The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Millipore membrane

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, Japan

The Millipore membrane is a type of laboratory filtration equipment used for separating and purifying various substances. It functions by allowing the passage of certain molecules or particles while retaining others, based on their size and other physical characteristics. The Millipore membrane is designed to provide a reliable and consistent filtration process for a wide range of applications in research, analysis, and industrial settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

118 protocols using millipore membrane

1

Ethanol Extraction of Plant Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ethanol extracts were obtained as follows: 10 g of the dry plant (aerial parts) was added to 100 mL of 50% (v/v) EtOH, were mixed, then were sonicated for 1 h at 25 °C, and finally, filtered through a Whatman filter (125 mm, Blue–Slow).
First, the extracts were micro-filtrated through a Millipore membrane (0.45 µm pores) for purification. Then, the extracts were concentrated by ultrafiltration through Millipore membranes with a cut-off of 1000 Da. The concentration ratio (ratio of permeate volume to concentrate) was 3:1. For microfiltration and ultrafiltration, a KMS Laboratory Cell CF-1 installation was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Leukocyte Migration Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leukocyte migration was evaluated using a Millipore membrane (Millipore). Migration was measured using a microscope where the Vernier graduated in micrometres (μm) was calibrated to obtain proper measurements at 100× magnification. Initially, we observed the cells on the upper surface, and the first mark was recorded. Then, we moved the focus into the membrane until the most distant leukocytes were identified, and this new position at the Vernier was recorded. The migration distance was established as the difference between the two registered positions. Five independent readings were taken for each sample considering different cells in the initial position. Each dilution was checked twice, and the average migration distance was used in our statistical analysis (Fig. 1).

Leukocyte migration was evaluated using a Millipore membrane (Millipore). Migration was measured using a microscope where the Vernier graduated in micrometres (μm) was calibrated to obtain the measurements. The microscope was focused onto the cells on the upper surface of the membrane (a) and the position of the fine focus Vernier recorded. The depth of focus was then advanced through the membrane (b and c) until the last and furthest migrating cells were seen. At that position, the mark on the calibrated Vernier was again recorded (d). All photographs taken at 100× magnification

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis and Sulfonation of Graphene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Graphite oxide (500 mg) was added into 250 mL double distilled water and exfoliated to graphene oxide by ultrasonication of graphite oxide dispersion (2 mg mL−1). Then, a 5% sodium carbonate solution was added so as to make the PH of the mixture achieve 9–10. Finally, 10 mL 64% hydrazine hydrate was put into the suspension and the solution was allowed to reflux for 24 hours at 95 °C. The mixture was cooled to ambient temperature and filtered through Millipore membrane (0.45 μm) and washed with double distilled water and methanol. The product, reduced graphene oxide (RGO), was freeze-dried and collected.
RGO (245 mg) was added into 40 mL water and allowed to sonicate for 1 h. Then, 2.108 g sodium nitrite and 1.757 g sulfanilic acid were added into the resulting mixture, where the diazonium would be formed. The mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature to achieve sulfonated graphene. The solution was filtered through Millipore membrane and washed with 100 mL 1 M HCl, double distilled water and 200 mL acetone repeatedly; this process has proved to be specifically efficient in the isolation of SG at high purity.34–36 (link) The black power was acquired by lyophilization for 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Purification of Cyanobacterial CPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CPS and biomass isolation were conducted following Di Pippoa et al. [23 (link)] with a few modifications. Leptolyngbya sp. cells and their envelopes (capsular polysaccharides [CPS] were re-suspended in distilled water (1:10), incubated at 60 °C for 60 min and then centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min to remove the cells which were then washed three times with deionized water, freeze-dried and lyophilized. The supernatant fluid was ultra-filtrated using a tangential ultra-filtration cell (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and Millipore membranes (30 kDa pore size) as described above (RPS isolation). The purified CPS was freeze-dried and lyophilized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Alginate Molecular Weight Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viscosity of culture broths was measured using a cone/plate rheometer as described by Peña et al. [17 ]. The alginate molecular weight distribution was estimated by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with a serial set of Ultrahydrogel columns (UG 500 and Linear Waters), using a HPLC system with a differential refractometer detector (Waters, 410). Elution was performed with 0.1 M NaNO3 at 35 °C at a flow rate of 0.9 ml min−1. The detector signal was processed with a PC compatible software (Empower GPC, Waters). Calibration of the columns were performed via a standard calibration method using as molecular weight standards, the standard pullulans within a range of 58–2350 kDa. For this purpose, the standard kit P-82 (58–1600 kDa) and P2500 (2350 kDa) from Shodex.Co (Japan) were used. Alginate solutions were filtered through 0.22 μm Millipore membranes to remove microgels [9 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chitosan-based Nanoparticle Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoparticles were produced by an ionic crosslinking technique [10 (link)], using sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) as the crosslinking agent, in 30% (w/w) concentration ratio of TPP to total chitosan amount, and mechanical stirring at approximately 350 rpm (Multistirrer 15 Magnetic Stirrer, Velp Scientific Inc., Bohemia, NY, USA). In general, for each 4 mL of chitosan solution at 2.5 mg/mL (in acetic acid 1%, v/v, pH 5.0, previously filtered through 0.45 μm Millipore™ membranes), 6 mL of TPP solution at 0.5 mg/mL (filtered through 0.22 μm) was added dropwise (30 s). Immediately after the addition of TPP, 1 mL of standard bromelain solution was added to produce chitosan–bromelain nanoparticles, or 1 mL of distilled water to produce bromelain-free chitosan nanoparticles (blank nanoparticles). After the addition of all components, the solution was kept under magnetic stirring for 40 min. To compare different specifications and origin, three chitosan types were used for nanoparticles production, i.e., low molecular weight chitosan (LMW), chitosan from shrimp shells (SHR), and chitosan oligosaccharide lactate (LAC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification of Pectic Substances

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to eliminate the water-insoluble fraction (WIF), which could consist of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, the pectic substances extracted from the conventional procedure or subcritical water at the optimum conditions were purified by a centrifugation process. The dried pectic substances were dissolved in fresh Milli-Q water (1:200, w/v), prepared from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore Co., Milford, MA, USA), for 15 h and centrifuged at 9072 g during 20 min at room temperature in a LABOFUGE ll centrifuge (Ollmann and Co. KG, LABSCO, Friedberg, Germany) to remove WIF. The supernatants were filtered through 11 and 3 µm Millipore membranes (Millipore Co., Milford, MA, USA), respectively. The filtrates were oven-dried at 40 °C for 12 h to recover the “purified” pectin, and weighed. The obtained pectins were used for the characterization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Amino Acid Profiling in Pigeon Lactation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amino acid analysis was done for assessing the correlation between AA in plasma and AA in crop milk during “lactation” in pigeons. AA concentrations in feed samples and crop milk were measured using HPLC with an Agilent 1,100 series system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) after hydrolysis in 6 mol HCl at 110°C for 24 h. AA concentrations in plasma were determined according to the method described by Sano et al. (2018) (link). Briefly, sulfosalicylic acid was added to plasma to a final concentration of 5%, and then, the samples were placed on ice for 15 min followed by centrifugation to remove precipitated proteins. The extracts were filtered through 0.22 μm Millipore membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and analyzed using an AA analyzer (Hitachi L-8900, Tokyo, Japan). The following AAs were evaluated: Pro, Glu, Gly, Ala, Ser, Asp, Cys, Tyr, Phe, Met, Lys, Thr, Leu, Ile, Val, His, and Arg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microbial Disinfection Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After analyzing the microbial count data, an effective acid mixture (i.e., 0.8% AA + 0.2% LA), 1% AA, 1% LA, and the control were selected, after which 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to detect naturally present microbes. The microbial count was analyzed once more to ensure that the results obtained showed a similar trend with Section 2.4. The disinfection process was performed as described in Section 2.3. The microbial suspension was prepared as described in Section 2.4. For total microbial DNA extraction, 40 mL of the suspension was drawn with a sterile syringe and filtered through two Millipore membranes (0.22 μm; 20 mL each; Billerica, MA, USA), after which DNA was extracted from the resulting membranes using Fast DNA SPIN extraction kits (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and concentration were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), respectively. The agar type and culture conditions are described in Section 2.4. Each treatment was replicated six times. Verification of microbiological analysis was performed three times with six replicates, and the results are expressed as microbial reduction (log CFU g−1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation of Bacteriophages from Sewage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteriophages were isolated from sewage using enrichment cultures [16] . All phages used in this study were isolated using the same method. For example, to isolate IME-SA1, approximately 2 mL of filtered (Millipore membranes, pore diameter 0.45 µm) sewage was mixed with 2 mL of 3×LB and 100 µl overnight culture of S. aureus (isolated from clinical samples in the same local hospital as the sewage). The enrichment culture was incubated at 37°C for at least 14 hours with agitation to allow amplification of bacteriophages, and was then centrifuged (10 min, 10,000 g, 4°C). The supernatant was filtered (Millipore membranes, pore diameter 0.45 µm) to remove the residual bacterial cells and 200 µl of bacteriophage was mixed with 500 µl of S. aureus cells in the exponential growth phase (OD600 = 0.2 to 0.5) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. About 5 mL of top agar (LB with 0.7% agar) at 50°C was then added, and the mixture was poured onto an LB plate prewarmed at 37°C (double-layer method) [16] . The plates were then incubated at 37°C overnight to obtain bacteriophage plaques [17] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!