Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Vanillin

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, Australia, Italy, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Spain, Switzerland, Poland, Belgium, Canada, Argentina, Macao, Sao Tome and Principe, Ireland, Mexico, Brazil, Japan
About the product

Vanillin is a chemical compound used as a flavoring agent. It is the primary component of the extract of the vanilla bean and is commonly used in the food, beverage, and pharmaceutical industries.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

862 protocols using vanillin

1

Estrogen receptor binding assay with capsaicin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Capsaicin, vanillin, vanillic acid, acetaminophen, estradiol, estriol, 5-pregnan-3β-OL-2O-one, progesterone, 4-androstene-3,17-dione and insulin (human recombinant) were all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). estradiol (E2)-6-HRP (NOV-ND-R0951) was acquired from Enzo Biochem (Farmingdale, NY, USA). Estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) recombinant protein was obtained from Invitrogen-Thermofisher (Waltham, MA, USA).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to investigate whether CAP acts as a competitive inhibitor or allosteric regulator in the presence of estrogen binding to the ESR1. An estrogen linked to horseradish peroxidase (EST-HRP) served as both the source of estrogen and a means by which to evaluate changes in the binding affinity of estrogen to its receptor in the presence of other ligands, such as CAP and ACET. To begin, the ESR1 was dissolved in a 1:1 solution of water to ethanol at a 1/100 dilution. Then, 100 μL of this solution was pipetted in duplicate into 10 wells of a Costar round-bottomed 96-well ELISA plate and incubated for one hour. Two wells in each row received only the ethanol–water solution and acted as controls. Any excess receptor was triply washed out using a 1% Tween 20 solution (in phosphate buffer) and a plate washer. Then, 200 μL of blocking agent (2% polyvinyl alcohol in phosphate buffer) was added to every well, incubated for an hour and then triply washed. Next, CAP was dissolved at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL ( 3.27×104M ) in a 1:1 solution of water to ethanol which acted as the base solution for EST-HRP dilution. The preparation of the EST-HRP dilutions was also carried out in a 0.01 mg/mL ( 3.27×105 M ) and 0.001 mg/mL ( 3.27×106 M ) CAP base solution to investigate the magnitude by which varying levels of CAP can shift the binding curve. A base solution of 1:1 water to ethanol without CAP served as the control. Beginning at a 1/100 dilution, the EST-HRP was then diluted by thirds ten times. An amount of 100 μL of each dilution was added to a well, incubated for an hour and triply washed. Finally, 100 μL of ABTS reagent was added to each well, incubated for an hour and the plate was read at 405 nm in a Spectramax UV-VIS scanning spectrophotometer.
The same competitive-binding ELISA procedure was used to investigate the effect of other ligands on the binding affinity of estrogen to the ESR1. The other ligands investigated were vanilloids with a similar structure to CAP, specifically VAN and VAN ACID, and known competitive inhibitors of the receptor, specifically ACET. These compounds were also tested against the same hormones as CAP using UV spectroscopy to investigate their binding activity.
UV spectroscopy in a crystal plate was used to investigate whether CAP has specificity for estrogen alone or whether it can bind to other naturally occurring hormones. To start, CAP was dissolved in a 1:1 solution of water to ethanol at 1 mg/mL ( 3.27×103 M ) and then diluted by thirds eight times. Next, the hormones were dissolved in a 1:1 solution of water to ethanol at a 1/100 dilution. An amount of 50 μL of each CAP dilution was added to 3 wells of a crystal plate, with one well serving as the control, with another 50 μL of 1:1 water to ethanol added, and the other two serving as experimental duplicates, with 50 μL of the prepared hormone solution added. Then, two additional wells were prepared to serve as controls: one containing 100 μL of 1:1 water to ethanol and the other containing 50 μL of prepared hormone solution and 50 μL of 1:1 water to ethanol. Finally, the plate was incubated for 1 h and read in a Spectramax UV-VIS scanning spectrophotometer, spanning wavelengths from 190 to 400 nm. Data analysis involved the subtraction of observed absorbance values from expected absorbance values generated from the control wells ([CAP + 1:1 solution] + [hormone + 1:1 solution] − [1:1 solution]) and plotting them as a function of CAP concentration. Because the solvent (1:1 solution of water–ethanol) was used as a control and subtracted from all wells, the resulting data reflected only the absorbances of the solute compounds. Since each compound has a different lambda maximal absorbance, analysis of the resulting data required finding one common wavelength at which the additions and subtractions of the spectra could be carried out and at which the absorbance of each compound was maximized. In practice, the best common wavelengths were found to be between 205 and 210 nm. These wavelengths also suggest that the dominant form of binding involves hydrogen and/or ionic bonding rather than interactions such as charge transfer complexing that would be dominant at higher wavelengths around 270–280 nm.
Data were analyzed and graphed using Microsoft Excel and diagrams were created on Microsoft PowerPoint (Redmond, WA, USA).
Similarity searches involving TRPV1, insulin and the estrogen receptor (SwissProt accession numbers provided in the relevant figures) were carried out using LALIGN (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/jdispatcher/psa/lalign accessed 14 February 2024) with the following parameter settings optimized for finding significant alignments in short sequences of proteins: BLOSUM80, Gap open −12.0, Gap extended −2.0, E value 1.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antioxidant Potential of Botanical Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), catechin, copper sulfate (CuSO4), tiobarbituric acid (TBA), rosmarinic acid, chicoric acid, quercetin, caftaric acid, vanillin, caffeic acid, syringic acid, rutin, gallic acid, naringenin, cinnamic acid, sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), ascorbic acid, potassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6), ferric chloride (FeCl3), trichloroacetic acid, aluminum chloride (AlCl3), and Folin–Ciocalteu reagent were purchased from MERCK (Lyon, France). All chemicals, including solvents, were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenolic Compound Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol and water (LC-MS grade) were purchased from HiPerSolv CHROMANORM, VWR Chemicals BDH (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Formic acid 98–100% was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). For the determination of phenolic compounds, apigenin 98%, caffeic acid 98%, catechin 97%, cinnamiccinnamic acid 97%, chrysin 98%, diosmin 97%, epicatechin, epigallocatechin 97%, ferulic acid 98%, epicatechin gallate 98%, hesperidin 98% (internal standard), kaempferol 98%, luteolin 98%, myritecin 97%, myricitrin 97%, naringin 98%, p-coumaric acid 98%, quercetin 98%, quercitrin 99%, rosmarinic acid 98%, protocatechuic acid 97%, rutin 98%, sinapic acid 98%, syringaldehyde 97%, syringic acid 98%, taxifolin 98%, vanillic acid 98%, and vanillin 98% were used and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Stenheim, Germany). Stock standard solutions of all the analytical standard compounds were prepared with LC-MS-grade methanol at 1000 mg/L and were afterward stored in dark brown glass bottles at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Analytical Techniques for Food Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ethanol (Química Moderna, Barueri, SP, Brazil, 95%) and distilled water (TE-4007-20, Tecnal, Niort, France) were used as solvents.
To determine the soluble protein content, the following were used: sodium hydroxide (Anidrol, Diadema, SP, Brazil, ≥97.0%), sodium citrate (Synch, New York, NY, USA, ≥99.0%), sodium carbonate (Êxodo Cientifica, Sumaré, SP, Brazil, ≥98.5%), copper sulfate (Anidrol, ≥98.0%), Follin and Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent 2N (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and bovine albumin as standard (Sigma-Aldrich ≥98.0%).
To determine the total glucosinolate content, sodium tetrachloropalladate (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥98.0%), mEthanol (HPLC grade, PanReac Applichem, Barcelona, Spain), hydrochloric acid (Anidrol, ≥37%) and sinigrine monohydrated (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99.0%) were used as reagents. For the quantification of tannins, sulfuric acid (Anidrol, ≥95.0%), mEthanol (HPLC grade, PanReac Applichem), and vanillin (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99.0%) were used as reagents, and catechin (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥96.0%) was used as the standard.
Sucrose content was determined using acetonitrile (HPLC grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and sucrose standard (Sigma Aldrich, >99.0%). For the identification and quantification of phenolic compounds, the following materials were used: ultra-pure water (Milli-Q plus, Induslab, Londrina, SP, Brazil), mEthanol (HPLC grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), formic acid (Merck, >99.0%,) and chromatographic standards of gallic, trans cinnamic, caffeic, coumaric, ferulic and quercetin acids, all from Sigma-Aldrich (≥98.0%).
In the analyses of antimicrobial activities, sterile water containing 2% dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) was used and 2,3,5-triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich) at 2.0% was used as a developer. For the cultivation of bacteria and fungus, BHI (brain heart infusion) and Sabouraud broths were used, respectively.
For protein fractions, sodium chloride (Synth, Diadema, Brazil, 98.0%), Ethanol (Exodo Científica, 99%), sodium hydroxide (Synth, 98%) and bovine albumin (Signa-Aldrich ≥98.0%) were used. For the determination of dietary fiber, the buffer 2-Morpholinoethanesulfonic acid/ Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Neon, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 99%) and the dietary fiber determination kit (Merck) were used. In the determination of functional properties, distilled water (TE-4007–20, Tecnal) and soybean oil (Imcopa oils) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extraction and Cell Culture Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, silica gel 60 (0.063–0.0200 mm), LiChroprep RP-18 (40–63 µm), TLC silica gel 60 F254, and TLC silica gel 60 RP-18 F254s aluminum sheets were purchased from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. Sephadex LH-20, n-butanol, methanol, glutamic acid, albumin, powdered milk, Dragendorff reagent, caffeine, vanillin, sucrose, glucose, RPMI medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), DMSO, and doxorubicin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. All solvents and reagents were of analytical grade.
Ethidium bromide and MTS colorimetric assay were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). EDTA, NaCl, and Tris base were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). NaOH was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). L-Glutamine, Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Penicillin G, Streptomycin, and Amphotericin B), trypsin, and HAM F-12 medium were purchased from GIBCO (Grand Island, NY, USA).
The colon carcinoma cell lines RKO (CRL-2577), HCT-116 (CCL-247), and the Cricetulus griseus cell line CHO-K1 (CCL-61) were purchased from ATCC, and SW613-B3 was provided by Dr. Ivanna Scovassi, CNR–IGM, Pavia, Italy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identification of Vanilloid Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glucovanillin was obtained from Chromadex (Irvine, CA, USA), and vanillin, vanillic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillyl alcohol, p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, anisaldehyde, and anisyl alcohol of analytical grade were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). A mix of alkanes C8–C20 from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for identification with GC-MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Herbal Dust from F. officinalis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The F. officinalis plant matrix was herbal dust produced as a result of intensive grinding in an industrial mill (UMČ 30, Biljotehnika, Pančevo, Serbia), and unequal parts of the initial herbal material (including stems, leaves, and flowers) in the production sector of the Institute for Medicinal Plants Research “Dr Josif Pančić”, Pančevo, Serbia (size ≤ 0.3 mm). After sieving through pharmaceutical sieves, the mentioned plant matrix takes the form of waste or dust, and according to regulations on the quality of tea, herbal tea, and tea products of the Republic of Serbia, cannot be an integral part of tea products for the market, trade, or sale [28 ].
Water was purified through a Simplicity UV® water purification system (Merck Millipore, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The water used for the LC-MS analysis was purified by a TKA water purification system (Niederelbert, Germany). Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, Coomassie® Brilliant blue G 250, phosphoric acid, and gallic acid were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany); ethanol and sodium carbonate from Fisher Science, Loughborough, UK; sodium nitrite from Alkaloid, Skopje, Macedonia; vanillin, hydrochloric acid, and phosphoric acid from Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA; ammonium acetate and nitric acid (65%) from Zorka Pharma, Šabac, Serbia; 1M sodium hydroxide from Alfapanon, Bački Petrovac, Serbia; 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) or ABTS, 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid or Trolox, 2,2-diphenyl−1-picrylhydrazyl or DPPH, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), bovine serum albumin (BSA), tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), aluminum chloride, and acetic acid from Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany; methanol, acetone, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Escherichia coli 055:B5), catechin, and LC-MS-grade acetonitrile and formic acid from Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA; and potassium persulfate from Centrohem, Stara Pazova, Serbia. DMEM/F12 cell culture medium (1:1 mixture of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium and Ham’s F-12 nutrient mixture) was from Pan-Biotech (Aidenbach, Germany). The study was conducted on the spontaneously immortalized human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT from adult skin (a generous gift from Prof. Milica Pešić, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Department of Neurobiology, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia), which has been proposed as a model for the study of keratinocyte functions [107 (link),108 (link)]. It displays normal morphogenesis and all major surface markers and functions characteristic of isolated keratinocytes [109 (link)]. HaCaT cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)–F12 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (herein—complete culture medium). Cell-permeable oxidation-sensitive probe H2DCFDA (2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate—Calbiochem) was from Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany), while MTT reagent (thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide, 1 mg/mL), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Lignin Oxidation Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alkaline nitrobenzene oxidation (NBO) was carried out in a stainless-steel bomb using the modified method of Kačíková et al. [34 (link)]. NBO products were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in an Agilent 1260 Infinity II Prime LC (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) apparatus equipped with a diode array detector at 210 nm, a Luna Omega column of 1.6 µm C18 (100 × 4.6 mm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), mobile phase water/methanol/propionic acid (88/4/8/0.1), a flow rate of 0.4 mL·min−1, and a temperature of 35 °C. The quantification was performed with the external calibration using standards (p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillin, vanillic acid, syringaldehyde, and syringic acid) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). NBO was performed in duplicate, and each sample was analyzed twice. Identification was made using a comparison of the retention times and UV spectra with the standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Honey Diastase and Phenolic Compounds Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glycerol (pure per analytical grade, ppa grade), gelatine (ppa grade), sodium hydroxide in a 0.1 M analytical weighed amount, sodium acetate trihydrate (ppa grade), potassium hexacyanoferrate (II) trihydrate (ppa grade), zinc acetate dihydrate (ppa grade), sodium carbonate (ppa grade), ethanol (≥96.0%) and Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent were purchased from Chempur (Piekary Śląskie, Poland). The Phadebas Honey Diastase Test tablets were bought from Magle Life Sciences (Malmö, Sweden), and glacial acetic acid (ppa grade) and formic acid (≥98.0%) were bought from Pol-Aura (Zawroty, Poland). Methanol and isopropanol were obtained from J.T. Baker (Gliwice, Poland) and Avantor (Gliwice, Poland), respectively, and were of HPLC grade. Proline (≥99.5%), ninhydrin (ACS reagent), 2-methoxyethanol (≥99.8%), hydroxymethylfurfural (≥99.0%), vanillin (≥99.0%), p-coumaric acid (≥98.0%), salicylic acid (≥99.0%), quercetin (≥95.0%), kaempferol (≥97.0%), isorhamnetin (≥95.0%), acacetin (≥97.0%), caffeic acid (≥98.0%), rutin trihydrate (≥90.0%), hesperetin (≥95.0%), pinocembrin (≥95.0%), chrysin (≥98.0%), trans-ferulic acid (≥99.0%), vanillic acid (≥97.0%), hesperidin (≥80.0%), gallic acid (≥97.5%) and DPPH (2,2-difenylo-1-pikrylohydrazyl, purity ≥ 90.0%) were bought from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). For the analyses, distilled or ultrapure water from the Milli-Q system (Merck, Germany, resistivity of 18.3 MΩ cm) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Standardized Phytochemical Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The
gelatin used in this
study was derived from porcine skin (CAS number 9000-70-8, product
number G1890) and was sourced from Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany.
The vanillin (CAS number 121-33-5, product number W310700) was obtained
from Sigma-Aldrich, Cedex, France. The ferric (III) chloride hexahydrate
(97%) was purchased from Loba Chemie Pvt Ltd., Maharashtra, Mumbai,
India (CAS number 10025-77-1, product number CHM.L0382000500). The
silver nitrate (AgNO3, 99.9%) was obtained from Poch SA,
Gliwice, Poland (CAS number 7761-88-8, product number CHM.814322777.250).
AGP (9 mg/capsule, drug registration number: G 292/43, product batch
code: 54109) was sourced from Khaolaor Laboratories Co., Ltd. (Samutprakarn,
Thailand). In brief, dried A. paniculata was inspected using the Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatograph (UPLC,
waters corporation, Milford, MA, USA) method, ground, and finely extracted
with chloroform, hexane, methanol and ethanol. The extract was then
injected to measure the AGP content. For the experiments, deionized
water (DI) with a specific resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm was
obtained from a RiOsTM Type I Simplicity 185 water purification system
by Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany. Additionally, dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) was purchased from Honeywell International, Inc., Charlotte,
NC, USA (CAS number 67-68-5, product number 15615740). Potassium carbonate
(K2CO3, ≥99.0%) was purchased from Merck
Millipore (CAS number 584-08-7, product number 104928).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.