We Dissect Protocols

Sodium borohydride

Manufactured by Merck Group
1 941 citations
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, France, Spain, Canada, China, Sao Tome and Principe, India, Australia, Poland, Japan, Netherlands, Brazil, Ireland, Mexico, Belgium, Finland, Sweden, Macao, Czechia, Singapore, Pakistan, Cameroon
About the product

Sodium borohydride is a reducing agent commonly used in organic synthesis and analytical chemistry. It is a white, crystalline solid that reacts with water to produce hydrogen gas. Sodium borohydride is frequently employed in the reduction of carbonyl compounds, such as aldehydes and ketones, to alcohols. Its primary function is to facilitate chemical transformations in a laboratory setting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Sodium borohydride is a chemical product commercially available from Merck Group and its authorized distributors. Prices for this product typically range from $57.50 to $219.00, depending on the quantity and form purchased.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

1 941 protocols using «sodium borohydride»

1

Synthesis and Characterization of Metal Nanoparticles

2025
Chemicals were commercial materials of the highest available grade, and they were used as received without any further purification. Sulfuric acid, tetrachloroauric acid (trihydrate, HAuCl4·3H2O, >99.9%), silver nitrate (AgNO3, 99.9999%), sodium citrate dihydrate, HOC(COONa)-(CH2COONa)2·2H2O (>99.9%), and sodium borohydride (powder, NaBH4, 98%) were purchased from Merck, Merck Life Science Sp.z.o.o, Poznan, Poland. Nitrogen gas (purity 99.999%) was purchased from Air Products (Warsaw, Poland). The 5 wt% Nafion solution was purchased from Merck Life Science Sp.z.o.o, Poznan, Poland. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30%) and potassium permanganate were purchased from Chempur (Piekary Slaskie, Poland). Phosphate buffer (pH = 6.5) was prepared using sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4) and disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4) purchased from Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A (Gliwice, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Staining of Paraffin Sections

2025
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections (4–5 µm) were de-paraffinized in xylene (Sigma-Aldrich, The Woodlands, TX, USA) for 2 × 5 min, rehydrated in graded ethanol (100%, 95%, 70%; Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 min each, and washed in PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST, Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min. Antigen retrieval was achieved by microwaving the sections in 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0, Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min at 350 W, followed by cooling for 20 min. Slides were washed twice in PBST (3 min each) and incubated with 1 mg/mL sodium borohydride (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 3 × 10 min, then thoroughly washed in PBS. Blocking was performed in 5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) and 5% goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBST for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies (anti-p53, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 2 µg/mL; GFAP, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:500; MacroH2A1.1, were diluted in PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Slides were rinsed 3 × 5 min in PBST. Secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit-FL, Texa Red, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:100) were applied in 2% BSA and 500× diluted goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich) at 100 µL/slide, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing three times for 5 min in PBST, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich), and sections were mounted with coverslips.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metformin and Arsenic Cytotoxicity Assessment

2025
All chemicals utilized in this study were purchased from Sigma Company (St. Louis, MO, USA) and included metformin, sodium borohydride, Arsenic (III) oxide (As2O3), and 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl-2 H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT). Additional reagents, including Na2HAsO4.7H2O, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Ascorbic acid, sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4), disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4), potassium ferricyanide, sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), trichloro acetic acid (TCA), sodium citrate, dextrose, citric acid, and ferric chloride (FeCl3) were provided by Merck (Germany). Borna Pouyesh Gene Company (BPGene Co., Kerman, Iran) supplied fetal bovine serum, trypsin, and DMEM medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Plasmonic Nanoparticle Synthesis

2025
Chloroauric acid (HAuCl4, 99%), urea (95%), sodium citrate (95%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 95%), isopropanol (95%), CuCl2 (99%), AgAc (99%), L-cysteine (Cys, 98%), L-glutathione (GSH, 99%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 95%), and the liquid substrate system for ELISA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA). All chemicals were used without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Evaluation of Prednisolone and Dexamethasone

2025
All the experiments’ chemicals, reagents, and solvents were HPLC-grade quality. Prednisolone sodium phosphate raw material, exhibiting purity of 99.95 ± 1.41% as assessed by the USP method [21 ], was obtained from the Egyptian International Pharmaceutical Industries Co. (E.I.P.I.CO) (10th of Ramadan, Egypt). Dexamethasone sodium phosphate raw material, with a purity of 100.04 ± 1.24% as determined by the comparison method [22 ], was kindly provided by Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries in Alexandria, Egypt. Pedicort syrup® (batch no. 8ZH4), labelled as 5.0 mg/mL of prednisolone (equivalent to 6.7 mg of prednisolone sodium phosphate), was obtained from Elesraa Pharmaceutical Optima Co. (Badr City, Egypt). Dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection USP42® (batch no. 9615092(A)), with a labeled content of 8.0 mg/2 mL, was obtained from Amria Pharmaceutical Company (Alexandria, Egypt). High-purity sodium borohydride (98%) and silver nitrate (99.8%) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Germany). Phosphoric acid, acetic acid, sodium hydroxide, and boric acid were sourced from El-Gomhouria Company (Mansoura, Egypt).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «sodium borohydride»

1

Extraction and Analysis of Human Milk Oligosaccharides

OS were extracted from human milk obtained from the milk banks in San Jose, CA and Austin, TX. The extraction method was the same as in our previous publication.27 (link), 45 (link) Sodium borohydride (98%) and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Nonporous graphitized carbon cartridges (GCC, 150mg bed weight, 4mL cartridge volume) were bought from Alltech (Deerfield, IL). Standard HMOs were purchased from Dextra Laboratories (Earley Gate, UK). α(1-2)-Fucosidase was from EMD Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). β(1-3)-Galactosidase was from New England Biolab (Beverly, MA). β(1-4)-Galactosidase was from ProZyme (San Leandro, CA). α(1-3,4)-Fucosidase was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All other reagents were of analytical or HPLC grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Agilent Technologies (United States), University of California, Davis

2

Isolation and Analysis of Human Milk Oligosaccharides

The OS used in this study are from pooled human milk provided by milk banks in San Jose, CA and Austin, TX. HMOs were isolated from the milk using a previously described procedure involving defatting, chloroform/methanol extraction, ethanol precipitation, and evaporation.6 (link) A sample enrichment step with solid phase extraction (SPE) employing graphitized carbon cartridge (GCC) was used before the analysis. GCC (150 mg bed weight, 4mL volume) were purchased from Alltech (Deerfield, IL). Sodium borohydride (98%) and 2, 5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Standard HMOs were purchased from Dextra Laboratories (Earley Gate, UK). α(1–2)-Fucosidase was obtained from EMD CALBIOCHEM (La Jolla, CA), β(1–3)-galactosidase and α(2–3)-neuraminidase from New England Biolab (Beverly, MA), β(1–4)-galactosidase from ProZyme (San Leandro, CA), and α(1–3,4)-fucosidase from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The non-selective sialidase was purified and provided by Prof. David Mills from the Department of Viticulture and Enology in UC Davis. All reagents are of analytical or HPLC grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of California, Davis, Agilent Technologies (United States)

3

Synthesis and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles

Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS), cetyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), sodium hydroxide, ammonium nitrate, potassium tetrachloroaurate, sodium citrate trihydrate, ascorbic acid, and sodium borohydride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Absolute ethanol was purchased from Fisher Chemicals.
Dynamic light scattering analyses were performed using a Cordouan Technologies DL 135 Particle size analyzer instrument. TEM analysis were performed on a JEOL 1200 EXII instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier, Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Néel, Université Grenoble Alpes, Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires, Université de Bordeaux, Université de Montpellier, Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron

4

Synthesis and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles

Citrate stabilized 5 nm gold nanoparticles were purchased from Ted Pella. Polystyrene (PS, MW 800–5000 g/mol) was purchased from Polysciences, Inc. Sodium borohydride and 4-nitrophenol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dodecanethiol (DDT) stabilized 5 nm nanoparticles, tetrahydrofuran (THF), HPLC grade), ethanol (ACS reagent grade), and diethyl ether (ACS reagent grade) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Fairmont, NJ, USA). Environmental Grade Hydrochloric Acid 30-38% and Environmental Grade Nitric Acid 70% were purchased from GFS Chemicals (Columbus, OH, USA). The 1H-NMR solvent D2O with 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid DSS as an internal standard was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Lab, Inc (Andover, MA, USA). These chemicals and materials were used as received. Polystyrene-b-polyethylene glycol (PS-b-PEG, PSm-b-PEGn where m = 1600 g/mol and n = 5000 g/mol) was obtained from Polymer Source (Product No. P13141-SEO). Prior to use, PS-b-PEG was dissolved in THF (500 mg/mL) and precipitated in ether (~1:20 v/v THF:ether). The PS-b-PEG was recovered by centrifuging, decanting, and drying under vacuum at room temperature for 2 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Virginia Commonwealth University, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University

5

Mapping LepRb Expression in Mouse Brain

To determine the distribution of LepRb expression in the mouse brain, we performed single-label free-floating ISHH on wildtype mice brain tissue (n = 4). The mouse LepRb-specific riboprobe (a generous gift from Dr. Christian Bjørbæk) was generated using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of mouse whole brain RNA (Ambion, Austin, TX) and the RT-PCR kit (Advantage; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The following primers were used to amplify a 400-base pair fragment corresponding to the intracellular domain of the long-form isoform of the leptin receptor: primer 1: 5′-AAAGAGCTCCTTCTCTGGGTCTCAGAGCAC-3′ and primer 2: 5′-AAAAAGCTTCTCACCAGTCAAAAGCACACCAC-3′ where the single-underlined sequence represent restriction enzyme recognition sites (primer 1: SacI site and primer 2: HinDIII site) and the double-underlined sequences are complementary to the mouse LepRb. The resulting PCR products were digested with SacI and HinDIII restriction enzymes and cloned into the pGEM-11Zf (+) plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI). Inserts were confirmed by DNA sequencing using T7 and Sp6 primers, Sequenase (Amersham Life Sciences, Arlington Heights, IL), and the 35Sequetide system (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA). Plasmids were linearized with HinDIII or SacI for generation of sense and antisense probes, respectively. These linearized templates were transcribed in vitro into cRNA using either T7 or Sp6 polymerase (Ambion).
The in situ hybridization procedure was a modification of that previously reported by our laboratory (Priestley et al., 1993; Elias, 1998 (link); Yamamoto, 2003; Liu, 2003 (link)). Tissue was rinsed with DEPC-treated PBS, pH 7.0, for 1 hour before being pretreated with 1% sodium borohydride (Sigma) in DEPC-PBS for 15 minutes. After washing in DEPC-PBS, tissue was briefly rinsed in 0.1M TEA, pH 8.0, and incubated for 10 minutes in 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1M TEA. The tissue was then rinsed in DEPC-treated 2× SSC before hybridization. cRNA probes were diluted to 106 cpm/mL in 50% formamide, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 (Gibco-BRL, Bethesda, MD), 5 mg tRNA (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 10% dextran sulfate, 0.3M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, and 1 × Denhardt’s solution (Sigma) and applied to the tissue. Sections were incubated overnight at 57°C. Tissue was rinsed four times in 4× sodium chloride/sodium citrate (SSC) before being incubated in 0.002% RNase A (Roche Applied Bioscience, Indianapolis, IN) diluted in 0.5M NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 1 mM EDTA (RNase buffer) for 30 minutes at 37°C. After 30 minutes in RNase buffer, and two rinses at room temperature in 2× SSC, tissue was washed three times in 50% formamide in 0.2× SSC for 10 minutes at 50°C. Tissue was then washed 2× SSC at 50°C, 0.27× SSC at 55°C, and 0.2× SSC at 60°C for 1 hour at each wash. After rinsing twice in 2× SSC at room temperature, tissue was mounted on SuperFrost Plus slides (Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA), dehydrated in 3-minute incubations of increasing concentrations of ethanol (50%, 70%, 80%, 95%, and 100%), and delipidated for 5 minutes in chloroform. After washes in 100% and 95% ethanol, tissue was air-dried and slides were placed in X-ray film cassettes with BMR-2 film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) for 2 days. Slides were then dipped in NTB2 photographic emulsion (Kodak), dried, and stored in desiccant-containing, foil-wrapped slide boxes at 4°C for 4 weeks. Slides were developed with D-19 developer, counterstained with thionin, and dehydrated in an increasing concentration of ethanol, cleared in xylenes, and coverslipped with Permaslip. A control experiment where an antisense LepRb riboprobe was used on tissue pretreated with RNase A (200 µg/ml) demonstrated the specificity of the protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Zero to Three, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Acceleron Pharma (United States), Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Universidade de São Paulo

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.