Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Multiwave 3000

Manufactured by Anton Paar
Sourced in Austria, Germany, United States, Australia, Switzerland, Japan, France
About the product

The Multiwave 3000 is a high-performance microwave digestion system designed for the rapid and efficient sample preparation of a wide range of materials. It provides controlled and reproducible digestion of samples, ensuring accurate and reliable analytical results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The Multiwave 3000 by Anton Paar has been discontinued and replaced by the Multiwave PRO system. Pre-owned Multiwave 3000 units may be available on the secondary market, with prices ranging from approximately $7,500 to $9,800.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

319 protocols using «multiwave 3000»

1

Microwave-Assisted Acid Digestion for ICP-OES Analysis

2025
The microwave acid digestion was applied for sampled dissolution and was carried out in closed vessel. Anton Paar Multiwave 3000 type device (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria) was used with microwave energy of 600 W. The sample was weighted to the nearest 0.1300 g into a fluorocarbon polymer microwave vessel (HF100), followed by the addition of an aqua reqia solution in an amount of 6 mL (4.5 cm3 HCl + 1.5 cm3 HNO3). The vessel was sealed and heated in the microwave unit equipped with pressure and temperature controllers. The temperature was ramped to 175 °C within 30 min followed by a contact time of 30 min. Then, the vessels were cooled, vented, and opened. After cooling, the total dissolved sample content was diluted to volume of 25 cm3 and the samples were analyzed by the ICP-OES method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Quantitative Amino Acid Profiling of Lyophilized Powders

2025
The total nitrogen content was determined using a Dumas instrument (Rapid MAX N exceed cube N/protein analyzer, Elemental Analyzer system GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany). A total of 300 mg of the sample was applied for measurement. The values of the total nitrogen content (%) were multiplied by 6.25 to find the protein content (n = 3). The amino acid content was obtained using HPLC-MS, following hydrolysis and derivatization using an EZ:faast amino acid kit (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), as reported by [10 (link)]. Briefly, the acid hydrolysis was applied to release the amino acid using 6 M HCl for 1 h at 110 °C in a microwave sample preparation system (Multiwave 3000, Anton Paar, Graz, Austria). Then, the samples were purified with a solid-phase extraction sorbent tip, and derivatization was carried out following the injection of sample aliquots into an Agilent HPLC 1100 instrument (Santa Clara, CA, USA) linked to an Agilent ion trap mass spectrometer. The amino acids were recognized by comparing the retention time and mass spectrometric profiles of an external reference standard mixture. Calibration curves were generated and analyzed using HPLC-MS for quantification. All analyses were performed in triplicate samples (with two analytical replicates; n = 3 × 2).
The total amino acid profile was measured using the acid hydrolysis method, as explained above, and the PRP was calculated using the following formula: PRP %=fds g×AAfds%AAspc g
where fds is the net weight (g) of the freeze-dried sample, AAfds is the sum of amino acid content of the freeze-dried sample, and AAspc is the sum of amino acid content ( g ) in the raw material (lyophilized PC powders) before enzymatic hydrolyzation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

2025
Surface morphology and atomic ratio of the samples was characterized using a Tescan Mira LMS scanning electron microscopy (SEM) operated at 20.0 kV and the energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) attached to the SEM, respectively. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) using a JEM-2100F TEM operating at 200 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (Bruker D8 Advanced) were obtained to determine the crystal structures of the samples. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiment was carried out using Thermo Scientific K-Alpha. All spectra were calibrated according to the C 1 s binding energy at 284.8 eV. Contact angle measurements were tested on a Contact Angle Measuring Device (SDC-100S, Dynetech) with a drop of aqueous electrolyte on the samples, which were thoroughly cleaned and dried as before measure. The gas bubble formation was characterized by an in-situ cell through an optical microscope (OLYMPUS, DSX1000). Macropore pore size distribution was analyzed by the mercury intrusion porosimetry. The analysis was conducted on a Micromeritics porosimeter (Micromeritics Autopore V 9620) with Hg contact angle of 140.9 degrees and Hg surface tension of 485 dynes cm−1. The Hg intrusion pressure was set from 0.2 to 33,000 psia. The EPR measurement was performed on an Endor spectrometer (Bruker EMXplus-9.5/12). The g factor was obtained by taking the signal of manganese as a standard. Micromeritics ASAP 2460 was used for measuring the specific Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area. Ag content was measured by Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES, 720ES) after mineralization at 200 °C for 35 min under pressure (Multiwave 3000, Anton Paar) using 69% HNO3 (TraceSELECT, Fluka Analytical) and subsequent dilution by 2% HNO3. CO2 and water vapor permeability were measured with the MOCON 430 tester and Lan Guang C360M tester, respectively. pH meter (PHSJ-3F, Zici, Shanghai) was used to test the pH of the electrolyte.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Quantifying Boron Uptake in Cells

2025
To confirm boron uptake by cells and exclude any possible contamination, ICP-MS measurements were performed. Samples previously pretreated with nitric acid were transferred into Teflon hermetic vessels and subjected to mineralization supported by microwave radiation (Anton Paar, Graz, Austrian, Multiwave 3000, 4 × XF100, max. 60 atm., p-rate 0.4 bar/s, IR 240 °C). A digest of the samples was diluted 10 times with 1% v/v nitric acid directly before the analysis by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (Perkin Elmer Elan DRC-e) with the parameters given in Table 1. The boron concentration was measured as the 10B isotope, with the use of a calibrator curve prepared using a Merck ICP-MS Multi Element Standard no. IV (23 Elements) Centipur, Taufkirchen, Germany, where the abundances of boron in the standard were: 10B—19.9% and 11B—80.1%. Since the cells were incubated with a medium with a monoisotopic compound (10B), mathematical corrections were made on the obtained results. After, each sample’s blank signal was checked and an additional standard was used to control the stability of the measurements (boron standard solution of 10 mg/L in water dedicated to ICP-MS, ARISTAR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Contaminant Analysis in Fish Tissues

2025
Samples for contaminant analysis were pooled in groups of 5 mixed-gender fish. Trace metals were determined in fish liver and muscle samples by microwave digestion (Multiwave 3000, Anton Paar, Luton, UK) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Elan 6100DRC+ with AS-90/91 autosampler, Perkin-Elmer Sciex, Beaconsfield, UK), as previously described [24 ,25 (link)]. Samples of livers for contaminant analysis were pooled in groups of 5 mixed-gender fish and trace metals, polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) were determined in fish liver by accelerated solvent extraction and gas chromatography mass spectrometry [26 ,27 ]. Hepatic EROD activity was determined in S9 post-mitochondrial fractions using a Perkin Elmer LS55 fluorometer [28 ,29 ] and normalised for protein content using the Lowry (1951) method [30 (link)] with bovine serum albumin as standard. Bile samples were analysed for PAH metabolites using synchronous fluorescent spectroscopy (with a 42 nm difference in excitation and emission wavelengths) and standard addition quantification using 1-hydroxypyrene, modified from Ariese et al., 2005 [31 ]. Micronuclei were determined [32 (link)] on 4000 erythrocytes per fish following Giemsa staining. Vtg was determined by ELISA [33 ]. Determination of contaminants and of EROD activity were accredited to ISO17025 [34 ] by the UK Accreditation Service.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «multiwave 3000»

1

Quantifying Soluble Proteins, Antioxidants, and Contaminants in Plants

To determine soluble protein and antioxidative enzymes, fresh plant materials (0.05 g) were homogenized in ice with 0.5 mL phosphate saline buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1 M) using a glass homogenizer. Homogenized samples were centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 20 min. This supernatant was used to determine the content of soluble protein and activities of antioxidative enzymes (total superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase) using commercially available test kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China; Li et al., 2013 (link); Yan et al., 2013 (link)). The absorbance of the supernatant was detected by BioDrop uLite (80-3006-51) under visible light at different wavelengths.
Photosynthetic pigments of duckweeds were extracted in 80% chilled acetone in the dark and estimated as described by Porra et al. (1989 (link)). Starch extraction and quantification were done according to the method described by Magel (1991 (link)). Starch was extracted with 18% (w/v) HCl. Detection was conducted using 0.5% (w/v) KI and 0.25% (w/v) I2 and measured at 605 nm and 530 nm. To determine the Hg content in duckweeds, plant material was dried at 75°C and digested with 10 ml concentrated HNO3 acid with the help of microwave digestion system (Anton paar, Multiwave 3000). Digested samples were diluted up to 10 ml with ultra-deionized water. Final concentrations of K2Cr2O7 and HNO3 of the samples were adjusted to be within 0.05% (M/V) and 0.05% (V/V) respectively. The residual level of Hg in each sample was measured using Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometer (Analytikjena, ContrAA 700) at the Center of Analysis and Test Center of Wuhan University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Shoot Phosphorus Determination by ICP-MS

For determination of shoot P concentration by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), shoot samples were dried for 2 d at 65 °C before digestion. For mature plants (i.e., ∼3 mo old; GrH, GAR, and WILD experiments), samples were digested using a microwave system (Multiwave 3000; Anton Paar). Approximately 0.3 g of dry homogenized plant material was digested using 4 mL of HNO3 (66% vol/vol) and 2 mL of H2O2 (30% vol/vol). The microwave program included a power ramp of 10 min followed by 30 min at 1,400 W and a final 15 min of cooling down. Final solutions were diluted 1:5 with deionized water before analysis. For young plants (i.e., 1 mo old; MS agar and sterilized soil experiments) plant material was digested using 500 µL of HNO3 (66%) at 100 °C for 20 min. Final solutions were diluted 1:10 with deionized water before analysis. Solution blanks were included. The P concentration was determined using an Agilent 7700 ICP-MS (Agilent Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Microwave-Assisted Digestion for Elemental Analysis

Using a high-accuracy balance (Mettler Toledo MT5), between 1 and 20 mg of the three certified reference materials were weighed and transferred to digestion tubes consisting of disposable standard glass vials (Wheaton® 15 × 46 mm, Cap 13-425). A mixture of 125 μL 30% H2O2 (J.T. Baker, The Netherlands) and 250 μL 65% HNO3 (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) was added to each vial containing ≤ 5 mg material, while the double volume of reagents was used for the higher sample quantities. To ensure tightness and stability at elevated temperatures, the vials were closed with special PEEK screw caps (MG5, Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria) and disposable PFTE lip-type seals (Mat. No. 41186, Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria; Fig. 5). Sample digestion was carried out in a microwave oven (Multiwave 3000, mode: Synthos, Software version 2.01, Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria) mounted with a 64 position carousel (64MG5, Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria). A 10 min ramping period was used to reach a digestion temperature of 140°C, which thereupon was maintained for 80 min. After cooling for 10 min, the vials were put in a freezer before releasing the pressure by uncapping. The freezing step ensured better recovery of volatile elements such as S and Se. Finally, samples were diluted to a final concentration of 3.5 or 7% HNO3 (4.6 ml) and analysed directly in the vial.
Rice grain materials and Arabidopsis seeds were digested by the same procedure as used for certified reference materials except that the micro-wave digestion period was elongated with 30 min, now lasting 110 min instead of 80 min. Traditional large-scale digestion of 250 mg CRM and milled rice grain samples was carried out for comparison with the micro-scaled digestion procedure. Samples were micro-waved for 50 min at 210°C at a maximum pressure of 40 bar in 100 ml closed tubes. The digestion medium consisted of 5 ml 65% HNO3 and 5 ml 15% H2O2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Analyzing Barley Grain Elemental Composition

Grains of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Golden Promise) were harvested from greenhouse-grown plants cultivated in a mixture of soil and sand supplemented with 0.15 kg m−3 Osmocote plus (Scotts Company, UK). The grains were rapidly rinsed three times with milli-Q water to remove surface contaminants and thereafter freeze dried. A subsample of 50 g, i.e. >1000 grains, was pulverized in a titanium mill and used as whole grain control material. For determination of total elemental concentrations in different grain tissues, 35 randomly selected grains were divided into five batches and their hull and embryo removed manually by use of a teflon-coated scalpel. Thereafter, each batch of seven grains was polished by high-speed shaking at 30 Hz in a ball mill (MM301, Retsch, Germany) mounted with a rack containing microcentrifuge tubes loaded with 200 mg of acid-washed quartz sand (Fluka 84878, 40–150 mesh SiO2). Before use, the sand had been additionally purified with 5% HNO3 and dried. Polishing was performed in six repeated cycles each of 150 s duration. Between each cycle, the remaining weight of the seven grains was recorded and they were moved to new tubes. In parallel, the mixture of abraded material and sand was weighed. This procedure allowed collection of six fractions of abraded material consisting of different proportions of pericarp, testa, aleurone, and endosperm in mixture with sand. After the final cycle of polishing, the rest of the grain, representing the core endosperm, was rapidly washed three times with milli-Q water in order to remove surface dust. Following drying, all samples, together with control samples of pure sand and pulverized whole grain, were digested for 80 min at 140 °C in a closed microscaled microwave digestion system (Multiwave 3000, Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria) equipped with a 64 position rotor (64MG5, Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria). The digestion medium consisted of a mixture of 125 μl of 30% H2O2 and 250 μl of 65% HNO3. All digests were diluted to 3.5% HNO3 and analysed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Agilent 7500ce, Agilent Technologies, UK). The results were validated using certified reference material NIST 8436 (durum wheat) and true blanks. Results for pure sand were subtracted from those for the abraded samples. Five independent replicates were analysed for each of the nine grain fractions (hull, embryo, pure endosperm, and six samples representing a gradient across the testa–aleurone–endosperm interface). The satisfactory micronutrient recoveries shown in Table 1 indicate that neither significant micronutrient contamination nor losses occurred during the process, in agreement with previous validations (Hansen et al., 2009 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Multiwash and Dissolution of Sulfur CRMs

All consumables were double acid washed (10 and 1 % HNO3m/m prepared from concentrated HNO3 (p.a., Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), diluted with laboratory water type I (0.055 μS cm−1; TKA-GenPure, Niederelbert, Germany), and rinsed with laboratory water type I. Laboratory water type I and nitric acid were further purified by using a sub-boiling distillation system (Milestone Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) and were used for dilution of standards and preparation of reagents. (NH4)2SO4 salts (AnalaR, VWR, Leuven, Belgium, further named as “V”; p.a., Merck, further named as “M”) were used for method development and optimization of method parameters (e.g., anion exchange time, tuning of instruments). NaHCO3 was used for regeneration of anion exchange membranes. Isotope certified reference materials (CRMs) IAEA-S-1, silver sulfide and IAEA-S-2, silver sulfide (both IAEA, Vienna, Austria) were used for calibration and validation of the MC ICP-MS measurement. The solid CRMs were dissolved by microwave-assisted acid digestion (Multiwave 3000, Anton-Paar, Graz, Austria): 6 mL sub-boiled HNO3 was added to 75 mg of a CRM. The digested material was diluted with sub-boiled water to obtain a 3.1 mmol L−1 S stock solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.