The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Milkoscan 133b

Manufactured by Foss
Sourced in Denmark

The MilkoScan 133B is a compact, automated milk analyzer designed for the dairy industry. It provides rapid and precise analysis of various milk components, including fat, protein, lactose, and solids-non-fat, without the need for complex sample preparation. The device utilizes Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) technology to deliver accurate results in a timely manner.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using milkoscan 133b

1

Colostrum Yield and Milk Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Colostrum yield per individual cow was determined as the sum of the amounts obtained from the first and second milkings (d 1 of lactation) and colostrum samples were taken. Moreover, individual daily milk yields of the animals were recorded at all milkings (06:00, 14:00 and 22:00) and milk samples of each cow were taken, once a week, up to d 100 after calving.
A portion of the composite milk sample, per cow for every sampling day, and colostrum samples were analysed for solids non-fat, protein, lactose and fat (Milko Scan 133B; Foss Electric, Denmark). Milk SCC was determined using a Fossomatic apparatus (Foss Electric, Denmark). Another portion of milk was frozen (−20 °C) until analysis for TAC (as below). Feed efficiency was calculated by dividing milk yield by DMI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Determination of Feed and Fecal Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the dry matter (DM) content in feed, refusals and feces, samples were dried in a forced-air oven at 60 °C for 48 h, and subsequently ground in a Wiley mill using a 3 mm screen (Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia). For experimental diets, organic matter (OM) was determined by incineration at 550 °C for 3 h. Standard procedures [24 ] were used to determine the DM (934.01), Kjeldahl N (984.13), and ether extract (920.39). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were analyzed according to Van Soest et al. [21 (link)], including α-amylase and sodium-sulfite for NDF analysis using the ANKOM system (ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY,) for NDF and ADF.
Milk yield was recorded on the last 5 days of each experimental period, and was collected at 08.00 h using a volumetric milk meter and considered for statistical analysis. Samples were preserved with potassium dichromate and analyzed for protein, fat, lactose, total solids (TS) and non-fat solids (NFS) using a MilkoScan 133B (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pregnancy Biomarker Monitoring in Dairy Cows

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten-mL of blood was collected from the jugular veins in a heparin-treated vacuum tube (BD Vacutainer Systems Preanalytical Solutions, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 9:00 AM before the start of the experiment, on 120th day and 240th day of pregnancy. After collection, the plasma was separated by centrifugation (4°C, 3,000 rpm, 15 min), and stored at −70°C until further analysis. Milk production was recorded daily by automatic recording with ALPRO SYSTEM (Alfa-Laval Agri., Peterborough, Ontario, Canada), and 30 days after parturition the milk was analyzed for milk protein, milk fat, lactose and solid-not-fat (SNF) using Milkoscan-133B (Foss, Hilleroed, Denmark), and the number of somatic cells was determined by using Fossomatic-300 (Foss).
Analysis of total estrogen, progesterone, triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) in blood was as follows; Total estrogen was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) method using DA Total Estrogen kit (ICN Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA), and progesterone measured using CoAT-A-OUNT Progesterone kit (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). T3 and T4 were determined by RIA method using RIA-mat-T3 and RIA-mat-T4 kits (Byk-Sangtec Diagnostica, Dietzenbach, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Goat Milk Composition and Fatty Acid Profile

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On days 10 and 30 after delivery, milk samples were collected from each goat twice a day (at 7:00 am and 6:00 pm) and pooled together within each group. Milk was stored at 4 °C and immediately transported to the laboratory for the analysis of fat, protein, lactose, and total solids using an infrared milk analyzer (Milkoscan 133-B, Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark) previously standardized for goat’s milk. Ash content was detected after burning a sample in a muffle furnace at 550 °C for 5 h.
Total lipids were extracted according to the chloroform/methanol method described by Folch et al. [25 (link)]. FAs were methylated using a BF3-methanol solution (12% v/v) [26 ]. The FA profile was assessed by using a Chrompack CP 9000 gas chromatograph, with a silicate glass capillary column (70% cyanopropyl polysilphenylene-siloxane BPX 70 of SGE Analytical Science, length 50 m, internal diameter 0.22 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm). The temperature program was 135 °C for 7 min, followed by increases of 4 °C per minute up to 210 °C. Fatty acid peaks were identified using a comparative analysis with standard reference mixtures. The fatty acid content was expressed as the percentage of total fatty acid methyl esters (FAME).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Milk Composition and Biochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Milk samples were collected during morning milking into tubes with and without additives on the same day blood was sampled. The chemical composition of milk was determined at the Central Laboratory for Milk Quality Control at Agriculture faculty of Novi Sad. Milk samples were analyzed by a FOSS milk analyzer, and their chemical composition was assessed by a MILKOSCANFT analyzer (Milko-Scan 133 B, Foss Electric, Denmark) using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Milk fat, protein and lactose contents were determined. Before analysis, samples were heated in a water bath at 40 + 2 °C. After homogenization, about 5 mL of milk was taken by the apparatus. Upon serum separation, milk was subjected to biochemical tests for the determination of the enzymes (AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, LDH), urea and BHB. Milk serum was separated after centrifugation at 10,000× g for 30 min and was transferred to new tubes for analysis. The biochemical reagents and apparatus used for milk serum analysis were the same as for blood serum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pasture Sampling and Forage Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the beginning of the trial, pasture samples were collected along transects according to methods from Freschi et al. (2015 (link)Freschi et al. ( , 2016 (link)Freschi et al. ( , 2017) ) (link) and Rizzardini et al. (2019) . Grass samples were dried in a stove, homogenized, and analyzed. Samples of the pelleted feeds and dried pasture were ground in a hammer mill with a 1-mm screen and analyzed using the following AOAC International (2004) procedures: DM (method 934.01), fat (method 920.39), ash (method 942.05), CP (method 954.01), crude fiber (method 945.18), ADF and ADL (method 973.18), and NDF (method 2002.04).
Individual milk samples were collected twice per day (at 0700 and 1800 h), stored at 4°C, and immediately transported to the laboratory for the analysis of fat, protein, lactose, and total solids with an infrared milk analyzer (Milkoscan 133-B, Foss Electric, Hillerod, Denmark) previously standardized for goat milk. Cheese samples were homogenized and lyophilized. Fat content was determined by the Soxhlet method (AOCS, 1996) and expressed as fat in DM. Total nitrogen was determined by the Kjeldahl method (AOAC, 1995) and expressed as protein content (nitrogen content × 6.38). In milk and cheese samples, ash content was detected after burning a lyophilized sample in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 5 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analysis of Milk Composition and Yield

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study also used the samples of milk taken automatically from all phases of milking. These milk samples were collected in special reservoirs analogous to those used in the trial milking. The collected milk samples were analyzed for basic morphological and biochemical parameters of milk: SCC, CFU, the proportions (fractions) of fats, proteins, lactose, solids and solids non-fat contents in milk. The analysis also included milk yield as production parameter, during the morning milking when the blood and milk samples were taken. Biochemical analyses of milk were carried out in a specialized laboratory for milk in the University of Environmental and Life Sciences in Wroclaw. An SCC assay was performed using a SOMACOUNT-150 (Bentley, USA) analyzer by employing the fluoro-opto-electronic method. CFU determination was performed by flow cytometry on a BACTOCOUNT-70 (Bentley, USA) analyzer. Determination of the fractions of milk fat, protein, lactose, solids, and SNF was done by a Milko-Scan 133 B (Foss Electric, Denmark) analyzer. Milk yield was recorded by the Alpro-Delaval electronic system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Determination of Feed Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the DM content of feed, refusals and feces, samples were dried in a forced-air oven (60°C, 48 h), and subsequently ground in a Wiley mill 3 mm diameter (Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA). Organic matter was determined by incineration (550°C for 3 h), fat, total nitrogen (AOAC International, 2005) , and CP content. The NDF and ADF were determined using the ANKOM technique (Van Soest et al., 1991) with α-amylase and uncorrected for ash. Milk samples were analyzed using a MilkoScan 133B (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark) to obtain the values of protein, fat, TS, and SNF. Fatty acids of the dietary components were separated by the Soxhlet method (AOAC International, 2005) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Milk Composition Analysis via Lyophilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pasteurized bovine, caprine, and ovine bulk milks were lyophilized (lyophilization cycle -50°C for 24 h; Lio5P, 5 Pascal s.r.l., Trezzano, Milan, Italy) and the resulting lyophilized powders stored at 4°C. Bovine, caprine, and ovine milk samples were analyzed for chemical composition using an infrared spectrophotometer (Milko Scan 133B; Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark) . Casein and whey protein fractions were obtained according to IDF (1993) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Methods for Forage and Milk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Residual DM concentration of dried and ground samples was determined in a forced-air oven at 105°C for 16 h. Silage DM concentration was corrected for the loss of volatile compounds as described by Huida et al. (1986) . Ash concentration was determined in a muffle furnace according to AOAC method 942.05 (AOAC International, 2012) . Nitrogen concentration in feed samples was determined using a Dumas-type elemental N analyzer (Leco FP-428, Leco Corporation, St. Joseph, MI). The NDF concentration was analyzed in the presence of Na 2 SO 3 , as described by Van Soest et al. (1991) , using an Ankom 220 Fiber Analyzer (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY). Heat-stable α-amylase was used for starch containing samples. Indigestible NDF (iNDF) in feeds and feces was determined based on 12-d in situ incubations in the rumen of dairy cows as described by Ahvenjärvi et al. (2006) . Grass silage OM digestibility was determined based on pepsin-cellulase OM solubility as described by Nousiainen et al. (2003) and modified by Huhtanen et al. (2006b) . Volatile fatty acid concentration in grass silage was determined by GC as described by Huhtanen et al. (1998) . Milk samples were analyzed for DM, protein, fat, and lactose concentration using an infrared milk analyzer (MilkoScan 133B, Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!