Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

The ReagentPlus brand from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, encompasses a line of high-purity reagents that are actively commercialized and available through authorized distributors like Omnilab. Some examples of ReagentPlus products and their pricing include:

- Sodium Succinate Dibasic Hexahydrate, ReagentPlus™, ≥99%
- 100g: €31.73
- 500g: €128.25
- 1kg: €169.10

- 1,4-Butanediol, ReagentPlus™, 99%
- 1L: €40.85
- 3L: €82.74

- Sodium Pyruvate, ReagentPlus™, ≥99%
- 10mg: €22.61
- 5g: €31.25
- 25g: €45.12
- 100g: €118.75
- 500g: €361.95

- Hydroquinone, ReagentPlus™, 99%
- 100g: €32.30
- 500g: €60.61
- 2kg: €140.60

- Glycine, ReagentPlus™, ≥99%
- 10mg: €35.50
- 100g: €47.60
- 500g: €81.40
- 1kg: €122.00
- 5kg: €500.00
- 25kg: €1,548.50

- Benzylamine, ReagentPlus™, 99%
- 100g: €27.17
- 500g: €77.52

These prices are sourced from Omnilab's online store and are subject to change. For the most accurate and current pricing, please refer to the official distributor's website.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

399 protocols using «reagentplus»

1

Enzymatic Synthesis of Diols and Esters

2025
1,4-Butanediol (99%, ReagentPlus),
1,8-octanediol (98%), 1,12-dodecanediol (99%), Candida
antarctica
lipase B immobilized on acrylic resin beads
(≥5000 U/g, Code L4777), and methanol (≥99.9%) were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Dimethyl adipate (99%) and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran
(99%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (now rebranded as Thermo Scientific).
Cygnet 217 (link) and HO-LGOL12 (link) were synthesized according to previously published procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Viscoelastic Polymer Solutions for Fluid Dynamics

2025
We used aqueous solutions of polyethylene oxide (PEO) (Sigma-Aldrich, molecular weight of 6 × 105 g mol−1) as the viscoelastic compound layer. The solutions were prepared by dissolving the polymers at a concentration of 0.3 wt% in deionized water (Smart2Pure 3 UV/UF, ThermoFisher Scientific, 18.2 MΩ cm at 20 °C) on a magnetic stirrer for 100 hours, at no heat and low stirring rates to minimize thermal and mechanical degradation.38 Then the solutions were further diluted to the required PEO concentration for each experiment. All PEO concentrations used in this study are below the critical overlap concentration estimated as 2.44 wt%, which defines the upper limit below which a polymer solution is considered dilute. Above this threshold, polymer chains start to enter a semi-dilute regime to overlap, interact, and may thereafter form entangled networks.46–48 As shown in Fig. 2, we performed rheological measurements (TA Instruments DHR-3 with a 40 mm diameter and 1° cone plate) and confirmed that PEO solutions used in our experiments can be described as viscoelastic Boger fluids without significant shear thinning.38,48 To further obtain the apparent extensional relaxation time, we employ the semi-empirical curve fit proposed by Rodríguez-Díaz et al. as λr = 2.707 × 10−7c1.733, where λr represents the apparent extensional relaxation time in ms and c denotes the polymer concentration in parts per million (ppm) for PEO.38,49 Hexadecane (Sigma-Aldrich, Reagent Plus, 99%, density ρb = 773 kg m−3, dynamic viscosity μb = 3.45 mPa s) was used as the Newtonian bulk liquid phase. The interfacial tensions were measured using the pendant drop method and analyzed using the open-source software Opendrop.50 All the fluid properties are summarized in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Extraction and Purification of Biomineralized Proteins

2025
Freeze-dried shells and scales from individuals were crushed in the presence of liquid nitrogen using ceramic pestle and mortar to powder the biomineralized parts. For the extraction of the matrix proteins from the scales, an extraction buffer (2 M hydroxylamine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99%), 2 M guanidine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥98%), and 0.2 M potassium carbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99%), which was adjusted to pH 9 as described69 (link), were added to the powder, and the resulting mixture was incubated at 45 °C with shaking at 250 rpm for 12 h. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 13,000 rpm (Eppendorf, Centrifuge 5424 R, German) for 5 min at room temperature, and the reaction was terminated through the addition of 3 µL 2% trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, ReagentPlus, ≥99%, United States) solution per 1 mL supernatant. The extraction procedure was repeated thrice using the same batch of scale powder, and the resultant protein solutions were concentrated using a 3 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) centrifugal concentrator (Millipore, Amicon Ultra-15, United States) at 25 °C and 4000 g RCF (Himac, Centrifuge CT 18 R, Japan).
SMP extraction was performed in accordance with a previously published protocol70 (link),71 (link) with adjustments. Shell powder (~1.0 g) lyophilized at a chamber pressure of 0.014 mbar and a temperature of −99 °C overnight was suspended in 20 mL 10% v/v acetic acid with mild rotation at 4 °C overnight for decalcification. The supernatant was collected after 30 min of centrifugation at 4 °C and 4000 g RCF and concentrated to 5 mL for an extra 20 min with a 3 kDa MWCO centrifugal concentrator. Continuous dialyzed shell protein solution was against 10× volume of Milli-Q water under the same centrifugation conditions.
Methanol/chloroform precipitation was applied to precipitate the extracted scale and shell protein. The pellet acquired was dissolved with 30 µL lysis buffer (8 M urea, 40 mM HEPES, Sigma-Alrich, United States), and the reconstituted protein was further purified using a ReadyPrepTM 2-D cleanup kit (Bio-Rad, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Synthesis of Colloidal Quantum Dots

2025
All
chemicals were used without further purification.
BaI2·2H2O (98%), CdO (99.99% trace metal
basis), ZnI2 (≥98%), (TMSi)3P (95%),
1-octadecene (for synthesis, ≥ 91.0%), oleic acid (technical
grade, 90%), trioctylphosphine oxide (ReagentPlus, 99%), olelyamine
(technical grade, 70%), and methyl acetate (MeOAc, ReagentPlus, 99%)
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Toluene (ACS grade, 99.5%) was
purchased from Oakwood Chemical. Acetone (ACS, 99.5%) was purchased
from VWR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Dispersion of AgMS Particles in Hexadecane Organogels

2025
hexadecane (Reagent Plus, 99%) was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. SEP diblock copolymer (KRATON G1702) and a SEBS triblock copolymer (KRATON G1650) were combined in a 1:1 ratio and dissolved in hexadecane at 40 mg mL−1 at 125 C in an oil bath with a stir bar. The gel was removed from the hot plate and cooled to ambient conditions for 5 min. Preparation of the gels for rheological characterization with concentrations in the range of 1–50 mg mL−1 followed the same protocol. AgMS‐organogel composites with the same volume fractions as the silicone oil suspensions were prepared by weight with the ρs approximately of hexadecane (0.77 g mL−1). To ensure the homogeneous distribution of particles in the gel matrix, the mixture was heated at 125  C in an oil bath and vortexed until the gel resolidified. The Shields number (i.e., the ratio between the shear forces and gravitational forces), was calculated to ensure that the particles remained well‐dispersed throughout the experiment.[43
] This value was >1800 for all γ˙ tested. The values of the Shields number for each γ˙ and AgMS concentration are shown in Table S1 (Supporting Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «reagentplus»

1

Oral Exposure of Rats to Silver Nanoparticles

Four week old female Wistar Hannover Galas rats with specific pathogen-free health status were purchased from M&B Taconic (Lille Skensved, Denmark). Upon arrival the rats were allowed to acclimatize for a week before the start of the experiment. The body weight of the animals at the beginning of the study was 107 ± 9 g (N = 28). The rats were housed conventionally two per cage (Macrolon, Techniplats Gazzada S. ar. L., Buguggiate, Italy) with a 12:12-h reversed light/dark cycle from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. The room temperature was 22 ± 1°C and the relative humidity 55% ± 5%. In their cages, the rats were given ad libitum a standard diet (Altromin rat No.1324, Brogården, Gentofte, Denmark) and citric acid acidified tap water (to avoid microbiological contamination of drinking water). The animal study was performed under conditions approved by Danish Agency of Protection of Experimental Animals and the in-house Animal Welfare Committee.
The rats were randomly divided in three groups and received either an aqueous solution of 11.5 mg/ml PVP (vehicle control, N = 9), AgNPs (N = 9) or AgAc (N = 7) by oral gavage twice a day for 28 days. Additionally, one rat was included in each of the vehicle control, the AgNP and the AgAc groups, respectively, for tissue sampling for electron microscopy. The dosing volume was 10 ml/kg b.w. The aqueous solution of PVP was chosen as a vehicle control because the same solution was used as stabilizer for the AgNPs. PVP was also added to the AgAc solution (AgC2H3O2, CAS number 563-63-3, ReagentPlus, Sigma Aldrich, Denmark) to a concentration of 11.5 mg/ml. The AgAc solution remained clear and colorless throughout the duration of the study indicating that silver did not precipitate or become reduced. The daily dose of silver in the AgNP and AgAc group was 9.0 mg/kg b.w.
In week three of the 28-day study the rats were individually placed in metabolism cages for 24 h for the collection of urine and feces in tubes on dry ice. During this time the animals had free access to water but not to feed in order to eliminate the risk of contamination of urine and feces samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Doxycycline Hyclate Powder Formulation and Analysis

A commercial formulation of doxycycline hyclate, HydroDoxx 500 mg/g oral powder (Huvepharma, Bulgaria) was used for treatment of the animals. The drug was administered at the dose rate of 5 mg·kg−1 bw. The powder was weighed in individual oral gelatin capsules, containing the exact dose according to the individual body weight of the rabbits. The capsules were filled on the day before treatment.
All reagents and solvents were HPLC grade and were provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA): acetonitrile CHROMASOLV®, HPLC grade, ≥99.9% purity, methanol HiPerSolv CHROMANORM for HPLC isocratic grade, oxalic acid 98% purity (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate 99.0–101.0% (Na2H2EDTA × 2H2O) and trifluoroacetic acid ReagentPlus®, 99% purity. Analytical standards doxycycline hyclate with purity ≥ 98% and oxytetracycline hydrochloride ≥ 95% crystalline were used for preparation of standard curves during HPLC analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Resorcinol-Formaldehyde Gel Synthesis

Unless otherwise stated, all resorcinol–formaldehyde (RF) gel samples were prepared using an analogous procedure, excepting for the specific parameter investigated in each section of the study. All chemicals were used as received from the supplying company, and deionised water was produced in-house (Millipore Elix® 5 with Progard® 2 (Merck, Watford, UK)). Firstly, the appropriate amount of resorcinol (Sigma Aldrich, Gillingham, UK, ReagentPlus, 99%) was added to a premeasured volume of deionized water in a jar containing a magnetic stirrer bar. Upon dissolution of all of the added resorcinol, a corresponding amount of sodium carbonate (Sigma Aldrich, anhydrous, ≥99.5%), on a molar basis, was weighed out and added to the solution. As outlined above, sodium carbonate acts as a catalyst, by a combination of increasing the solution pH in the basic region via hydrolysis of the carbonate ion, and by the introduction of sodium ions, which, it has been suggested, assist in the addition of formaldehyde to resorcinol [46 (link)]. Catalyst concentration is expressed as resorcinol/catalyst molar ratio (R/C) and the range studied here is R/C 100–600. After all solids were dissolved, the required amount of formaldehyde, in the form of formalin solution (Sigma Aldrich, 37 wt % formaldehyde in water, containing 10–15 wt % methanol as a polymerization inhibitor), was added, and the solution was stirred in a closed jar for 30 min. All samples were prepared with 20 w/v% solids content, unless otherwise stated, and the total volume used was 60 mL, made up of water and methanol, contributed by the formalin solution used. At the end of the period of agitation, stirrer bars were removed from the solution, and the jar lid was hand-tightened, before moving the jar to an oven (Memmert UFE400, Schwabach, Germany) preheated to 85 °C, unless otherwise stated. Samples formed during this study gelled within 1–2 h [13 (link)]; however, samples were left to cure for three days in order to ensure sufficient time for crosslinking to occur. After three days, the jars containing the gels were removed from the oven and left to cool to room temperature. The formed gels were cut into smaller pieces before washing and solvent exchange with acetone (Sigma Aldrich, ≥99.5%). Standard solvent exchange involved addition of ~180 or ~240 mL of acetone to the drained gel, before resealing the lid and, in order to minimise acetone losses, wrapping with paraffin film. Sealed jars were put on a shaker unit (VWR 3500 Analog Orbital Shaker, Lutterworth, UK) and agitated for three days. In the improved solvent exchange method, the exchanged acetone was drained and replaced with 80 mL of fresh solvent on each successive day for three days. After three days of either solvent exchange method, the gel was drained and placed in a vacuum oven (Townson and Mercer 1425 Digital Vacuum Oven, Stretford, UK), preheated to 85 °C (or, in the case of the temperature study samples, the drying temperature was set to match the curing temperature), to dry for two days. Finally, the sample was transferred to a labelled sample tube for storage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Quantifying Pressure-Induced DPA Release in Spores

Similar to previous studies (Margosch et al., 2004a (link); Reineke et al., 2013b (link)), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine the relative amount of DPA released from pressure treated spores. In accordance with the method used by Fichtel et al. (2007b (link); except for a post-column complexation), a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system (autosampler, pump; Dionex, USA) together with a Themostatted Column Compartment (TCC-100; Dionex) equipped with a Phenomenex Gemini C18 column (150 mm length, 4.6 mm di; Phenomenex, Germany; column temperature: 20°C) was used. The column was protected with a Phenomenex Gemini C18 guard column (4 mm × 3 mm). Sodium bisulphate buffer solution (50 mM NaSO4; 233714, ReagentPlus®, 99%; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) adjusted to pH 1.2 with sulphuric acid (H2SO4, X994.1, Rotipuran® 95–98%, Carl Roth, Germany) filtered through PVDF membrane disk filters (pore size 0.22 μm; 1201107; Berrytec, Germany) and degassed by ultrasonication was used as mobile phase. Isocratic elution was used for standard runs (20% methanol; 7342.1, Rotisolv® HPLC gradient grade, Carl Roth; degassed with helium). A gradient program (20–40% methanol) was used for sample runs. Flow rate was set to 2 mL min-1. An Ultimate 3000 variable wavelength detector (Dionex) was used to measure DPA absorbance at 275 nm.
Dipicolinic acid concentrations in the surrounding medium of untreated, pressure treated, and autoclaved C. botulinum TMW 2.990 spores were determined. Additionally, the total amount of DPA detectable in autoclaved C. botulinum TMW 2.992 and TMW 2.994 spore samples was analyzed. Untreated and high pressure treated C. botulinum TMW 2.990 samples were kept at room temperature for 2 h after a treatment and stored at -80°C prior to HPLC analysis. For analysis, samples were filtered through cellulose acetate syringe filters (pore size 0.2 μm; F2500-16; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), diluted 1:1 with NaSO4/H2SO4 (pH 1.2), adjusted to pH 1.2 with H2SO4, and filtered again. To extract all available DPA, spore suspension samples of each batch were placed in 15 mL polypropylene screw cap tubes (62.554.502; Sarstedt, Germany) and autoclaved (208 kPa, 121.1°C) for 30 min (Pellegrino et al., 2002 (link)) followed by 1:1 dilution, H2SO4 addition, and filtration. Samples (200 μL) were placed in polypropylene HPLC vials (250 μL; 6820.0029; Thermo Fischer Scientific). Twenty microliter sample were injected per run. The use of glassware was avoided to minimize possible adsorption effects of DPA to surfaces (Fichtel et al., 2007b (link)). 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (DPA; 2321-10G-F; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used as standard. Pressure-induced DPA release was calculated relative [%] to the total DPA content (autoclaved samples; Margosch et al., 2004a (link); Reineke et al., 2013b (link)). Experiments were conducted independently in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Synthesis and Characterization of Resorcinol-Formaldehyde Gels

A series of RF gels were synthesised with varying compositions, each gel formed through an established procedure requiring four reagents: resorcinol (ReagentPlus, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK), formalin solution (37 wt % formaldehyde in water and methanol, Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK), deionised water (produced in-house with Millipore Elix 5, Progard 2), and a catalyst. In this work, the catalysts used were sodium carbonate (Na2CO3, anhydrous, ≥99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK), sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3, anhydrous, ≥99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK), ammonium hydrogen carbonate (NH4HCO3, 99%, Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK), sodium sulphate (Na2SO4, anhydrous, ≥99.0%, Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK), and sodium chloride (NaCl, Redi-Dri, anhydrous, ≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, UK).
In the preparation of the gels investigated here, the volume of liquid added per gel in the initial solution was kept constant at 60 mL, which included the water and methanol content of the formalin solution. The total solids content of the initial mixture was kept constant at 12 g, which included the mass of formaldehyde contained within the formalin solution. The mass of resorcinol (R), formaldehyde (F), and catalyst (C) was varied according to the R/C ratio being prepared, all the while maintaining a constant R/F ratio of 0.5 in accordance with the stoichiometry of the resorcinol–formaldehyde reaction. Data for the mass of individual components of each reagent are included within the Supplementary Materials, in addition to details of how the volume of formalin required for each gel was calculated.
The RF gel synthesis follows a standard procedure, with the reagents initially combined in individual circular glass jars according to the desired catalyst concentration and mixture, forming the initial RF solution. For gels synthesized using a combination of two catalysts, the two compounds were weighed into separate crucibles and added to the mixture simultaneously. The resulting solution pH was measured using a Hanna Instruments benchtop pH meter (Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, UK), after which point the jar was sealed and placed into a Memmert ULE-500 oven (Büchenbach, Germany) at 85 °C and left to gel for a 3-day period.
After the gelation period was complete, the gels underwent a 3-day solvent exchange process, where the water within the pores was exchanged for acetone. Acetone was selected as a solvent for exchange, due to its low surface tension value (23.46 mN/m for acetone in comparison to 71.99 mN/m for water; both values taken at 25 °C [38 (link)]), therefore, minimizing the extent of pore shrinkage upon drying, in addition to its miscibility with water.
Finally, following the completion of the 3-day solvent exchange step, the jars containing RF gel samples were drained, covered with perforated aluminum foil, and placed into a Towson and Mercer 1425 Digital Vacuum Oven (Stretford, UK). After closing the vacuum oven door, the oven heating was turned on and the temperature was set to 110 °C, which corresponds to 85 ± 5 °C inside the oven (monitored using a thermometer placed inside the oven). The vacuum pump (Vacuubrand MZ 2C NT, Wertheim, Germany) attached to the oven was turned on, with two solvent traps with water/ice mixture placed between the oven and the pump, to condense acetone evaporating from the gel samples. The solvent traps were used to preserve the vacuum pump, limiting the amount of solvent vapor that came into contact with the membranes, as well as monitoring sample drying. For safety purposes, the oven and the pump were not left running overnight but were turned on at the beginning of each working day for 8 h. The gels were dried for 2 days, after which they were transferred into labelled sample containers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.