The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

65 protocols using gata4

1

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Cellular Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described previously22 (link). Briefly, for immunocytochemistry, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA,
Biosesang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) in PBS for 1 h at 4°C and were permeabilized with 0.1%
Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 5 min. Then, the cells were blocked with blocking solution
(DAKO North America Inc., Carpinteria, CA) for 1 h at RT and were incubated with primary
antibodies overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 h at RT. The
following antibodies and dilutions were used: LHX1 (1:100; Santa Cruz); PAX2 (1:100;
Thermo Scientific); GATA4 (1:100; Santa Cruz); and FSHR (1:100, Santa Cruz). The secondary
antibodies were as follows: Alexa-488, Alexa-594, Alexa-488 (1:200, Life
Technologies).
For immunohistochemistry, the primary antibodies used were as follows: GFP (1:100; Abcam,
Boston, MA) and GATA4 (1:100; Santa Cruz). The secondary antibodies used were as follows:
Alexa-488; and Alexa-594 (1:100, Life Technologies). Immunofluorescence images were taken
using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM 880, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoprecipitation of GATA4 in Osteoblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoprecipitation (IP) reactions were conducted on whole-cell lysates prepared in standard RIPA buffer extracted from calvarial osteoblasts. IPs were performed with antibodies to GATA4 (Clone G-4, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) or normal mouse IgG, along with Protein G magnetic beads (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Immunoblotting was performed with antibodies to FOXC1 (Cell Signaling Technology, clone D8A6, Danvers, MA, USA) and β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, clone 8H10D10). Whole blots are shown in Supplemental Figure S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry and immunoflu-orescence staining, primary antibodies against the following proteins were used: Rabbit anti DsRed monoclonal (Clonetech), DsRed (L-18 Santa Cruz), CC10 (S-20 Santa Cruz), c-MYC (N-262 Santa Cruz), GATA-4 (C-20 Santacruz), PGP 9.5 (78-504 AbD Serotec), PCNA (555566 Becton Dickinson Co), pro SPC (Gift from J. Whitsett), Actin (I-19 Santacruz), Aquaporin 5 (Alomene Aqp-005),C-RAF (E 10) Santa Cruz), HA Tag (clone 3F10 Roche), Cleaved Caspase 3 (Cell Signaling).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Blastocyst Immunostaining for Cell Lineage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blastocyst immunostaining was performed as described (Nichols et al., 2009 ). Briefly, embryos were washed once in PBST and once in PBS/PVP (P0930, Sigma), permeabilized for 45 min in 0.5% Triton X100 (T9284, Sigma) in PBS/PVP, blocked in 0.1% BSA with 2% donkey serum in PBST for 2h and incubated overnight with primary antibodies used at 1/100 dilution. Primary antibodies used were: Nanog (RCAB0002P-F, Cosmo Bio Co., Ltd.), Cdx2 (MU392A-UC, BioGenex), Gata6 (AF1700, R&D Systems), Gata4 (sc-1237, Santa Cruz), Sox17 (AF1924, R&D Systems). On the next day, embryos were washed in PBST and incubated for 2h with the secondary Alexa Fluor (Invitrogen) conjugated antibodies diluted 1/400 in 1% donkey serum in PBST. Blastocysts were counterstained with DAPI and mounted individually in 20 μl PBS droplets on glass-bottom Petri dishes for imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Goat Testis Immunohistochemistry for MT1, MT2, RORα, GATA-4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Testis samples from 3-month-old goats were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The samples were cryo-embedded in optimum cutting temperature (OCT) compound and then cut into 7 μm thick sections. MT1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-13180), MT2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-13177), RORα (Abcam ab60134) and GATA-4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-1237) distributions were examined using immunohistochemistry. Briefly, after washing three times with PBS, the slides were incubated with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies directed against MT1 (final concentration 1:200), MT2 (final concentration 1:200), GATA-4 (final concentration 1:200), and RORα (final concentration 1:200) were added to the solution. After 4 hours of incubation, the secondary antibody was applied for 1 h. Staining was visualized using a 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol for Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X‐100 for 5 min and blocked in 3% (vol/vol) goat serum (Dako) or donkey serum (Sigma) for 45 min. They were then incubated in primary antibodies for 45 min followed by secondary antibodies for 30 min (Alexa Fluor dyes, 1:1000, Invitrogen). All antibodies were diluted in the blocking buffer. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma) for 5 min and coverslips were mounted on slides with FluorSave (Merck). All procedures were performed at room temperature. Primary antibodies used in this study were Vimentin (1:100, Millipore), NFIA (1:250, abcam), GFAP (1:500, Dako), GFAP (1:500, Sigma), S100B (1:500, Dako), βIII‐tubulin (1:1000, Sigma), TDP‐43 (1:250, Abnova), NANOG (1:250, R&D Systems), SOX2 (1:250, Millipore), TRA‐1‐60 (1:250, Santa Cruz), OCT3/4 (1:250, Santa Cruz), SOX1 (1:100, R&D Systems), Nestin (1:1000, Millipore), Brachyury (1:100, R&D Systems), EOMES (1:600, abcam), FOXA2 (1:100, R&D Systems), GATA‐4 (1:100, Santa Cruz), SMI32 (1:250, Covance), and Caspase‐3 (1:500, Abcam).
Fluorescent imaging was performed on fields of view containing uniform DAPI staining using either an Axio Observer.Z1 (Zeiss) epifluorescence microscope or an LSM710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss). Images were processed and blindly analyzed by using the ImageJ64 (v 1.47) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Characterization of CPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CPCs were passaged 3–5 times, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, and stained for c‐kit (H‐300; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas TX), GATA‐4 (9,053; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and Nkx‐2.5 (14,033; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Notch1 (ab8925, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Sca‐1 (ab51317, Abcam), CD31 (sc‐28,188, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or CD34 (7,324; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Pooled patient cell lines were used, and the data were analyzed using Flow Jo V10 software. Cells were also analyzed before after ES with Ki‐67 antibody (sc‐23,900, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Calcein AM and Ethidium homodimer‐1 for live/dead quantification in addition to microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence staining, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 1%Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 1 h, blocked with 5%BSA (Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature, then incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight and then incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The primary antibodies included Gata4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), Gata6 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), Sox17 (Cell Signaling Technology), Sall4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Oct4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Sox2 (Calbiochem, Billerica, MA, USA), Nanog (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Cdx2 (Bio Genex, San Ramon, CA, USA), Sparc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Cdh1 (Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA), Desmin (Millipore), Cytokeratin (Millipore), and βIII-Tubulin (Abcam). Secondary antibodies include goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 546 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 546 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The nuclei were stained with DAPI (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Cardiac Progenitor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CPCs were characterized for surface expression of cKit (H-300, Santa Cruz), cardiac transcription factors nkx2–5 and gata4 (Santa Cruz) and Notch1 Extracellular Domain (N1ECD, clone 8G10, Millipore) using FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). Data was analyzed using FlowJo version 7.6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min at room temperature and then made permeable with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min. Cells were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 30 min and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in 1% BSA in PBS. The antibodies used were HNF4A (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-6556), GATA4 (1:250; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-1237), and NKD1 (1:250; Abcam, ab133650). Cells were washed in 1% BSA in PBS and incubated with secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, A21206, Alexa fluor anti-rabbit 488 nm; A11058, Alexa fluor anti-goat 594 nm; and A11055, Alexa fluor anti-goat 488) and DAPI for 1 h at room temperature and washed with PBS. Images were processed using Adobe Photoshop to optimize brightness and contrast, with all control and experimental images being treated identically.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!