Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Micropipette

Manufactured by Gilson
Sourced in France, United States, Germany
About the product

The Micropipette is a precision laboratory instrument used to accurately measure and transfer small volumes of liquids, typically in the range of microliters. It enables the precise and repeatable dispensing of liquid samples, a critical function in various scientific and medical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The Gilson micropipettes are actively commercialized and available through authorized distributors. Prices vary depending on the model and volume range. For example, the PIPETMAN P2 model, covering 0.2 to 2 μL, has a listed price of $843.50 on Fisher Scientific. The PIPETMAN P200 model, with a volume range of 20 to 200 μL, is priced at $338.80 on Marshall Scientific. Please refer to Gilson's official website or contact authorized distributors for the most accurate and current pricing information.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

49 protocols using «micropipette»

1

Standardized Sperm Collection in Amphibians

2024
Males were weighed and injected in the dorsal musculature with 2 international units per gram (IU/g) of body weight with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (BioVendor Laboratory Medicine Inc., Lot # RU-82209-4, Ashville, NC, USA) diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Gibco, Ref # 10010-031, Grand Island, NY, USA) at a concentration of 2 IU/µL. Animals were returned to their tanks and collected again after 18–43 h. Animals were anesthetized in 0.15% tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222 Syncaine, Syndel, Ferndale, WA, USA) that was diluted with aquarium water and buffered to a pH of 6.5–7.5 with sodium hydroxide (1.0 N standardized solution, VWR Chemicals, Radnor, PA, USA) (Supplementary File S1). When animals lost righting reflex after being flipped upside-down (about 15–20 min), they were removed and placed on a firm, inclined surface.
The abdomen and cloaca were rinsed with deionized (DI) water followed by Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution at 200 mOsm/kg (HBSS200; pH 7.4) (Supplementary File S1). The sides and abdomen of the animals were massaged with gentle pressure from anterior to posterior toward the cloaca [9 (link)] (Figure 1A, Video S1). Massage motions were repeated, and sperm samples were collected using a micropipette (p1000 µL; Gilson Pipetman) (Figure 1A) and transferred to 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes. When necessary, larger animals were held with two hands when performing massages to better control pressure above the cloaca (Video S1). Urine was discharged with highly diluted sperm prior to the release of relatively concentrated sperm, and thus, the spermic urine (relatively clear liquid) and sperm fluid (opaque and white liquid) were collected in separate tubes. The time it took to anesthetize animals, collect sperm, and evaluate quality was recorded to identify potential bottlenecks during collection with limited personnel. The concentration (sperm/mL), volume (µL), and motility (described below) of collected sperm fluid were recorded, and the total number of sperm collected was calculated to evaluate relationships between animal size and sperm production.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Yogurt Production with Red Dragon Fruit

2023
The tools used were stove, pot, spatula, knife, spoon, cutting board, basin, sieve, and glass jar. The equipment used in testing physical, antioxidant and organoleptic properties are pH meter PH02, viscotester Rion VT-O4F, A w meter (Novasina ms 1 set-aw), TB-Changxie digital scales, erlenmeyer flask, 100 ml measuring cup, glass funnel, spray bottle, dark glass bottle, cuvette, burette, autoclave HVE-50 (Hirayama), incubator (NuAire), Uv-Vis spectrophotometer, Universal 320 R centrifuge, memmert waterbath, test tubes, laminar air flow cabinet (Esco), micropipette (Gilson), vortex VM-300 (Gemmy), bunsen, goblet glass, hot plate, sudip, blue tip, refrigerator, labels and organoleptic properties questionnaire.
The raw materials in making yogurt were pure cow's milk, bacterial cultures of Streptococcus thermophilus FNCC-0040 and Lactobacillus bulgaricus FNC0041, sugar, and red dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus). The testing materials used were pH 4 and 7 buffer solutions, alcohol, 0.1 N NaOH solution, H2SO4, NaCl, HCl, boric acid (H 3 BO 3 ), bromcherosol green methyl red indicator drops, DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), Vitamin C and distilled water, methanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Sperm Velocity Measurement via CEROS Tracker

2023
Sperm were activated by gently mixing with a Gilson micropipette 1 μL of ejaculate preserved in ZSI with 10 μL of aged tap water. Three microliters of samples were then quickly placed in separate wells on a 12-well multi-test slide and covered with an 18 × 18 mm coverslip. Both slide and coverslip were previously coated with 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Sigma–Aldrich), to avoid sperm sticking to the glass slide Sperm velocity was measured using a CEROS Sperm Tracker (Hamilton Thorne Research, Beverly, MA, USA) in the first 10 s after activation. The measurement was repeated on three subsamples per male, leading to a repeatability of 0.68 ± 0.1422, and mean values were used for statistical analyses. Mean velocity measurements were based on 280 ± 169 (mean ± s.d.) sperm tracks per male. Since sperm velocity parameters (VAP: average path velocity, VSL: straight-line velocity, and VCL: curvilinear velocity) were highly correlated (all Pearson R > 0.88; all p < 0.001), only VAP was considered in the following analyses. The measurement was repeated twice per male, yielding a repeatability of 0.68 ± 0.14, and mean values were used for statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Antioxidant Evaluation of Black Mangrove Leaves

2023
The primary materials used in this study were samples of black mangrove leaves (Rhizophora mucronata) obtained from Indah Kapuk Beach, North Jakarta. The materials used for extraction were ethanol solvents. The materials used for testing antioxidant activity with the DPPH method are DPPH solution and ascorbic acid (Vitamin C). The materials used for antioxidant testing with the ABTS method are ABTS powder and potassium persulfate. The materials used for testing the antioxidant activity of the CUPRAC method were 96% ethanol, CuCl 2 .2H 2 O, ethanolic neocuproine, ammonium acetate buffer, and Trolox solution. The tools used are a knife, spatula, glassware (Pyrex), micropipette (Gilson), vortex (VM-300), digital scale, aluminum foil, desiccator, ashing furnace oven, rotary evaporator (RV 10 digital V), orbital shaker, and UV-VIS spectrophotometer (UV-2500).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Mass Photometry Protein Characterization

2023
Data was either collected on a TwoMP (Refeyn, UK) or on a custom-built mass photometer. Coverslips (Menzel-Glaeser, 24 x 50 mm # 1.5 SPEZIAL; Thermo Fisher Scientific, U.S.) were cleaned to remove any contaminants by sonication for 5 minutes in 50/50 isopropanol and Milli-Q water (Merck, Germany), followed by 5 minutes in Milli-Q only. They were then dried using N2 and stored in a covered box to prevent re-contamination. Immediately before measurement, a silicon gasket (Grace Bio-Labs CultureWell, 3 x 1 mm; U.S.) was laid on the coverslip to contain the sample. The coverslip was placed on a sample-stage (xyz for TwoMP; z-only for custom-built system) above the objective and a small amount of immersion oil (Zeiss, Immersol 518 F; Germany) was added between the coverslip and objective to form a continuous interface. Once the gasket and objective were aligned, buffer was loaded into the gasket using a micropipette (Gilson Pipetman, U.S.). In case of the TwoMP, this allowed the focus position of the setup to be found and the autofocus to be set before the protein began binding to the coverslip. The custom-built system was operated without an autofocus but proved to be stable enough over the recording time. Once focus had been set, the protein was diluted in an Eppendorf tube (Eppendorf, 1.5 mL; Germany) to give 20 μL of sample, at a concentration of 10-50 nM. The sample was added to the gasket and the focus quickly rechecked. If the added sample had been kept on ice, the refractive index of the solution could change when the preloaded buffer and sample were mixed due to the difference in temperature, which changed the focus position slightly. A movie was then recorded.
The protein dynamin-1 ΔPRD was used as a mass calibrant. It is highly stable, easily produced in large volumes and oligomeric, providing a large number of species of known mass (sometimes up to 7) with which to calibrate, increasing the accuracy of the calibration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «micropipette»

1

Evaluating Antioxidant Effects on LPS-Induced Lung Inflammation

Balb/c mice were divided into three groups (n = 5/group): control, E10 and E11. The control group received 200 μL of apyrogenic water, and the groups were designated as E10, and E11 according to the extract received in a dose of 5 mg/kg, p.o. The animals were anesthetized intramuscularly with 0.4 mL of 2% xylazine chloridrate (20 mg/kg) and 5% ketamine chloridate (25 mg/kg). With a micropipette (Gilson), 10 μL of LPS solution (1 mg/mL sterile PBS) was given by the aerogenic route using nasal instillation. This induction was done on three consecutive days (Figure 2). One day before the first LPS application, the control, E10, and E11 treatment was started. This treatment continued for four days, and the sacrifice of the animals was performed 24 hours after the last application of LPS, when the bronchoalveolar lavage was performed as mentioned above [26 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Murine Adenovirus Vaccine Administration

Six-week-old male B10.Br mice (MHC H-2k) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and housed in a temperature-controlled, light-cycled facility at the Animal Research Center of The University of Texas at Austin with free access to standard rodent chow (Harlan Teklad, Indianapolis, IN) and tap water. Hartley Guinea pigs (male, 200g) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Raleigh, NC) and housed under the same conditions. Animals were anesthetized by a single intra-peritoneal injection of a 3.9:1 (v:v) mixture of ketamine (100 mg/ml, Fort Dodge, Animal Health, Fort Dodge, IA) and xylazine (100 mg/ml, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Once deep plane anesthesia was achieved, mice were immunized with 1×108 and Guinea pigs 1×109 infectious particles of Ad-CAGoptZGP regardless of immunization route. IM injections were divided between each gastrocnemius muscle (50 µl/muscle mouse, 100 µl/muscle Guinea pig) located on the hind limb. IN immunization (mice) was performed by dripping 10 µl of the preparation in each nostril with a micropipette (Gilson, Middleton, WI). For SL immunization, sterile forceps were placed under the tongue of the animal and 10 µl (mouse)/40 µl (Guinea pig) slowly dispensed onto the exposed area with a micropipette. Animals immunized by the IN and SL routes were maintained in an upright position for 30 minutes after treatment to minimize accidental swallowing of the vaccine. Mice were immunized orally with tuberculin syringes attached to feeding needles (18G, Popper & Sons, Inc, New Hyde Park, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Single-Cell DNA Sequencing: Enrichment, Lysis, and Analysis

Live or fixed tumor cells enriched from blood by ISET®, collected without sticking them to the filter as described in section 5, and transferred in suspension to a cell culture plate could be gently picked up manually and individually with a micropipette (Gilson P2) under an inverted Olympus CK30-F2000 microscope at the x10 objective and transferred to an individual 0.2 mL PCR tube.
Single cells’ proteins were lysed so as to release the DNA using our in house protocol (in 15 μL, 100 mM TrisHCl pH 8 and 400 μg/mL of proteinase K incubated for 2 hours at 60°C followed by proteinase K inactivation for 5 min at 94°C). The single-cell DNA was then pre-amplified by combining our lysis protocol and by adapting it to single-cell whole genome amplification (WGA) commercial kits: MALBAC (Yikon Genomics, China); Picoplex (Rubicon Genomics and New England BioLabs, USA); GenomePlex (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Amplified DNA was then purified using the DNA Clean & Concentrator™-5 kit (Zymo Research, Germany) and quantified by Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The WGA products' quality was assessed by PCR as described elsewhere [40 (link)].
For NGS single-cell analysis using the Illumina approach, 250 ng of the amplified DNA was used to prepare libraries for high-throughput sequencing with the Nextera Exome Enrichment Kit (Illumina, USA) following the supplier’s protocol. A fraction of the library DNA from the pre-capture step was used for whole genome analysis. The libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq2000 (Illumina) in 2 x 100 bp paired-end runs. Data were mapped against the human genome and the number of reads per chromosome was calculated.
In order to perform single-cell targeted theranostic mutations' NGS analysis, we used the ThermoFisher approach, 10 ng of purified WGA DNA was used to generate 207 amplicons libraries including 50 oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes through the use of the optimized primer pool “Hotspot cancer panel v2” and Ion Torrent™ Library Kit V2 (ThermoFisher, USA), according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Briefly, Ion adapters and barcodes were added using the “bioanalyzer protocol” (for living single cells and bulk extracted DNA) or the “FFPE protocol” (for fixed single cells), respectively for 17 cycles and 20 cycles of pre-amplication. The quality of purified libraries was verified with the Bioanalyzer (Agilent, USA) and quantified by qPCR using the Ion Library TaqMan™ Quantitation Kit. Libraries were templated using the Ion One-Touch system and sequenced on Ion Torrent™ 318 chips using the Ion Personal Genome Machine™ (ThermoFisher, USA).
Data analysis was performed using the Ion Torrent™ suite (ThermoFisher, USA) and Excel (Microsoft, USA) softwares. Sequencing artifacts in homopolymer regions were filtered out. In theory, when analyzing diploid single cells, only three allele frequencies should be possible: 0% (wild-type), 50% (heterozygous mutant/wild type) and 100% (homozygous mutant). However, WGA and sequencing methods introduce variability and quantitative amplification biases. In consequence, COSMIC hotspot mutations were included in our analysis only if present in at least one single cell WGA sample with a quality score over 100 and 15% allele frequency while using 10X depth amplicon coverage. Venn diagrams were drawn using a public online tool (bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Pyrethroid Quantification Assay for Bednets

Figure 1 presents the field method of this pyrethroid quantification assay. The insecticide residue aliquots were air-dried and re-dissolved in 25 l ethanol containing 0.35 mM CDNB. The mixture was combined with 450 l of 2.5 mM GSH in a sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.5. The same concentrations and volumes of reagents were combined with extracts from ten untreated bednets and used as controls. Recombinant -6 enzyme (0.2 g) was added and tubes were incubated at room temperature for 7 minutes. Starch solution (20 l of a 0.4% solution) was added to each tube and iodine titration was performed by adding 2.5 mN iodine solution drop-wise to each tube to reach an endpoint using a 1 ml variable volume Gilson micropipette. Alternatively, a syringe with a fine needle can be used as a dropper. It was essential during this procedure that the reaction mixture was not agitated too much as each iodine drop was added. The difference between the volume of iodine solution required to produce a blue colour in the test and control tubes was determined, and the actual concentration of insecticide on the bednet was calculated using the standard curve of iodimetric assays performed on bednets with known concentrations of insecticides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Measuring Sperm Velocity Using CEROS Tracker

Sperm were activated by gently mixing with a Gilson micropipette 1 μL of ejaculate preserved in ZSI with 10 μL of aged tap water. Three microliters of samples were then quickly placed in separate wells on a 12-well multitest slide (MP Biomedicals) and covered with a 18 × 18 mm coverslip. Both slide and coverslip were previously coated with 1% polyvinyl alcohol (Sigma–Aldrich), to avoid sperm sticking to the glass slide21 (link). Sperm velocity was measured using a CEROS Sperm Tracker (Hamilton Thorne Research) in the first 10 seconds after activation. The measurement was repeated on three subsamples per male, leading to a repeatability of 0.68 ± 0.1422 , and mean values were used for statistical analyses. Mean velocity measurements were based on 280 ± 169 (mean ± s.d.) sperm tracks per male. Since sperm velocity parameters (VAP: average path velocity, VSL: straight-line velocity, and VCL: curvilinear velocity) were highly correlated (all Pearson R > 0.88; all p < 0.001), only VAP was considered in the following analyses. The measurement was repeated twice per male, yielding a repeatability of 0.68 ± 0.1422 , and mean values were used for statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.