Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

86 protocols using «dmem f12»

1

HaCaT Cell Culture Protocol

2025
Human epidermal keratinocytes (HaCaT) were purchased from AddexBio (#T0020001) and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium [DMEM F/12, (Wisent, 319-075-CL), 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, 12483–022), 1% (v/v) Pen/Strep (Wisent, 450–201-EL)]. HaCaT cells from passages 15–20 were used in all experiments. Cells were kept at 37°C and 5% CO2 with full media changes performed every 2 days with 10% DMEM until the cells reached 70–90% confluency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Scratch Wound Healing Assay in HaCaT Cells

2025
The methodology used in this study was adapted from Liang et al. (2007) (link). Briefly, HaCaT cells were seeded at 3.0 × 105 cells per well in a 6-well plate in 10% DMEM F/12 and grown for 1–2 days to form a 90–95% confluent monolayer. Cell morphology and monolayer uniformity were assessed prior to wounding. To facilitate consistent imaging of the same site over multiple time points, a cross was etched on the back of the plate to identify the region of interest. A vertical scratch was manually created along the center of each well using a P1000 pipette tip, using the etched cross as a guide. Media was then removed, and cells were washed with pre-warmed PBS. The PBS was removed and conditioned media along with serum reduced media in a 1:1 ratio [DMEM F/12, (Wisent, 319–075-CL), 5% (v/v) FBS (Gibco, 12483–022), 1% (v/v) Pen/Strep (Wisent, 450-201-EL)] was added to the cells. This ratio was chosen as it maintains keratinocyte viability in culture for up to 7 days (Figure S1). The scratch site was imaged at the same location at time 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after wounding using the EVOS XL Core Imaging system (AMEX1000) at 4x magnification. The scratch area, wound coverage of total area and standard deviation (SD) of the scratch width were quantified using an ImageJ (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) plugin adapted from Suarez-Arnedo et al. (2020 (link)). The rate of cell migration and percentage of wound closure were calculated according to (equation 1) and (equation 2), respectively, based on calculations from a protocol by Grada et al. (2017 (link)).
where Wi is the initial wound width, Wt is the wound width at n h both in μm, and t is the time span of the assay at n in h. At = 0 is the initial wound area, At = Δt is the wound area after n h of the initial scratch, both in μm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Isolation and Culture of Mouse Chondrocytes

2025
Rib cartilage was isolated from C57BL/6J suckling mice of 5 to 7 d old and cut into pieces under aseptic conditions. The cartilage was digested with 0.2% collagenase II at 37 °C for 4 h. The digestive fluid was then filtered through a 100-μm cell filter and then centrifuged for 5 min to collect the isolated cells. Primary mouse chondrocytes were cultured in DMEM/F12 (WISENT, Canada) with 10% FBS, which was refreshed every 2 to 3 d. Primary chondrocytes were identified by Col2a1 immunofluorescence staining for subsequent experiments. The second generation of chondrocytes was used for subsequent progression of the experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Automated Patch-Clamp Characterization of Engineered Sodium Channels

2024
Four engineered cell lines were used for SyncroPatch experiments: hNav1.7‐HEK293 cell, hNav1.1‐HEK293 cells, hNav1.2‐CHO cells (Catalog Number CT4010; ChanTest, Cleveland, OH, USA) and hNav1.5‐HEK293 cells (Catalog Number CT6207; ChanTest, Cleveland, OH, USA).
HNav1.7‐HEK293growth medium consisted of EMEM, 10% FBS and 300 µg mL−1 G418. All medium components came from Wisent (St. Bruno, QC, Canada). HNav1.1‐HEK293 cells growth medium consisted of DMEM /High Glucose (Cytiva, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA), 10% FBS, 1 mg mL−1 G418, 1x Penicillin Streptomycin, 3 µg mL−1 Puromycin (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). FBS, G418 and Pen/Strep purchased from Wisent (St. Bruno, QC, Canada). HNav1.5‐HEK293 cells (Catalog Number CT6207; ChanTest, Cleveland, OH, USA) growth media consisted of DMEM/F12, 10% FBS, 0.5 mg mL−1 G418 and 1x Pen/Strep (Wisent, St. Bruno, QC, Canada). HNav1.2‐CHO EZ cells (Catalog Number CT4010; ChanTest, Cleveland, OH, USA) growth media consisted of DMEM/F12, 10% FBS (Wisent, St. Bruno, QC, Canada).
HNav1.7‐HEK293 cells, hNav1.1‐HEK293 cells and hNav1.5‐HEK293 cells, were cultured in T‐75 flasks at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and split when confluency reached 70–80% to retain surface channel expression. Cells were harvested for use when confluency reached ≈70%. To harvest cells, the media was aspirated and cells were washed 2x by the addition and aspiration of 5 mL of DPBS (Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline, no Ca2+, no Mg2+; Gibco, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Post washing, 2.5 mL of Accutase (Sigma–Aldrich Corporation, Saint Louis, USA) was added to flasks which were then rocked to ensure complete coverage.  Flasks were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 15 min. Flasks were gently rocked to dislodge the cells and 8 mL of serum free EMEM added to flasks to dilute the Accutase and inhibit cell digestion. Cells were gently triturated with a 5 mL pipette and then transferred to a 15 mL centrifuge tube. Cells were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 4 min, and re‐suspended in chilled (4 °C) External Solution (Nanion Technologies, Munich, Germany) at a concentration of 1–5 × 106 cells mL−1.
HNav1.2‐CHO EZ cells were thawed and plated into 100 mm tissue culture dishes. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 2 h prior to harvesting. Harvesting was the same as described above.
The patch‐clamp whole‐cell experiments using a SyncroPatch 384PE (Nanion Technologies, Munich, Germany) were performed with the following solutions: i) internal solution for cell recording contained (in mm) CsF, 110; NaCl, 10; CsCl, 10; EGTA,10; Hepes,10 (285 mOsm; pH adjusted to 7.2 with 1 N CsOH); ii) external solution contained (in mm) NaCl, 140; KCl, 4; CaCl2, 2; MgCl2, 1; glucose, 5; HEPES, 10 (298 mOsm; pH adjusted to 7.4 with 1 N NaOH). All solutions were purchased from Nanion Technologies, Munich, Germany.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

EMT Regulation in MCF10a Cells

2024
MCF10a cells were maintained in 1:1 DMEM/F12 (Wisent), 20 ng/mL hEGF (Gibco), 0.5 μg/mL Hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μg/mL human recombinant insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), 5% Horse Serum (Gibco), and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (Wisent). MCF10a cells were plated onto 6 well plates at 3 × 105 cells per well. Growth media was changed 24 hours after plating with media containing 4 ng/mL hTGFb-1 (Biolegend) or normal media, and 1C8 (10 μM final concentration), GPS167 (1 μM final concentration), or DMSO. Media was replenished 48 hours after treatment start. RNA was harvested at the time of treatment (D0) and 4 days later (D4) using Qiazol reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was generated using Superscript IV (Invitrogen) and qPCR was performed using PowerUp Sybr Green (Applied Biosystems). All expression values were normalized to the geometric mean of hTBP and hHPRT1 expression, and statistical tests performed with Tukey’s post-hoc test from triplicate experiments.
RT-qPCR primers used for EMT assay:
hsCDH2_F AGGCTTCTGGTGAAATCGCA
hsCDH2_R TGCAGTTGCTAAACTTCACATTG
hsCDH1_F CACCACGTACAAGGGTCAGG
hsCDH1_R GGTGTATACAGCCTCCCACG
hsVIM_F CGGGAGAAATTGCAGGAGGA
hsVIM_R AAGGTCAAGACGTGCCAGAG
hsTBP_F TGCACAGGAGCCAAGAGTGAA
hsTBP_R CACATCACAGCTCCCCACCA
hsHPRT1_F GAAAAGGACCCCACGAAGTGT
hsHPRT1_R AGTCAAGGGCATATCCTACAACA.
The CellTox Green cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega) was used according to instructions provided by the manufacturer. This assay is based on fluorescence signal enhancement upon binding of Green dye to DNA from compromised cells with impaired membrane integrity. Cells were monitored for cytotoxicity over 72 h after treatment on a fluorescence plate reader. DHX33 siRNA (CAAUGAAAGUCCCAAAUGUTT) oligos were transfected into HCT116 cells at a concentration of 80 nM using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with GPS167 and the CellTox Green cytotoxicity assay carried out.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.