We Dissect Protocols

4500 q trap

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
383 citations
Sourced in United States, Japan, China
About the product

The 4500 Q TRAP is a highly sensitive and versatile liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system designed for a wide range of analytical applications. It features a triple quadrupole mass analyzer and a proprietary TRAP technology, providing enhanced sensitivity and selectivity for the detection and quantification of analytes in complex matrices.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The 4500 QTRAP is a mass spectrometry system manufactured by SCIEX. It is currently available for purchase through authorized distributors. The price for this system can vary, but third-party retailers like VWR list it around $663,130.47 USD.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

383 protocols using «4500 q trap»

1

Metabolite Profiling of Plant Samples

2025
The freeze-dried leaf and fruit samples were powdered using a mixer mill (MM 400, Retsch) with a zirconia bead for 1.5 min at 30 Hz. First, 100 mg powder was weighed and extracted overnight at 4 °C with 1.0 ml 70% aqueous methanol. Following centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 min, the extracts were absorbed (CNWBOND Carbon-GCB SPE Cartridge, 250 mg, 3 ml; ANPEL) and filtered (SCAA-104, 0.22 μm pore size; ANPEL) before liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis.
The sample extracts were analyzed using an LC–ESI–MS/MS system (HPLC, Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A system; MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP). The effluent was alternatively connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP)–MS. LIT and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were acquired on a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Q TRAP), API 4500 Q TRAP LC–MS/MS System, equipped with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface, operating in a positive ion mode and controlled by Analyst 1.6 software (AB Sciex). Orthogonal projections to latent structures–discriminant analysis was applied to identify altered metabolites.
The coefficient of variation was calculated for each metabolite on the basis of the following formula: δ/μ, where δ and μ are the standard deviation and mean of each metabolite in the population, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolomic profiling of biological samples

2025
Sample preparation and extraction: biological samples were freeze-dried by a vacuum freeze-dryer (Scientz-100F). A mixer mill (MM 400, Retsch, Haan, Germany) was used to crush the freeze-dried samples. Lyophilized powder (100 mg) was dissolved with 1.2 mL 70% methanol solution, and vortexed 30 s every 30 min for 6 times in total; the samples were placed in a refrigerator at 4 °C overnight, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min; and the supernatant was filtrated (SCAA-104, 0.22 μm pore size) for UPLC-MS/MS analysis. UPLC-MS/MS analysis: the sample extracts were analyzed by a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, SHIMADZU Nexera X2; MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The injection volume was 4 μL. The effluent was alternatively connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap. LIT and triple quadrupole scans were acquired on a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer, AB4500 Q TRAP UPLC/MS/MS System, equipped with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface, operating in positive and negative ion mode and controlled by Analyst 1.6.3 software (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). Triple quadrupole scans were acquired as MRM experiments with collision gas (nitrogen) set to medium. DP and CE for individual MRM transitions were performed with further DP and CE optimization. A specific set of MRM transitions was monitored for each period according to the metabolites eluted within this period. The qualitative and quantitative metabolites were based on matching the retention time, count per second, and area of the peak to the Metware database (Metware Biotechnology, Wuhan, China) including more than 20,000 types of metabolites and secondary metabolites. Unsupervised PCA was performed using the Metware Cloud (https://cloud.metware.cn). Significantly changed metabolites were determined by fold change ≥ 1.5 or fold change ≤ 0.67, and VIP ≥ 1. Metabolites KEGG annotation were annotated based on KEGG compound database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/compound/, accessed on 26 January 2025), and p-value < 0.05 was set as the significant threshold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UPLC-ESI-MS/MS Metabolite Profiling Protocol

2025
The sample extracts were analyzed using a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, SHIMADZU Nexera X2; MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP). The UPLC utilized an Agilent SB-C18 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 mm x 100 mm). The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (pure water with 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid). The gradient program started with 95% A and 5% B, transitioning linearly to 5% A and 95% B within 9 minutes, maintaining this ratio for 1 minute. The program then reverted to 95% A and 5% B over 1.1 minutes, held for 2.9 minutes. The flow rate was 0.35 ml/min, the column oven was set to 40°C, and the injection volume was 4 μl. The effluent was connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP)-MS. LIT and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were acquired using an AB4500 Q TRAP UPLC/MS/MS System with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface, operating in both positive and negative ion modes, controlled by Analyst 1.6.3 software (AB Sciex). The ESI source parameters were: source temperature 550°C, ion spray voltage 5500 V (positive)/-4500 V (negative), ion source gas I and II at 50 and 60 psi, respectively, curtain gas at 25 psi, and high collision-activated dissociation (CAD). Instrument tuning and mass calibration were performed with 10 and 100 μmol/L polypropylene glycol solutions in QQQ and LIT modes. QQQ scans were acquired as MRM experiments with nitrogen collision gas set to medium. Specific MRM transitions were monitored for each period based on the eluted metabolites (Zheng et al., 2022 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

UPLC-ESI-MS/MS for Metabolite Analysis

2025
The sample extracts were analyzed using an UPLC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, SHIMADZU Nexera X2-Shimadzu-Kyoto, Japan, https://www.shimadzu.com.cn/, accessed on 1 October 2024); MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP, https://www.thermofisher.cn/cn/zh/home/brands/applied-biosystems.html, accessed on 1 October 2024). The analytical conditions were as follows: UPLC employed a column, Agilent SB-C18 (1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm). The mobile phase consisted of solvent A, pure water with 0.1% formic acid, and solvent B, acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Sample measurements were performed with a gradient program that employed the starting conditions of 95% A and 5% B. Within 9 min, a linear gradient to 5% A and 95% B was programmed, and a composition of 5% A and 95% B was kept for 1 min. Subsequently, a composition of 95% A and 5.0% B was adjusted over 1.1 min and kept for 2.9 min. The flow velocity was set to 0.35 mL per minute. The column oven was set to 40 °C. The injection volume was 4 μL. The effluent was alternatively connected to an electrospray ionization triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer (ESI-Q-TRAP-MS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Untargeted Metabolomics of Tea Samples

2025
The non-targeted metabolomics techniques were used to uncover the chemical profiles of tea samples with different PF durations, following the method of Qian et al. [20 (link)], and set up three biological replicates. Firstly, sample extraction was carried out in the following procedure: The vacuum freeze-dried tea samples were ground into powder, and 100 mg of powder was precisely weighed and dissolved in 0.6 mL of 70% methanol extract. Subsequently, the mixture was refrigerated at 4 °C overnight with six vortexing cycles. The next day, the extract was centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 10 min), and the resulting filtrate, passed through a nylon needle microporous filter membrane (SCAA-104, 0.22 μm pore size; ANPEL, Shanghai, China), was used for UPLC-MS/MS analysis.
The chromatograms were obtained using UPLC (Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A, Shanghai, China) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 QTRAP, Shanghai, China). The UPLC conditions were set as follows: The chromatographic column used was a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 (1.8 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm); The mobile phases A and B were ultrapure water and acetonitrile, respectively, both containing 0.04% acetic acid; The elution gradient started at 5% phase B, increased linearly to 95% over 10.00 min, held at 95% for 1 min, then decreased to 5% between 11.00 and 11.10 min, and remained at 5% until 14 min; The flow rate was set at 0.35 mL/minutes; The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C; The injection volume was 4 μL. The MS/MS conditions were as follows: electrospray ionization temperature set to 550 °C; mass spectrometry voltage at 5500 V; curtain gas at 30 psi; collision-activated dissociation parameter set to high; acquisition mode was the multi-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode in the data-dependent acquisition (DDA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «4500 q trap»

1

LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds

The sample extracts were analyzed with the use of an LC-ESI-MS/MS system, which mainly includes HPLC (Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM20A system, http://www.shimadzu.com.cn/) and MS (Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP, http://www.appliedbiosystems.com.cn/). API 4500 Q TRAP LC/MS/MS System, equipped with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface, ran in a positive ion mode. Liquid chromatography conditions included the following: (1) The Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 (100 mm × 2.1 mm × 1.8 μm) chromatographic column was used. (2) Samples were rapidly eluted by using 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). (3) The separation was achieved with the following gradients: starting with 5% solvent B and raised to 95% B in 11 min, kept 95% B for 1 min, dropped quickly to 5% within 0.1min and kept 5% B for 3 min. (4) Constant flow rate was at 0.4 mL/min, (5) The column temperature was 40 °C, and (6) The injection volume was 5 μL.
The effluents were alternatively connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap MS/MS (ESI-Q TRAP-MS/MS). LIT (linear ion trap) and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were carried out by triple quadrupole-linear ion-trap mass spectrometer (Q TRAP). Mass spectrometry conditions: Electrospray ionization (ESI) temperature was set at 550 °C, mass spectrometry voltage was 5500 V, and gas I (GSI) and gas II (GSII) were set at 55 psi and 60 psi, respectively. Curtain gas (Curtain Gas, CUR) was at 25 psi and the Collision-induced ionization (Collision-activated dissociation, CAD) parameter was set to high. QQQ scans were obtained as MRM experiments with collision gas (nitrogen) set to 5 psi. In the triple quadrupole (QQQ), DP and CE for individual MRM transitions was completed with DP and CE optimization. The resulting data was processed using the mass spectrometry software, Analyst (Version 1.6.1 Applied Biosystems Company, Framingham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

2

Metabolite Identification and Quantification by HPLC-MS/MS

The HPLC effluent was connected to an electrospray ionization (ESI)-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap–MS/MS system (Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP). Metabolite identification and quantification were carried out following Chen et al. (2013 (link)). In brief, the inspected mass spectra were 50–1,000 m/z. Nitrogen was used as both the nebulizer/auxiliary and collision gas. The ESI source was set to positive ionization mode, the source temperature was held at 550°C; the capillary voltage was 5.5 kV. The monitoring mode was set to multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM).
Metabolite identification was based on the primary and secondary spectral data annotated against public databases, namely MassBank (http://www.massbank.jp/), KNAPSAcK (http://kanaya.naist.jp/KNApSAcK/), HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca/), MoToDB (http://www.ab.wur.nl/moto/), and METLIN (http://metlin.scripps.edu/index.php), following the standard metabolic operating procedures. Metabolite quantification was carried out using MRM. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS–DA) was carried out with the identified metabolites. Metabolites with significant differences in content were set with thresholds of variable importance in projection (VIP) ≥ 1 and fold change ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : China Agricultural University, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

3

UPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds

The sample extracts were analyzed using an UPLC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, SHIMADZU Nexera X2, www.shimadzu.com.cn/ (accessed on 2 February 2021); MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 Q-TRAP, www.appliedbiosystems.com.cn/ (accessed on 2 February 2021)). The analytical conditions were as follows, UPLC: column, Agilent SB-C18 (1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm); the mobile phase consisted of solvent A, pure water with 0.1% formic acid, and solvent B, acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Sample measurements were performed with a gradient program that employed the starting conditions of 95% A, 5% B. Within 9 min, a linear gradient to 5% A, 95% B was programmed, and a composition of 5% A, 95% B was kept for 1 min. Subsequently, a composition of 95% A, 5.0% B was adjusted within 1.10 min and kept for 2.9 min. The column oven was set to 40 °C. The injection volume was 4 μL. The effluent was alternatively connected to an electrospray ionization (ESI)-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP)-MS
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Luoyang Normal University

4

Metabolomic Analysis of Peach Samples

A previously described relative quantification method of widely targeted metabolites was used to analyze samples [16 (link)]. The freeze-dried peach flesh was crushed using a mixer mill (MM 400, Retsch) with zirconia beads for 1 min at 30 Hz. Sixty to eighty milligrams of powder was extracted overnight at 4 °C with 1 ml of 70% aqueous methanol. Following centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the extracts were absorbed (CNWBOND Carbon-GCB SPE Cartridge, 250 mg, 3 ml; ANPEL, Shanghai, China, www.anpel.com.cn) and filtrated (SCAA-104, 0.22 μm pore size; ANPEL, Shanghai, China, www.anpel.com.cn), and then analyzed using an LC-ESI-MS/MS system (HPLC, Shim-pack UFLC Shimadzu CBM30A system, www.shimadzu.com.cn; MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 QTRAP, www.appliedbiosystems.com.cn/). The analytical conditions were as follows: HPLC column, Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 (1.8 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm); solvent system, water (0.04% acetic acid): acetonitrile (0.04% acetic acid); gradient program, 95:5 V/V at 0 min, 5:95 v/v at 11.0 min, 5:95 v/v at 12.0 min, 95:5 v/v at 12.1 min, 95:5 v/v at 15.0 min; flow rate, 0.35 ml/min; temperature, 40 °C; injection volume, 2 μl. The effluent was alternatively connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP) MS.
Linear ion trap (LIT) and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were acquired on a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap MS (QTRAP) using an API 4500 QTRAP LC/MS/MS System, which was equipped with an ESI Turbo Ionspray interface operated in positive ion mode and controlled by Analyst 1.6.2 software (ABSciex). The ESI source operation parameters were as follows: ion source, turbo spray; source temperature, 550 °C; negative ion spray voltage (IS), 4500 V; ion source gas I (GSI), gas II (GSII), and curtain gas (CUR) were set at 55, 60, and 25 (35) psi, respectively; and the collision gas (CAD) was high (medium). Instrument tuning and mass calibration were performed with 10 and 100 mmol/l polypropylene glycol solutions in QQQ and LIT modes. The QQQ scans were acquired as multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) experiments with the collision gas (nitrogen) set to 5 psi. The declustering potential (DP) and collision energy (CE) for individual MRM transitions were performed with further DP and CE optimization. A specific set of MRM transitions was monitored for each period according to the metabolites that were eluted within this period.
Using the above method, a total of 70 representative samples (35 in 2015 and 35 in 2016 years) were selected and carried out metabolome library construction. The result showed that 2151 substances could be identified. After performing quality control, a total of 1858 metabolites were found to be stable. These 1858 metabolites were used as the references to identify metabolites in the 252 samples over 2 years.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Cornell University, Hainan University

5

LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Metabolites

The sample extracts were analyzed using an LC-ESI-MS/MS system (HPLC, Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A system, www.shimadzu.com.cn/; MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP, www.appliedbiosystems.com.cn/). The analytical conditions were as follows, HPLC: column, Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 (1.8 μm, 2.1 mm*100 mm); solvent system, water (0.04% acetic acid): acetonitrile (0.04% acetic acid); gradient program, 100:0 V/V at 0 min, 5:95 V/V at 10.0 min, 5:95 V/V at 11.0 min, 95:5 V/V at 11.1 min, 95:5 V/V at 15.0 min; flow rate, 0.35 ml/min; temperature, 40°C; and injection volume: 5 μl. The effluent was alternatively connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (Q TRAP)-MS.
LIT and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were acquired on a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Q TRAP) using an API 4500 Q TRAP LC/MS/MS System, which was equipped with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface operated in a positive ion mode and controlled by Analyst 1.6.2 software (AB Sciex). The ESI source operation parameters were as follows: ion source, turbo spray; source temperature 550°C; ion spray voltage (IS) 5,500 V; ion source gas I (GSI), gas II (GSII), curtain gas (CUR) were set at 55, 60, and 25.0 psi, respectively; and the collision gas (CAD) was high. Instrument tuning and mass calibration were performed with 10 and 100 μmol/L polypropylene glycol solutions in QQQ and LIT modes, respectively. The QQQ scans were acquired as MRM experiments with the collision gas (nitrogen) set to 5 psi. The DP and CE for individual MRM transitions were performed with further DP and CE optimization. A specific set of MRM transitions was monitored for each period according to the metabolites that were eluted within this period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.