Hydrofluoric acid
Hydrofluoric acid is a chemical compound with the formula HF. It is a highly corrosive and toxic inorganic acid used in various industrial and laboratory applications.
Lab products found in correlation
Market Availability & Pricing
The Hydrofluoric Acid product is commercially available from Merck Group and can be purchased through authorized distributors. Pricing for a 500 mL bottle typically ranges from €41.04 to 1,594.91 TL, depending on the distributor.
Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.
Is this product still available?
Get pricing insights and sourcing optionsSpelling variants (same manufacturer)
Similar products (other manufacturers)
The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.
Product FAQ
244 protocols using «hydrofluoric acid»
Fabrication and Characterization of rGO-TiO2 Nanotubes
Histological and Ultrastructural Analysis of Sponges
For histological examination, we fixed the specimens with Pampl’s fluid (formalin 11%, ethanol (95%) 27%, acetic acid (100%) 7%, and H2O 55%) for 24 h at 4 °C. Then, we dissolved the siliceous spicules that make up its skeleton by submerging the specimens in 4% hydrofluoric acid (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA, cat. n. 1.00338) for an additional 24 h at 4 °C. Then, we followed standard histological protocols [10 (link)].
For transmission electron microscopy, we fixed specimens in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA, cat. n. 16020) in a 0.2 M Na-cacodylate sucrose buffer (pH 7.2; Electron Microscopy Sciences, cat. n. 12300) for 2.5 h at 4 °C. Then, we rinsed the specimens 3 times with a 0.2 cacodylate sucrose buffer for 45–60 min total, post-fixed them for 2 h in a 1% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences, cat n. 19150) 0.2 cacodylate sucrose buffer, and washed them 1 time with the buffer and then 3 times with deionized water for 45–60 min total. We stained them en bloc with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, cat n. 22400) for 16 h at 4 °C. After washing the specimens 4 times with water for 45–60 min total, we dehydrated them with an ascending ethanol series up to 70% ethanol. Then, we desilicated the specimens with 4% hydrofluoric acid for 1 h at 4 °C. Afterwards, we washed the specimens in 70% ethanol, and we completed the dehydration with an ethanol series up to 100%. Then, we transferred the specimens to anhydrous propylene oxide (cat. n. 14300) for 30 min (replacing the anhydrous propylene oxide with fresh one after 15 min). We infiltrated samples with 5% Spurr’s epoxy resin (in anhydrous propylene oxide 3 h with rotation; 50% resin in anhydrous propylene oxide overnight with rotation (18 h); 75% resin in anhydrous propylene oxide with rotation (6 h); and 100% pure resin 3× for 24 h total (6 h, 12 h, 6 h). Finally, we flat embedded the specimens and polymerized them at 60 °C for 27 h. We used a diamond knife to cut ultrathin sections. We observed the sections under a Philips CM12 transmission electron microscope.
Synthesis of Rare-Earth Fluoride Compounds
(YF3)
99.99%, ytterbium fluoride (YbF3) 99.99%, erbium fluoride
(ErF3) 99.99%, thulium fluoride (TmF3) 99.99%,
and holmium fluoride (YF3) 99.99% were purchased from Alfa
Aesar. Ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2) and hydrofluoric
acid (HF) were provided by Sigma-Aldrich. Methanol was purchased from
a local provider.
Anodized Titanium Copper Electrodeposition
Anodisation experiments were performed using a power supply (HMC 8043 Ronde & Schwarz) attached to a digital multimeter (HMC 8012 Ronde & Schwarz). The temperature of the two-electrode cell was maintained at 17 ± 1 °C by use of a recirculation bath. The anodised titanium panels served as the anode and they were held by a titanium jig. A panel of stainless steel (304) served as the cathode. The electrolyte solution was agitated by air. To observe the copper particles within the NTs, Cross Hatch Adhesion Tape (ASTM D3359-22, Elcometer 99) was applied for 2 minutes and carefully removed immediately before SEM analysis.
Electrodeposition experiments were performed using an alternating current (AC) power supply (12 V variable Electrosound). The experiments were carried out in a two-electrode cell, where the anodised titanium sample served as the cathode, and a copper plate was used as the anode. The NT sample was placed in a flat specimen holder (2.5 × 2.5 cm, Redoxme AB) with a circular area of 1 cm2 (single face) exposed to the electrolyte. The electrolyte solution was magnetically stirred, and experiments were carried out at room temperature.
Synthesis and Characterization of Metal Coordination Compounds
X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns were collected on a Bruker D2 PHASER at 30 kV and 10 mA for Cu Kα (λ = 1.54050 Å), with a step size of 0.02° in 2 θ. Fourier transform-Infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker ALPHA II FT-IR spectrometer using the attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were measured on a Bruker Advance III HD 300 MHz. For NMR sample preparation, 0.005 g of samples were digested using D2SO4 (20 μL) and DMSO-d6 (600 μL) as solvents. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm was obtained using a Quantachrome Instruments Autosorb-iQ at 77 K. All samples ( ~ 60 mg) were activated under ultra-high vacuum at 130 °C for 24 h prior to each measurement. The surface areas were calculated using BETSI, following the Rouquerol criteria 1–461 (link). Pore size distribution was calculated using quenched solid density functional theory (QSDFT) method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping were taken using JSM 7800 F Prime operating at 15 kV. For SEM imaging, the samples were placed on the carbon tape on an aluminum sample holder and coated using carbon-sputter coating. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained by using an AXIS SUPRA and spectra were analyzed using XPSPEAK 4.1. Inductively coupled-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) data were collected on a Perkin Elmer Optima 8300. For ICP-AES sample preparation, 0.01 g of samples were digested with 60 μL of hydrofluoric acid. The hydrofluoric acid was completely removed by vaporization before the samples were further dissolved with 4 mL of Nitric acid. The acid-digested samples were diluted with deionized water before measurement. UV-Vis-NIR spectra were recorded with a PerkinElmer Lambda 365 UV/Vis spectrophotometer for reflectance measurement. Raman spectroscopy data were obtained using a Thermo Fischer Scientific DXR2xi Raman imaging microscope with 532 nm laser source.
Top 5 protocols citing «hydrofluoric acid»
Selective Etching of Ti3AlC2 for MXene Synthesis
Purification and Analysis of Peptidoglycan-Linked Polysaccharides
Photosensitizer-Functionalized Silica Particles
Synthesis and Backfilling of Bimetallic Raspberry Colloids
The synthesis of PVP-capped bimetallic Pd0.04Au0.96 nanoparticles (NPs) and raspberry colloids were reported in our previous publications9 (link),15 (link). In general, citrate capped Au nanoparticles (~5 nm) were prepared by reduction of HAuCl4 with sodium borohydride NaBH4 in DI water. As synthesized Au nanoparticle solution (40 mL) was used for the synthesis of Pd0.04Au0.96 by adding to it 5 mL of ascorbic acid aqueous solution (0.1 M) and 150 μL of Pd(NO3)2 aqueous solution (10 mM). The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature and stored at 4 °C. Carboxylic acid-functionalized polystyrene colloids (PS-COOH) with diameter of ~340 nm were synthesized by surfactant free emulsion polymerization, using acrylic acid as co-monomer and ammonium peroxodisulfate as an initiator following a recipe from the literature36 (link). Raspberry colloids were synthesized by adding specific amounts of Pd0.04Au0.96 nanoparticles to the colloidal dispersion of thiol-modified polystyrene colloids (PS-SH)9 (link),15 (link). Typically for ~1% metal loading, 2.5 mL of the Pd0.04Au0.96 solution was added to 1 mL of 1 wt.% PS-SH colloidal dispersion in DI water. The dispersion was stirred for 2 h, washed three times with water using centrifugation (9500 rpm for 40 min), and re-dispersed in water to give ~5 wt% PS@Pd0.04Au0.96 raspberry colloids. The backfilling method used to form RCT SiO2-based structures was described in detail in our previous publications24 ,37 (link). In general, the raspberry colloidal dispersion was dried at 65 °C and then backfilled with prehydrolyzed TEOS solution. The backfilled samples were dried and finally calcined at 500 °C in air for 2 h to remove polymer colloids and organic volatiles, and to solidify the matrix into SiO2.
Analytical Procedure for Germanium Isotope Analysis
reagent grade. All samples and standards were diluted with deionized
water (Milli-Q Integral 3 Q-POD Water Purification System, Merck Millipore,
Darmstadt, Germany).
Selected geological reference materials
were analyzed to validate the proposed analytical procedure. They
include U.S. Geological Survey reference materials BHVO-2 (Hawaiian
basalt), GH (granite; Hoggar, Algeria), GL-O (glauconite; Normandy,
France), and IF-G (iron formation; West Greenland).
Hydrofluoric
acid (40%), nitric acid (65%; both Merck Suprapur,
Darmstadt, Germany), and phosphoric acid (≥85%; Sigma, Milwaukee,
WI, USA) were applied to dissolved geological SRMs.
EMSURE fuming
hydrochloric acid (37%) and chloroform for liquid
chromatography (both Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used in the extraction
procedure. Compressed helium (Air Products, Warsaw, Poland) was used
to purge samples after extraction.
Sodium borohydride (Sigma,
Milwaukee, WI, USA), sodium hydroxide
micropills (POCH, Gliwice, Poland), sodium acetate trihydrate (≥98.0%;
POCH, Gliwice, Poland), and glacial acetic acid (100%; Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany) were used for the generation of germanium hydride. NaBH4 solution (1%, w/v) in 0.01 M NaOH was freshly prepared on
a daily basis31 (link) by dissolving consecutively
0.24 g of sodium hydroxide and 6.0 g of Sodium borohydride in 600
mL of deionized water. To prepare the acetic acid–sodium acetate
stock buffer solution (1 M), 34 g of CH3COONa·3H2O was dissolved in ∼150 mL of deionized water, then
4.8 mL of glacial CH3COOH was added, and the obtained solution
was diluted to 250 mL with water. Acetic buffer solution (0.1 M) was
prepared by an appropriate dilution of the stock solution.
Two
batch solutions of NIST 3120a standard (LOT 000411 and LOT
151115, both containing 10 g/L Ge) were used in the analysis, but
only LOT 000411 was applied as a standard reference material with
δ74/70Ge equal to 0. Bracket solutions for measuring
delta values of Ge via the SSB procedure were prepared by spiking
0.1 M acetic buffer with NIST 3120a solution to a final Ge concentration
of 25–80 μg/L, trying to match the intensities of the
bracket and the sample.
Single-element nickel and copper ICP
standards (both Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany), iron atomic absorption standard (VHG Labs, Manchester, NH,
USA), and zinc calibration standard (CPAchem, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria),
as well as ICP multielement standard solution VI (Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany), were used in interference study by spiking the diluted NIST
3120a solution (70 μg/L Ge) to a final content of interfering
ions of 0.2–2.0 mg/L. The synthetic seawater was prepared similarly
as in ref32 (link) by an appropriate dilution
of chloride salts of sodium (Sigma, Milwaukee, WI, USA), magnesium,
and potassium (both Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with deionized water
with the only difference that sodium sulfate (Sigma, Milwaukee, WI,
USA) was also added to the mixture. The solution obtained had a comparable
composition to the natural seawater33 (
seawater was spiked with NIST 3120a to a total Ge concentration of
80 μg/L.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!