Kaempferol
Kaempferol is a chemical compound used as a lab equipment product. It is a type of flavonoid, a class of plant-based compounds. Kaempferol is primarily used in research and scientific applications.
Lab products found in correlation
Market Availability & Pricing
Kaempferol is an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) commercially available through authorized distributors from the Merck Group. It is offered in various quantities, with prices typically ranging from $77.40 for 10 mg to $1,550.00 for 500 mg when purchased through official channels.
Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.
Is this product still available?
Get pricing insights and sourcing optionsSpelling variants (same manufacturer)
Similar products (other manufacturers)
The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.
Product FAQ
1 107 protocols using «kaempferol»
DPPH Assay for Phenolic Compounds
Flavonoid Neuroprotection in LPS-Induced Inflammation
After the NGF-induced differentiation, the cells were exposed to 1 μg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h to induce an inflammatory response. Subsequently, the cells were treated with different NCs (experimental groups) and vehicles (control), and the cells without LPS treatment were called the normal-control group. The NCs were various flavonoid compounds, including astragalin, dihydromyricetin, coumarin, quercetin, luteolin, chrysin, kaempferol, and apigenin (Sigma-Aldrich), at concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 25, and 25 μM. The flavonoid compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich) and diluted in a culture medium, with the final DMSO concentration not exceeding 0.1%. After 24 h of flavonoid treatment, cell viability was assessed using a thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) lipid peroxidation assay kit (DoGenBio, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Cell viability was expressed as a percentage relative to the untreated control cells.
NGF-induced differentiated cells exposed to LPS in 6-well plates (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with flavonoid compounds (0, 5, and 25 μM) for 48 h. Lipid peroxidation and acetylcholinesterase activity were measured using TBARS and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) assay kits (DoGenBio, Seoul, Republic of Korea), respectively. The levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-1β were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA kits, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA, and Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, respectively).
Identification of Phenolic Compounds
Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation Protocol
Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Assays Protocol
Top 5 protocols citing «kaempferol»
Proteome Analysis of Kaempferol Treatment
Comprehensive Phytochemical and Antioxidant Analysis
Anti-hyperuricemic and Antioxidant Effects of Parsley
ReagentQuercetin, kaempferol, potassium oxonate, xanthine, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), uric acid, allopurinol, tetraethoxypropane (TEP), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and bicinchoninic acid kit were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (Steinheim, Germany). All other reagents were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The reagents used were from of analytical grades. Parsley (Petroselinum crispum) leaves were collected from a same vegetable garden, Tabriz, Iran. The following study was conducted in the Department of Nutrition and Biochemistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, between May 2007 and October 2008.
Test compound preparationParsley (Petroselinum crispum) leaves were carefully washed with water and left to dry at room temperature. Then they were weighted and completely blended in distilled water (1 : 1 w/v). Quercetin and kaempferol were dissolved in propylene glycol (17 (link)). allopurinol used as a positive control, was prepared in 0.9% saline. All freshly prepared juicy samples were administrated to the corresponding groups by oral gavage once a day for 2 weeks.
AnimalsA total of 60 male Wistar rats (body weights: 180-200 g) were obtained from the animal house of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. They were fed with a commercial laboratory diet and allowed food and water ad libitum for an acclimatization period of 1 week prior to the experiment. All animals were maintained on a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle and the temperature and humidity were kept at 18 ± 1°C and 50%, respectively. They were handled according to the recommendation of the local and national ethic committees.
Animal model of hyperuricemia in ratsExperimentally-induced hyperuricemia in rats (due to inhibition of uricase with potassium oxonate) was used to study antihyperuricemic and antioxidant effects of test compounds (16 (link)). Briefly, 250 mg/Kg, uricase inhibitor, potassium oxonate (PO), dissolved in 0.9% saline solution was administrated intraperitoneally to each animal 1 h before oral administration of test compounds.
Exprimental designThe animals were randomly divided into ten equal groups (n = 6). group 1: untreated, non- hyperuricemic animals; group 2: normal animals given 5 g/Kg parsley; group 3: normal animals given 5 mg/Kg kaempferol; group 4: normal animals given 5 mg/Kg quercetin; group 5: normal animals given 5 mg/Kg allopurinol; group 6: hyperuricemic animals; group 7: hyperuricemic animals given 5 g/Kg parsley; group 8: hyperuricemic animals given 5 mg/Kg kaempferol; group 9: hyperuricemic animals given 5 mg/Kg quercetin; group 10: hyperuricemic animals given 5 mg/Kg allopurinol.
Sample preparationBlood sample was taken from each rat by cutting the tail tip 1 h after the test compound administration at first, 7th and 14th days of the study. Serum was obtained by centrifuging blood sample at 6000 rpm for 10 min. For HPLC analysis, the serum was filtered using SPARTAN 13/0.45 RC, Watman. The sera were stored at -20°C until use. At the end of the experiment, rats were anesthetized between 09.00 and 10.00 am. Their livers were removed, weighed and then rapidly washed in cold saline (0.9%) and placed in ice-cold isotonic potassium chloride solution (1.15% KCl w/v) containing 0.1 mM EDTA. The livers were then chopped into 4-5 volumes of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and homogenized by a homogenizer fitted with a Teflon pestle. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min, the lipid layer was carefully removed, and the resulting supernatant fraction was further centrifuged at 15,000 g for 60 min at 4°C. The supernatant was stored at -20°C until use. At the end of the experiment, rats were anesthetized between 09.00 and 10.00 am. Their livers were removed, weighed and then rapidly washed in cold saline (0.9%) and placed in ice-cold isotonic potassium chloride solution (1.15% KCl w/v) containing 0.1 mM EDTA. The livers were then chopped into 4-5 volumes of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and homogenized by a homogenizer fitted with a Teflon pestle. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min, the lipid layer was carefully removed, and the resulting supernatant fraction was further centrifuged at 15,000 g for 60 min at 4°C. The supernatant was stored at -80°C till the use time (18 (link)-20 (link)).
Uric acid determinationThe serum uric acid levels were analyzed by the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method using a system supplied by Waters Associates, Northwich, Cheshire which consisted of a Waters 515 pump, Waters 717 plus Autosampler, Waters 2487, Dual λ Absorbance Detector. The mobile phase was a mixture of 100 mM KH2PO4 (pH 3.5): Methanol (97:3, v/v).
Separations were performed on a C-18 column (Perfectsil Target ODS-3 (5 μM), 250´ 4.6 mm) with a C-18 guard column (Perfectsil Target ODS-3 (5 μM), 10´ 4 mm). The effluent was monitored by UV detection at 290 nm at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Standard solutions of uric acid in the range of 0.1 to 20 mg/dL were prepared in mobile phase. Serum uric acid concentrations were expressed as mg/dL. 6-Mercaptopurine (1 mM) was used as the internal standard (21 (link)).
XO and XDH activity determinationThe XO and XDH activity were measured spectrophotometrically by monitoring the production of uric acid from xanthine according to Prajda and Weber’s method (22 (link)). In the case of XDH, the assay mixture consisted of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 200 µM NAD+, and 100 µL of the enzyme solution. After preincubation at 37°C for 15 min, the reaction was initiated by the addition of the substrate solution. After 30 min, the reaction was terminated by adding 0.5 mL HCl (0.6 M), and the absorbance was measured at 290 nm using a Shimadzu 2550 UV/VIS spectrophotometer which was controlled by the Shimadzu UV Probe personal software package including kinetics software. The instrument was connected to a Shimadzu cell temperature control unit. XO activity was measured using a similar method described for XDH with the difference being that molecular oxygen was used in place of NAD+ as electron acceptor. One unit (U) of activity was defined as 1 nmole of uric acid formed per min at 37°C, pH 7.4.
Protein determinationProtein concentration was determined spectrophotometrically by bicinchoninic acid kit using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Total antioxidant capacity assayThe total antioxidant capacity of serum was determined by measuring its ability to reduce ferric ions (Fe3+) to ferrous form (Fe2+) by the FRAP (Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma) test. The FRAP assay measures the change in absorbance at 593 nm owing to the formation of a blue colored Fe2+-tripyridyltriazine compound from Fe3+ by the action of electron donating antioxidants. The FRAP reagent consists of 300 μmole/mL acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 10 μmolee/mL tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ) in 40 μmole/mL HCl and 20 μmole/mL FeCl3 in the ratio of 10:1:1. Briefly, 30 μL of serum was added to 1.0 mL freshly prepared and prewarmed (37°C) FRAP reagent in a test tube and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The absorbance of the blue colored complex was read against a reagent blank (1.0 mL FRAP reagent + 30 μL distilled water) at 593 nm. Standard solutions of Fe2+ in the range of 10 to 1000 μmole/L were prepared from ferrous sulphate in water. FRAP values were expressed as μmole Fe3+ reduced to Fe2+ per liter (23 (link)).
Lipid peroxide determinationLipid peroxide in the serum was measured using Yoshioka method (24 (link)). Briefly, 0.5 mL serum was shaken with 2.5 mL of 20% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in a 10 mL centrifuge tube. 1 mL of 0.67% TBA was added to the mixture, shaken, and warmed for 60 min in a boiling water bath followed by rapid cooling. Then it was shaken into a 4 mL of n-butanol layer in a separation tube and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in the serum was determined at 532 nm by spectrophotometer against n-butanol. The standards of 0.1 to 20 μmole/L tetraethoxypropane (TEP) were used. The results were expressed as μmole/L serum.
Statistical analysisAll the samples and standards were run in duplicate and the results were expressed as mean ± SD. The statistical comparison between the experimental groups was performed by independent-sample t-test using SPSS computer program. The probabilities of 5% or less (p ≤ 0.05) were considered significant.
HPLC-DAD-MS Analysis of Bioactive Compounds
5 mg of DE (MeOH) was re-dissolved in 1 mL of MeOH and 5 mg of DE (H2O) was re-dissolved in 1 mL of MeOH:H2O (10:90; v:v). After filtration through 0.45 µm nylon membrane filters, 10 μL of sample was injected.
Standards of caffeic acid, 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid; CAS No. 327-97-9), 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid, kaempferol, quercetin, and rutin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain) and individual stock solutions (500–1000 mg L−1) were prepared in MeOH. LC-MS grade acetonitrile (Panreac; Barcelona, Spain) and ultrapure water (Milli-Q Waters purification system; Millipore; Milford, MA, USA) were also used. We prepared calibration curves for caffeic acid, 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid, chlorogenic acid, kaempferol, quercetin, and rutin at concentrations 0.5–100 µg mL−1 in MeOH. Chromatograms were recorded at 320 nm for caffeic acid, 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid and chlorogenic acid, and 350 nm for kaempferol, quercetin, and rutin. Peak area (at the corresponding wavelength) was plotted versus analyte concentration to construct the calibration graphs.
Zika Virus Progeny Production Assay
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!