Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Ammonium formate

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, China, France, Switzerland, India, Spain, Canada, Poland, Belgium, Sao Tome and Principe, Macao, Australia, Netherlands, Czechia, Japan, Ireland, Sweden, Austria, Norway, Singapore, Hungary, Finland, Portugal
About the product

Ammonium formate is a chemical compound that is commonly used in various laboratory applications. It is a crystalline solid that is soluble in water and other polar solvents. Ammonium formate serves as a buffer in analytical techniques and is also used as a mobile phase additive in liquid chromatography.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

1 515 protocols using ammonium formate

1

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Solvents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solvents used in this study were of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry grade. Methanol and acetonitrile were sourced from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK), ammonium formate from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany), formic acid from TCI (Shanghai, China), and methyl tert-butyl ether from Sinopharm (Beijing, China). Ultrapure water was produced using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolite Extraction and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS grade methanol (MeOH) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK). 2-Amino-3-(2-chloro-phenyl)-propionic acid was obtained from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Ultrapure water was generated using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, USA). Acetonitrile (ACN) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK). Formic acid was obtained from TCI (Shanghai, China). Ammonium formate was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). Ultrapure water was generated using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, USA).
High-speed freezing centrifuge was obtained from Hunan Xiangyi Experiment Equipment Co., Ltd. (Hunan, China). The vortex mixer was obtained from Haimen Kylin-bell Lab Instruments Co., Ltd. (Haimen, China). The centrifugal vacuum evaporator was from Eppendorf China Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ultrasonic cleaner was obtained from Kunshan Shumei Experiment Equipment Co., Ltd. (Kunshan, China). The tissue grinder was obtained from Zhejiang Meibi Experiment Equipment Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang, China). Microporous membrane filters (0.22 µm) were purchased from Tianjin Jinteng Experiment Equipment Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Opioid Quantification Using HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Opioids were used as analytes: 6-acetylmorphine hydrochloride (6-AM), morphine (MOR), 6-acetylcodeine (6-AC), and codeine monohydrate (COD). Analytes were purchased from Lipomed AG (Arlesheim, Switzerland) at a concentration of 1.00 mg/mL. Three deuterated opioids were used as the internal standards: 6-acetylemorphine-D3 hydrochloride trihydrate (6-AM-D3), morphine-D3 (MOR-D3), and codeine-D3 hydrochloride dihydrate (COD-D3). All the internal standards were purchased from Lipomed AG at a concentration of 1.00 mg/mL. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade solvents were used for opioid extraction and analysis. Methanol (99.8%), ethyl acetate, phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), hexane (ultrapure grade), acetic acid (0.1 M), dichloromethane (DCM), isopropanol (IPA), and ammonium formate were used as solvents, all of which were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck, KGaA), except for ammonium formate, which was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). The solvents were stored at room temperature (25 °C). Several consumables were used for sample preparation and analysis, including Clean Screen® SPE (CSTHCU203, 200 mg/3 mL) cartridges, adjustable volume pipettes, disposable tips, sample vials, inserts with screw-top caps, Pyrex sample tubes (16 × 125 mL), disposable plastic transfer pipettes, syringes, and syringe filters. The cartridges were supplied by UCT Bristol (St. Louis, MO, USA), the pipettes and tips by Eppendorf AG (Hamburg, Germany), the vials, insert, and caps by Thermo Scientific (Langerwehe, Germany), the sample tubes by Neutrex® (DWK Life Sciences, Wertheim, Germany), the transfer pipettes by S. G. H. (Lecca, Italy), and the syringes and filters by Ramy, Alshifa (Dammam, Saudi Arabia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Dimethoate Sorption-Desorption Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An analytical standard of dimethoate with a purity of >99.0% (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was used for the sorption–desorption experiments. Its physicochemical properties are listed in Table 1 [62 ]. To prepare the standard solution, dimethoate was dissolved in MS-grade methanol (Honeywell, Charlotte, NC, USA) and further diluted with methanol or the corresponding mobile phase. For the soil sorption experiment, a 1000 mg/L stock solution of dimethoate was prepared by dissolving 250 μL Chromgor® 40 in acetonitrile ultra-gradient-grade (J.T. Baker, Deventer, The Netherlands). Working solutions with dimethoate concentrations ranging from 5.0 to 100.0 mg/L were then prepared by dilution with a 0.01 M calcium chloride solution (CaCl2, Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ, USA).
All solvents and chemicals were of analytical grade. These included: ammonium formate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), sodium acetate, sodium hydroxide, sodium pyrophosphate, potassium dichromate, sulfuric acid and phenolphthalein (Kemika d.d., Zagreb, Croatia). In addition, glucose (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and a certified EDTA standard (41.06 wt% C, 5.51 wt% H and 9.56 wt% N) were used (LECO Corporation, Saint Joseph, MI, USA). Deionized water was purified using a Siemens Ultra Clear system (Munich, Germany) to ensure high quality experimental conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Cocaine and Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cocaine, benzoylecgonine, cocaine-d3, and benzoylecgonine-d3 were all obtained from Cerilliant Corporation (Round Rock, TX, USA). Formic acid ampoules were obtained from Life Technologies Corporation (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) grade water and acetonitrile were obtained from Honeywell (Muskegon, MI, USA). Ammonium formate was obtained for Millipore Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). Sodium borate decahydrate was obtained from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE), 2-propanol, and defibrinated sheep blood were all obtained from VWR (Radnor, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Quantification of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS grade solvents were used throughout
the study. Methanol was purchased from Fisher Scientific, and water
and ammonium formate (≥99%) were purchased from Supelco. C57BL/6
mice (BioIVT), domestic shorthair cats, beagle dogs (BioIVT), and
human plasma were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Blood was collected
from Sprague–Dawley rats by cardiac puncture and centrifuged
at 3000 g for 30 min at 4 °C to separate the plasma and stored
at −80 °C until further analysis. Fetal bovine serum was
obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and β-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase
from Roche. Urolithin A (UA) (Ambeed, 99%), cyclosporine A (CsA) (LC
Laboratories, >99%), ascomycin (ASC) (Alfa Aesar, 95%), and (±)
naringenin (NAR) (Sigma-Aldrich, 95%) were procured. CsA and ASC were
stored at −20 °C, UA at 4 °C, and NAR at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lipid Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following chemicals were used throughout the lipid extraction and analysis, water (Hypergrade for LC-MS, LiChrosolv®, MerckKGaA), acetonitrile (MSsuprasolve®, Sigma Aldrich), methanol (HPLC grade ≥99.9%, Sigma Aldrich), chloroform (stabilsed with amylenes, ≥99.5%, Sigma Aldrich), isopropanol (Optima™LC/MS Grade, Fisher Scientific), ammonium formate (99.995%, Sigma Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Plasma Sphingolipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical parameters monitored in the study included uterine artery flow rate (mean pulsatility index), body mass index (BMI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and weight gain. Pregnant individuals underwent uterine artery flow rate assessment via pulse color Doppler throughout the entire pregnancy. The BMI and MAP were calculated using established formulas as detailed in our previous work (18 (link), 19 ).
Serum lipid parameters, including total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol (calculated using Friedewald’s equation), and apoA-I, were determined using commercially available kits and methods as already explained in details (17 (link), 18 (link)). ApoM mass concentrations were quantified using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) technique (FineTest Biotech Inc., Wuhan, China).
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade analytical standards were used for quantification of sphingosine (SPH), sphinganine (SAP), S1P, ceramide C16:0 (Cer C16:0), ceramide C24:0 (Cer C24:0) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Birmingham, USA), sphinganine-1-phosphate (SAP1P), and sphingomyelin C16:0 (SM C16:0) (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, USA). SPH d17, S1P d17, and ceramide C17:0 (Cer C17:0), obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, USA), and sphingomyelin C17:0 (SM C17:0) purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, USA) were used as internal standards (IS). Methanol (HPLC grade) was purchased from Fisher (Pittsburgh, USA), chloroform, and ammonium formate from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, USA), trifluoroacetic and formic acid from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, USA).
Sphingolipid quantification employed liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), beginning with plasma lipid extraction via liquid-liquid extraction. A 50 µL plasma aliquot was introduced into the IS-coated (SPH d17, S1P d17, Cer C17:0, and SM C17:0 mixture) glass vials. Subsequently, 2 mL of an extraction mixture (methanol:chloroform blend in a 2:1 ratio with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) was added to each vial and vigorously vortexed for 30 seconds. In the ensuing step, 0.67 mL of chloroform was introduced, and the test tubes were once again thoroughly mixed for 30 seconds. Following this, 1.15 mL of HPLC-grade water was added to establish a 1:1:0.9 ratio for methanol, chloroform, and water. After vortexing for 30 seconds and centrifugation for 20 minutes at 2000xg, a protein layer could become distinguishable in the interlayer. The lower chloroform layer was transferred to a new clean tube, dried to solid, and reconstituted in 30 µL of HPLC-grade methanol. It underwent further 30 seconds vortexing and centrifugation at 1500xg for 10 minutes prior to the injection into the column.
Sphingolipids underwent chromatographic separation using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C8 column (4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) with a gradient elution of solvent A (1 mM ammonium formate in methanol with 0.2% formic acid) and solvent B (2 mM ammonium formate in water with 0.2% formic acid). The mobile phase initially consisted of 80% A and 20% B, with subsequent linear gradients to 90% A at 10.6 minutes, which was held for 6 minutes. Subsequently, a linear gradient to 99% A was applied up to 66 minutes, and back to 80% A at 68 minutes. The final condition was sustained for further 7 minutes until the end of run. Flow rate was 0.5 mL/min with a 15 µL sample injection volume.
Analyte m/z transitions were provided in Table 1. Quantification was done using multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) on triple quad mass spectrometer Agilent 6420 equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) ion source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). Source conditions included a gas temperature of 340 °C, vaporizer temperature of 250 °C, gas flow rate of 12 L/min, and nebulizer pressure at 20 psi. Positive and negative capillary voltages were set at 4500 V and 4000 V, respectively.
Intra-run variabilities ranged from 3.8% to 18.8%. Inter-run variabilities varied from 4.1% to 19.4%. Calibration ranges were: SPH (3.91-1001.7 nmol/L), SAP (3.50-223.7 nmol/L), S1P (10.3-1317.6 nmol/L), SAP1P (1.02-524.2 nmol/L), Cer C16:0 (0.055-14.1 µmol/L), Cer C24:0 (0.083-17.8 µmol/L), and SM C16:0 (7.89-1010.0 µmol/L).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Erjingtiao Chili Pepper Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Erjingtiao dried chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L. ‘Erjingtiao’) was purchased from the Longquanyi district vegetable wholesale market, Chengdu, Sichuan Province. Third-grade rapeseed oil (Yihai Kerry, Chongqing, China) was purchased from supermarkets in the Longquanyi district, Chengdu, Sichuan Province.
MS-grade methanol, MS-grade acetonitrile, and HPLC-grade 2-propanol were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Cleveland, OH, USA), HPLC-grade formic acid and ammonium formate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and 2-methyl-3-heptanone was purchased from Beijing Manhag Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Reagents for Metabolite Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This experiment utilized a variety of solutions and reagents. Liquid chromatography-mass-spectrometry-grade methanol and acetonitrile were both purchased from Thermo (Waltham, MA, USA). We sourced 2-chlorophenylalanine from Aladdin (Carlsbad, CA, USA). High-performance liquid-chromatography-grade formic acid was obtained from TCI (Tokyo, Japan). Liquid-chromatography-grade ammonium formate was purchased from Sigma (Darmstadt, Germany). The experimental water was ultrapure water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ/cm, and it was purified using a Millipore ultrapure water system (Burlington, NJ, USA). Additionally, ACS-grade chloroform was sourced from Wokai (Beijing, China). These solutions and reagents provided a solid guarantee for the accurate conduct of the experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.