Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Ultrapure concentrated nitric acid

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany
About the product

Ultrapure concentrated nitric acid is a laboratory reagent used for various analytical and research applications. It is a highly corrosive and oxidizing liquid that is typically employed in processes such as sample digestion, metal etching, and laboratory analysis. The product is of high purity, ensuring accurate and reliable results in laboratory settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

11 protocols using «ultrapure concentrated nitric acid»

1

Trace Element Analysis in Pregnancy

2024
Fasting blood samples were collected from each participant during all three trimesters of pregnancy using BD Vacutainer® Blood Collection Tubes for Trace Element Testing and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Subsequently, three different volumes of blood (10, 20, and 30 µL) were transferred to Eppendorf plastic microtubes containing 200 µL of concentrated ultrapure nitric acid (Merck). After sealing, the tubes were incubated at 60 °C for 24 h for digestion, followed by dilution with 1 mL of miliQ water. Elemental analysis (Fe, Zn, Cu, Ca, Mg, and P) was conducted using a PerkinElmer Optima 8300 ICP-OES instrument (Shelton, CT, USA), employing appropriate calibration curves and a digestion blank containing ultrapure nitric acid alone [58 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Leaf Mineral Content Analysis by ICP-MS

2024
Samples of freeze-dried leaves (0.02 g) (Freeze Dry System/Freezone 4.5, Labconco, USA) were mineralized in ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in a closed microwave system (Uni Clever, Plazmatronika, Poland). Mn (55) was analyzed by ICP-MS spectrometry (Elan DRC-e, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, USA), according to the procedure described in detail by Tobiasz et al.38 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Elemental Profiling of Wheat Anthers

2024
Macro- and micronutrients were analyzed in wheat anthers using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP MS) according to procedures described by Zembala et al. [86 (link)] and Tobiasz et al. [74 (link)].
Lyophilized anthers (0.01 to 0.02 g) underwent digestion in a closed microwave system (Uni Clever, Plazmatronika, Poland) using 5 mL of ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The digests were diluted to 25 mL with deionized water. Macronutrients were determined using an ICP-AES spectrometer (Optima 2100, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA) at the following wavelengths: K (766.5 nm), Ca (317.9 nm), Mg (285.2 nm) and Na (589.6 nm). Micronutrients were determined in relation to the following isotopes: Mn(55), Fe(57), Cu(63) and Mo(98) using an ICP-MS spectrometer (Elan DRC-e, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA). Calibration was performed using multi-element standard sets (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Trace Element Analysis in Serum and Urine

2021
Sample collection and processing were carried out in local clinics. Five milliliters of venous blood was collected in a pro-coagulation tube, let stand at room temperature for 15 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min to separate serum, and immediately transferred to 2 mL frozen pipe. A spot 10-mL urine sample collected from each subject at the end of a work shift have been described previously [10 (link)]. All samples were stored at -80°C until analysis. All test tubes used in the study were free of metal contamination.
The 28 elements analyzed in this work were aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), beryllium (Be), bismuth (Bi), cadmium (Cd), calcium (Ca), cesium (Cs), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), indium (In), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), lithium (Li), manganese (Mn), magnesium (Mg), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), potassium (K), rubidium (Rb), selenium (Se), silver (Ag), sodium (Na), strontium (Sr), thallium (Tl), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn).
At the time of sample analysis, serum and urine samples were brought to room temperature. An aliquot of 500 μL serum and urine samples was diluted with a solution containing 0.1% (V/V) Triton-X-100 (Sigma, USA) and 1% ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Sigma, USA) to a 5 mL total volume. Prior dilution of each sample was critical in order to obtain the best results. The samples were then quantified by ICP-MS using freshly made multi-element stock solution on the day of analysis. The instrument parameters are as followed: nebulizer carrier gas flow, 1.10 L/min; sample depth, 4.8 mm; RF power, 1450 W; sampler/skimmer, nickel; CeO+/Ce+, <0.5%; 140Ce16O/140Ce, <2%. Calibration was performed using a certified reference standard (Agilent, USA). Validity of the calibration curve was evaluated by analyzing the standards from the same source after every two hours injection. The calibration curve was considered valid if the observed concentration of the independent standard was within 10% of the expected concentration. We also measured the recovery of each sample at random. The internal standard and the limits of detection (LOD) for these 28 elements were shown in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Heavy Metal Analysis in Herbs

2021
The reagents purchased from the Merck Company (Darmstadt, Germany) were: ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (69%), standard solutions of studied elements—arsenic (H3AsO4 in HNO3 0.5 mol L−1, 1000 mg L−1 As), cadmium (Cd(NO3)2 in HNO3 0.5 mol L−1, 1000 mg L−1 Cd), lead (Pb(NO3)2 in HNO3 0.5 mol L−1, 1000 mg L−1 Pb), mercury (Hg(NO3)2 in HNO3 2 mol L−1, 1000 mg L−1 Hg). From Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA) ammonium dihydrogen phosphate was obtained. Certified reference material mixed polish herbs (INCT-MPH-2) was obtained from the Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (Warsaw, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «ultrapure concentrated nitric acid»

1

Elemental Analysis of Lyophilized Leaves

The leaves were lyophilized (Freeze Dry System/Freezone 4.5, Labconco, USA) and samples of 0.02 or 0.11 g (for micro-and macroelements, respectively) were mineralized in ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Merck, Damstad, Germany) in a closed microwave system (Uni Clever, Plazmatronika, Poland). The microelements were analyzed by ICP-MS spectrometry (Elan DRC-e, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, USA) in relation to standard isotopes: B(11), Mn(55), Fe(57), Cu(63), Zn(66), Mo(98). The determination of macroelements was performed by an ICP-AES spectrometer (Optima 2100, Perkin Elmer) at the following wavelengths: for K, k = 766.490 nm; Ca, k= 317.933 nm; Mg, k = 285.213 nm; P, k = 213.617 nm; S, k = 181.975 nm and Na, k = 589.592 nm (for details see Zembala et al. 2010 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Cadmium and Calcium Accumulation in Maize Coleoptiles

Cd and Ca concentrations in maize coleoptile segments were determined by emission spectrometry with excitation by way of an argon inductively coupled plasma technique by means of a Spektroflame-M spectrophotometer (Spectro Analytical Instruments, Germany). Before chemical analysis, 110 intact coleoptile segments were split along the long axis and preincubated for 2 h in an intensively aerated growth medium (control). The composition and volume (0.3 cm3 segment−1) of the incubation medium were the same as that used in the growth experiments. After preincubation of the coleoptile segments, Cd (0.1–1000 μM), Cd together with FC (1 μM), or TEA chloride (30 mM) were introduced into the incubation medium for 5 h. The variant in which these three components (Cd2+, FC, and TEA chloride) were combined was also studied. Moreover, Cd and Ca content in maize coleoptile segments exposed (for 5 h) to 100 μM Cd or Cd combined with (1 μM) FC or/and Ca-channel blockers (La and Ver) was also determined. In this case, the segments were first preincubated for 2 h in control medium, whereupon Cd or Cd with FC or/and Ca-channel blockers were added. After each treatment, the halves of the segments were removed from the solution and washed three times with deionized water, whereupon they were dried at 80°C to determine dry weight. For Cd and Ca analyses, dry plant tissue was mineralized. Each sample (approximately 0.2 g dry matter) was treated with 5 ml ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Merck, Germany) and left for 24 h. Next, the samples were digested until complete mineralization was achieved. After mineralization, the samples were diluted with redistilled water to a volume of 10 ml. Concentrations of Cd and Ca were measured by inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectroscopy (frequency 27.12 MHz; power 1.0 kW; plasma gas 14.0 l/min; auxiliary gas 0.5 l/min; carrier gas 1 l/min; and analytical line Cd2+ 228.802 nm and Ca2+ 422.673 nm). As standards for control of the elemental analysis, Virginia tobacco leaves (CTA-VTL-2) were used; the results fit the range of certified recommended values. All experiments concerning the accumulation of Cd2+ and Ca2+ were replicated at least four times, and results are expressed as means ± SEs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Multi-element Analysis of Blood Samples

All samples were collected and processed in a clean environment. Blood samples (6 mL) were collected in vacutainers containing lithium heparin (BD, Bergen, NJ, USA), and were immediately transferred to 2 mL freezing tubes (Axygen, San Francisco, CA, USA) after thorough mixing. All samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. Before analyzing, the samples were warmed to room temperature (23 °C). As described in previous literature [70 (link)], 0.5 mL of blood was added to 4.5 mL of a diluent containing 0.01% (V/V) Triton-X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, Bergen, NJ, USA) and 0.5% ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Samples were vortexed in a table-top vortexer (Multi Reax [XWT-204], Heidolph, San Francisco, CA, USA). Concentrations of Zn, Ge, and Pb in the diluted samples were then quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Yttrium (Y) solution with concentration of 10 μg/L was used as the internal standard. The 0.01% Triton-X-100 and 0.5% ultrapure by 10 determination will respond to signals corresponding to 3 times the standard deviation of the analyte concentration as the detection limit; the 10 times value was determined by a solvent blank, and the response signals corresponding to 10 times the standard deviation of the measured element concentrations were defined as a quantification limit. Since the method for sample processing calls for dilution by a factor of 10, the limit of detection and limit of quantification were both multiplied by 10. This resulted in limits of detection for Zn, Ge, and Pb of 4.30, 0.18 and 0.28 μg/L, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Biomarkers of Manganese Exposure

Trained clinical staff collected whole blood samples from participants during their study visit using standard protocols. Trace metal-free vacutainers (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were used to limit external metal contamination. Samples were frozen at −20 °C and stored until analysis. Whole blood samples were analyzed for Mn at the Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Beijing using inductively-coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS); these methods have been described previously [45 (link),46 (link)]. Briefly, blood samples were diluted with 0.01% Triton-X-00 (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and 0.5% ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Samples were vortexed and then analyzed using XSERIES 2 ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The SeronormTM Trace Elements Whole Blood Control Level 1 (Sero AS, Billingstad, Norway) was used for internal quality insurance. None of the collected samples had a Mn concentration below the detection limit (DL) of 0.11 μg/L.
Although toenail Mn is more commonly used than fingernail Mn, FMn has been used in previous studies as a biomarker of exposure [47 (link)]. Fingernails were used in this study due to a concern that toenails would have a greater potential for external contamination because participants were observed to wear open-toed shoes to the factory. Participants were asked to thoroughly wash their hands with soap to remove external debris. Fingernail samples from participants’ 10 fingers were collected using a titanium dioxide nail clipper. Fingernail samples were stored in small Ziploc bags and kept at room temperature until analysis. Samples were cleaned twice using ultrasonic cleaning procedures in 1% Triton X-100 solution (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Saint Louis, MO, USA) [48 (link)]. Following each cleaning, the nails were rinsed multiple times with deionized (DI) water and then dried at 60 °C. After the second round of cleaning, the fingernail samples were digested at 200 °C in ultrapure nitric acid (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Saint Louis, MO, USA), then analyzed for Mn using the ELEMENT-2 mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, Bremen, Germany) at Purdue University’s Campus-Wide Mass Spectrometry Center. Mn concentrations were corrected for systematic error using an internal standard run simultaneously with the samples. The DL for fingernail Mn ranged from 1.31 to 3.97 ppb. Seventeen (28.3%) FMn measurements were below the DL but still had detectable concentrations which were larger than blank samples. Replacement of values
link),50 (link)]. While these values likely have a greater variability and uncertainty compared to values >DL, this approach is likely to reduce the potential for left-censoring to induce bias in our results.
After fingernails were cut but prior to the BnMn measurement, participants were asked to wash their right hand and lower arm with soap and water for a second time. A trained research assistant then cleaned participants’ right hand and lower arm with 50% alcohol wipes. Each participant’s right hand was irradiated for 10 min to excite the 55Mn atoms in the hand bone to 56Mn. A bag filled with water was wrapped around the participant’s arm to hold it in place as well as reduce the whole body effective radiation dose (estimated at 23 µSv) [32 (link)]. After 5 min of rest to allow for the initial decay of unstable isotopes, participants then moved to a high purity germanium (HPGe) detection system that collected Mn γ ray (847 keV) spectra over the course of an hour as the 56Mn neutrons de-excite [32 (link)]. BnMn concentrations were calculated from the Mn γ ray spectra using a pre-existing calibration line created from a set of Mn-doped bone-equivalent hand phantoms. A Mn/Ca γ ray ratio was used to account for variation in neutron flux, hand palm attenuation, and counting geometry. This also accounts for bone density, making this a comparable measure to BnMn presented in µg/g Ca. BnMn in µg/g multiplied by 3.94 is equivalent to BnMn in µg/g Ca [33 (link),34 (link)]. The transportable IVNAA system has a DL of 0.64 µg Mn per g dry bone (ppm) [33 (link)]. There were 19 (31.7%) participants with BnMn < DL; 13 of the 19 (68.4%) were negative values. Negative BnMn measurements can be estimated when the true BnMn value is close to zero: this has also been seen in bone lead measurements [51 (link)]. Similar to the rationale described above for retaining fingernail Mn measurements
link),52 (link)]. Therefore, these values were included in the current analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Elemental Analysis using ICP-MS

All the reagents used were of analytical grade. Ultrapure water (18 MΩ•cm) obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Paris, France) was used in the preparation of all solutions. Ultrapure concentrated nitric acid (65% v/v) purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and hydrogen peroxide (30% v/v) from Biopack (Argentina) were used throughout. All the glassware was washed in 0.5 mol L -1 HNO 3 solution for 24 h and later rinsed with ultrapure water before use. Argon (99.996%) from Air Liquide (Córdoba, Argentina) was used for ICP-MS determinations. Certified multi-element standard solutions 2, 3 and 5, and rhodium ( 103 Rh) mono-elemental standard solution from Perkin Elmer Pure Plus Atomic Spectroscopy Standards, (Norwalk, USA) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.