Cd68 antibody
The CD68 antibody is a laboratory tool used to identify and quantify a specific protein, CD68, which is expressed on the surface of certain immune cells. The CD68 antibody can be used in various analytical techniques, such as flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting, to help researchers study the role of CD68-positive cells in different biological processes and disease states.
Lab products found in correlation
Market Availability & Pricing
Is this product still available?
Get pricing insights and sourcing optionsSimilar products (other manufacturers)
The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.
Product FAQ
12 protocols using «cd68 antibody»
Antibody Characterization for Immune Cell Analysis
COVID-19 Lung Tissue Immunohistochemistry
Histological Analysis of COVID-19 Lung Samples
Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury Analysis
Childhood Adipose Tissue Characterization
Preparation of and analyses of AT samples was performed according to previously published protocols [12 (link)]. Briefly, adipocytes and stromal vascular fraction (SVF) were isolated by collagenase digestion and adipocyte diameter was determined after osmium fixation using a Coulter counter (Multisizer III; Beckmann Coulter). Macrophage infiltration was analysed by immunohistochemical staining of AT sections with CD68 antibody (M0718, DAKO).
Prior to surgery, fasting blood samples were obtained and stored at -80°C. Analyses of serum parameters (adiponectin, leptin, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), glucose and insulin) were performed by a certified laboratory (Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig).
Top 5 protocols citing «cd68 antibody»
Isolation and Characterization of Airway Epithelial Cells
For culture, cells were washed once in RPMI-1640 media and the cell pellet resuspended in bronchial epithelial basal media (BEBM, Clonetics, CA) supplemented with bovine pituitary extract (50 mM), insulin (5 mM), hydrocortisone (0.5 mM), gentamicin (0.001%, v/v), amphotericin B (0.0005%, v/v), retinoic acid (0.1 μM), transferrin (10 mM), triiodothyronine (6.5 μM), epinephrine (6.5 μM) and human recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF: 0.5 μM). The cells were then seeded into a culture vessel (25 cm2 growth surface area) pre-coated with a mixture of fibronectin, collagen and bovine serum albumin, and maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator. Twenty-four hours post-isolation, unattached cells were collected. These cells were reseeded into the same culture vessel, with fresh media containing Ultroser G (2% v/v; BioSepra, CA), a serum substitute. The collection and reseeding of viable unattached cells was repeated at both 48 and 72 hours post isolation. Subsequent cultures were fed every second day and were usually passaged every 13–16 days.
Before the remaining cell suspension was used for protein and RNA extraction, and to produce cytospin slides, the macrophages were removed by positive selection: the cell suspension was added to a culture dish that had been previously coated with CD-68 antibody (Dako, Australia). The plate was incubated for 20 minutes (37°C, 5% CO2) to allow the macrophages to adhere. The suspended epithelial cells were aspirated from the plate, and the macrophages removed using trypsin (0.25%) for subsequent analysis. The macrophage depleted cell suspension was used to produce cytospins, extract protein, and extract RNA.
Cytospin slides were prepared by centrifuging epithelial cells onto a glass slide in a cytocentrifuge (Hettich). Slides were air dried, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, and then stored at -20°C until required. Immunocytochemical staining of the cytospins was used to confirm the purity of the epithelial sample. Antibodies against cytokeratin (a marker for tissue of epithelial origin), α -smooth muscle actin (a marker of myofibroblasts, myoepithelial cells and smooth muscle cells), smooth muscle myosin (a marker of smooth muscle cells), and vimentin (a marker of mesenchymal cells) were used to confirm epithelial cell phenotype.
Immunocytochemical techniques provide only semi-quantitative data about protein expression, and are not sensitive enough to determine levels of protein expression accurately; therefore protein was extracted for analysis with Western blotting. Protein was extracted from the pelleted epithelial cells by lysing the cells in 200 μl of an SDS extraction buffer (20 mM Tris, 1 mM SDS, 1 mM DTT) in the presence of protease inhibitors (Sigma). A commercial assay (Micro BCA Protein Assay, Pierce Biotechnology) was used according to the manufacturers instructions to determine the concentration of total protein in the cell lysate. For each sample, 50 μg of protein was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with anti-β-actin antibody. Antibody binding was detected with ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection Reagents (Amersham Biosciences).
Total RNA was extracted from epithelial cells using the QIAGEN RNeasy kit (Vic, Australia). RNA quality and quantity was assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyser (Vic, Australia). RNA was prepared from 18 subjects according to a modified version of the protocol of Baugh et al [6 (link)] and hybridised to microarrays. For our first study, gene expression profiles from 9 mild, asymptomatic asthmatics were compared to 9 healthy children for a total of 18 arrays. Expression of genes in cells from asthmatic and healthy children was compared using Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Arrays (HG-U95Av2), which examine the expression of approximately 23,000 genes. Real-time PCR was used to validate the array data for specific genes. Real-time PCR was conducted as previously described [3 (link)].
Data was reported as mean (SE) and analysed by independent samples t-test. Significance was taken as p < 0.05. The proportion of basal cells was analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the difference between the three phenotype groups.
Atherosclerosis Development in Coronary Stents
Ceramide Signaling in Neuroinflammation
Quantitative Analysis of Renal Histology
RNA in situ hybridization ADAM19-FR polymerase chain reaction product of 507 bp was subcloned in pCRII-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Insert lengths were routinely checked by amplification with M13 forward and M13 reverse primers, and restriction enzyme analysis with EcoR1. Orientation of the polymerase chain reaction product was determined by polymerase chain reaction using ADAM19specific primers in combination with vector-specific M13F and M13R primers. This was confirmed by sequence analysis of the ADAM19 construct. Deparaffinized sections were air-dried, treated with Triton X-100, followed by proteinase K (5 mg/ml in trisbuffered saline) (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at 371C for 20 min, washed with PBS, and incubated with 10 ng/100 ml digoxin-labeled probe (antisense or sense) in a hybridization solution consisting of 100 ml 50 Â Denhardt's solution, 1 ml 20 Â standard sodium citrate, 1 ml 50% dextran sulfate, 2.5 ml formamide, 200 ml (25 mg/ml) t-RNA, 49 ml 1 M dithiothreitol, and 125 ml (10 mg/ml) salmon sperm DNA overnight at 551C. After washing, slides were treated with 2 U/ml RNase T1 (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) in 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (pH 8.0) and 2 Â standard sodium citrate at 371C for 30 min Positive cells were visualized with anti-digoxin-labeled alkaline phosphatase (Roche) for 1 h at 371C in 0.1 M maleic acid buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl, 1% blocking buffer, and 2% normal sheep serum. Staining reaction was performed for 1 h at 371C with nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4chloro-3 0 -indolyphosphate p-toluidine salt (Roche) in 1 ml acid-fast buffer (pH ¼ 9.0) containing 50 mM MgCl 2 and 0.01 M levamisole.
Quantifying Adipose Tissue Macrophages
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!