Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Mars 6

Manufactured by CEM Corporation
Sourced in United States, Germany
About the product

The MARS 6 is a high-performance laboratory equipment designed for precise and efficient sample preparation and analysis. It features a compact and durable construction, with a range of specialized components to support various experimental procedures. The core function of the MARS 6 is to provide a controlled and consistent environment for sample preparation and processing, enabling researchers to obtain reliable and accurate data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The MARS 6 microwave digestion system is currently marketed and sold by CEM Corporation through authorized distributors. While the manufacturer does not publicly disclose pricing for new units, used systems are available on secondary marketplaces, with prices ranging from approximately $550 to $38,888, depending on condition and included accessories.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

105 protocols using «mars 6»

1

Elemental Analysis of Aged Baijiu

2025
The concentrations of nine elements—Ca, Na, Mg, Al, K, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn—in each Baijiu sample were detected using an X-Series 2 ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) after being aged for 12, 16, and 20 months. The reagents used were 9 single-element standard solutions of Ca, Na, Mg, Al, K, Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn with a concentration of 1000 mg/L, as well as Rh and Tl single-element standard solutions (Guobiao Testing & Certification, Beijing, China). The Thermo Fisher standard tune solution (Tune A) was utilized. 65% volume fraction nitric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). All experimental water was ultrapure water. First, each Baijiu sample was pretreated by microwave digestion (MARS6, CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA). To do this, a 10 mL sample of Baijiu was placed in the microwave digestion tank, the solutions were concentrated to 4 mL in the acid extractor at 65 °C, and then add 6 mL of nitric acid. Cover the flask and let it stand for 1 h. Subsequently, the tank covered was tightened, and digestion was allowed to proceed according to the standard operation of the microwave digestion instrument. After cooling, the tank cover was slowly opened to release any pressure, and the inner cover was rinsed with a small amount of water. Then, the digestion tank was placed in an ultrasonic water bath to degasify it for 5 min. The volume of each solution was adjusted to 25 mL with water, and the resulting solutions were mixed well and set aside. A blank test was conducted simultaneously. The instrument parameters were optimized for the tuning solution. Internal standards of Rh and Tl (5 µg/L) were used to quantitatively analyze the mixed standard solutions of different elements in CCT mode. Among them, Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, and Fe were combined together as a mixed standard solution, with series concentrations of 0 μg/L, 20 μg/L, 50 μg/L, 100 μg/L, 200 μg/L, 300 μg/L, 400 μg/L, and 500 μg/L. Mn, Cu, and Zn were grouped together as another mixed standard solution, with concentrations of 0 μg/L, 0.1 μg/L, 0.5 μg/L, 1 μg/L, 4 μg/L, 7 μg/L, and 10 μg/L.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Optimizing Quinine Extraction via MAE and UAE

2025
The response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize the extraction of quinine from bark using microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE). Solvent concentration, extraction time, and temperature were evaluated as independent variables, with the tested conditions detailed in Table 1 (a and b). Additionally, Soxhlet extraction was performed as a reference method following the conditions described by Gatti et al. [39 (link)]. To prevent the sample-to-solvent ratio from influencing the results, the same ratio was consistently applied across all three methods.
MAE was conducted using a laboratory microwave oven (Mars 6, CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA) operating at 1000 W, with an initial ramp time of 15 min. Samples of 1 g were weighed into microwave extraction tubes, followed by the addition of 40 mL of EtOH. For UAE, a bath sonicator (FS30D, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a frequency of 42 kHz and a power output of 100 W was used. In this method, 25 mg of the sample was weighed into 2 mL microtubes, and 1 mL of the solvent was added. The internal standard, caffeine, was added along with the solvent before starting the extraction process.
The optimal conditions determined were as follows: for MAE, 65% EtOH, a temperature of 130 °C, and an extraction time of 34 min; for UAE, 61% EtOH, a temperature of 25 °C, and an extraction time of 15 min. After extraction, the solid phase was separated from the liquid extract by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 min (Sorvall ST8, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The liquid extracts were filtered using 0.2 μm hydrophilic PTFE syringe filters (Titan 3, Thermo Scientific, Shanghai, China). The filtered extracts were then transferred to vials for chromatographic analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Cadmium Quantification in Tissue Samples

2025
About 0.05–0.1 g of the powder was weighed, and 10 mL of HNO3 was added and digested using a microwave digestor (Mars 6; CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA). A blank method was used during the digestion of each batch to eliminate the interference of reagents and solvents. For quality control, standard shrimp material (GBW10050a; Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences) was digested under the same conditions to ensure that the recoveries of tissues were controlled at 95–105%. Cadmium concentrations were determined for each tissue using ICP-MS, and Cd concentrations were expressed as μg-g−1 dry weight (w/w).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Mineral Content Analysis of Samples

2025
The mineral contents, including zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), iron (Fe), were determined using the AOAC method. For the analysis of all the minerals, a microwave digestion method was used for the sample preparation. We used 70% nitric acid (Chemitop Co., Ltd., Jincheon, Republic of Korea) as the digestion reagent, and ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm or higher) was produced using an ultrapure water system (ELGA, High Wycombe, UK). For the sample preparation, 0.1 g of each sample was placed in a microwave vessel, and 10 mL of nitric acid solution was added. The sample was then subjected to microwave digestion using a microwave digestion system (MARS 6, CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA) for 1 h. After digestion, the sample was allowed to cool, and deionized water (ddH2O) was added to bring the final volume to 25 mL. The solution was filtered using a 0.45 μm syringe filter (for laboratory use) and used as the final sample. The five minerals (Ca, K, Mg, Na, Fe) were analyzed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), while the zinc (Zn) was analyzed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Synthesis of Bromo-Methoxy Benzopyran Derivative

2024
3-bromo-4-methoxyphenylacetic acid (1.0 eq) and 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde (1.0 eq) were added to acetic anhydride (7.8 eq) and triethylamine (2.0 eq). The reaction mixture was stirred under 120 °C for 30 min using microwave radiation in the reactor Mars™ 6 (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA). After cooling, concentrated HCl was added to the mixture to achieve an acidic pH, and the process was controlled using the paper indicator to monitor the pH. Then, the reaction mixture was poured into an ice-water bath, and after 24 h of stirring the precipitate was filtrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and then extracted twice with H2O to remove the rest of the hydrochloric acid. The organic layers were combined and evaporated under reduced pressure to dryness. The residue was purified by column flash chromatography on silica gel using CombiFlash®Rf+ (chloroform/ethyl acetate, increasing concentration gradient) with an integrated Evaporative Light Scattering Detector (ELSD) and UV detector. Yield: 85.2%. ESI-MS for C19H19BrO6 (m/z): [M + Na]+ 445.2. 1H NMR (401 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.20–7.14 (m, 2H), 6.44 (s, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.62 (s, 3H), and 3.50 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 168.23, 154.93, 152.35, 139.63, 138.38, 133.86, 130.61, 130.44, 130.13, 129.50, 112.86, 110.53, 108.07, 60.08, 56.41, and 55.37.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «mars 6»

1

Quantifying Metal Concentrations in Leaves

The details about digestion process and quantification of metals in leaves have been fully explained elsewhere36 (link),37 (link). In brief, 7 mL of HNO3, 2 mL of H2O2 and 1 mL of H2O were added to 0.5 g of fresh leaves and heated at 200 °C during 45 min in a microwave digester (MARS 6 – CEM Corporation). The extraction for each point was performed in triplicate. The samples were filtered followed by adjusting the volume to 25 mL with Milli-Q water, and the concentrations of metals were measured using an Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Thermo Scientific iCAP 7000 Series). The metals included in the composition of tires, with given certified values and recoveries in the range of 43.41–91.14%, were analyzed (i.e., Al, Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu, Mg, Co, Ba and Cr). K (% Recovery 78.89) was also quantified, since it is a metal commonly detected during biomass burning. Moreover, more natural metals, such as Ca and Mn (%Recovery 88.02 and 111.01, respectively), were also measured. For the recovery percentage, the certified reference material NIST SRM 1575a—Trace elements in Pine Needles was used. The limits of detection (LOD) were calculated as 3 times the standard deviation of 10 blanks measurements divided by the slope of the analytical curve, while the limits of quantification (LOQ) were calculated similarly by multiplying the standard deviation by 10. The range values for LOD and LOQ were 2.58 × 10−7–0.0088 μg g−1 and 8.59 × 10−7–0.029 μg g−1, respectively.
In order to have an idea if the concentrations of metals found in this area were high—since there was no data from before the protest events – an extra sample of Araucaria heterophylla needles was collected at point E4 for the same chemical analysis. The Araucaria heterophylla concentrations of metals in the urban park were then compared with those found in the streets of Quito with a range in vehicular traffic intensity49 (link). It is important to compare the concentrations using the same plant species since it has been widely reported in literature that the accumulation capacity of plants for pollutants is species dependent62 (link),63 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Tampon Metal Content Analysis

Detailed information about sample preparation and analysis is provided in the supplemental material (Section 1: Detailed Methods). In brief, we acid digested 0.2 – 0.3 g of tampon in a microwave digestion system (MARS 6, CEM Corporation, USA). Each sample included portions of the inner absorbent core and, if present, the non-woven outer covering (components A and C in Fig. 1) from random areas of the tampon. Duplicate samples were prepared in an identical fashion. We measured all non-mercury metals in the tampon digest using a PerkinElmer NexION 350S Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry with dynamic reaction cell (ICP-DRC-MS). For Hg, we used an Agilent 8900 ICP-MS equipped with an Agilent SPS 4 autosampler system. All analyses were conducted at the Trace Metal Core Facility, Columbia University, using established instrument settings (Schilling et al., 2024 (link)). We corrected metal concentrations for drift and then subtracted blank values. We calculated the method detection limit (MDL) values as 3.33 times the standard deviation of blank measurements [n = 21]) (Armbruster and Pry, 2008 (link)) and multiplied by the dilution factor of 100. The method quantification limit (MQL) was calculated as 10 times the standard deviation of blank measurements (n = 21) and multiplied by the dilution factor. We handled observations with concentrations below the MDL by using the machine-read values in the statistical analyses, however, we replaced negative Hg values with the MDL divided by the square root of 2 to allow for geometric mean calculations. The intra-assay coefficient of variation ranged from 6.7 % for Ba to 45.3 % for Hg (Supplemental Table S1). Our measures were in good agreement with the certified value for most certified metals (Ba, Ca, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, Sr, V) in the IAEA-V-9 cotton reference material (range: 43 % to 116 %), and 90 % or greater of spiked metals (As, Co, and Zn) (Supplemental Table S2). More details about quality control, including a discussion about metals with lower vs. higher levels of agreement, can be found in the supplemental material (Section 2: Quality Control of Cotton Certified Reference Material (IAEA-V-9) and Tampon Samples).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Determination of Cation Contents in OFI

For the determination of Na, K, Mg and Ca contents, the protocol by D’Imperio et al. [40 (link)], with some modification of mineralization process, was used. Briefly, 0.3 g of OFI was accurately weighed in microwave digestion vessels, followed by the addition of 10 mL of 65% HNO3 and digestion in a closed-vessel microwave assisted digestion system (MARS 6, CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA). The two step digestion procedure was performed as follows: 15 min to reach 200 °C and 10 min at 200 °C (constant T; power set at 900–1050 W; 800 psi). Blanks, HNO3 without the sample, were also prepared and digested using the same conditions, before the digested solutions were cooled and quantitatively transferred to 50 mL volumetric flasks, diluted to volume (50 mL) with ultrapure H2O (Milli-Q Millipore 18 M Ω cm−1, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA) and filtered using a 0.45 μm filter. The resulting solution was analysed by ion chromatography (Dionex DX120, Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with a conductivity detector, using an IonPac CG12A guard column and an IonPac CS12A analytical column (Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 35 °C, flow 1 mL/min. The content of cations was calculated on the basis of the calibration curves previously obtained. Standard used: Multi Element IC Standard solution Fluka TraceCERT®, Supelco® (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), contains cation element. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were defined as the minimum amounts at which the analyte can be reliably detected and quantified. As follows, the values of LOD and LOQ of cations in µg/L were Na (0.239, 0.717), K (1.732, 5.196), Mg (1.371, 4.113) and Ca (0.806, 2.418). The accuracy and precision of the cation measurement procedures were verified by testing the certified reference standard 1573a-Tomato Leaf powder of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), with an element recovery average of 102 ± 5.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Soil and Rice Heavy Metals Analysis

Soil pH was measured at a solid:water ratio of 1:2.5 (w/v). SOM content was determined using the chromic acid titration method17 (link). To analyse total concentrations of heavy metals, 0.1 g of ground soil samples was digested with 7 mL HNO3 + 2 mL HF + 1 mL H2O2 in a microwave oven (Mars 6, CEM Corporation, USA). Available heavy metals in the soil samples were extracted using the Bureau Communautaire de Référence (BCR) method48 whereby 1.0 g of air-dried soil (< 2 mm) was shaken for 24 h with 40 mL of a solution containing 0.11 mol L−1 acetic acid. Then, the liquid extract was separated from the solid residue through filtration, and the heavy metals in the extract were considered as available heavy metals. For the rice, 0.25 g of grain powder was digested with 5 mL HNO3 and deionized to a fixed volume.
Concentrations of Cd, Pb, Ni, Cr, Zn and Cu in the soil and rice grain samples were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Agilent 7,800, USA). Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) was verified from Chinese standardized reference materials: GBW07456-CSS-27 for the soil samples and GBW10023-CSB-14 for the rice grain samples. All samples were determined in duplicate. The blank and standardized reference materials were included with every 20 samples in the analyses. While applying these procedures, analytical quality control tests revealed high levels of precision throughout. The elemental recoveries and relative standard deviation (RSDs) for standardized reference materials were 96–105% and < 3.5%, respectively.
BAF was measured by the ratio between the heavy metals level in paddy soil and that measured in rice grains49 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Fecal Nutrient Digestibility Determination

Feces were pooled per day (including 24 h post first food consumption), resulting in maximum eight samples per cat per period/food. Feces were oven-dried at 60°C to reach a constant weight. Water loss after oven-drying was not used to calculate dry matter of the fresh feces as cat litter was still included, which renders such data inaccurate. After drying, all visible cat litter granules and cat hairs were manually removed and the cleaned feces were ground to pass a 1-mm sieve in an ultra-centrifugal mill (ZM100, Retsch B.V., Ochten, Netherlands). Fecal samples were analyzed by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS; Anadis Instruments Benelux BV & Nirvention BV, Almere, Netherlands), with the NIRS being calibrated by chemical analyzes of a subset of 50 feces samples obtained in this study. Samples of feces and foods were analyzed in duplicate for dry matter (30 ) (DM), nitrogen (31 ) (N), crude fat (32 ) (Cfat), and gross energy (33 ) (GE). Crude protein (CP) has been calculated as N × 6.25. Food samples were also analyzed for total dietary fiber (34 ). Ti concentrations in foods and all fecal samples were determined using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Iris intrepid II XSP, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) after destruction with H2SO4 using a microwave digestion system (MARS 6, CEM Corporation, Matthews NC, Unites States).
Apparent fecal nutrient digestibility was calculated as described elsewhere (5 , 6 ):
where Nutfeces, Nutfood, Tifeces and Tifood are the nutrient content (% DM) and Ti content (% DM) of feces and food, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.