Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

The Heracles 2 electronic nose by Alpha MOS has been discontinued and is no longer actively commercialized by the manufacturer. Alpha MOS has introduced the Heracles Neo as the successor, featuring enhanced performance for smell analysis. While the Heracles 2 may still be available through secondary markets, the Heracles Neo is the recommended replacement from the manufacturer.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

38 protocols using «heracles 2»

1

Gas Chromatography-Based Gel Analysis

2025
Samples were analyzed using a gas chromatography electronic nose Heracles II (Alpha MOS, Toulouse, France). Weigh 3 g of gel and place into a sealed 20 mL headspace vial. The test unit consisted of two columns DB-5 and DB-1701 (capillary column, 10 m × 0.18 mm) with different polarity and two FID (dihydrogen flame) detectors. For headspace extraction, the temperature was set to 60 °C, while the inlet temperature was maintained at 200 °C. The temperature program consisted of an initial increase from 50 °C to 80 °C at a rate of 1 °C per second, followed by a further increase to 250 °C at a rate of 2 °C per second.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Aroma Profile Analysis by Electronic Nose

2024
The aroma profile of samples was analyzed using an electronic nose (Heracles 2, Alpha MOS, France), following the method of Aunsa-Ard and Kerdcharoen (2022) (link) with an appropriate modification. The sample volume was 5 mL, in a 20 mL vial. The equilibration process was conducted at 60 °C for 25 min, with shaking at 500 rpm. A 100 μL aliquot was injected at a temperature of 250 °C, at a rate of 125 μL/s. The carrier gas flow rate was maintained at 10 mL/min. Analytes were collected over a temperature range of 50 °C to 240 °C, with a final collection temperature of 240 °C. The column temperature program involved an initial ramp of 1 °C/s to 80 °C, followed by a ramp of 2 °C/s to 250 °C, with a 60-s hold at the final temperature. Detection was performed using a flame ionization detector (FID) at 260 °C, with a detection time of 177 s. The FID amplification factor was set to 12. Calibration was conducted using nC2 – nC16 normal alkane standards, with retention indices calculated. Qualitative analysis of each compound was performed using the AroChemBase database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Volatile Compound Fingerprinting of Cakes

2024
Fingerprinting of volatile compounds was performed using an ultra-fast GC electronic nose (Heracles II, Alpha M.O.S., Toulouse, France), equipped with an autosampler (Odour Scanner HS 100, Alpha M.O.S., Toulouse, France), a cooled Tenax trap, two capillary columns of different polarities and two flame ionization detectors (FIDs). The two parallel columns were the non-polar MXT-5 (5% diphenyl) and a medium polar MXT-1701 (14% cyanopropylphenyl) column with dimensions of 10 m × 180 μm × 0.4 μm.
Prior to analysis, 2 g of cake was weighed in 20 mL vials, which were then tightly capped with PTFE/silicone seals to prevent the penetration of environmental odours. Each cake sample was analysed five times and blanks (empty vials) were added before, in between and after the measurements of different samples. To introduce the volatile compounds into the headspace, vials were incubated for 20 min at 60 °C with a constant agitation of 500 rpm. After incubation, the headspace was collected into a syringe of 70 °C at a speed of 500 µL/s. Then, 5 mL was injected into the GC system for 45 s at 125 µL/s at 200 °C and 10 kPa with a hydrogen N7.0 carrier gas (Parker Balston, Gateshead, Tyne & Wear, UK). Afterwards, a trap system with an initial condition of 40 °C for 50 s was heated in 35 s to 240 °C and sustained for 30 s. The vent rate of the injector was at 30 mL/min and the split of the trap at 10 mL/min. At a temperature of 250 °C, the valve sent the volatiles to the columns. The oven had an initial temperature of 50 °C for 2 s, whereafter it was raised to 80 °C at 1.0 °C/s and immediately ramped up to 250 °C at 3.0 °C/s and kept for 21 s. The temperature of the FIDs was 260 °C, and the gain and offset of both FIDs were 12 and 1000, respectively. The total acquisition time was 110 s with an acquisition period of 0.01 s [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Volatile Compound Analysis of Microcapsules

2024
The volatile compounds within the microcapsules were extracted using the Heracles II electronic nose (Alpha M.O.S., Toulouse, France), which utilizes ultra-fast gas chromatography with headspace. The system features a detection system comprising two metal columns of varying polarities (nonpolar MXT-5 and slightly polar MXT1701, diameter = 180 µm, length = 10 m) and two flame ionization detectors (FIDs).
For the analysis, 10% solutions (0.25 g in 5 g) of each sample were placed in standard headspace vials sealed with a Teflon-faced silicon rubber cap. Incubation was performed at 35 °C for 900 s under an agitation speed of 8.33 Hz. The carrying gas was hydrogen (flow rate 1 mL/min). The injector temperature was set at 200 °C, with an injected volume of 3500 µL and speed of 125 mL s−1. The analytes were collected in the trap at 15 °C and subsequently divided and simultaneously transferred into the two columns. The carrying gas was maintained at a constant pressure of 80 kPa, with a split flow rate of 10 mL/min at the column heads. The temperature program in the oven was as follows: 60 °C for 2 s, a ramp of 3 °C s−1 to 270 °C, held for 20 s, and FID1/FID2 at 280 °C.
The volatile compounds identified in the samples were presented in the form of a table with Kovats indices. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Kovats indices were established using alkane standards (n-butane to n-hexadecane) (Restek Centre County, PA) measured under the same conditions as the samples [65 (link),66 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Electronic Nose Analysis of Samples

2024
For an electronic nose analysis, 5 g of sample was placed in a vial, and an electronic nose (Heracles II, Alpha MOS, Toulouse, France) was applied, whereby measurements were taken after saturating the volatile compounds under the following conditions: headspace temperature, 60 °C; flow rate, 250 mL/min; quantity injection, 2.5 mL; and acquisition time, 120 s. The data were analyzed and obtained as a chromatogram using Alphasoft (Alpha MOS, Toulouse, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.