We Dissect Protocols

Chloroform

Manufactured by Avantor
592 citations
Sourced in United States, Poland, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Italy, Portugal, India, Netherlands, Hungary, Sweden, Spain, Austria, Switzerland, Denmark, Canada, Singapore
About the product

Chloroform is a colorless, dense liquid with a characteristic, sweet odor. It is a widely used solvent in various industrial and laboratory applications, primarily due to its ability to dissolve a wide range of organic compounds. Chloroform has a high boiling point and low flammability, making it a suitable choice for specific chemical processes and analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Chloroform is an active chemical product commercially available from Avantor. It is priced between $74.61 and $76.86 through authorized distributors.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

592 protocols using «chloroform»

1

Synthesis of Functionalized Organic Compounds

2025
1,8-Diaminooctane (99%), 1,12-diaminododecane (98%), 2,2′-(ethylenedioxy)bis(ethylamine) (98%), 4,9-dioxa-1,12-dodecanediamine (99%), suberic acid (>98%), dodecanedioic diacid (99%), 5,5-dimethyl-1,3-cyclohexanedione (dimedone, 95%), N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (99%), 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (>99%), 1,6-dibromohexane (96%), N-hydroxyphthalimide (97%), 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (>99%), hydrazine monohydrate (N2H4, 64 to 65%; reagent grade, 98%), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), sodium trifluoroacetate (NaTFA, 99%), dithranol (99%), sodium sulfate (anhydrous, >99.5%), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 99%), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. 2,2′-[1,2-Ethanediylbis(oxy)]bis[acetic acid] (97%) was purchased from Ambeed and used as received. Bis-PEG2-acid was purchased from AccelaChem and used as received. All solvents—methanol (MeOH) (>99.9%), dimethylformamide (DMF) (>99.8%), ethanol (96%), cyclohexane (99%), hexane (99%), dichloromethane (DCM) (99%), acetone (99%), chloroform (CHCl3) (>99%), and ethyl acetate (>99%)—were purchased from VWR and used without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Blueberry Antioxidant Polymer Study

2025
Polylactide with an average molecular weight of 155,500 Da was delivered by Nature Works® (Minnetonka, MN, USA). Poly(ethylene glycol) with Mw = 1500, DPPH, and vanillic acid were provided by Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Chloroform, acetone, and calcium chloride were purchased from Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A. (Gliwice, Poland). Blueberries of the Brightwell variety, originating from Chile, were used during the storage test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Enzymatic Synthesis of DHA-Phospholipids

2025
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) was obtained from the enzymatic hydrolysis of anchovy oil, purchased in capsules from NuaBiological in a pharmacy in Madrid (Spain). Glycerophosphocholine (GPC) was purchased from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Soluble lipases such as Lipozyme® TL from Thermomyces lanuginosa (TLL), Candida antarctica B (CALB), Palatasa® 20,000 L (PALA), Eversa® Transform 2.0 (NS40), Novozym®40119 (NOVO) and phospholipases Lecitase® Ultra (LECI), and Quara® LowP (QlowP) were kindly donated by Novozymes (Bagsvaerd, Denmark). Immobeads-C18 IB-ADS-3 (C18) immobilization support was provided by ChiralVision (Leiden, the Netherlands), and DEAE-Sepharose purification support was from Sigma–Aldrich. ExtraBond® Silica columns were obtained from Scharlab, S.L. (Barcelona, Spain). Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), sodium chloride, p-nitrophenyl butyrate (pNPB), and 3Å pore size molecular sieve (2–3 mm bead) were provided by Sigma–Aldrich. Methanol, chloroform, hexane, 2-propanol, ethyl acetate, ammonium hydroxide, and acetonitrile were purchased from VWR Chemicals (Matsonford Road Radnor, PA, USA) and Sigma–Aldrich. 1,2-didocosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (Di-DHA-PC) standard was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, AL, USA). The ionic liquids (ILs) used were 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (BMIM-BF4), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (EMIM-Ac), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIM-Cl), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate (EMIM-PF6), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrachloroaluminate (EMIM-AlCl4), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMIM-BF4), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate (EMIM-Otf), and 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (MOIM-BF4), all provided by Sigma–Aldrich. All other reagents and solvents used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis and Characterization of Carboxylated PDMS Elastomers

2025
PDMS-DMS-B12 [(carboxydecyl)-terminated
polydimethylsiloxane, 15–30
cSt] and PDMS-DMS-B25 [(carboxydecyl)-terminated polydimethylsiloxane,
450–550 cSt] were purchased from Gelest and a vinyl-terminated
PDMS (100 cSt) from abcr. Dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) and DMF of HPLC grade were obtained from Fisher Chemical, LiBr
was obtained from Alfa Aesar, and chloroform, diethyl ether (Et2O), THF, MgSO4, and DMF were purchased from VWR.
3-(4,5-Dimethyldiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)
was bought from Calbiochem, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium
(DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco, DMF-d7 was purchased from Deutero, and Aerosil R
106 was purchased from Evonik. N,N-Dimethylacetamide
(DMAc), 2-isopropenyl-2-oxazoline (iPOx), CuCl, CuCl2,
tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPMA), 2-chloropropionitrile (CPN), 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile)
(AIBN), and thioglycolic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. iPOx
was distilled under reduced pressure prior to RDRP. For FRP, the monomer
was used as received. Dialysis was performed with a no.6 dialysis
tubing from Spectrum Laboratories with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO)
of 1 kDa.
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was carried out
on two different
instruments. On the one hand, a Viscothek GPCmax instrument from Malvern,
equipped with a PFG column from Polymer Standard Service GmbH (300
× 8 mm, 5 μm particle size) and run with DMF containing
10 mM LiBr as the mobile phase, was used. The samples were prepared
as a 10 mg*mL–1 solution, filtered through a 0.2
μm PTFE syringe filter prior to injection, and eluted at a flow
rate of 0.75 mL*min–1 at 60 °C. The system
was calibrated with polystyrene standards from the Polymer Standard
Service GmbH using a conventional calibration of the refractive index
detector. On the other hand, an SEC system consisting of Shimadzu
LC–20, a Shimadzu refractive index detector, and two PPS PFG
5 μm columns or PSS GRAM 5 μm columns from Polymer Standard
Service GmbH (300 mm × 8 mm) at 25 °C were employed. DMAc
with an addition of 0.1 wt % LiBr was used as an eluent at a flow
rate of 1 mL*min–1, and samples were injected with
a concentration of 1 mg*mL–1. Poly(methyl methacrylate)
standards from Polymer Standard Services GmbH were used for calibration.
Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded with a PerkinElmer 100 Series
FTIR spectrometer equipped with ATR using a scan number of 128 as
well as on a Nicolet 8700 FTIR spectrometer from Thermo scientific
equipped with a Nicolet Continuum microscope and a germanium ATR crystal
using 64 scans and a resolution of 4 cm–1.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements were performed on
a Bruker Avance III 300 MHz spectrometer in deuterated solvents at
25 °C, referenced to the respective internal solvent signal.
XPS signals were recorded using a Thermo Scientific Nexsa G2 surface
analysis system equipped with a microfocused, monochromatic Al Ka
X-ray source (1486.68 eV). An X-ray beam of 400 mm size was used.
The spectra were acquired in the constant analyzer energy mode with
a pass energy of 200 eV for the survey. Narrow regions were collected
using a pass energy of 50 eV. Charge compensation was achieved with
the system dual beam flood gun. The Thermo Scientific Avantage software,
version 6.7.0, was used for digital acquisition and data processing.
Spectral calibration was determined by using the automated calibration
routine and the internal Au, Ag, and Cu standards supplied with the
K-Alpha system. The surface compositions (atomic %) were determined
by considering the integrated peak areas of the detected atoms and
the respective sensitivity factors. The fractional concentration of
a particular element A was computed using where In and sn are the
integrated peak areas and the Scofield sensitivity factors corrected
for the analyzer transmission, respectively.
The elastomer samples
for rheological characterization and gel
fractions were cured in a circular Teflon mold in a drying and heating
chamber from Binder at 120 °C. Rheological characterizations
were conducted on an Anton Paar MCR 502 rheometer with a plate–plate
geometry (8, 10, and 25 mm diameters) through stress-controlled oscillatory
tests at 24 °C. Amplitude sweeps were performed with a constant
frequency of 1 rad*s–1 and an increasing strain
rate γ from 10–3 % to 10° % for E-B12
and 10–2 % to 102 % for E-B25 and E-Syl.
Subsequently, frequency sweeps at a constant rate of deformation of
γ = 1 × 10–2 % for E-B12 and of γ
= 1% for E-B25 and E-Syl were conducted. The reaction kinetics was
directly investigated by measuring the freshly prepared formulations
on the heated rheometer plate at the respective temperatures (room
temperature, 80, 120, and 160 °C). The gel fractions of the elastomer
pellets were determined by washing the pellets with CH2Cl2 over 24 h. After separation of the solid fraction
by decanting or filtration and subsequent drying on air at RT for
48 h, the weight loss of pellets was determined and the gel fraction
was calculated. Tensile tests were performed on a TA Instruments DMA
Q800 with an increase in the applied normal force of 0.25 N per 60
s and a sample geometry of width = 40 mm, length = 100 mm, and thickness
= 2 mm.
Cytotoxicity of elastomers was tested using extracts
according
to ISO 10993 and direct contact cytotoxicity. Extracts from two types
of elastomers were obtained by extraction into growth medium (DMEM
+ 10% FBS) for 24 h. The extract thus obtained was labeled as 100%
and was subsequently diluted with growth medium to 50, 10, and 1%
solutions. The pure extracts and their dilutions were then added to
3T3 fibroblasts that grew on a 96-well tissue culture plate at a concentration
of 5 × 103 cells per well. After 24 h of incubation,
quantification of living cells was performed using the MTT test. Extracts
from wells were replaced by 100 μL of MTT at a concentration
of 0.5 mg*mL–1 in growth media (DMEM + 10% FBS)
and incubated for 3 h. Afterward, MTT was removed, and 100 μL
of dimethyl sulfoxide was added to the wells to extract the water-insoluble
formazan formed by living cells. The absorbance was measured via a
plate reader at 595 nm (Multiscan FC, Thermofisher). For contact cytotoxicity,
cells were seeded in the 24-well tissue culture plate at a concentration
of 50 × 104 cells per well and incubated overnight. The next
day, pieces of elastomers covering 10% of the well surface were placed
in triplicate into the cell containing wells and incubated for 24
h, followed by an MTT assay as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Procedures for Olive Oil

2025
The following chemicals and reagents were used in the present study: ethanol (≥99.93%), sodium hydroxide (0.1 mol/L or 0.1 N), chloroform (≥99%), and cyclohexane (≥99.8%) were supplied by VWR (VWR International, LLC, 1–3 Rue d’Aurion, Rosny-sous-Bois, France). Glacial acetic acid with ≥99% purity was supplied by Fisher Scientific Ltd. (Loughborough, UK). Diethyl ether (≥99.8%) was purchased from Honeywell Riedel-de Haen GmbH, Seelze, Germany. Potassium iodide (≥99.0%), phosphoric acid (H3PO4) (49–51%), and sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3.5H2O) with 99% purity were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). HPLC-grade syringic acid ≥97%, and tyrosol (2-(4-hydroxyphenyl) ethanol) with ≥98% purity were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). LC-MS-grade methanol with ≥99.9% purity and acetonitrile with 100% purity were supplied by Fisher Scientific Ltd. (Loughborough, UK). Ultrapure water was obtained from a MilliQ system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).
For sensory analyses, watch glasses, odorless markers to mark the tasting glasses, tasting sheets, bottled water, apples, and standard cups were used following the standard procedure of the International Olive Council [31 ]; additionally, an air oven was used (Super M 1072, Barcelona, Spain) to maintain the temperature of the sample at 28 ± 2 °C before the analysis. Moreover, a balance (Sartorius AG120S, Göttingen, Germany) with a precision of +0.1 g, a thermometer for controlling the room temperature, and a thermometric probe (J. P. SELECTA, Barcelona, Spain) to measure the temperature of the samples were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «chloroform»

1

Multimodal Cellular Imaging Techniques

Poly-L-lysine solution (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), boric acid (Mallinckrodt Baker Inc., Paris, KY), Tris buffered saline (TBS,10X, Cellgro, Mediatech, Inc. Herndon, VA), ultra pure water (KD Medical, Columbia, MD), and Pyrex dishes, 100×20mm (CORNING, NY) were used. Fluorescent probes for staining mitochondria (Mito Traker Green FM; MTG), lysosomes (Lyso Tracker Red DND-99; LTR), Golgi apparatus (BODIPY FL C5-ceramide), endoplasmic reticulum (Rhodamine B, hexyl ester, perchlorate; R6), and nucleus (Hoechst 33342; HO342) were purchased from Molecular Probes Eugene, OR; cell membrane dye (PKH 26 Red Fluorescent cell linker kit, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO); Albumin, Bovine and Methyl-β-cyclodextrin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (1x, GIBCO/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), chloroform and methanol (Burdick&Jackson, Muskegon, MI) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

2

Protein Kinase Activity Assay

Protein G–Sepharose was from GE Healthcare. [γ-32P]ATP was from PerkinElmer. Agarose-conjugated anti-FLAG M2 antibody, Triton X-100, EDTA, EGTA, sodium orthovanadate, sodium glycerophosphate, sodium fluoride, sodium pyrophosphate, 2-mercaptoethanol, sucrose, benzamidine, Tween 20, Tris/HCl, sodium chloride, magnesium acetate and doxycyclin were from Sigma. PMSF was from Melford. Tissue culture reagents, Novex 4–12% Bis-Tris gels and NuPAGE LDS sample buffer was from Invitrogen. Ampicillin was from Merck. P81 phosphocellulose paper was from Whatman. Methanol and chloroform were from VWR Chemicals. Inhibitors GDC-0941 (Axon Medchem), GSK2334470 (Tocris), AZD8055 (Selleck) and BKM120 (Chemie Tek) were purchased from the indicated suppliers. VPS34-IN1 (1-[{2-[(2-chloropyridin-4yl)amino]-4′-(cyclopropylmethyl)-[4,5′-bipyrimidin]-2′-yl}amino]-2-methyl-propan-2-ol) was synthesized as described in patent WO 2012085815 A1 [Cornella Taracido, I., Harrington, E.M., Honda, A. and Keaney, E. (2012) Preparation of bipyrimidinamine derivatives for use as Vps34 inhibitors; method for synthesis of this compound is described on page 73, Table 4, example 16a.VPS34-IN1 has a CAS registry number 1383716-33-3].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : MRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, University of Dundee, AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)

3

RNA Extraction and Quantification for EBOV

Total RNA was isolated and purified from EBOV trVLP infected cells using a QIAGEN RNAeasy kit, while viral RNA was extracted from supernatants using a QIAGEN QIAmp Viral mini kit, both accordingly to the manufacturer’s instructions. Unless otherwise stated, 50ng of purified RNA was reverse transcribed by random hexamer primers using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). Alternatively, strand-specific reverse transcription was performed as shown before [28 (link)] to generate cDNAs for viral genomic RNA using a reverse primer directed against the trailer region of the genome (-vRNA, EBOV -vRNA RT primer), for complementary RNA using a forward primer targeting the trailer region as well (+cRNA, EBOV +cRNA RT primer), or viral mRNA using oligo dT. Of the reaction, 5μl were subjected to quantitative PCR using primer/probe sets for human Gapdh (Applied Biosystems), and EBOV trVLP 5’-trailer region, L-Pol RNA or VP40 RNA (primer/probe sequences in S4 Table). Quantitative PCRs were performed on a QuantStudio 5 System (Thermo Fisher) and absolute quantification data analyzed using Thermo Fisher’s Cloud Connect online software.
Input and pulldown samples from RNA immunoprecipitations were first resuspended in QIAzol (QIAGEN), and passed through QIAshredder columns (QIAGEN) for homogenization, and then passed to phase lock gel tubes (VWR) prior to addition of chloroform (SIGMA). After manually shaking the tubes, samples were centrifuged full-speed, for 15min at 4°C. The aqueous phase was passed to a new tube, and isopropanol added. After 10 minutes at room temperature, tubes were centrifuged as before and supernatants removed. RNA pellets were subsequently washed with 75% Ethanol, and spun at 7500xg, for 5 minutes at 4°C. Following aspiration of the supernatants, RNA pellets were left to dry and then resuspended in RNase-free water. Downstream processing for reverse transcription and quantitative RT-PCR was done as detailed above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : King's College London, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Imperial College London, MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research

4

Standardized Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

The main standards used in the analyses of phenolic compounds by LC–MS/MS, and all other relevant data were presented in detail in a previous work [9 (link)]. The additional standards were leontopodic acid A, cat. N 6026S, and leontopodic acid B, cat. N 6032S.
Chemicals applied for TPC, antioxidant activity assays (ATBS and DPPH): ethanol HPLC grade (Panreac, Barcelona, Spain), gallic acid, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent 2 N, Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid), DPPH• (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), sodium carbonate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), potassium persulfate and absolute ethanol (Neon, Suzano, SP, Brazil), and quercetin dihydrate (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH., Steinheim, Germany).
Chemicals used for the GC–FID analyses: Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix (CRM47885), toluene (pure, VWR International, France), sulfuric acid (98%, MerckKGaA, Germany), sodium chloride (pure, MerkKGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), potassium bicarbonate (pure, VWR International, Paris, France), chloroform (99.8% VWR International, Paris, France), sodium sulfate (pure, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany), and helium (99.9999%, Air Liquide A/S).
The rest of the reagents applied were of the highest purity: methanol ≥ 99.9%, ethanol ≥ 99.8% and n-hexane ≥ 99% were purchased from Honeywell Riedel-de-Haen (Seelze, Germany), ethyl acetate ≥ 99.5% from JLS-Chemie Handel GmbH (Hannover, Germany), methyl tert-butyl ether ≥ 99.8%, and acetonitrile ≥ 99.9% from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany) and bone dry grade CO2 (99.99% pure; No water, Messer, Sofia, Bulgaria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Chemical Engineering, University of Lisbon, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, University of Southern Denmark, Universidad Tecnológica de Aguascalientes, Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías

5

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis

Cellular RNA was isolated using RNAiso Plus (TAKARA, Kusatsu, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the cell pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of RNAiso Plus by pipetting, mixed with 0.1 mL chloroform (Amresco, Cleveland, OH, USA), and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were mixed with 0.25 mL 100% isopropanol, and isolated RNA pellets were washed with 70% ethanol and centrifuged at 7500× g for 5 min. Dried pellets were dissolved in 30 µL diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) water, and RNA was quantified while using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was prepared from RNA using a cDNA synthesis kit (PrimeScript™, TAKARA). qRT-PCR was performed to determine the RNA levels. The primer was mixed with distilled water and then placed in 384-wells. Template (cDNA) and SYBR green (TAKARA) were subsequently added, and then validated using PCR machine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Table S1 lists the genes of interest.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Gachon University, Jeju National University

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.