We Dissect Protocols

Sas 9.4 ts level 1m5

Manufactured by SAS Institute
23 citations
Sourced in United States
About the product

SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 is a software product developed by SAS Institute. It is a maintenance release that provides updates and enhancements to the core SAS 9.4 platform. The software is designed to improve the performance, stability, and functionality of the SAS environment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

23 protocols using «sas 9.4 ts level 1m5»

1

Pneumonia Risk Factors in Municipalities

2025
We calculated the distribution of patients for each categorical variable including age in 10-year intervals, for both the total population and by municipality type. We also calculated mean and standard deviation for age as a continuous variable. The proportion of patients who experienced at least one outpatient pneumonia or pneumonia hospitalization was determined for each municipality and for each municipality type. We excluded four small island municipalities from analysis due to few observations.
We estimated risk of pneumonia between municipality types for both outpatient pneumonia and pneumonia hospitalization with a multinomial logistic regression model with the following groups as outcome variable: 1) No pneumonia during the year, 2) at least one outpatient pneumonia (but no pneumonia hospitalization) during the year, and 3) at least one pneumonia hospitalization during the year. The ‘No pneumonia’ group was used as reference, and the model was adjusted for age, sex, educational level, co-habitation status, and CCI. We used a significance level of 5%. SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multivariate Analysis of Factors Influencing Health in Polsenior2 Study

2025
The data management and the statistical analyses were performed with R version 3.6.3 R (R Core Team, version 3.6.3) and SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The data was presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were created to evaluate the associations between binary dependent variables and covariates. The multiple logistic regression model included the independent variables age, sex, education level, financial situation, quality of life, place of residence, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, tobacco consumption, alcohol consumption, hypercholesterolemia, and poor nutritional status. The independent variables were chosen based on previously reported potential risk factors from the existing literature and data available in the Polsenior2 study. Highly correlated variables, such as abdominal obesity and high BMI, were excluded from the analysis. Sampling weights were included in the statistical calculations to account for the complex survey design using the R survey package. The poststratification procedure was used to match the age–sex sample distribution to the population of Poland. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. The Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was calculated, indicating a slight multicollinearity among the predictors. In each case, the VIF values ranged from 1 to 1.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Factors Associated with Stroke in Poland

2024
The data management and the statistical analyses were performed with R version 3.6.3 R (R Core Team, version 3.6.3) and SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The data was presented as percentages with 95% con dence intervals. A univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were created to determine the association between binary dependent variable and covariates. The multiple logistic regression model contains independent variables which were Age, Sex, Education Level, Financial situation of the household, Quality of Life, Place of residence, Stroke, Hypertension, Diabetes, Obesity, Tobacco, Alcohol, Hypercholesterolemia, and Poor Nutritional Status. Sampling weights were included in statistical calculations to account for the complex survey design using R survey package. The post-strati cation procedure was used to match age-sex sample distribution to the population of Poland. The level of signi cance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Gdańsk Medical University

4

Adjusting Polish Population Statistics

2024
Post-stratification was used to adjust the sample structure against the Polish population in 2017. The results are presented as percentages, median values with first and third quartiles, and mean values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis was performed using the statistical package R version 3.6.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proportions of Patients in ICS Treatment

2024
We calculated the proportion of patients in each ICS treatment group for each year of study. We also calculated the proportion of patients in each group of age (40–49 years, 50–59 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years, or 80+ years), sex (male or female), CCI (0, 1, 2, or 3+), co-habitation status (living alone or co-habiting), education (primary, secondary, vocational, or college), and income status (employed, unemployed, disability pension, early retirement, age pension, education, or other). For age, we also calculated the mean and standard deviation. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Southern Denmark

Top 5 most cited protocols using «sas 9.4 ts level 1m5»

1

Analyzing COPD Exacerbation and Mortality

Baseline characteristics were described as mean (standard deviation [SD]) for continuous variables and absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables. Baseline characteristics were described during the baseline year or at the date of first mMRC measurement (index date) (sFigure 2). Baseline treatment was defined as respiratory medication collected during the four months prior to index.
Follow up for moderate exacerbations, severe exacerbations and death started on the day after the index date between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014. Follow up ended on the date of death, emigration, 36 months after index date, or end of study Dec 31, 2017, whichever occurred first. If a patient had several mMRC measurements during the study period, the first measurement was used as index. Patients who developed an OCS-related diagnosis were censored from analyses on the date of diagnosis.
Logistic regression models were applied to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs of moderate exacerbation, severe exacerbation and death in B1 with B0 as reference for each year of follow up and adjusted for age, sex, cohabitation status, comorbidity, BMI and smoking. A cumulated measure of outcomes over the entire three year follow up was calculated with each patient being categorized according to the most severe event they experienced during follow up.
The hazard ratio of exacerbations accounting for recurrent exacerbations was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model with 95% confidence intervals and GOLD B0 as the reference group. Recurrent events were included in the model as a covariate. Furthermore, the model was adjusted for age, sex, cohabitation status, comorbidity, BMI and smoking and death was handled as a competing event using the Fine & Gray method.20 (link)
All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 TS Level 1m5, and all p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Southern Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, AstraZeneca (Sweden), Uppsala University

2

Statistical Analysis of PolSenior and PolSenior2 Studies

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R version 3.6.3 R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Due to the skewed distribution of values for the BMI and the WC, variables were calculated as the median (first quartile—third quartile). The significance of the relationship between the analyzed factors was tested using a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis Test. We performed a chi-squared test for the trend in proportions for the categorical data and a Mann Kendall trend test for the quantitative data, respectively, to check whether the data had a significant trend. We used Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho) as a measure of the correlation between the parameters and a multivariate linear regression to model the relationship between two or more variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were created to determine the association between binary dependent variables and covariates. The proportions were compared with a chi-squared test and a chi-squared test for the trends in age groups. A Kaplan–Meier plot was used to present the survival curves, which were compared using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for the univariable and multivariable survival analyses, with age as one of the covariates. A proportional-hazards assumption was tested using Schoenfeld residuals. For all statistical analyses, the level of significance was set at 0.05.
The statistical analysis of PolSenior and PolSenior2 studies took into account a complex survey sampling, and post-stratification was used to weigh the sample in relation to the structure of the Polish population in 2019.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Gdańsk Medical University, Medical University of Silesia, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology

3

Retrospective Analysis of Pneumonia Incidence

This was a descriptive study. For categorical variables, the proportion of patients within each group was calculated. Age was the only continuous variable in our study, and we calculated both mean and standard deviation as well as proportions in each 10-year age group (40–49 years, 50–59 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years, and 80+ years). Short college, medium college, and masters/PhD were summed into one group (college) to account for too few observations in the groups. CCI was grouped into four categories (0, 1, 2, and ≥3). Because ICD-10 code registration in the DNPR is delayed, and we only have access to data until 2018, the last valid CCI is from 2015 [10 (link)].
We calculated the proportion of patients who had at least one outpatient pneumonia or pneumonia hospitalization within each year, and we investigated the relationship between pneumonia groups and ICS treatment dose groups. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gender Differences in Healthcare Costs

Costs are presented as annual means for cases and controls. Statistical significance of the cost estimates and DCCI was assessed by non‐parametric bootstrap analysis. A significance level of 0.05 was assumed for all tests. In the before and after analysis, only cases with at least a 5‐year follow‐up period prior to diagnosis were included. A Generalized Estimating Equation (two‐step model) for gamma regression was used to compare healthcare costs, income from employment and public transfer income in female cases and controls with male cases and controls within age groups and to assess gender differences in healthcare costs (adjusted for age). The two‐step model takes individuals with no costs or income (= 0) into account. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital

5

Statistical Analysis of Complex Survey Data

The data management and the statistical analyses were performed with R version 3.6.3 R (R Core Team, version 3.6.3) and SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M5 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The continuous variables were compared with t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests for two groups and in the case of three or more groups, ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for normally and non-normally distributed variables, respectively. The proportions were compared with chi-square test. Sampling weights were included in statistical calculations to account for the complex survey design using R survey package. The post-stratification procedure was used to match age–sex sample distribution to the population of Poland. The two-tailed tests were carried out with significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Jagiellonian University, Gdańsk Medical University, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology

The spelling variants listed above correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.