Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Mathematica 10

Manufactured by Wolfram
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Israel
About the product

Mathematica 10 is a software system for technical and scientific computing. It provides a comprehensive platform for symbolic, numerical, and graphical computation. Mathematica 10 includes a wide range of functions for data analysis, visualization, and programming. It is designed to handle complex mathematical problems and provide accurate results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Mathematica 10 is no longer actively commercialized by Wolfram. The latest version, Mathematica 14.2, was released in April 2025 and is the recommended replacement.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

133 protocols using «mathematica 10»

1

Visualization Tools for 3D Modeling

2025
The modeling procedures, tools of the used models and visualization tools of model schemes are described in Methods of ref. 1 (link). Graphs were created with Mathematica 10 (Wolfram Research) and MATLAB (MathWorks) using several functions for the visualization of 3D surfaces and 2D graphs. Numerical source data for Figs. 17 is presented in Supplementary Data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Enzymatic Kinetics of Peroxidase-Catalyzed o-Phenylenediamine Oxidation

2024
The enzymatic reaction was carried out at room temperature with 80 μM of H2O2 in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) with 5 μg/mL BSA to prevent HRP loss. The formation of DAP was followed in the kinetic regimen by measuring the absorbance at 421 nm using a UV-1800 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) spectrophotometer. After mixing the buffer concentrate, H2O, H2O2, and oPD in a single-use, 1 cm acrylic cuvette, the reaction was started by the addition of an HRP aliquot, followed by pipetting for 30 s and measurements of absorbance for 350 s, one point per second. During the preliminary experiments, an appropriate concentration of HRP was chosen (8 ng/mL) so that the absorbance after 5 min at 5 mM oPD did not exceed 0.25, being in a linear range for DAP colorimetric detection. Background oPD oxidation was measured for each oPD concentration the same way as the enzymatic reaction, but with the HRP aliquot replaced by buffer. The resulting pairs of kinetic curves (with HRP and without) were processed to obtain the enzymatic reaction rate (see Appendix B for details). The DAP concentration from A421 was calculated using an absorption coefficient of 15,560 M−1×cm−1 at pH 6. The entire dataset of the reaction rate versus the oPD concentration was fitted using the Michaelis–Menten equation in Mathematica 10.2 (Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL, USA) using the built-in NonlinearModelFit function with the weight equal to inversed data variance at each oPD concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Spectroscopic Analysis of Photophysical Properties

2022
Steady-state absorption and emission spectra were recorded by means of a Hitachi (U-3310) spectrophotometer and an Edinburgh (FS920 and FS980) fluorimeter, respectively. The fluorescence quantum yields for PZDN, PZTN, and PZQN in cyclohexane were measured at 298 K and compared to those of Coumarin 480 in methanol (Q.Y. = 0.87). The irradiation source for the photochemistry analysis was chosen to be a 450 W Xe lamp (or 405 nm 3 W LED lamp) coupled with a monochromator with a slit open to allow an ~10 nm bandwidth at the selected wavelength (~0.1 mW). Nanosecond time-resolved population decays were fitted with the sum of exponential functions using the nonlinear least-squares procedure in combination with reconvolution fitting with the instrumental response function (IRF). The phosphorescence at 77 K was measured by means of a Princeton Instruments PIMAX system in conjunction with an intensified charge-coupled detector (ICCD), for which the time gating was delayed to the phosphorescence domain. The dynamic simulation was carried out by means of Wolfram Mathematica 10.153 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Visualizing Flowers through Honeybee Eyes

2022
The honeybee has three spectral types of photoreceptors, maximally sensitive in the UV-, blue-and green-wavelength range, which are referred to as S, M, and L, for the short-, middle-, and long-wavelength-sensitive photoreceptor, respectively (Menzel and Backhaus, 1991) . To create images of flowers as they are seen through the eyes of a honeybee, we applied the procedure described in Vorobyev et al. (2001b) . Briefly, we made UV-and RGB-photographs of the flowers and also measured their reflectance spectra. We then calculated the quantum catch values for the L, M and S photoreceptors (LMS values) for the different flower regions assuming that the illumination was D65 daylight and substituted the RGB values in the images with the LMS values (Wyszecki and Stiles, 1982; see Supplementary materials for more details). The software for image processing written using Wolfram Mathematica 10, is available on request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Phylogenomic Analysis of Cockroach Evolution

2021
Demultiplexed FASTQ files had adapters removed and low-quality bases trimmed (Krueger, 2017; Trimgalore v. 0.4.3 options: -q 20; -stringency 3; -e 0.1; -length 30). Reads were assembled with Trinity v.2.0.6 (Grabherr et al., 2011; Haas et al., 2013) . Orthologs from OrthoDB v. 7 (Waterhouse et al., 2013) were identified in the 90 sequenced libraries and 37 additional Blattodea and Polyneoptera sequences (Evangelista et al., 2019) using Orthograph v. 0.6 (Petersen et al., 2017) with Drosophila melanogaster, Pediculus humanus, Tribolium castaneum, and Zootermopsis nevadensis as reference genomes [default options except -anysymbol option called in MAFFT (Katoh and Standley, 2013) , and blast-max-hits = 50]. 265 targeted loci were extracted from the ortholog set. Quality filtered reads are available on NCBI GenBank (SRP155429).
Each locus was aligned in MAFFT v. 7.3 (Katoh and Standley, 2013; options: -retree 4maxiterate 10 -adjustdirection) and then trimmed from the edges to eliminate leading or trailing sites missing >80% of data. A second, alignment was conducted in MAFFT v. 7.3 (-localpair -maxiterate 1000), which was then adjusted to maintain consistent reading-frame. Alignments were finalized with manual adjustment in AliView v. 1.18 (Larsson, 2014) to remove poor quality reads and correct misaligned sections. Custom scripts in Mathematica 10 (Wolfram Research, 2012) available in the package Phyloinformatica v. 0.9 (Evangelista, 2019) were used to manage sequence files, translate sequences, trim and concatenate alignments. We refer to the final concatenated alignment (127 taxa) as the "265_Full" alignment.
We ran PartitionFinder 2 (Lanfear et al., 2016) with the 265_Full alignment with blocks defined as codon positions per locus, possible models as GTR and GTR+G, branch lengths considered as unlinked, best model chosen with AICc, and rcluster search scheme (percent = 10; max = 1000). Using the resulting codon partitioning scheme, we ran a preliminary tree search with 10 independent runs in RAxML v. 8.2 (Stamatakis, 2014) , implemented on the CIPRES portal (Miller et al., 2010) . Assessment of the best preliminary tree showed that a few taxa (Amazonina platystylata, Doradoblatta sp., Ischnoptera galibi, Lanxoblatta sp., Panchlora stolata, Pycnoscelus femapterus, Pycnoscelus striata) had exceptionally long branches. The same taxa were among those with the largest proportion of missing data (supplementary data). After reassessing the alignments in which these species were present, we removed Pycnoscelus striata, P. femapterous, Ischnoptera galibi, Amazonina platystylata, and Doradoblatta sp. from the analysis under the grounds that (i) their data was low quality (short reads ambiguously aligned and with many nucleotide differences) and (ii) the pattern of data presence would not allow for testing of their hypothesized taxonomic assignment (see supplementary data). When running the tree searches there were no exceedingly long branch lengths, and Blaberidae was monophyletic.
Trees were inferred for three alignments: 1) the full alignment ("265_Full"), 2) using only the 2 nd codon positions (correcting for noise; "265_2nd"), 3) low missing data alignment (correcting for relationships inferred from missing data patterns; "265_Reduced"). The latter alignment was created by only retaining nucleotide positions having data for 51 or more taxa (Phyloinformatica function trimAlign2 missingProportion = 0.60; Evangelista, 2019) ). The same partitioning, modelling and RAxML parameters as used above were applied to each analysis but with 100 independent tree runs (GTRGAMMA, -f d, -N 100). We inferred one more tree using the 265_Full alignment in IQTree (Nguyen et al., 2015) using partitions determined by PartionFinder2, models determined by IQTree (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) and the options:ninit 200 -nbest 10 -allnni -ntop 40 -wbt -wsl -wsr. These four trees (265_Full, 265_2nd, 265_Reduced, 265_Full_IQ) were later used as a baseline for establishing subsample convergence on a reasonable topology. We assessed support for the three RAxML trees by bootstrap resampling using the auto-MRE stopping criteria (60, 300 and 108 for the first three trees respectively) and calculating bootstrap frequencies and node certainty scores (Kobert et al., 2016) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.