Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Nonidet p 40

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Canada, China, Japan, Sao Tome and Principe, France, Ireland, Belgium, Denmark, Israel, Spain
About the product

Nonidet P-40 is a non-ionic detergent used in various laboratory applications. It is a polyoxyethylene derivative that can be used for cell lysis, protein extraction, and other biochemical procedures. The product is designed to maintain the native structure and function of biomolecules during processing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Nonidet P-40, previously manufactured by Shell Chemical Company, is no longer in production. Sigma-Aldrich, a subsidiary of Merck Group, has discontinued the sale of Nonidet P-40 and recommends IGEPAL CA-630 as a chemically similar alternative.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

818 protocols using «nonidet p 40»

1

Prostate Tissue Staining Protocol

2025
Prostate tissues were harvested from Ing3-LacZ heterozygous and wild-type control male mice, placed in PBS, and immediately proceeded with the staining procedure.
Tissues were transferred to 0.2% (w/v) glutaraldehyde-fixative (0.2% glutaraldehyde, 2 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 5 mM EGTA (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA; cat# E4378-10G) in sodium phosphate buffer (SPB; 5.3 mL of solution A (200 mM NaH2PO4·2H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA; cat# 71500-250G)) and 94.7 mL of solution B (200 mM Na2HPO4·2H2O diluted with Milli-Q water to 200 mL, pH 8.0))) for 90 min at 4 °C. Afterwards, the samples were washed three times in basis staining buffer (BSB; 2 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 0.01% (w/v) Na-deoxycholate (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA; cat# D6750-10G), 0.02% (v/v) Nonidet P-40 (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA; cat# I3021), 5 mM EGTA in SPB, pH 8.0) for 30 min and submersed in X-gal staining solution (80 µL of X-gal stock solution in 2 mL of BSB containing 10 mM ferricyanide and 10 mM ferrocyanide) for five to eight hours (depending on the staining solution, which was re-used up to four times with a clear reduction in staining intensity). The samples were covered with aluminium foil and placed in a 37 °C shaking incubator. Stained samples were washed two times in basis staining buffer for 30 min and submerged into 4% formaldehyde (buffered aqueous solution, 0.5–1.5% methanol; VWR, Radnor, PA, USA; cat# 9713.1000) for nine to ten hours at 4 °C. Fixed samples were washed briefly in 70% ethanol and placed into fresh 70% ethanol for storage at 4 °C. Images were taken and evaluated with the Leica MZ 16 FA microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and a Leica DFC310 FX camera utilizing the Leica LAS AF software (version 3.3; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

HBV Particle Precipitation and DNA Quantification

2025
Cell supernatants (500 µL) were incubated with anti-preS1 antibodies and 10 µL of protein G- Sepharose beads (Invitrogen), overnight, at 4 °C, to precipitate enveloped HBV particles. After washing five times with PBS, the bound virions were eluted with 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 8, containing 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma-Aldrich). The encapsidated viral DNA was quantified as described [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Hypotonic Propidium Iodide Staining for iPSCs

2025
Hypotonic propidium iodide staining solution [50 µg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, #P4170), 0.1% trisodium citrate dihydrate (HIMEDIA®, #GRM1415), 0.3 µl/ml Nonidet P-40 (Sigma-Aldrich, #56741) in distilled water] was added to iPSCs and scraped using a cell scraper to harvest the nuclei. The harvested suspension was centrifuged at 850 g for 5 min. The obtained pellet was resuspended and incubated in 1 ml staining solution. The nuclei were analysed using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) with BD FACSDiva™ software (BD Biosciences), and the data were processed using FCS Express 6 software (https://denovosoftware.com/). Per experimental condition, 10,000 events were recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Purification and Pulldown of GST-tagged Proteins

2025
The GST-tagged proteins were cloned into pGEX-4T-1 vector and expressed in bacterial Rosetta (DE3) pLysS-competent cells. Expression was induced with 0.2 mM IPTG overnight at 20 °C. Purification was performed using a glutathione spin column (Thermo Fisher, catalogue no. 16105). Untagged NTD proteins (10 µg) were incubated with GST-tagged proteins (100 µg) and immobilized overnight at 4 °C on glutathione-Sepharose beads in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalogue no. N-3516) and 2 mM EDTA. Subsequently, the resin was washed three times with the same binding buffer to remove unbound proteins. Pulled-down complexes were denatured in tricine sample buffer, separated by 4–20% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized using GelCode blue staining (Thermo Fisher, catalogue no. 24594).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Quantifying ALP Activity in HDPs

2025
ALP activity changes with and without n-BA were quantified for HDPs. HDPs were cultured with and without n-BA for 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. ALP activity was evaluated using LabAssay ALP (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) according to the manufacturer's instructions with absorbance measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader. To extract total protein, HDPs were dissolved in radio-immunoprecipitation assay buffer (1% Nonidet P-40; Sigma-Aldrich, 150 mmol/L NaCl, and 50 mmol/L Tris; pH = 7.4; containing protease inhibitors). Protein concentrations were determined by the Lowry method using the DC Protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Canada) with bovine serum albumin as standard. ALP activity was calculated as unit per μg protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «nonidet p 40»

1

FISH Analysis of EBV Plasmid Localization

FISH analysis was performed based on the protocol of Lawrence et al (1989) (link), with some modifications. Briefly, 721 cells, HeLa-EBNA1, and 293 clones carrying EBV plasmids were synchronized by treatment with 15 μM aphidicolin (Sigma) or 100 ng/ml nocodazole (Sigma) for 16 h. Cells were treated with 0.075 M KCl for 20 min at 37°C, fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1) for 30 min at room temperature, and spread on the slides. Slides were treated with 4 × SSC (1 × SSC: 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate) containing 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40 (Sigma) for 30 min at 37°C, dehydrated in a cold ethanol series (70, 80, 90%) for 2 min each, air dried, and denatured in 70% formamide–2 × SSC for 2 min at 72°C. Slides were dehydrated in a cold ethanol series and air dried. Hybridization probes for detection of EBV plasmids were generated by nick translation using biotin-11-dUTP (Roche). A 20-μg weight of a probe was precipitated by ethanol in the presence of 6 μg salmon sperm DNA (Eppendorf) and 4 μg human Cot-1 DNA (Invitrogen), resuspended in CEP hybridization buffer (Vysis), and incubated for 10 min at 70°C, for 5 min at 4°C, and for 1 h at 37°C. A hybridization mix containing 5 ng probe was placed on each sample and incubated overnight at 37°C in a moist chamber. Slides were washed in 2 × SSC containing 50% formamide for 30 min at 50°C and in 2 × SSC for 30 min at 50°C. Hybridized probe was revealed by incubation with 30 μl detection solution containing streptavidin conjugated to Cy3 (Cytocell) for 20 min at 37°C. Slides were washed twice in 4 × SSC containing 0.05% Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 5 min at room temperature. The chromosomes were counterstained by a mounting medium containing diamidino-2-phenilindole (DAPI) (Vector). The images were acquired by an inverted fluorescence microscope (Axiovert 200 M, Zeiss) equipped with a digital CCD camera (Axiocam HRm, Zeiss) and a z-motor. Cy3 and DAPI were visualized using specific individual filter sets for Texas-red and DAPI. Images were collected by a × 63, 1.4 NA oil objective lens (Plan Prochromaro, Zeiss) with 5–10 slices of z-stacks, with exposures of 0.01 and 1 s to detect Cy3 and DAPI, respectively. AxioVision software (Zeiss) was used for acquisition and computation of the images. For high-resolution images, captured raw images were deconvolved with AxioVision software (Zeiss) using an inverse filter algorithm. All images were digitally processed for presentation with Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Immunoblotting Protocol for Protein Detection

Immunoblotting was as previously described (Aurelian et al., 2016 (link); June et al., 2015 (link); Liu et al., 2011 (link)). Cells grown on T-75 or T-25 flasks (n=5/group) were lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.15 mm NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate), 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma). NAc-shell micropunches (300-µm thick) from naive P (n = 12) and NP (n=9) rats, and from P rats infused with pHSVsiTLR4 (n = 6) or pHSVsiNC (n = 4) were lysed with CelLytic MT (dialyzable mild detergent, bicine and 150 mM NaCl; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, Cat. # C3228) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total protein was determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat.# 23228 and Cat.# 1859078). The proteins were resolved by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF, Bio-Rad, Cat.# 162-0177). The blots were exposed to primary antibody overnight (4°C), followed (1 h; RT) by horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies. Detection was with the Plus-ECL kit reagents (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat.# NEL105001EA) and quantification was by densitometric scanning with a Bio-Rad GS-700 imaging densitometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Integrative Analysis of Liver Cancer Metabolism

Diethylnitrosamine (DEN), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), paraformaldehyde, formaldehyde, glycine, TRI Reagent, Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG), 3-bromopyruvate (3-BrP), doxorubicin (DOXO), etoposide (ETO), MG-132, C646, Nutlin-3, Oil Red-O (ORO), Propidium Iodide (PI), Triton X-100, Nonidet P-40 (NP-40), Adenosine 5′-triphosphate sodium salt (ATP), glucose, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate sodium salt (NADP+), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase were from Sigma-Aldrich. 2-(N-(7-Nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)Amino)-2-Deoxyglucose (2-NBDG), MitoTracker Green FM (MTG), Hoechst 33342 and Alexa Fluor™ 568 donkey anti-mouse IgG (H + L) were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Trypan blue 0.4% solution was from Lonza. (H + L)-horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG were from Bio-Rad Laboratories. l-lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was from Roche Applied Science. Polyethylenimine (PEI) was from Polysciences. GW-7647 and GW-6471 were from Cayman Chemical. Choline deficient diet (CDD) was from Research Diets.
Human HCC samples were kindly provided by Prof. Grazi from the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. Analyses were performed after approval from the Regina Elena Cancer Institute ethical committee. All mouse experimentation was performed in accordance with accepted standard of human animal care and after approval by the Italian Ministry of Welfare committee and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Rome “Tor Vergata” (Italy). C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Harlan Laboratories Srl (Urbino, Italy) and randomly divided in two groups; treated group (n = 7, male) was intraperitoneally injected with a 20 mg/kg DEN dose at 15 days after birth and fed a CDD at weaning. Reference group (n = 7, male) was intraperitoneally injected with saline solution and fed standard pellet, at weaning (ND). Hepatic status was periodically followed-up by analyses on hepatic clinical markers aspartate aminotransferase (GOT-AST) and alanine aminotransferase (GPT-ALT) on sera from retro orbital blood collection. Before sacrifice, mice were fasted for 4 h and euthanized. Livers were perfused with saline solution prior to all the analyses performed. Mice liver thick sections were also stained for H&E morphological evaluation and for ATGL expression by IHC.
For this study, three different liver cancer cell lines were used. HepG2 and Hep3B cell lines were purchased from Leibniz-Institut DSMZ, Braunschweig (Germany). Huh7.5 cell line was a kind gift from Dr. Carla Montesano, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” (Italy). All cell lines were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) 1 g/L glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM l-glutamine, 10 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin and 1% MycoZap. Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere and plated at a 2 × 105 cells/ml density for all the experiments. After 24 h plating, cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA™4/HisMaxC and pcDNA™4/HisMaxC-ATGL or pEGFP, pATGLWT-EGFP and pATGL(Ser47Ala)-EGFP or pcDNA3.1 and pcDNA3.1-p53WT plasmids, for the times indicated in the experiments, by the PEI reagent, according to manufacturer’s instructions. sip53 and siATGL were reversely transfected using Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. GW-7647 and Nutlin-3 were used at a final concentration of 1 µM for 24 h. GW-6471 was used at a final concentration of 5 µM for 24 h. C646 and MG-132 were used at a final concentration of 10 µM for 24 h and 4 h, respectively. 2-DG and 3-BrP were used for 24 h at 30 mM and 30 µM final concentrations, respectively. DOXO and ETO were used for 16 h at 2 µM and 50 µM final concentrations, respectively.
TGs content was evaluated by Triglyceride Quantification Colorimetric/Fluorometric Kit (BioVision) and total neutral lipids stored in LDs by Oil Red-O staining procedure. Briefly, cells were fixed, rinsed in 60% isopropanol and stained with the Oil Red-O working solution. Oil Red-O was eluted and relative absorbance measured at 510 nm. Oxidative metabolism was examined by RT-qPCR analysis of both mitochondrial FAs uptake and β-oxidation genes and Krebs cycle genes, also by Western blot. FAs utilization was assessed by Seahorse Bioscience XFe96 analyzer in combination with the Seahorse XF Palmitate-BSA FAO Substrate assay kit. Mitochondrial function was assessed both using a Seahorse Bioscience XFe96 analyzer in combination with the Seahorse Bioscience XF Cell Mito Stress Test assay kit and by a Clark-type oxygen electrode. ATP levels were detected using the ATP Bioluminescence Assay Kit CLS II (Roche Applied Science). SIRT1 activity was determined by the SIRT1/Sir2 Deacetylase Fluorometric (Human) Assay Kit (Abnova).
Glycolysis was monitored by RT-qPCR analysis of SLC2A1/GLUT1 and SLC2A2/GLUT2 glucose transporters and SLC16A1/MCT1 lactate transporter. Glucose uptake was cytofluorimetrically recorded in FL-1 channel by a FACScalibur instrument after a 1-h-incubation with 100 µM 2-NBDG. HK activity and extracellular lactate measurements were determined spectrophotometrically.
Proliferation was evaluated by Trypan blue staining, CCK-8 colorimetric assay (Cell Counting Kit-8, Dojindo Molecular Technologies) and by BrdU incorporation assay. For BrdU incorporation assay, cells were fixed and incubated with an anti-BrdU primary antibody (after DNA denaturization) and nuclei stained with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342. Images were digitized with a Delta Vision Restoration Microscopy System (Applied Precision) equipped with an Olympus IX70fluorescence microscope (Olympus Italia).
Nuclear fractions were obtained as previously described [64 (link)] and used for both Western blot and ChIP assays.
Cell viability was determined by Trypan Blue and Propidium Iodide staining procedures (dead cells were expressed as percentage of subG1 cells).
Data were presented as means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed by unpaired 2-tailed Student t test and one- or two-way ANOVA. Comparisons were statistically considered significant at p ≤ 0.05 (*).
RT-qPCR, Western blot, and fluorescence microscopy procedures as well as complete and detailed description of all methods employed are reported in Supplementary information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Cell Cycle Analysis of Compound Effects

For the cell-cycle assay, U2OS cells were treated for 24 h with 35 μM of compound 6, 50 μM of 5a, or 50 μM of 8a, detached with 0.11% trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, S.Louis, MO, USA)/0.02% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Sigma-Aldrich, S.Louis, MO, USA), washed in PBS, and centrifuged. The pellet was resuspended in 0.01% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma-Aldrich, S.Louis, MO, USA), 10 μg/mL RNase (Sigma-Aldrich, S.Louis, MO), 0.1% sodium citrate, and 50 μg/mL propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma-Aldrich, S.Louis, MO, USA), for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. PI fluorescence and forward scatter (FS) signals were analyzed using a Beckman Coulter Epics XL-MCL flow cytometer. DNA distribution in the cell cycle was analyzed by the MODFIT 5.0 software. As the signal collected by a multichannel analyzer, the mean of the FS distribution is expressed as mean channel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Isolation of Tegument and Somatic Fractions from Fasciola hepatica

All FhNEJ samples were treated as described by García-Campos et al. [17 (link)] for isolation of the tegument and somatic fractions. This protocol is based on the procedure described earlier in [18 (link)], with minor modifications, in which the tegumental nature of the antigens extracted from F. hepatica intact worms was tested by the peroxidase-antiperoxidase immunocytochemical technique at the light microscope level [18 (link)]. Thus, and although a complete separation of tegument and somatic FhNEJ extracts is expected to be difficult to achieve due to technical constraints, enriched protein fractions of the tegument can be obtained as described by other authors [17 (link), 18 (link)]. FhNEJ were washed twice with sterile PBS, resuspended in an appropriate volume of PBS + 1% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma) and incubated at room temperature with gentle stirring for 30 min in order to extract the tegument fraction. After incubation, the samples were centrifuged (300 g, 5 min) and the supernatant of the detergent-soluble extract containing the enriched protein fraction of the FhNEJ tegument was transferred to clean tubes. The pellet containing naked FhNEJ was resuspended in RIPA buffer (Sigma) and disrupted by ultrasound (5 cycles of 30 s). Finally, samples were centrifuged (1,000 g, 5 min) and the clarified supernatant containing somatic proteins was transferred to clean tubes. All F. hepatica samples were treated with protease inhibitors and stored at -80°C until use.
Cell culture plates containing MPSIEC were washed twice with sterile PBS and incubated on ice for 10 min to weaken cell adhesion. Cells were carefully lifted from the plate using a cell scraper, collected with a pipette tip and deposited into 1.5 ml tubes. Cytosolic and membrane proteins were separately isolated using the Mem-PER Plus Membrane Protein Extraction kit (Thermo Fisher) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Protease inhibitors were added at the appropriate ratio and the samples were stored at -80°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.