Ultrapure concentrated nitric acid
Ultrapure concentrated nitric acid is a laboratory reagent used for various analytical and research applications. It is a highly corrosive and oxidizing liquid that is typically employed in processes such as sample digestion, metal etching, and laboratory analysis. The product is of high purity, ensuring accurate and reliable results in laboratory settings.
Lab products found in correlation
Market Availability & Pricing
Is this product still available?
Get pricing insights and sourcing optionsSpelling variants (same manufacturer)
The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.
Product FAQ
11 protocols using «ultrapure concentrated nitric acid»
Trace Element Analysis in Pregnancy
Leaf Mineral Content Analysis by ICP-MS
Elemental Profiling of Wheat Anthers
Lyophilized anthers (0.01 to 0.02 g) underwent digestion in a closed microwave system (Uni Clever, Plazmatronika, Poland) using 5 mL of ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The digests were diluted to 25 mL with deionized water. Macronutrients were determined using an ICP-AES spectrometer (Optima 2100, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA) at the following wavelengths: K (766.5 nm), Ca (317.9 nm), Mg (285.2 nm) and Na (589.6 nm). Micronutrients were determined in relation to the following isotopes: Mn(55), Fe(57), Cu(63) and Mo(98) using an ICP-MS spectrometer (Elan DRC-e, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA). Calibration was performed using multi-element standard sets (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA).
Trace Element Analysis in Serum and Urine
The 28 elements analyzed in this work were aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), beryllium (Be), bismuth (Bi), cadmium (Cd), calcium (Ca), cesium (Cs), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), indium (In), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), lithium (Li), manganese (Mn), magnesium (Mg), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), potassium (K), rubidium (Rb), selenium (Se), silver (Ag), sodium (Na), strontium (Sr), thallium (Tl), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn).
At the time of sample analysis, serum and urine samples were brought to room temperature. An aliquot of 500 μL serum and urine samples was diluted with a solution containing 0.1% (V/V) Triton-X-100 (Sigma, USA) and 1% ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Sigma, USA) to a 5 mL total volume. Prior dilution of each sample was critical in order to obtain the best results. The samples were then quantified by ICP-MS using freshly made multi-element stock solution on the day of analysis. The instrument parameters are as followed: nebulizer carrier gas flow, 1.10 L/min; sample depth, 4.8 mm; RF power, 1450 W; sampler/skimmer, nickel; CeO+/Ce+, <0.5%; 140Ce16O/140Ce, <2%. Calibration was performed using a certified reference standard (Agilent, USA). Validity of the calibration curve was evaluated by analyzing the standards from the same source after every two hours injection. The calibration curve was considered valid if the observed concentration of the independent standard was within 10% of the expected concentration. We also measured the recovery of each sample at random. The internal standard and the limits of detection (LOD) for these 28 elements were shown in
Heavy Metal Analysis in Herbs
Top 5 protocols citing «ultrapure concentrated nitric acid»
Elemental Analysis of Lyophilized Leaves
Cadmium and Calcium Accumulation in Maize Coleoptiles
Multi-element Analysis of Blood Samples
Biomarkers of Manganese Exposure
Although toenail Mn is more commonly used than fingernail Mn, FMn has been used in previous studies as a biomarker of exposure [47 (link)]. Fingernails were used in this study due to a concern that toenails would have a greater potential for external contamination because participants were observed to wear open-toed shoes to the factory. Participants were asked to thoroughly wash their hands with soap to remove external debris. Fingernail samples from participants’ 10 fingers were collected using a titanium dioxide nail clipper. Fingernail samples were stored in small Ziploc bags and kept at room temperature until analysis. Samples were cleaned twice using ultrasonic cleaning procedures in 1% Triton X-100 solution (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Saint Louis, MO, USA) [48 (link)]. Following each cleaning, the nails were rinsed multiple times with deionized (DI) water and then dried at 60 °C. After the second round of cleaning, the fingernail samples were digested at 200 °C in ultrapure nitric acid (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Saint Louis, MO, USA), then analyzed for Mn using the ELEMENT-2 mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, Bremen, Germany) at Purdue University’s Campus-Wide Mass Spectrometry Center. Mn concentrations were corrected for systematic error using an internal standard run simultaneously with the samples. The DL for fingernail Mn ranged from 1.31 to 3.97 ppb. Seventeen (28.3%) FMn measurements were below the DL but still had detectable concentrations which were larger than blank samples. Replacement of values
- link),50 (link)]. While these values likely have a greater variability and uncertainty compared to values >DL, this approach is likely to reduce the potential for left-censoring to induce bias in our results.
After fingernails were cut but prior to the BnMn measurement, participants were asked to wash their right hand and lower arm with soap and water for a second time. A trained research assistant then cleaned participants’ right hand and lower arm with 50% alcohol wipes. Each participant’s right hand was irradiated for 10 min to excite the 55Mn atoms in the hand bone to 56Mn. A bag filled with water was wrapped around the participant’s arm to hold it in place as well as reduce the whole body effective radiation dose (estimated at 23 µSv) [32 (link)]. After 5 min of rest to allow for the initial decay of unstable isotopes, participants then moved to a high purity germanium (HPGe) detection system that collected Mn γ ray (847 keV) spectra over the course of an hour as the 56Mn neutrons de-excite [32 (link)]. BnMn concentrations were calculated from the Mn γ ray spectra using a pre-existing calibration line created from a set of Mn-doped bone-equivalent hand phantoms. A Mn/Ca γ ray ratio was used to account for variation in neutron flux, hand palm attenuation, and counting geometry. This also accounts for bone density, making this a comparable measure to BnMn presented in µg/g Ca. BnMn in µg/g multiplied by 3.94 is equivalent to BnMn in µg/g Ca [33 (link),34 (link)]. The transportable IVNAA system has a DL of 0.64 µg Mn per g dry bone (ppm) [33 (link)]. There were 19 (31.7%) participants with BnMn < DL; 13 of the 19 (68.4%) were negative values. Negative BnMn measurements can be estimated when the true BnMn value is close to zero: this has also been seen in bone lead measurements [51 (link)]. Similar to the rationale described above for retaining fingernail Mn measurements
- link),52 (link)]. Therefore, these values were included in the current analysis.
Elemental Analysis using ICP-MS
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!