We Dissect Protocols

Buffered peptone water (bpw)

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
616 citations
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Italy, Australia, Germany, Spain, France, Canada, Belgium, Switzerland, Japan
About the product

Buffered peptone water is a general-purpose microbiological culture medium used for the enrichment and recovery of a wide range of microorganisms. It provides a buffered environment and peptone as a source of nutrients to support the growth of microbes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) is a commercially available product from Thermo Fisher Scientific, offered through authorized distributors. It is available in both dehydrated and ready-to-use bottled formulations.

The dehydrated formulation is sold in 500 g packages, with prices around $285.00 per unit. The ready-to-use bottled formulation is available in packs of 10 bottles, with prices approximately €48.10 per pack.

Please note that prices may vary based on region and distributor.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

616 protocols using «buffered peptone water (bpw)»

1

Enterococcus Enumeration in Food Samples

2025
In the course of microbiological testing, 10 g of each sample was blended with 90 mL of Buffered Peptone Water (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) for two minutes (BagMixer® 400 P, Interscience, Saint Nom la Brétèche, France). This initial mixture was labeled 10−1, and a 10−2 dilution was subsequently prepared using 0.1% peptone water. From both dilutions (10−1 and 10−2), 100 µL was plated onto Slanetz–Bartley agar (Oxoid, UK) and incubated for 36–48 h at 41.5 °C [10 (link)]. Following incubation, as many as five colonies per plate that showed typical Enterococcus characteristics were chosen for species confirmation using the Autobio ms1000 MALDI-TOF system (Autobio Diagnostics, Zhengzhou, China). According to the manufacturer’s protocols, identification scores falling above 9.000 were regarded as reliable for species-level classification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Klebsiella Detection in Chicken Meat

2025
A total number of 285 chicken meat swab samples were gathered from various retail outlets in the Sylhet district. In order to preserve the proper temperature during transportation, swab samples from chicken meat were aseptically collected in disinfected containers containing buffered peptone water (BPW; Oxoid, UK) and brought to the lab in a refrigerated box. At first each sample was inoculated into BPW and underwent incubation at 37 °C for 24 h as pre-enrichment. The increase of turbidity in the BPW media was a sign of bacterial proliferation. The enriched samples were cultured on Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB; Oxoid, UK) agar media following pre-enrichment, and then they were proceeded with aerobic incubation for 18–24 h at 37 °C. After sub culture into MacConkey agar (Oxoid, UK) plates, the suspected colony underwent incubation for 24 h at 37 °C additionally. The initial screening for probable Klebsiella spp. was made easier by the characteristic colony morphology, notably the pink colonies that were indicative of lactose fermentation. Biochemical assays were performed after selection to verify the isolates' identities. The isolates' capacity to ferment lactose was confirmed by the lactose fermentation test conducted on MacConkey agar. Additionally, the ability to hydrolyze urea was also evaluated using a urease test, which showed a pinkening of the medium. The isolates' ability to use citrate as the exclusive carbon source was tested by the citrate utilization test, which again showed a color shift. The methyl red-Voges Proskauer (MR-VP) test helped characterize the isolates by distinguishing between 2,3-butanediol fermentation and mixed acid fermentation, while the indole test assessed tryptophan production, as shown by a color shift with the inclusion of Kovac's reagent. Finally, a motility test was used to assess whether the isolates were motile or not, which is a crucial trait for Klebsiella spp.. All tests were conducted following standard microbiological protocols and the guidelines followed by Liza et al. [3 (link)]. Lastly, PCR was performed for final confirmation on the isolates of Klebsiella spp. that were tentatively positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Identification of E. coli

2025
Livers of ill or dead chickens were collected, and approximately 1 cm3 of liver tissue samples were cut in a sterile, ultra-clean room. Samples were enriched in buffered peptone water (Oxoid, Manchester, UK) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The enriched bacterial cultures were streaked on eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar (Oxoid Company, Manchester, UK) using a sterile wire loop and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Colonies exhibiting a green metallic sheen were presumptively identified as E. coli. E. coli MG1655 was used as a positive control strain.
Genomic DNA was extracted using the boiling method [14 (link)]. Briefly, 1.5 mL of suspended plaque samples were centrifuged for 15 min (13,523× g, 4 °C). The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of PBS. This washing step was repeated three times. The resuspended samples were incubated at 99 °C for 15 min. After centrifugation (15 min, 13,523× g, 4 °C), the genomic DNA supernatant was immediately cooled to −20 °C for storage.
The genomic DNA supernatant was used as a DNA template. DNA extracted from isolated E. coli strains was amplified using species-specific primers for phoA (F-CGATTCTGGAAATGGCAAAAG, R-CGTGATCAGCGGTGACTATGAC) and E. coli-specific primers for PCR [3 (link)]. DNA from E. coli MG1655 served as the positive control, and PCR reactions without a DNA template served as the negative control. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels, with gel images captured and analyzed using the GelDoc© Gel Documentation System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Identification of Cefotaxime-Resistant E. coli

2025
The collected material was enriched in buffered peptone water (Oxoid, United Kingdom) under aerobic conditions for 24 h at 37°C, 10 μL of each enriched peptone waters were then cultured for cefotaxime-resistant E. coli on McConkey agar supplemented with cefotaxime (2 mg.L−1) (MCAcef) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Inoculated plates were cultured under aerobic conditions for 48 h at 37°C and presumptive lactose-positive colonies with characteristic morphology were identified by MALDI-TOF MS method using the Microflex LT instrument equipped with MALDI Biotyper software version 3.1 and the MALDI Biotyper® library version MBT 6903 MSP (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Isolates were classified as E. coli if the identification score was greater than 2.0. The colonies definitely confirmed as E. coli were subcultured on McConkey agar without cefotaxime and finally on Columbia blood agar (Oxoid, United Kingdom) and preserved at −80°C in 0.5 mL of cryoprotective medium containing bacteriological peptone and glycerol. If positive, one E. coli isolate represented one calf. The human samples were processed analogically, but up to five isolates from each culture were taken, if the culture was positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation of Listeria from Meat Samples

2025
A 25 g sample of meat was weighed, cut into small pieces aseptically with a sterile knife, placed in a sterile plastic bag with 225 ml of buffered peptone water (Oxoid Ltd. Hampshire, UK), and homogenized with a laboratory shaker (Stomacher 400, Seward, England) at high speed for 2 min. The mixture was then incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. The resulting suspension was used for isolation and identification of Listeria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «buffered peptone water (bpw)»

1

Evaluating Poultry Carcass Microbial Loads

In each experiment, 30 chicken carcasses prior to inside outside wash step were collected from a processing plant in large sterile bags. Chickens were weighed and the deep muscle breast temperature was recorded within 20 min of arrival in the laboratory. Individual carcasses were subsequently placed in a whirl pack bag (ThermoFisher Scientific, Scoresby, Australia) and washed with massaging for 2 min in 200 mL buffered peptone water (BPW; ThermoScientific, Oxoid, Scoresby, Australia). Two mL of the BPW wash were spread plated onto five modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) (ThermoScientific, Scoresby, Australia) plates (400 µL per plate) and incubated at 42 °C with 10% CO2 for 48 hours to assess direct Campylobacter spp. counts. From the initial 200 mL BPW wash, 40 mL was incubated overnight at 37 °C. Then, 100 µL of the incubated BPW was transferred into 10 mL Rappaport Vassiliadis soya peptone broth (RVS, ThermoScientific, Oxoid, Scoresby, Australia) and incubated overnight at 42 °C for selective growth of Salmonella enterica serovars. A loop-full of the RVS broth was streaked on to xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (XLD; ThermoScientific, Oxoid, Australia) plates. Suspected Salmonella colonies were subcultured onto Brilliance Salmonella agar (ThermoScientific Oxoid, Scoresby Australia) for confirmation. To quantify the total viable counts (TVC) in the carcass wash, the carcass wash was diluted 10-fold and plated on nutrient agar. The limit of detection for TVC was 0.25 colony forming units (CFU)/cm2 of chicken carcass. The plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C and colonies were recorded in colony forming units (CFU). For Campylobacter spp. the limit of detection was 10 CFU/mL of rinsate.
Following the initial BPW wash, 5 carcasses each were placed into six different treatment groups, water and sanitizer wash each at 5 °C, 15 °C, and 22 °C (Table 1). Carcasses were placed into large containers filled with diluted sanitizer and agitated continuously for the entire treatment period (Table 1). Carcasses were then removed and placed in a sterile bag and rinsed as with BPW. The miniaturized Most Probable Number (MPN) method described by [20 (link)], was used to determine the Salmonella load in culture-positive samples. Campylobacter and Salmonella counts as well as the TVC were interpreted per square centimeter of carcass as per the Australian standard [21 ]. Briefly, surface area of a whole chicken carcass in square centimeters was calculated by the following formula, 0.87 m + 635 (m = total mass in grams) and the microorganisms per square centimeter of surface area from the rinse fluid was calculated using the following formula,

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Adelaide, Department of Primary Industries and Regions South Australia

2

Isolation and Identification of C. jejuni from Chicken Meats

Chicken meats of different brands and products were purchased from seven different retail stores in Edmonton, Canada. C. jejuni was isolated as described by Chon et al. (2012) (link) with some modifications. Briefly, the chicken meats were submerged in buffered peptone water (Oxoid, UK) at 37°C overnight and then inoculated in Bolton Campylobacter selective broth (Oxoid) at 42°C for 24 h under microaerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2). Aliquots (100 μl) were serially diluted and spread on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar plates supplemented with Preston Campylobacter selective supplements (Oxoid). Cultures were incubated at 42°C for 48 h under microaerobic conditions. C. jejuni colonies were confirmed by multiplex PCR as described previously (Wang et al., 2002 (link)). The primer sequences were described in Table 1. All C. jejuni strains were grown on MH media at 42°C under microaerobic conditions. Occasionally, culture media were supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Alberta

3

Quantification of E. coli and Fecal Coliforms in Minced Beef

For each sample, minced beef meat was weighed, and 25 g were aseptically placed in a sterile stomacher bag (Fisher Scientific, New Hampshire, USA). The sample was then diluted 1:10 with 225 mL of sterile buffered peptone water (BPW) (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and homogenized for 1 min using a stomacher (Thomas Scientific, New Jersey, USA). The suspension was then serially diluted (10-fold) in BPW and 3 dilutions (10−1, 10−2, 10−4) were plated on RAPID’E. coli 2 agar plates (BioRad, Hercules, California, USA) in duplicates. The plates were incubated at 44 °C for 18–24 h under aerobic conditions. Colony forming units (CFU) that matched the diagnostic phenotypes (violet to pink E. coli colonies and blue to green colonies for other fecal coliforms) were counted and bacteria densities were determined by averaging the counts from the duplicates. Data were reported as averages of CFU per gram of raw minced beef. BPW without meat was used as control throughout the experiment. E. coli DH5α was used to test the quality of the RAPID’E. coli 2 agar plates. Average CFU counts of E. coli and fecal coliforms were compared using the Student’s t-test. A p < 0.05 was used to identify statistically significant differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Georgia, American University of Beirut

4

Antimicrobial Potential of Essential Oils

The essential oils, which exhibited the best antimicrobial activity in the paper disk diffusion assay, and some individual constituents, were selected for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) using broth dilution method. One colony of each bacterial strain was sampled with a loop, then inoculated in 25 mL BHI broth and incubated for 18–24 h at 37°C in order to get a bacterial suspension of 109 cfu/mL. Only P. fluorescens and B. thermosphacta were incubated at, respectively, 30 and 22°C. Each stock solution was diluted with buffered peptone water (Oxoid) to obtain 105 cfu/mL bacterial suspensions. Serial dilutions of essential oils (0.125–5 μL/mL) were prepared with BHI broth medium in test tube and mixed with bacterial suspensions to give a volume of 4 mL and a final concentration of bacteria of approximately 5 × 104 cfu/mL. Final solutions were incubated at the temperature mentioned earlier. The MIC was considered as the lowest concentration that prevented the visible growth. The MBC was determined by subculturing 100 μL from each negative test tube onto plate count agar (PCA) plates. MBC was defined as the lowest concentration resulting in a negative subculture or giving presence of only one colony after incubation. The experiments were carried out in four replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Institute of Technology of Cambodia, University of Liège

5

Microbiological Analysis of Chicken Thigh

10 g of chicken thigh was sampled with sterile scalpels and forceps and immediately transferred into a sterile stomacher bag containing 90 mL of 0.1% buffered peptone water (BPW, pH 7.0, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK); the sample was then homogenized for 60 s in a stomacher at room temperature. Sampling was carried out at on day 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 of the experiment
For each sample, appropriate serial decimal dilutions were prepared in 0.1% BPW solution. The amount of 0.1 mL of serial dilutions of prepared samples was spread on the surface of dry media. Total viable counts (TVC) were counted on a Plate Count Agar (PCA, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) after incubation for 3 days at 30 °C, aerobically. The number of pseudomonads were determined on a Cephaloridine Fucidin Cetrimide agar (Oxoid, supplemented with SR 103, Basingstoke, UK) after incubation at 25 °C for 2 days, aerobically. For the detection of Enterobacteriaceae, 15 mL of molten (45 °C) Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar (Oxoid) was inoculated with 1.0 mL of the sample. Incubation was carried out at 37 °C for 24 h, aerobically. The number of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were determined on a Man Rogosa Sharpe agar (Oxoid) after incubation at 25 °C for 5 days, anaerobically. Then, the agars were evaluated for bacterial growth, and 8 colonies (depending on the different morphological characteristics of colonies) per plate were selected for further confirmation with the MALDI-TOF MS Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Slovak University of Agriculture, Rzeszów University, University of Kragujevac

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.