Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

The Hydrofluoric Acid product is commercially available from Merck Group and can be purchased through authorized distributors. Pricing for a 500 mL bottle typically ranges from €41.04 to 1,594.91 TL, depending on the distributor.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

244 protocols using «hydrofluoric acid»

1

Fabrication and Characterization of rGO-TiO2 Nanotubes

2025
TiO2 NTs (diameter: 100 nm) were prepared by anodizing (voltage: 20 V, duration: 30 min) a pure Ti sheet (99.5%; size: 5 × 5 cm2, thickness: 250 μm; Hyundai Titanium Co., Incheon, South Korea) in a hydrofluoric acid (0.5 w/v%, Merck & Co., Chicago, IL, USA) solution. The anodized specimen was heat-treated (temperature: 500 °C, soaking time: 2 h) to crystalize the specimen. Two rGO powders including (1) a non-functional rGO (NON-rGO) and (2) an aminated rGO (NH2-rGO) (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) were used in this study. The rGO powder coating on the surface of the TiO2 NTs specimen was fabricated using electrophoretic deposition (EPD)24 (link). The rGO powder was dispersed in deionized water (concentration: 0.5 mg/mL) by ultrasonication (VC 505, Sonics & Materials Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) with magnesium nitrate hydrate (concentration; 0.05 mg/mL: Mg(NO3)2-6H2O, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA) to activate the charge on the rGO surface. rGO dispersed in deionized water was coated onto the TiO2 NTs via EPD for 1 min (EPD voltage: 50 V). After the EPD process, the rGO-TiO2 NTs specimens were washed and dried at 60 °C for 24 h. The rGO-TiO2 NTs were characterized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; S-4800; Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan), contact angle measurements, diffuse reflectance ultraviolet–visible-near infrared spectrophotometry (DRS; SolidSpec-3700; Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan), and Photoluminescence spectrophotometry (PL; LabRAM HR-800, Horiba Co., Kyoto, Japan). The optical band gap energy of the rGO-TiO2 NTs was determined using the Tauc plot calculated from the DRS spectra as shown in Eq. (1)25 (link). αhν1/n=Ahν-Eg, where α, hν, A, and Eg are the absorption coefficient, incident light frequency, proportionality constant and band gap, respectively. The value of the exponent ‘n’ determines the nature of the electronic transition; further, the anatase TiO2 and rGO typically exhibit an indirect band gap, and hence, the exponent value corresponds to 226 (link),27 (link). From the Tauc plot, the linear extrapolation of (αhν)1/n to the zero of the Y-axis provides the value of the optical band gap energy of the specimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Histological and Ultrastructural Analysis of Sponges

2025
Sponges are partially translucent, but only superficial structures can be observed in vivo. However, their shape is regular, and any morphological changes are easily observable under a microscope without having to remove them from the aquarium because of the sponge’s culture setting. In order to recognize cancer-like features in sponges, we will focus on any morphological anomalies, such as a local overproliferation of cells or a change in pigmentation other than the acute effect of radiation. We measured the morphological changes in the animals in vivo using ImageJ software version 1.51 [16 (link)].
For histological examination, we fixed the specimens with Pampl’s fluid (formalin 11%, ethanol (95%) 27%, acetic acid (100%) 7%, and H2O 55%) for 24 h at 4 °C. Then, we dissolved the siliceous spicules that make up its skeleton by submerging the specimens in 4% hydrofluoric acid (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA, cat. n. 1.00338) for an additional 24 h at 4 °C. Then, we followed standard histological protocols [10 (link)].
For transmission electron microscopy, we fixed specimens in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA, cat. n. 16020) in a 0.2 M Na-cacodylate sucrose buffer (pH 7.2; Electron Microscopy Sciences, cat. n. 12300) for 2.5 h at 4 °C. Then, we rinsed the specimens 3 times with a 0.2 cacodylate sucrose buffer for 45–60 min total, post-fixed them for 2 h in a 1% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences, cat n. 19150) 0.2 cacodylate sucrose buffer, and washed them 1 time with the buffer and then 3 times with deionized water for 45–60 min total. We stained them en bloc with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, cat n. 22400) for 16 h at 4 °C. After washing the specimens 4 times with water for 45–60 min total, we dehydrated them with an ascending ethanol series up to 70% ethanol. Then, we desilicated the specimens with 4% hydrofluoric acid for 1 h at 4 °C. Afterwards, we washed the specimens in 70% ethanol, and we completed the dehydration with an ethanol series up to 100%. Then, we transferred the specimens to anhydrous propylene oxide (cat. n. 14300) for 30 min (replacing the anhydrous propylene oxide with fresh one after 15 min). We infiltrated samples with 5% Spurr’s epoxy resin (in anhydrous propylene oxide 3 h with rotation; 50% resin in anhydrous propylene oxide overnight with rotation (18 h); 75% resin in anhydrous propylene oxide with rotation (6 h); and 100% pure resin 3× for 24 h total (6 h, 12 h, 6 h). Finally, we flat embedded the specimens and polymerized them at 60 °C for 27 h. We used a diamond knife to cut ultrathin sections. We observed the sections under a Philips CM12 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Synthesis of Rare-Earth Fluoride Compounds

2025
Reagents: sodium fluoride (NaF) 99.99%, yttrium fluoride
(YF3)
99.99%, ytterbium fluoride (YbF3) 99.99%, erbium fluoride
(ErF3) 99.99%, thulium fluoride (TmF3) 99.99%,
and holmium fluoride (YF3) 99.99% were purchased from Alfa
Aesar. Ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2) and hydrofluoric
acid (HF) were provided by Sigma-Aldrich. Methanol was purchased from
a local provider.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Anodized Titanium Copper Electrodeposition

2025
Ti6Al4V sheets (1 mm thickness; titanium grade 5, SAS Titanium Services, France) were cut into 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm panels. Ammonium sulphate, ammonium fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, nitric acid, sulfuric acid, and copper(ii) sulphate pentahydrate were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. The NT sample was placed in a flat specimen holder (25 × 25 mm, Redoxme AB) with a circular area of 1 cm2 (single face) exposed to the electrolyte. The electrolyte used for copper electrodeposition was composed of copper(ii) sulphate pentahydrate (1 M), sulfuric acid (1% v/v), and deionised water. Microbiological experiments involved the use of tryptic soy broth (TSB), maximum recovery diluent (MRD), and plate count agar, which were purchased from Scharlab.
Anodisation experiments were performed using a power supply (HMC 8043 Ronde & Schwarz) attached to a digital multimeter (HMC 8012 Ronde & Schwarz). The temperature of the two-electrode cell was maintained at 17 ± 1 °C by use of a recirculation bath. The anodised titanium panels served as the anode and they were held by a titanium jig. A panel of stainless steel (304) served as the cathode. The electrolyte solution was agitated by air. To observe the copper particles within the NTs, Cross Hatch Adhesion Tape (ASTM D3359-22, Elcometer 99) was applied for 2 minutes and carefully removed immediately before SEM analysis.
Electrodeposition experiments were performed using an alternating current (AC) power supply (12 V variable Electrosound). The experiments were carried out in a two-electrode cell, where the anodised titanium sample served as the cathode, and a copper plate was used as the anode. The NT sample was placed in a flat specimen holder (2.5 × 2.5 cm, Redoxme AB) with a circular area of 1 cm2 (single face) exposed to the electrolyte. The electrolyte solution was magnetically stirred, and experiments were carried out at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Synthesis and Characterization of Metal Coordination Compounds

2025
1,3,5-Benzentricarboxylic acid (95%), sulfuric acid-d2 (96–98%), hydrofluoric acid (48%), copper(II) nitrate trihydrate (99–104%), iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate (98%), trifluoroacetic acid (99%), poly(vinylidene fluoride) (average MW: ~ 534,000), copper(II) acetate monohydrate (98%), sodium chloride (99%), potassium chloride (99%), copper(I) iodide (98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Zirconium dichloride oxide octahydrate (98%), formic acid (99%), cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate (98–102%), hydrobromic acid (48%), hydroiodic acid (55–58%) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (99.9%) was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. Nitric acid (60%), N,N-dimethylformamide (99.5%), acetone (99.5%), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (99%), hydrochloric acid (35–37%) were purchased from DAEJUNG chemicals. Copper(II) fluoride (98%) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry. All chemicals and solvents were of reagent grade and used without further purification.
X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns were collected on a Bruker D2 PHASER at 30 kV and 10 mA for Cu Kα (λ = 1.54050 Å), with a step size of 0.02° in 2 θ. Fourier transform-Infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker ALPHA II FT-IR spectrometer using the attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were measured on a Bruker Advance III HD 300 MHz. For NMR sample preparation, 0.005 g of samples were digested using D2SO4 (20 μL) and DMSO-d6 (600 μL) as solvents. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm was obtained using a Quantachrome Instruments Autosorb-iQ at 77 K. All samples ( ~ 60 mg) were activated under ultra-high vacuum at 130 °C for 24 h prior to each measurement. The surface areas were calculated using BETSI, following the Rouquerol criteria 1–461 (link). Pore size distribution was calculated using quenched solid density functional theory (QSDFT) method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping were taken using JSM 7800 F Prime operating at 15 kV. For SEM imaging, the samples were placed on the carbon tape on an aluminum sample holder and coated using carbon-sputter coating. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained by using an AXIS SUPRA and spectra were analyzed using XPSPEAK 4.1. Inductively coupled-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) data were collected on a Perkin Elmer Optima 8300. For ICP-AES sample preparation, 0.01 g of samples were digested with 60 μL of hydrofluoric acid. The hydrofluoric acid was completely removed by vaporization before the samples were further dissolved with 4 mL of Nitric acid. The acid-digested samples were diluted with deionized water before measurement. UV-Vis-NIR spectra were recorded with a PerkinElmer Lambda 365 UV/Vis spectrophotometer for reflectance measurement. Raman spectroscopy data were obtained using a Thermo Fischer Scientific DXR2xi Raman imaging microscope with 532 nm laser source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «hydrofluoric acid»

1

Selective Etching of Ti3AlC2 for MXene Synthesis

The material used in this study was synthesized by selective etching of Al atomic layers from Ti3AlC2. One gram of Ti3AlC2 powder (particle size, <44 μm; Carbon-Ukraine) was gradually added to a 10 mL solution of 6 ml of 12 M hydrochloric acid, 3 ml of 49% hydrofluoric acid (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 ml of deionized water (23 ). The mixture was kept in an ice bath for 10 min and then stirred for 24 hours at room temperature. After etching, the mixture was washed five times by centrifugation in two 150-ml plastic centrifuge tubes at 3500 rpm for 2 min until the pH of the supernatant reached 7 to 6. After that, the sediment was added to a cold 20% solution of lithium chloride (LiCl) in water. The mixture was dispersed by manual shaking, stirred in an ice bath for 10 min, and then stirred at room temperature for 4 hours. After that, MXene was washed three times until the supernatant becomes dark, which is an indication of the beginning of delamination. The unreacted Ti3AlC2 and large multilayered Ti3C2 particles were separated by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 1 min, and the collected supernatant was used for spraying. Ti2C and Mo2TiC2 films were made as described elsewhere (22 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Purification and Analysis of Peptidoglycan-Linked Polysaccharides

PG‐PS was purified as previously described (Candela et al., 2011). Cells were grown in 1 l TY medium to OD600 1.0, pelleted and boiled for 10 min in 80 ml of 50 mM Tris‐HCl, pH7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% SDS. The suspension was centrifuged at 6500 g for 10 min and the boiling step repeated to obtain the peptidoglycan covalently linked to cell wall polysaccharide. The resulting pellet was washed in 40 ml of 50 mM Tris‐HCl, pH 7.4, sonicated and centrifuged at 50 000 g for 20 min. The remaining contaminants were discarded by treating the resulting pellet, solubilised in 20 mM MgSO4, by DNase (1 mg ml−1) and RNase (5 mg ml−1) for 2 h, then by proteinase K (20 μg ml−1 at room temperature for 12 h) in the presence of 10 mM CaCl2, and finally by SDS boiling (1% at 100°C for 10 min). Under these conditions, polysaccharides covalently linked to the peptidoglycan via a phosphodiester linkage co‐purify with the PG. To purify the PG, the PSII polysaccharide was released from the PG and degraded by incubation of the PG‐PS with hydrofluoric acid (48%; Sigma‐Aldrich) for 48 h at 4°C. PG was then washed three times in H2O and evaporated. To purify and analyse the PS covalently linked to the PG, the PS was partially released from the PG using 1% acetic acid (95°C, 1 h). After centrifugation, the supernatant was lyophilised and analysed by NMR (Brucker Advance 300). The sample was dissolved in D2O, and the spectra was recorded at 300K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Photosensitizer-Functionalized Silica Particles

Silicon phthalocyanine dichloride (SiPcCl2), chlorin e6, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (ATPS), 3-glycidyloxypropyl-trimethoxysilane (GPTMS), 3-iodopropyl-trimethoxysilane, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluorohexyltrimethoxysilane, hydrofluoric acid, trans-2-methyl-2-pentenoate anion, 9,10-dibromo anthracene, t-butyl acrylate, o-tolylphosphine, potassium formate, Pd(OAc)2, triethylamine, trifluoroacetic acid, dimethylformamide, sodium hydroxide, toluene, acetonitrile, dichloromethane, deuterium oxide-d2 were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Allentown, PA). 9,10-Anthracene dipropionate dianion was synthesized in three steps and 76% yield using the procedure reported by Matsuo et al.26 (link) Porous Vycor glass (Corning 7930) was purchased from Advanced Glass and Ceramics (Holden, MA) and ground to particles sized 40–150 μm in diameter. Silicone 3140 manufactured by Dow Corning (3140) was purchased from Ellsworth Adhesives. SiO2 nanoparticles TS530 were obtained from the Cabot Corporation. The materials listed above were used as received without any further purification. UV-vis spectra were collected with Hitachi U-2001 or Shimadzu-1800 spectrophotometers. Irradiance was measured using a visible-light-enhanced silicon photodetector (Newport Corp.), which was calibrated for 400–1100 nm optical power measurements and its maximum measurable power is 2.0 W. The temperature of the particles on the SHS surface was determined using a Testo 845 infrared temperature instrument (Lenzkirch, Germany) positioned above the surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Synthesis and Backfilling of Bimetallic Raspberry Colloids

Styrene, acrylic acid, ammonium peroxodisulfate, gold (III) chloride hydrate (HAuCl4, 99.995%), palladium (II) nitrate hydrate (Pd(NO3)2, 99.9%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 99%), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, MW 10 K), sodium citrate, 2-aminoethanethiol hydrochloride (AET, 98%), N-Ethyl-N′-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDAC, ≥99.0%) and 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES, >99.5%), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), nitric acid (HNO3 (aq), 67–70% w/w), hydrochloric acid (HCl (aq), 36.5−38.0% w/w and 0.1 M), hydrofluoric acid (HF, 50 %), acetone and sand (white quartz, 50–70 mesh particle size) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Ethanol was obtained from Koptec. ICP-MS calibration samples of Au (10 PPM) and Pd (10 PPM) were obtained from Inorganic Ventures. All the chemicals were used as received. Triply distilled deionized (DI) water (18 MΩ) was used in all experiments. All glassware and teflon-coated magnetic stir bars used in the metal nanoparticle synthesis were thoroughly cleaned in aqua regia (3 parts HCl, 1 part HNO3) (Caution: highly corrosive) and rinsed in DI water.
The synthesis of PVP-capped bimetallic Pd0.04Au0.96 nanoparticles (NPs) and raspberry colloids were reported in our previous publications9 (link),15 (link). In general, citrate capped Au nanoparticles (~5 nm) were prepared by reduction of HAuCl4 with sodium borohydride NaBH4 in DI water. As synthesized Au nanoparticle solution (40 mL) was used for the synthesis of Pd0.04Au0.96 by adding to it 5 mL of ascorbic acid aqueous solution (0.1 M) and 150 μL of Pd(NO3)2 aqueous solution (10 mM). The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature and stored at 4 °C. Carboxylic acid-functionalized polystyrene colloids (PS-COOH) with diameter of ~340 nm were synthesized by surfactant free emulsion polymerization, using acrylic acid as co-monomer and ammonium peroxodisulfate as an initiator following a recipe from the literature36 (link). Raspberry colloids were synthesized by adding specific amounts of Pd0.04Au0.96 nanoparticles to the colloidal dispersion of thiol-modified polystyrene colloids (PS-SH)9 (link),15 (link). Typically for ~1% metal loading, 2.5 mL of the Pd0.04Au0.96 solution was added to 1 mL of 1 wt.% PS-SH colloidal dispersion in DI water. The dispersion was stirred for 2 h, washed three times with water using centrifugation (9500 rpm for 40 min), and re-dispersed in water to give ~5 wt% PS@Pd0.04Au0.96 raspberry colloids. The backfilling method used to form RCT SiO2-based structures was described in detail in our previous publications24 ,37 (link). In general, the raspberry colloidal dispersion was dried at 65 °C and then backfilled with prehydrolyzed TEOS solution. The backfilled samples were dried and finally calcined at 500 °C in air for 2 h to remove polymer colloids and organic volatiles, and to solidify the matrix into SiO2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Analytical Procedure for Germanium Isotope Analysis

All chemicals were of analytical
reagent grade. All samples and standards were diluted with deionized
water (Milli-Q Integral 3 Q-POD Water Purification System, Merck Millipore,
Darmstadt, Germany).
Selected geological reference materials
were analyzed to validate the proposed analytical procedure. They
include U.S. Geological Survey reference materials BHVO-2 (Hawaiian
basalt), GH (granite; Hoggar, Algeria), GL-O (glauconite; Normandy,
France), and IF-G (iron formation; West Greenland).
Hydrofluoric
acid (40%), nitric acid (65%; both Merck Suprapur,
Darmstadt, Germany), and phosphoric acid (≥85%; Sigma, Milwaukee,
WI, USA) were applied to dissolved geological SRMs.
EMSURE fuming
hydrochloric acid (37%) and chloroform for liquid
chromatography (both Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used in the extraction
procedure. Compressed helium (Air Products, Warsaw, Poland) was used
to purge samples after extraction.
Sodium borohydride (Sigma,
Milwaukee, WI, USA), sodium hydroxide
micropills (POCH, Gliwice, Poland), sodium acetate trihydrate (≥98.0%;
POCH, Gliwice, Poland), and glacial acetic acid (100%; Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany) were used for the generation of germanium hydride. NaBH4 solution (1%, w/v) in 0.01 M NaOH was freshly prepared on
a daily basis31 (link) by dissolving consecutively
0.24 g of sodium hydroxide and 6.0 g of Sodium borohydride in 600
mL of deionized water. To prepare the acetic acid–sodium acetate
stock buffer solution (1 M), 34 g of CH3COONa·3H2O was dissolved in ∼150 mL of deionized water, then
4.8 mL of glacial CH3COOH was added, and the obtained solution
was diluted to 250 mL with water. Acetic buffer solution (0.1 M) was
prepared by an appropriate dilution of the stock solution.
Two
batch solutions of NIST 3120a standard (LOT 000411 and LOT
151115, both containing 10 g/L Ge) were used in the analysis, but
only LOT 000411 was applied as a standard reference material with
δ74/70Ge equal to 0. Bracket solutions for measuring
delta values of Ge via the SSB procedure were prepared by spiking
0.1 M acetic buffer with NIST 3120a solution to a final Ge concentration
of 25–80 μg/L, trying to match the intensities of the
bracket and the sample.
Single-element nickel and copper ICP
standards (both Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany), iron atomic absorption standard (VHG Labs, Manchester, NH,
USA), and zinc calibration standard (CPAchem, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria),
as well as ICP multielement standard solution VI (Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany), were used in interference study by spiking the diluted NIST
3120a solution (70 μg/L Ge) to a final content of interfering
ions of 0.2–2.0 mg/L. The synthetic seawater was prepared similarly
as in ref32 (link) by an appropriate dilution
of chloride salts of sodium (Sigma, Milwaukee, WI, USA), magnesium,
and potassium (both Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with deionized water
with the only difference that sodium sulfate (Sigma, Milwaukee, WI,
USA) was also added to the mixture. The solution obtained had a comparable
composition to the natural seawater33 (Table 1). This synthetic
seawater was spiked with NIST 3120a to a total Ge concentration of
80 μg/L.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.