Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Fdk 20

Manufactured by Wagner Instruments
Sourced in United States
About the product

The FDK 20 is a laboratory equipment product designed for general-purpose use. It serves as a fundamental device for various applications within the laboratory setting. The core function of the FDK 20 is to perform essential tasks as required by the user.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

10 protocols using «fdk 20»

1

Shelf Life Analysis of Tomato Fruits

2025
Shelf life analyses were performed on tomato fruits under cold storage conditions (6 ± 2 °C and 90% relative humidity (RH)). Fruits harvested from the third bunch were evaluated at the red maturity point 87,807 (70% of the fruits presented the typical light red color of maturity) [88 ]. Physicochemical analyses were performed at regular intervals (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 days) for 20 days for cold storage using five fruits per sampling time. The variables evaluated were measured following the methods described by Yadav and Singh, [89 (link)] weight loss was calculated from the difference between the initial and final weights and expressed as % weight loss; total soluble solids (TSS) were determined via a PR-101ATAGO PALETTE digital hand-held refractometer; and fruit firmness (FF) was determined via a manual penetrometer (Wagner Instruments, model FDK 20, Greenwich, CT, USA). Three measurements were taken at different points on the fruit, and the average was obtained. The results of firmness were expressed in kg cm2; hydrogen potential (pH) and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined with a HANNA® brand digital conductivity meter in mS cm1. In addition, biochemical parameters were evaluated at the first sampling time using a fresh sample to analyze the content of vitamin C [90 ], total phenols [91 (link)], and lycopene [92 ] and antioxidant capacity [93 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Standardized Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol

2023
Sensory profiles were assessed by QST according to the DFNS standardized protocol by certified examiners (AB, HA and PB). Each participant was tested on the palm of the dominant hand. The DFNS QST protocol has been published in detail42 (link) and includes determination of 13 sensory parameters: the cold and warm detection threshold (CDT, WDT), the thermal sensory limen (TSL), paradoxical heat sensations (PHS), the cold and heat pain threshold (CPT, HPT), the mechanical detection and pain threshold (MDT, MPT), mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS), dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA), the wind-up ratio (WUR) as a measure for temporal summation (TS) of pain, the vibration detection threshold (VDT) and the pressure pain threshold (PPT). Thermal stimuli were applied by a Peltier-based computerized thermal stimulator (TSA II, Medoc, Ramat Ishai, Israel, 30 × 30 mm contact probe). For mechanical testing von Frey filaments (0.25 to 512 mN; MARSTOCK nervtest, Marburg, Germany), blunt pinpricks (8 to 512 mN; Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Mainz, Germany) and a hand held pressure algometer (2 to 10 kg; 1cm2 contact probe; FDK20, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT) were used. The WUR was calculated as the ratio of the pain intensities evoked by 1 and 10 pin-prick stimuli of 256 mN (if not tolerated 128 mN). Vibration detection was evaluated by the method of Limits by using the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork (64 Hz) with an amplitude scale from zero to eight. In addition, the VDT was also tested by the method of Levels using the Vibration Sensory Analyzer-3000 (VSA-3000, Medoc, Ramat Ishai, Israel).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol

2022
The quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized computer-controlled method and is currently the only available technique to quantitatively assess the functional state of the somatosensory system [31 (link)]. QST allows to evaluate the function of unmyelinated C-fibres, thinly myelinated A-delta fibres, and thickly myelinated A-beta fibres and their projection pathways using seven individual tests to assess 13 individual parameters. QST was performed pre- and postoperatively by a single investigator according to the official testing protocol [36 (link)]. Thermal tests were performed using a Sensory Analyzer TSA-II (Medoc, Ramat Yishai, Israel). Cold and warm detection thresholds were measured first (CDT, WDT), followed by the measurement of cold pain and heat pain thresholds (CPT, HPT). The mechanical detection threshold (MDT) was measured with a standardized set of modified von Frey hairs (Somedic, Sösdala, Sweden) that exert forces upon bending between 0.25 and 512 mN. The vibration detection threshold (VDT) was performed with a Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork (64 Hz, 8/8 scale). The mechanical pain threshold (MPT) was measured by a custom-made pinprick set with forces from 8 to 512 mN. Mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) was assessed using the same pinprick stimuli to obtain a stimulus response function for pinprick evoked pain. Subjects were asked to give a pain rating for each stimulus on a 0 to 10 NRS. A pressure gauge device (FDK 20, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA) was used to measure the pressure pain threshold (PPT). The wind-up ratio (WUR) is described as the increase in pain intensity over time, when a given stimulus is repeated above a critical rate. It is caused by repeated stimulation of group C peripheral nerve fibres, leading to increasing electrical response in the corresponding posterior horn neurons and is represented by comparing the perceived intensity of a single pinprick stimulus (256 mN) to a train of 10 pinprick stimuli of the same force applied at a 1/s rate. Subjects rated the experienced pain of the single stimulus and thereafter the pain at the end of the test by using a numerical rating scale. The pain rating of the 10 repetitive pinprick stimuli was then divided by the pain rating to a single stimulus to calculate the WUR [35 (link), 36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Assessment of Temporomandibular Dysfunction and Pain Perception

2020
Pain pressure threshold (PPT): The minimal pressure (kg/cm2) which induces pain was measured by pressure algometry (Wagner Instruments FDK 20). The patient was seated, and the masseter, temporal, and sternocleidomastoid muscles were assessed bilaterally, performing three measurements in each muscle, with a period of thirty seconds rest between them. The average of the three scores was obtained for analysis. The reliability of pressure algometry procedure was found to be high (ICC = 0.91 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.82–0.97) [26 (link)] and moderate in patients with TMD (ICC = 0.64) [27 (link)]. When testing treatment effect of PPT a principal component analyses (PCA) was performed to summarize in one variable both sides (left and right) of masseter, both sides of temporal and both sides of sternocleidomastoid muscle features. In fact, the first component in each PCA explained 90.1% for masseter, 93.1% for temporal and 96.3% for sternocleidomastoid variables.
Dysfunction Index of TMD: It was assessed by the Helkimo Index which includes the following five clinical signs and symptoms (scored with 0, 1, or 5 points each): (i) impaired range of mandibular mobility; (ii) TMJ function impairment; (iii) muscle pain; (iv) TMJ pain during palpation; and (v) pain during mandibular movement. The total score is based on the sum of the score of the five items, with 25 being the maximum score. The index classifies the individual as follows: absence of TMD signs and symptoms (0 points), mild TMD signs and symptoms (score range, 1–4 points), moderate TMD signs and symptoms (5–9 points), and serious TMD signs and symptoms (10–25 points) [28 (link)].
Change perception: Assessed at T2 with the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGICS), which evaluates the change perceived by the subject after treatment. This scale has seven affirmations depicting a patient’s rating of overall improvement (1 = “very much improved”, 2 = “much improved”, 3 = “minimally improved”, 4 = “no change”, 5 = “minimally worse”, 6 = “much worse”, or 7 = “very much worse”). Therefore, the lower the score, the higher the improvement perception [29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Fibromyalgia: Magnesium, Calcium, and Quality of Life

2019
A cross-sectional research study was performed between March and October 2012, and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Clínicas of the Federal University of Paraná (HC/UFPR). The study analyzed women in ages between 18 to 60 years, selected at the Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic at the HC/UFPR, who had been diagnosed with FM according to criteria set forth by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990 [18] . The reason for including only women in the study was the low prevalence of fibromyalgia among men. The control group consisted of women with the same age span who did not have FM and other associated clinical conditions.
Patients with fibromyalgia and depression or anxiety were only included if their treatment had remained unchanged for 3 months. The exclusion criteria were: use of calcium and magnesium supplements, medication change over the previous 4 weeks, use of corticosteroids or anticytokine agents, pregnancy, lactation, and a diagnosis of diabetes, decompensated endocrine diseases, infectious diseases (over the previous 4 weeks), demyelinating neurological diseases, peripheral neuropathies, inflammatory articular diseases, systemic autoimmune diseases, severe cardiovascular diseases, malignancy (over the previous year), and severe psychiatric diseases (substance abuse, schizophrenia, psychosis). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents were suspended 48 h before collection of blood samples, and all other medications were required to remain unchanged for at least 30 days.
After having executed an Informed Consent Agreement, all women underwent anthropometric assessment, physical exam of pain perception threshold and tender point (TP) count, blood sample collection, filling out of FM impact questionnaire, (FIQ), of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and 3-day dietary record (DR).
Anthropometric assessment was performed by means of body mass index (BMI) consisting of the relation between body weight in kilograms and body height squared in meters: BMI = weight/height(m) 2 [19] .
The pain threshold was evaluated at the trapezius muscle, using a Fischer algometer (model FDK 20, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA). Each TP was manually palpated with a strength of 4 kgf/cm 2 and the response was recorded as positive (with pain) or negative (without pain). In order to measure the pain threshold in the TP located in the right trapezius, the algometer was placed against the skin of the participant and pressed with a strength of 1 kgf/s until pain onset. Then, the pressure (in kgf/cm 2 ) was recorded and defined as the pain threshold.
Blood samples for measuring serum magnesium (Mg) and calcium (Ca) were drawn in the morning after a 10-12-h fasting. Samples were then placed in ice and centrifuged at 4 °C. Serum was stored at -80 °C. for later analysis at the UFPR Clinical Analysis Laboratory. For the determination of Mg and Ca levels, the Abbott C9000 and/or Ci8200 devices were used. According to the laboratory, reference range values for serum magnesium are 1.6-2.6 mg/dL and for serum calcium are 8.9-10 mg/dL.
The FIQ was employed to assess the impact of FM in quality of life. This questionnaire covers matters related to functional capacity, professional situation, psychological disorders and physical symptoms. It features a score ranging from 0 to 100the higher the score, the greater the impact of FM in quality of lifeconsequently, the lower the overall health [20] (link).
PHQ-9 is a tool with 9 items used to identify individuals in risk of depression. Its score ranges from 0 to 27, with possible answers variating between 0 (not at all) and 3 (nearly every day). The higher the score, the higher the severity [21] .
In order to fill out the Dietary Record, subjects were instructed to take notes on a form including the sort of food and drink they have had and their quantities, three times, in alternate days including 1 day on weekend [22] . Later, all these information was inputed in Avanutri® software and the average dietary intake was calculated. According to the DRIs (Dietary Reference Intakes), the EAR (Estimated Average Requirement) for Mg is 255 mg/d for women aged between 19 and 30 years, and 265 mg/d for women older than 31 years. For Ca, the EAR is 800 mg/d for women aged between 19 and 50 years and 1000 mg/d for women older than 51 years [23] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.