam was reflected on a spatial light modulator (SLM, Easy3D Module, Abberior Instruments) to generate a mixture of doughnut-shaped and bottle-shaped beams for 2D and 3D-STED, respectively. Image acquisition was controlled by the Imspector software (Abberior Instruments). The performance and spatial resolution of the microscope was checked and optimized by visualizing and overlapping the PSFs of the laser beams using 150-nm gold nano-spheres and 40-nm fluorescent beads and correcting the main optical aberrations with the SLM. The spatial resolution was 175 nm (lateral) and 450 nm (axial) in confocal mode and 60 nm (lateral) and 160 nm (axial) in STED mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Super-Resolution Microscopy Setup

2023
We used a custom-built STED/confocal setup55 (link) constructed around an inverted microscope body (DMI 6000 CS, Leica Microsystems) which was equipped with a TIRF oil objective (x100, 1.47 NA, HXC APO, Leica Microsystems) and a heating box (Cube and Box, Life Imaging Services) to maintain a stable temperature of 32 °C. A pulsed-laser (PDL 800-D, PicoQuant) was used to deliver excitation pulses at 488 nm and a de-excitation laser (Onefive Katana 06 HP, NKT Photonics) operating at 594 nm was used to generate the STED light pulses. The STED beam was profiled to a donut shape using a spatial light modulator (Easy3D Module, Abberior Instruments). Image acquisition was controlled by the Inspector software (Abberior Instruments). The spatial resolution of the microscope was 175 nm (x-y) and 450 nm (z) in confocal mode and 60 nm (x-y) and 160 nm (z) in STED mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

RESOLFT Microscopy of HeLa Cells

2021
All images shown were recorded with transiently
transfected HeLa cells 24 h post-transfection. Cells were mounted
in DMEM without phenol red (Thermo Fisher) and imaged at ambient temperature
with a customized 1C RESOLFT QUAD scanning microscope (Abberior Instruments,
Göttingen, Germany). The microscope was equipped with an UPLSAPO
1.4 NA 100× oil immersion objective (Olympus, Shinjuku, Japan)
as well as 405 and 488 nm continuous-wave lasers (both Cobolt, Solna,
Sweden). The 405 nm doughnut-shaped beam was realized with an easy
3D module (Abberior Instruments). Fluorescence was detected with a
SPCM-AQRH-13 photon counting module (Excelitas Technologies, Waltham,
MA, USA) with a HC 550/88 detection filter. Laser powers were measured
behind the objective with a PM200 power meter with the S170C sensor
(ThorLabs, Newton, NJ, USA). The circular or ring-like area of both
beams at FWHM intensity in the focus were determined and used for
further calculations. Images and filament intensity line profiles
measured with three adjacent lines were analyzed with the Fiji distribution
of ImageJ (v1.52p)58 (link),59 (link) and OriginPro 2018b (OriginLab).
This manuscript has been previously submitted to the preprint server
bioRxiv.60
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Multimodal STED Microscopy Techniques

2020
In the case of the one-photon system23 (link), the excitation light was provided by a pulsed diode laser (λ = 485 nm) and the STED light came from a Ti:Sa femtosecond laser emitting at 838 nm, which was converted to a wavelength of 597 nm by an optical parametric oscillator (OPO). A signal from the OPO was used to trigger pulsed diode laser. We used a glycerol objective with a correction collar to reduce spherical aberrations. In the case of the 2P-STED setup, the excitation light was provided by a second Ti:Sapphire laser tuned to 910 nm running at 80 MHz that was synchronized to the OPO pulses. We used water-immersion objectives with long working distances, either from Nikon (CFI Apo 60X W NIR, 1.0 NA, 2.8 mm WD)46 (link) or Olympus (LUMFI 60×, 1.1 NA, 1.5 mm WD)45 (link). The STED pulses were broadened in time by passing them through glass rods and a long optical fiber (20 m) to ensure effective de-excitation and maximal resolution enhancement. Synchronization and optimal pulse delay were achieved with phase-locked loop electronics.
The STED beam reflected twice on two different surfaces of a single spatial light modulator (SLM) (Easy3D Module, Abberior Instruments, Göttingen, Germany) to generate doughnut and bottle beams for 2D and 3D-STED microscopy. The SLM was conjugated to the beam scanner (Yanus IV, TILL Photonics, Gräfelfing, Germany) via appropriate relay lenses and the scanner was conjugated to the back focal plane of the objective via the scan and tube lens combination (Fscan = 5 cm and Ftube = 25 cm, Leica Microsystems). In the case of 2P-STED microscopy47 (link), the STED doughnut was created by passing the STED beam through a vortex phase mask, which imposed a helical 2π phase delay on the wave front. Wave plates (λ/2 and λ/4) were used to make the STED light circularly polarized before it entered into the objective.
The excitation and STED beams were precisely co-aligned using a dichroic mirror and a piezo-positioner. Both beams passed through an x–y beam scanner. The fluorescence was de-scanned and focused into a multimode optical fiber connected to an avalanche photodiode operated in photon-counting mode.
For the FRAP experiments, a second Ti:Sa femtosecond laser beam (at λ = 900 nm) was injected into the optical path of the microscope using a 680 nm short-pass dichroic mirror. For two-color imaging, two fluorophores with partially overlapping excitation and emission spectra (e.g., YFP and GCaMP6s) were imaged simultaneously using a single excitation/STED laser beam pair. The emission signal was split by a 514 nm long-pass dichroic mirror, and was sent into separate photodetectors48 (link),49 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.