We Dissect Protocols

Glutaraldehyde

Manufactured by Merck Group
4 618 citations
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, India, Switzerland, China, France, Canada, Sao Tome and Principe, Spain, Poland, Japan, Belgium, Israel, Ireland, Brazil, Singapore, Sweden, Czechia, Macao, Netherlands, Australia, Portugal, Denmark, Panama, Hungary, Austria
About the product

Glutaraldehyde is a chemical compound used as a fixative and disinfectant in various laboratory applications. It serves as a cross-linking agent, primarily used to preserve biological samples for analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Glutaraldehyde is an active chemical compound commercially available through authorized distributors like Sigma-Aldrich, a subsidiary of the Merck Group. Sigma-Aldrich offers a 50% aqueous solution of glutaraldehyde priced at $248.00 per 1 liter, as well as a 25% aqueous solution available for $265.00 per 500 milliliters.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

4 618 protocols using «glutaraldehyde»

1

Protein Extraction and Staining Protocol

2025
Zwittergent 3-14 detergent (code: 693017) was purchased from Millipore (Burlington VT, USA), agarose (code: BY-R0100) was from BIOWEST (Nuaillé, France), Freund’s adjuvant (code: P5881) and glutaraldehyde (code: G6257) were purchased from Sigma (Tokyo, Japan), Coomassie brilliant blue (code: 6104-59-2), methanol, and acetic acid were from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The lysis buffer (PBS containing 1% Zwittergent), staining solution (0.2% (w/v) Coomassie brilliant blue, 5% (v/v) methanol, 1% (v/v) acetic acid in distilled water), and destaining solution (40% (v/v) methanol, 10% (v/v) acetic acid in distilled water) were prepared in the lab.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Morphological Characteristics of Aeromonas hydrophila

2025
The morphological characteristics of A. hydrophila were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Bacterial suspensions were subjected to various treatments, followed by centrifugation to obtain a pellet, which was then washed twice with PBS. The cells were fixed with 2.5 % glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) at 4 °C for 2 h. After fixation, the cells underwent additional washing with PBS and were subjected to a graded series of ethanol solutions (35 %, 50 %, 70 %, 80 %, 90 %, and 100 % (v/v)) for dehydration. Subsequently, the samples were gold-coated under vacuum and examined using a scanning electron microscope (JSM-7500F, JEOL, Japan) at magnifications of 10,000 × and 20,000 × . Untreated cells served as the control group for comparison.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Observation of Dual-Species Biofilms

2025
For SEM observation, dual-species biofilms were grown on silicone
coupons following a structured protocol. Initially, samples were washed
with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.2, prepared using KH2PO4 (Exodus Science, Brazil) at a concentration
of 10 mM, NaCl (Dinamica, Brazil) at 137 mM, and KCl (LabSynth Ltd.a.,
Brazil) at 2.7 mM. After washing, biofilms were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde
(Sigma-Aldrich, Portugal) in PBS for 1 h to preserve cellular structure.
Subsequently, samples underwent a dehydration process using an ethanol
gradient of 10%, 30%, 70%, and 100% ethanol solutions, with each step
lasting 15 min. This gradient ensures complete dehydration to avoid
structural distortion during SEM observation. After fixation and dehydration,
the coupons were dried in a laminar flow chamber at room temperature
(22 ± 2 °C) for 24 h to ensure complete removal of solvents.53 (link),78 (link) After drying, the samples were coated with a gold film (120 nm thick)
using a metallizer (Quorum Q 150R ES, England) for 12 min, a critical
step to increase electronic conductivity during imaging. The morphology
and interactions of the biofilms were then observed using SEM/EDX
(Tescan VEGA3, Czech Republic) under vacuum conditions with an accelerating
voltage of 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Olfactory Rosettes

2025
Olfactory rosettes (n = 40) were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, Cat. No. G5882) solution in PBS at 4 °C for 2 h. After washing with PBS, biomaterial was postfixed in 2% OsO4 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in the same buffer for 12 h, washed in PBS, and dehydrated in an ascending alcohol gradient with acetone. The dehydrated specimens were embedded in Araldite 502 resin with a 2,4,6-tris dimethylamino methylphenol (DMP-30) catalyst (Araldite 502 Kit, SPI Supplies, West Chester, PA, USA). Ultrathin sections (70–80 nm) were made with an Ultracut R microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), placed on copper grids, and contrasted in lead citrate according to Reynolds (1963) [42 (link)]. The grids prepared with specimens were examined under a Leo 906E transmission electron microscope. Images were captured with a Mega View II digital camera and processed using the Mega Vision soft package (Soft Imaging System GmbH, Muenster, Germany). The comparative analysis of ribosomes quantity in the OSNs cytoplasm in fishes on the different reproductive stages was performed indirectly by evaluating the optical density with Image Pro+. On the whole, we analyzed 60 images for each group (pre-spawning and spawning) fish. We evaluated the mean length between nuclear pores in pre-spawning and spawning fish with Image Pro+ 6.0.0.260 soft (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). Based on these data, we calculated the number of pores per 1 µm2. On the whole, we analyzed 40 images for each group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of Autophagic Macrophages

2025
Cultured macrophages were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) prepared in 0.1mmol/L cacodylate buffer for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes in 0.1mmol/L cacodylate buffer, cells underwent a 1-hour post-fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide (Sigma-Aldrich). Subsequent staining was performed with 2% uranyl acetate (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min in the dark. Dehydration was achieved through sequential 10-minute immersions in increasing ethanol concentrations (50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) followed by two 10-minute incubations in propylene oxide (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were then embedded in epoxy resin (Sigma-Aldrich) and allowed to polymerize at 60 °C for 48 h. Sections of 60–90 nm thickness were generated using an ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems) and collected on copper grids. For enhanced contrast, sections were treated with lead citrate (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min, then visualized under a transmission electron microscope (Leica Microsystems) to identify and quantify characteristic autophagic structures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «glutaraldehyde»

1

Characterization of Bacterial Recombination Proteins

DNA modification enzymes were supplied by Roche, BioLabs or Fermentas and DTT was from Sigma. The cross-linking agent glutaraldehyde was from Sigma. SsbA (18.7 kDa) and RecO (29.3 kDa) proteins were purified as described (22 (link)) and free from corresponding E. coli proteins. RecA (38.0 kDa) was purified as previously described (28 (link)). SsbB (12.4 kDa) and SsbB* (13.5 kDa) proteins were purified as described in Supplemental Material.
All proteins were purified to homogeneity >98%. The NH2 terminus of the purified proteins was sequenced by automatic Edman degradation. The corresponding molar extinction coefficients for SsbA, SsbB, SsbB*, RecA and RecO were calculated as 11 400, 13 000, 12 950, 15 200 and 19 600 M−1 cm−1, respectively, at 280 nm, as previously described (28 (link)). The protein concentrations were determined using the above molar extinction coefficients. RecA is expressed as mol of protein as monomers, RecO as dimers, and SsbA, SsbB and SsbB* as tetramers.
For determination of the oligomeric state of SsbA or SsbB protein cross-linking experiments were performed as described in Supplemental Material.
Limiting Trypsin (0.25 µg/ml) degradation of SsbB or SsbB* proteins was performed as described elsewhere (29 (link),30 (link)) and in the Supplemental Material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología

2

Fabrication of Stretchable Cell Culture Device

A custom strain device was manufactured from stainless steel (Figure S3), and cells were grown on modified stretchable PDMS surfaces. PDMS sheets (0.25 mm thick), cut into 5 by 1.7 cm rectangles, and PDMS rings, 2 mm thick with 1.0-cm inner and 1.6-cm outer diameters, were cleaned in PCC-54, ethanol, and finally water. After drying, PDMS rings were placed in the middle of the PDMS sheets, and the PDMS was treated with air plasma (PDC-32G, Harrick Scientific, http://www.harricksci.com/) at 250 mbar for 30 s to render the surface hydrophilic. For noncovalent attachment of Fn-u to the surface, plasma-treated surfaces were used. For covalent attachment of Fn-u, amino groups were attached to the plasma-treated surface with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane vapor in an evacuated chamber for 1 h. Vapor-based silanization resulted in significantly lower surface fluorescence than solution-based silanization (data not shown), as has been previously reported [50 (link)]. After silanization, 0.125% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) was added and the sample incubated for 20 min. Finally, the surface was rinsed with water and dried prior to assembly of the strain device.
All metal strain device parts were autoclaved prior to assembly within a tissue culture hood. PDMS sheets were clamped into the strain device, and the culture surface within the PDMS ring was incubated with 0.03 g/l Fn-u for 1 h. Unreacted glutaraldehyde was quenched by incubation with DMEM plus 10% NCS for 20 min at 37 °C. Then 20 × 103 fibroblast cells/cm2 were seeded onto the PDMS surface and allowed to adhere for 30 min prior to removal of unbound cells and replacement with DMEM plus 10% NCS, 0.005 g/l Fn-DA, and 0.045 g/l Fn-u. After 24 h, cells were washed two times in 37 °C PBS and extracted, leaving behind the detergent-insoluble Fn matrix, with a 5-min incubation in 0.5% Triton X-100 plus 20 mM NH4OH in PBS (pH ∼9.7). The strain device with attached cell-free matrix was then imaged. Three separate fibril detachment experiments were performed with both Fn labeling approaches, while four and six separate stretching experiments were performed with amine/cys Fn-DA or cys/cys Fn-DA, respectively, on Fn-u that was covalently attached to the membrane. During strain application, it was found that mounting the PDMS ring on the PDMS membrane prior to treatment with air plasma most often resulted in the PDMS ring sliding on the membrane surface during stretching. Strain samples were discarded if the ring stuck to the membrane, thus leading to inhomogeneous strain application, or leaked culture medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

3

Imaging Techniques for Pigment Analysis

Adult fish were briefly anaesthetised with 0.004% MS-222 (Sigma) and imaged with Canon D5MarkII/MACRO 100 (Figs 1, 3). Fish fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.08% glutaraldehyde (Sigma) (Fig. 2) were photographed under a Leica MZ1 stereomicroscope. Metamorphic fish were anaesthetised, embedded in low melting point agarose with 4.5 mg/ml ± epinephrine (Sigma) for melanosome contraction, and photographed under a Leica M205 FA stereomicroscope with a Leica DCF300 FX camera using the software LAS V4.1 to allow multifocus images. An illumination was chosen to display iridophores optimally while xanthophore visibility is poor. Photographs were processed in Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology

4

Macrophage Isolation and Functional Assays

Macrophages were isolated as previously described.20 (link),22 (link) Bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMMs) were isolated from the femurs of mice and cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10 ng/mL recombinant mouse macrophage colony–stimulating factor (Invitrogen) for 7 days before the experiment. Elicited peritoneal macrophages were harvested from each genotype by peritoneal lavage with PBS 3 days after intraperitoneal injection of 1 mL of 3% thioglycollate. For adhesion assay, calcein acetoxymethyl–labeled peritoneal macrophages were incubated with primary porcine ECs, and attached cells were fixed and counted.23 (link) Migration assays were performed using transwells with 8.0-μm pore polycarbonate membrane inserts (Corning).22 (link) Macrophages were seeded on the transwell filters, and the lower chambers were filled with either control media or media containing 500 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS). After 5 hours, cells were removed from the upper surface of the insert by scraping using Q-Tips. The membranes were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde (Sigma), stained with hematoxylin (Leica) and mounted on the slides using glycerol gelatin. hematoxylin-stained cells were counted under the microscope. For lipid uptake assay, macrophages were incubated with DMEM containing 100 μg/mL of oxidized LDL (Biomedical Technologies) for 24 hours, followed by washing with PBS and staining with Oil-red-O/hematoxylin.20 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Iowa, University of Kentucky

5

Single Molecule Magnetic Tweezers Assay

The single molecule magnetic tweezers measurements were done in fluid chambers made of two sandwiched glass coverslips (Ted Pella) separated by strips of parafilm. The bottom surfaces were successively cleaned by sonication for 20 min in 1% Hellmanex (Hellma), acetone and ethanol (both from Sigma-Aldrich). After drying with air, the bottom surfaces were exposed to air plasma for 20 min, and silanized by immersion for 20 min in a solution of (3-aminopropyl)-trimethoxysilane (Sigma-Aldrich) 0.1 % v/v, in ethanol. After washing unreacted silane with ethanol, the surfaces were cured at 100°C for >1 hour. The top glass surfaces were cleaned by sonication in 1% Hellmanex for 20 min and washed with ethanol. To eliminate reflection of incident light from the magnets, the top glass was coated with either a non-reflective black tape or a 60 nm layer of Ni/Cr and 40 nm of gold (Good Fellow, using an Edwards Auto 306 Vacuum Coating System). For long-term magnetic tweezers experiments, glass coverslips with an imprinted 50 μm2 (link) grid array (Ibidi) were used to allow for repeated addressing of individual beads over multiple days (Figure S2). These coverslips were cleaned similarly, with the exception of air plasma, and silane curing at 100°C which was replaced with a 24 h vacuum step.
After assembly, the chambers were incubated for 1 hour with a solution of glutaraldehyde 1% v/v (Sigma Aldrich) diluted in PBS buffer, pH 7.2. The fluid chamber was then filled with 0.025% w/v amine-terminated nonmagnetic polystyrene beads with diameter of 2.89 μm (Spherotech), diluted in PBS. After 10 min, the beads that did not adsorb were washed with 100 μL PBS buffer. The chambers were then reacted for > 4 hours with a solution of 10 μg/mL HaloTag amine (O4) ligand (Promega), diluted in the same PBS buffer. Finally, the fluid chambers were blocked for 12 hours with TRIS buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2 and 1% w/v sulfhydryl blocked-BSA (Lee Biosolutions).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Columbia University

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.