Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Freezing point microosmometer

Manufactured by Advanced Instruments
Sourced in United States
About the product

The Freezing Point Microosmometer is a laboratory instrument designed to measure the osmolality of small sample volumes. It operates on the principle of freezing point depression, determining the osmotic concentration of a solution by measuring the temperature at which it freezes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

15 protocols using «freezing point microosmometer»

1

Tilapia Cas9-OmB Cell Line Osmotic Stress Assay

2023
A tilapia Cas9-OmB cell line32 (link) previously generated in our lab was used in this study. The genomic presence and expression of Cas9 transgene was verified by an array of PCRs targeting transgene amplicons using both genomic DNA (gDNA) and complementary DNA (cDNA). Cas9-OmB cell working stock (passage 40 of the original OmB cell line42 (link); P40) was thawed and maintained at ambient CO2 and 26 °C in L-15 medium (Hyclone, SH30910.03) containing 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, 11415-064), 1% (vol/vol) Penicillin–Streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, P4333). When culture plates reached a confluency of 80–90%, cells were passaged (at 3–4-day intervals) using a 1:5 splitting ratio. For applying hyperosmotic stress to cells, hyperosmotic (650 mOsmol/kg) was prepared using hypersaline stock solution (osmolality: 2,820 mOsmol/kg). This stock solution was made by adding an appropriate amount of sodium chloride (NaCl) to regular isosmotic (310 mOsmol/kg) L-15 medium. The hypersaline stock solution was then diluted with isosmotic medium to obtain hyperosmotic medium of 650 mOsmol/kg. Medium osmolality was always confirmed using a freezing point micro-osmometer (Advanced Instruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Hyperosmotic Stress Response in O. mossambicus Brain Cell Line

2022
The O. mossambicus brain (OmB) cell line was subjected to all hyperosmotic stress challenges. L-15 medium containing 5% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% (vol/vol) penicillin-streptomycin at 26 °C was used to grow OmB cells at 2% CO2 as previously described [17 (link),18 (link)]. Using a large supply of OmB cell superstock (passage 15; P15), all experiments were conducted on OmB cells between P20 and P27. OmB cells were passaged every 3–4 days using a 1:5 splitting ratio and exposed to hyperosmotic medium (osmolality: 650 mOsmol/kg) during hyperosmotic stress challenge. The hyperosmotic medium was made by adding an appropriate volume of hyperosmotic stock solution (osmolality: 2820 mOsmol/kg) to isosmotic L15 medium (osmolality: of 315 mOsmol/kg). An appropriate amount of NaCl was added to isosmotic L-15 medium to prepare the hyperosmotic stock solution. Medium osmolality was measured by freezing point micro-osmometer (Advanced Instruments). All exposures were performed by acutely increasing medium osmolality from 315 to 650 mOsmol/kg for 24 h. Parallel handling controls were subjected to medium change without increasing the medium osmolality. Actinomycin D, a widely-used transcription initiation inhibitor [28 (link),29 (link)], was added at a concentration of 10 µM to a subset of hyperosmotically challenged OmB cells and isosmotic controls to analyze the contribution of transcriptional regulation in the hyperosmotic upregulation of protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Hyperosmotic Stress Response in Tilapia OmB Cells

The tilapia OmB cell line was used for all experiments and luciferase reporter assays. OmB cells were maintained in L-15 medium containing 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% (vol/vol) penicillin–streptomycin at 26 °C and 2% CO2. The purpose of FBS supplement is to support sufficient and reproducible OmB cell growth and potential variability issues derived from FBS (e.g. unknown components in FBS can interact with OmB cells or treatments) were minimized/resolved by employing proper controls in parallel with all treatments to isolate osmolality as the only variable factor. Even though FBS is not normally present in fish and has the potential to alter OmB cell responses to hyperosmolality, there is currently no alternative to the use of serum supplement for OmB cell culture and the vast majority of studies on virtually all vertebrate cell lines use FBS or, less commonly, a similar serum such as horse serum. Using a large supply of OmB cell superstock (passage 15; P15), all experiments were carried out on OmB cells between P18 to P26. Cells were passaged every 3–4 d using a 1:5 splitting ratio. For applying hyperosmotic stress to OmB cells, hyperosmotic (650 mOsmol/kg) medium was prepared using hypersaline stock solution (osmolality: 2,820 mOsmol/kg). This stock solution was made by adding an appropriate amount of NaCl to regular isosmotic (315 mOsmol/kg) L-15 medium. The hypersaline stock solution was then diluted with isosmotic medium to obtain hyperosmotic medium of 650 mOsmol/kg. Medium osmolality was always confirmed using a freezing point micro-osmometer (Advanced Instruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Confocal Imaging of Membrane Permeabilization

A cover slip with cells was transferred into a glass-bottomed chamber (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) mounted on an Olympus IX81 inverted microscope equipped with an FV 1000 confocal laser scanning system (Olympus America, Center Valley, PA). The chamber was filled with a buffer composed of (in mM): 136 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose (pH 7.4), with the addition of 5 µg/ml (7.5 µM) of Pr iodide and 1 µM of YP iodide. This ratio of concentrations was established empirically, in order to account for the different brightness of the dyes, enable their reliable detection, and minimize the chance of quenching (see section 3.2). The same concentrations are commonly used in membrane permeabilization studies with these dyes. For one experiment illustrated in Fig. 2, the buffer contained 43 µg/ml of Pr and no YP.
The buffer osmolality was at 290–300 mOsm/kg, as measured with a freezing point microosmometer (Advanced Instruments, Inc., Norwood, MA). The chemicals were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and Invitrogen (Eugene, OR).
Images were acquired with a 40×, NA 0.95 dry objective. YP and Pr were excited at 488 and 543 nm, and the emission was collected at 505–525 nm and 560–660 nm, respectively. The lasers were operated in a line sequence mode to avoid the “cross-talking” of the dyes.
The sensitivity of emission detectors (photomultiplier tubes, PMT) was chosen individually for different sets of experiments. For those summarized in Fig. 1, the sensitivity was relatively low, to cover a broad range of Pr uptake with possible pixel saturation only in digitonin-permeabilized cells. For Fig. 2, the PMT sensitivity was tuned as indicated in the figure legend. For experiments in Figs. 3-6 and Fig. 8, the sensitivity was set constant at the highest level which still prevented pixel saturation after the most intense nsEP treatment (100 pulses). Experiments presented in Fig. 7 were performed separately from the rest of the study and utilized somewhat different laser and PMT settings; calibrations shown if Fig. 3 do not apply to these data.
Stacks of images captured before and after pulsing (in most experiments, at regular 10-s intervals) were quantified with MetaMorph Advanced v.7.7.10.0 (Molecular Devices, Foster City, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Fluorescent Dye Imaging of Cellular Responses

A coverslip with cells was placed in a glass-bottomed chamber (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) mounted on an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope equipped with an FV 1000 confocal laser scanning system (Olympus America, Center Valley, PA). The chamber was filled with a physiological solution containing (in mM): 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 1 HEPES, 10 Glucose, X GdCl3, (pH 7.4 with NaOH) where X was varied from 0 to 1 mM. The concentration of HEPES was kept at a minimum to prevent precipitation of Gd3+ in the solution. The osmolality of the solution was between 290 and 310 mOsm/kg, as measured by a freezing point microosmometer (Advanced Instruments, Inc., Norwood, MA). The membrane-impermeable fluorescent dyes YP and Pr iodide were added to the solution at 1 μM and 5μg/mL, respectively. These dyes are non-fluorescent when in the chamber solution, but once they enter the cell, their emission increases profoundly upon binding to intracellular nucleic acids (20 (link)). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Where indicated in the text, the chamber was continuously perfused with the physiological solution (including the dyes) during the experiment, with a flow rate of 3 mL/min. All experiments were performed at room temperature (22 ± 2°C).
Differential-interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescent images were taken with a 40X, NA 0.95 dry objective as a time series beginning before nsEP exposure and continuing for up to 7 minutes after it. YP was excited with a blue laser (488 nm) and Pr was excited with a green laser (543 nm); the emission of each dye was detected between 505 and 525 nm or between 560 and 660 nm, respectively. To avoid “cross-talk” between the dyes, the lasers were operated in a line sequence mode. Images were quantified using MetaMorph Advanced v.7.7.0.0 (Molecular Devices, Foster City, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.