Stimuli were applied to the back of the child’s bare left and then the right calf. Each stimulus approach and removal were audibly signaled and accompanied by a 5-second lag between signal and application. Timing was guided by an in-ear digital timer. At least a ten-second return to baseline for child behavior separated the application of each stimuli type. If a participant had tears or other signs of distress, the stimulus application was terminated. If distress was ongoing after stopping the application, the entire mQST was terminated at the lead examiner and/or caregiver’s discretion.
Algometer
The Algometer is a laboratory instrument used to measure pressure pain thresholds. It applies a controlled, steadily increasing force to a specific area of the body and records the point at which the subject experiences pain. The device provides an objective measure of pain sensitivity.
Market Availability & Pricing
Is this product still available?
Get pricing insights and sourcing optionsSpelling variants (same manufacturer)
Similar products (other manufacturers)
The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.
Product FAQ
6 protocols using «algometer»
Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing in Children
Stimuli were applied to the back of the child’s bare left and then the right calf. Each stimulus approach and removal were audibly signaled and accompanied by a 5-second lag between signal and application. Timing was guided by an in-ear digital timer. At least a ten-second return to baseline for child behavior separated the application of each stimuli type. If a participant had tears or other signs of distress, the stimulus application was terminated. If distress was ongoing after stopping the application, the entire mQST was terminated at the lead examiner and/or caregiver’s discretion.
Immediate Effects of LLLT on Pain, Pressure Pain Threshold, and Cervical ROM
We evaluated the pressure pain threshold of the trigger point using an algometer (Wagner Instruments, USA), following the procedure of pressure pain threshold measurement proposed by Fischer [22 (link)]. The threshold was determined as the mean of the two last values out of three consecutive measurements, with a 10 s pause in between.
Active cervical ROM for three motion planes, including flexion-extension, bending, and rotation, were measured with the MicroFET3 electrogoniometer (Hoggan Health Industries, USA).
Assessing Trapezius Muscle Discomfort Thresholds
All measurements were made at three time-intervals: before therapy (pre); after therapy (post); and on the second day after therapy (follow-up).
Standardizing Abdominal Examination in Traditional Korean Medicine
Evaluating Shoulder Muscle Function in Myofascial Pain
A palpation examination was performed on all subjects. For the subjects with myofascial pain, the examination was performed to confirm the presence of a clinically relevant MTrP, while for asymptomatic subjects it was performed to exclude the presence of any MTrP and specifically any spot tenderness within any taut band of the upper trapezius muscle. For the subjects with myofascial pain and MTrP, the examiner marked the location of the MTrP on the skin using a custom designed stamp (1 cm2 circle with a dot in the centre). The dot in the centre was overlapped with the spot tenderness, and its distance from the X-and Y-axes of the ALS was measured with a measuring tape. Pain pressure threshold (PTT) over the spot tenderness was recorded using an algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). The contact area of the algometer tip was 1 cm 2 and the application rate was approximately 1 kg/s. PPT was measured three times over 10 s intervals, and the average value was recorded as the PPT.
Two adjustable straps connected to the load cells were positioned over the acromion of both shoulders (Figure 1). The subject was instructed to keep their trunk against the back of the chair and both the straps were tensioned to avoid any shoulder movements. The subject was then instructed to perform a shoulder elevation task that consisted of pushing up both shoulders towards the ceiling.
Two maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of shoulder elevation were performed, each lasting ~4 sec with 2 min rest in between. The subjects were asked to reach their maximum force gradually and were verbally motivated by the investigator. For each of the two MVC contractions, the average value around the maximum force was considered and the highest of the two values was taken as the reference MVC. After ~2 min of rest the subject performed a series of 6 ramped contractions from 0-15-0% and 0-60-0% MVC each of 60 sec duration. The order of the ramp contractions was alternated (15%, 60%, 15%, 60%, 15%, 60%). Visual feedback was provided by means of a moving arrow and two moving bars on a screen positioned ~1 m in front of the subject. EMG and force signals were acquired during each contraction.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!