Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Tc 324b

Manufactured by Warner Instruments
Sourced in United States
About the product

The TC-324B is a temperature controller designed for laboratory applications. It provides precise temperature control and monitoring capabilities. The device features a digital display, adjustable temperature setpoints, and a range of temperature control modes. For detailed technical specifications and intended use cases, please consult the product documentation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The TC-324B temperature controller by Warner Instruments appears to have been discontinued and is no longer available through the manufacturer or authorized distributors. However, it can still be found on secondary markets such as eBay, with prices ranging from $799 to $876.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

167 protocols using «tc 324b»

1

Infrared-Guided Retinal Slice Electrophysiology

2024
All procedures were performed under infrared (~1 mm) illumination with dual-unit Nitemare (BE Meyers, Redmond, WA) infrared scopes. The whole-cell patch-clamp recording (Pang et al., 2010a (link), 2012 (link)), preparation of living retinal slices (Werblin, 1978 (link); Wu, 1987 (link)), light simulation, immunofluorescence, and confocal microscopy (Pang et al., 2018 (link); Gao et al., 2019 (link)) essentially followed procedures described in previous publications.
Animals were dark-adapted for 1–2 h before the related experiment. The Ames medium in the recording chamber was oxygenated and maintained at 34°C with a temperature control unit (TC 324B, Warner Instruments, CT). The controller was wired with DigiData1322A to record and monitor the temperature. Axopatch 700A and 700B amplifiers were connected to DigiData 1322A interfaces and operated by the pClamp software v9.2 and v10.3 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Patch pipettes had 9–12 MΩ tip resistance when filled with an internal solution containing 112 mM Cs-methanesulfonate, 12 mM CsCl, 5 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 4 mM ATP, 0.3 mM GTP, 10 mM Tris, and 0.5% Lucifer yellow, adjusted to pH 7.3 with CsOH. For current-clamp and some voltage-clamp recordings, the pipettes were filled with internal solutions containing: 112 mM K-gluconate, 10 mM KCl, 10 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 4 mM Na2-ATP, 0.3 mM Na3-GTP, and 0.5% Lucifer yellow, adjusted to pH 7.3 by KOH. The internal solution and external normal Ringer’s solution yield a chloride reversal potential (ECl) of −59 mV at room temperature. Recorded cells were visualized by Lucifer yellow fluorescence with a confocal microscope (LSM 510 and LSM 800, Carl Zeiss, Germany).
A photostimulator delivered light spots of a diameter of 600–1,200 μm and 500 nm wavelength (λmax = 500 nm, full width-half max 10 nm) at a series of intensities (−10 to −1 log I) to stimulate the retina via the epi-illuminator of the microscope (Maple and Wu, 1998 (link); Pang et al., 2002 (link), 2010b (link)). Since we delivered uncollimated light beams through an objective lens of a large numerical aperture (Zeiss 40x/0.75 water), the incident light could enter the retina in many directions and, thus, had a minor photoreceptor self-screening effect (Field and Rieke, 2002 (link)). The intensity of unattenuated (0 in log unit (log I)) 500 nm light from a halogen light source was 4.4 × 105 photons.μm−2.sec−1. The light intensity was transformed into the unit of photoisomerization per rod per second (Rh*rod−1 s −1) with a rod cross-section of 0.5 μm−2 (Howes et al., 2002 (link)) and a rod integration time of 0.4 s (Baylor, 1987 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Electrophysiology of Locus Coeruleus Neurons

2024
Brainstem slices were placed under a Zeiss Axioexaminer (Axioskop 2) microscope for electrophysiology and held down with a steel harp. Slices were maintained at 31°C–33°C using an in-line heater (TC-324B, Warner Instruments) for 95% O2/5% CO2 bubbled ACSF. ACSF was perfused through gravity perfusion at a rate of 2 mL/min. Voltage-clamp whole cell electrophysiology was performed on individual LC neurons, confirmed through post-hoc immunohistochemistry as being TH+. Recording pipettes were pulled from glass capillaries (#BF150-86-7.5, Sutter Instruments) on a Zeitz DMZ Universal pipette puller, with end resistance of 4-5MΩ. Internal recording solution contained (in mM): CH3CsO3S 130, CsCl 4, EGTA 2, ATP-Mg 4, GTP-Na 0.3, HEPES 10, QX-314 5, AF-555 0.05, pH 7.3.
Micromanipulators (MC1000E, Sutter Instruments) were used for the recording pipette and to hold the optic stimulation fiber, maintained on opposite sides of the holding chamber. Optic stimulation was provided through a 473 nm diode-pumped solid-state (DPSS) laser (Laserglow Technologies) equipped with a fibreoptic cannula (Thorlabs CFMC12L20, 200 μm core, 0.39 NA), set to a power that induced a postsynaptic response of a few hundreds of pA (typically 5–10 mW), and controlled through triggering by a Digidata 1440A (Molecular Devices). For experiments comparing amplitude of postsynaptic responses between sham and SNI mice, the laser power was maintained at a consistent power for all experiments (∼5 mW at tip of fibreoptic cannula). Pulses were delivered once per 15 s for 5 ms. Electrophysiological data was collected by an Axopatch 200B (Molecular Devices) or a Multiclamp 700b (Molecular Devices) connected to a PC computer equipped with Clampex 10.7 (Molecular Devices).
For recordings of optically evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (oEPSCs), resting membrane potential was maintained at −60 mV to isolate excitatory current. For recording of optically evoked inhibitory post-synaptic currents (oIPSCS), resting membrane potential was maintained at 0 mV to isolate inhibitory current. Junction potential was calculated to be 10.4 mV, such that −60 mV = −70.4 mV (Junction Potential Calculator, Clampex 10.4, Molecular Devices). For all experiments, reported values are not junction potential corrected. All analysis of oEPSCs/oIPSCs was performed in Clampfit 10.7 or 10.4 (Molecular Devices).
For pharmacology experiments, the following chemicals were perfused individually, or in several different combinations for 15 min after baseline recordings were performed: TTX (500 nM), 4-AP (100 μM), Bicuculline (10 μM), DNQX (20 μM). Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals used were obtained from Millipore-Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Acute Brain Slice Preparation

2024
Mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal 2% Avertin and subsequently perfused with oxygenated (95%O2/5%CO2) ice-cold cutting solution containing (in mM) 110 choline-Cl, 10 D-glucose, 7 MgCl2, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4·2H2O, 0.5 CaCl2, 1.3 Na-ascorbate, and 25 NaHCO3. Whole brains were extracted into ice-cold cutting solution, and coronal 290 µm brain slices were cut with a vibrating microtome and incubated for 30 min at 34 °C in oxygenated (95%O2/5%CO2) artificial cerebral spinal fluid (aCSF) containing (in mM) 125 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.0 CaCl2, 1.0 MgCl2, and 25 D-glucose. ACSF was adjusted to 290 to 295 mOSM by addition of ~4% H20 by volume. The slices were then stored in oxygenated aCSF at room temperature prior to recording. All recordings were performed at ~37 °C using TC-324B (Warner Instruments). Please see SI Appendix for further details.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Electrophysiological recording of brain slices

2024
Slices were transferred to a recording chamber positioned under a direct microscope (Scientifica, Brambleside, UK) equipped with oblique illumination optics (Olympus) and an infrared camera system (Zyla, Andor, Belfast, Northern Ireland). Cells were visualized with a 60× infrared water‐immersion objective (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Slices were superfused with preheated ACSF (29–31°C, TC‐324B, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, USA) with the following composition (in mM): 130 NaCl, 24 NaHCO3, 3.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2 CaCl2,1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, saturated with 95% O2, 5% CO2 at pH 7.4.
Pipettes were pulled from thin borosilicate capillaries (G150TF‐4, Warner Instruments) with a resistance of ∼2 MΩ when filled with an internal solution containing (for current‐clamp recordings) the following (in mM): 125 CH3KO4S, 10 NaCl, 16 KHCO3, 4 ATP‐Mg, 0.3 GTP‐Na and 0.25% biocytin equilibrated with 95% O2, 5% CO2 at pH 7.3. Voltage clamp recordings were performed with an internal solution containing (in mM): 125 CH3CsO3S, 16 KHCO3,4 ATP‐Mg2, 0.3 GTP‐Na2, 10 QX‐314‐Cl, 1 EGTA and 0.25% biocytin equilibrated with 95% O2, 5% CO2 at pH 7.3. Data were acquired with a Multiclamp 700A amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Series resistances were monitored throughout experiments and measured, but not corrected. Signals were filtered at 3 kHz and digitized at a minimum of 20 kHz using a Digidata 1550A digitizer and the Clampex11 program (Molecular Devices). Recorded waveforms were analysed using the following programs: pClamp (Molecular Devices, RRID:SCR_011323), OriginPro2020 (Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA, RRID:SCR_014212) and Prism (GraphPad Software LLC, La Jolla, CA, USA, RRID:SCR_002798).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Patch-clamp recording of DCN cartwheel cells

2024
Slices were transferred to a recording chamber and perfused with standard ACSF at 3 ml/min and maintained at 31–34°C with an in-line heater (TC-324B; Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT). Cells were viewed using an upright microscope (BX51WI; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a ×60 objective, equipped with custom-made infrared Dodt contrast optics, CCD camera (Retiga 2000R; QImaging, Surrey, Canada), and fluorescence optics. All recordings were collected from CWCs of the DCN. CWCs were targeted by their location in the molecular and fusiform cell layers of DCN, and by their round soma (Kim and Trussell, 2007 (link)). Identification was then confirmed by their distinctive firing pattern (simple or complex spikes) (Golding and Oertel, 1997 (link)). In slices from GlyT2-EGFP, glycinergic cells in the DCN were identified by their GFP expression. In some experiments, 0.1% biocytin (B1592; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was added to the pipette solution for post hoc identification of CWCs. Recording pipettes were pulled from 1.5 mm OD, 0.84 mm ID borosilicate glass (1B150-F; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) to a resistance of 2–4 MΩ using a horizontal puller (P-97 or P-1000; Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). In most experiments, internal recording solution contained (in mM) 113 K gluconate, 2.75 MgCl2, 1.75 MgSO4, 0.1 EGTA, 14 Tris2-phosphocreatine, 4 Na2-ATP, 0.3 Tris-GTP, 9 HEPES with pH adjusted to 7.25 with KOH, mOsm adjusted to 290 with sucrose (ECl, –84 mV). For voltage clamp to isolate NALCN current, internal solution contained (in mM) 87 CsMeSO3, 18 CsCl, 5 CsF, 10 TEA-Cl, 10 HEPES, 5 EGTA, 5 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na2-GTP, 13 di-Na phosphocreatine, 2 QX-314 (pH 7.25, 295 mOsm). For a few voltage-clamp experiments, we used an internal solution containing (in mM) 103 CsCl, 10 TEA-Cl, 2.75 MgCl2, 9 HEPES, 0.1 EGTA, 0.3 Tris-GTP, 14 Tris2-phosphocreatine, 4 Na2-ATP, 3.5 QX-314 (pH adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH). Puff application of agonists and antagonists was delivered through a picospritzer (Picospritzer III; Toohey Company, Fairfield, NJ), at 7–10 psi, with borosilicate glass capillaries. NA or baclofen applications were at 100 µM and 50–100 ms in duration. The puff pipette was placed around 100 µm from the soma of the recorded cell to avoid mechanical disturbance.
Cell-attached (voltage-clamp) recordings were made using normal extracellular solution. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made using a Multiclamp 700B amplifier and pCLAMP 10 software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Signals were digitized at 20–40 kHz and filtered at 10 kHz by Digidata 1440A (Molecular Devices). In voltage clamp, cells were held at –65 mV, with access resistance 5–30 MΩ compensated to 40–60%. In current clamp with control solutions, the resting membrane potential was maintained at –60 to –70 mV with bias current. To isolate NALCN currents, synaptic blockers, NBQX (10 µM), MK-801 (10 µM), SR-95531 (10 µM) or picrotoxin (100 µM), strychnine (0.5 µM), apamin (100 nM), and BaCl2 (200 µM) were added to the bath solution. In those experiments, shifts in Ca2+ from 2 mM to 0.1 mM were accompanied by a shift in Mg2+ from 1 mM to 3 mM. To record evoked IPSCs, CWCs were stimulated with brief voltage pulses (100 µs) using a stimulus isolation unit (Iso-Flex; A.M.P.I, Jerusalem, Israel) via a bipolar or glass microelectrode placed in the molecular layer of the DCN.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.