The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Filter paper number 42

Manufactured by Cytiva

Filter paper number 42 is a laboratory filtration product manufactured by Cytiva. It is designed for general filtration applications in scientific and research settings. The paper is made from high-quality materials and is suitable for a range of filtration needs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using filter paper number 42

1

Barley Antiosteoporotic Extract Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was cultivated in 2015 in the experimental field at the National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk, Korea. BS was prepared using the procedure reported in the literature [23 (link)]. Barley seeds were washed twice using deionized distilled water and imbibed in water at 18°C for 24 hr. The imbibed seeds were germinated in 65% humidity at 16°C in a normal light cycle (16/8 hr day/night). The germinating seeds and seedlings were harvested in liquid nitrogen 7 days after germination. The collected leaves were freeze-dried immediately after sampling. Prior to obtaining the BSE, the leaves were pulverised to 100 mesh. The masses of all the samples were based on dry weight. To determine the antiosteoporotic activities, the pulverised seeds (10 g) were extracted with 20 ml of the prethanol for 2 days at 4°C in the dark. The crude extracts were filtered through Whatman Number 42 filter paper to remove the sediment. The solvent was evaporated, and the prethanol extracts were obtained from the BS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polyphenol Extraction and Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the preparation of polyphenol extracts, 1 g of ground materials was mixed with 20 mL of 80% methanol. The mixture was shaken for 24 hours at room temperature, filtered through a Whatman number 42 filter paper, freeze dried at −40°C until use. The polyphenol profile of tested extract was determined according to the method of Kurata et al [18 ]. The polyphenol extract was filtered through a cellulose acetate membrane (0.20 μm; Advantec, Tokyo, Japan), and 10 μL of the filtrate was injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Waters 2996; Newark, Delaware, USA) using an ODS column (ODS-AM 301 column, 4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm particles; YMC, Kyoto, Japan). The temperature was set at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.2% (v/v) formic acid (A) and methanol (B). Elution was performed with the linear gradient as follows: 2% B from 0 minutes to 15 minutes, 2%–45% B from 15 minutes to 50 minutes, and 45% B from 50 minutes to 65 minutes. The flow rate was 1 mL/minute. Polyphenolic compounds were then compared with the obtained standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antioxidant Activity Assessment by DPPH Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of the samples’ antioxidant activity was done with the DPPH assay according to Subianto et al. (2013 (link)). In preparation for the assay, distilled water was added to the samples (1:1), centrifuged for 30 min at 5000 rpm, and filtered with Whatman number 42 filter paper. The supernatants were diluted fivefold to obtain the samples for DPPH assay. The samples and the DPPH solution reacted for 30 min and the absorbance (A) was measured at 517 nm in a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The Gallic acid standard curve was conducted with methanol as the solvent. The samples’ antioxidant activity was expressed in milligrams of Gallic acid equivalent per gram of yogurt (mg GAE·g−1) and calculated according to Eq. (4): %Inhibition=A control-A sample/A control×100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Hydroethanolic Extract Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty (50 g) of the hydroethanolic extract was twice extracted with 500 ml of 80% aqueous methanol at room temperature. The whole solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper number 42 (125 mm). The filtrate was later transferred into a crucible and evaporated into dryness over a water bath and weighed to a constant weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hydrolytic Extraction of B. retusa Fruits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fruits of B. retusa (10 g) were extracted by hydrolysis of sample with 30 mL of methanol under refluxed for 1 hour. Extract obtained was filtered using Whatman filter paper number 42. 10 mL of distilled water was added to the filtrate and evaporated to a volume of 10 mL. Samples were analyzed immediately after extraction in order to avoid possible chemical degradation [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lettuce Seed Germination Bioassay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Germination and growth bioassays were performed in Petri dishes (90 mm in diameter), with Whatman filter paper number 42. Commercial seeds of Lactuca sativa (lettuce) were treated with different solutions of the EO solubilized in 0.1% DMSO at 0.1; 0.5; 1.0; 5 and 10%, respectively. The Petri dishes were then incubated at 22 °C for 5 days in the absence of light to simulate the germination process. Several parameters were evaluated, including the number of germinated seeds, the root length, and the hypocotyl length. A solution of 0.1% DMSO was used as a negative control, and a 2% glyphosate solution (Fuego®, NeoAgro, Lima, Peru) was used as a positive control. Each Petri dish had twenty seeds, and four replicates were utilized [43 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Lagenaria coromandelica Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

(1) HPLC Conditions. HPLC analysis was carried out using autosampler Water 2459 series. Separation was achieved at 25°C on a 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d. 5 μm, C18 column (Water SunFire Column). The mobile phase consisted of methanol and 2% aqueous acetic acid; gradient mode (0–15 min, 40–60% v/v methanol and 15–20 min, 60% v/v methanol) was pumped using pump with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Data analysis was performed using Water Empower software. Standard curve and retention times were calibrated using pure standards compounds (gallic acid, catechin, ellagic acid, and quercetin) (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). The result was expressed as milligram per gram (mg/g) of extract.
(2) Preparation of Sample Solution. Leaves of L. coromandelica (10 g) were extracted by hydrolysis of sample with 30 mL of methanol, ethyl acetate, and water separately under refluxed for 1 hour. Extract obtained was filtered using Whatman filter paper number 42. 10 mL of distilled water was added to the filtrate and evaporated to a volume of 10 mL. Samples were analyzed immediately after extraction in order to avoid possible chemical degradation [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!