Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

The VCX 750 ultrasonic processor is currently available from Sonics & Materials Inc. through authorized distributors. Prices for this model typically range from $5,757.69 to $7,962.97 based on information from secondary markets.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

377 protocols using «vcx 750»

1

MALDI-TOF MS Profiling of Mycobacterium abscessus

2025
Mycobacterium abscessus isolates were cultured on blood agar (Clinag Co., Limited, Thailand) for five days at 37 °C. A full loop (5-10 mg) of the culture was then transferred to a microcentrifuge tube containing 400 µ L of TE buffer. This tube was heated at 95 °C for 30 minutes and then frozen at -20 °C for one hour. After thawing at room temperature, the sample was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 2 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, and 900 µ L of ethanol was added. The sample was centrifuged again at 13,000 rpm for 2 minutes, and the supernatant was removed. The cells were washed with 900 µ L of sterile water and ethanol, each time followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 2 minutes. After the washing steps, the supernatant was discarded, and the sample was allowed to dry at room temperature. Glass beads of the same volume as the pellet, 20 µ L of formic acid and 20 µ L of acetonitrile were added. The sample was homogenized with an Ultrasonic processor VCX-750 (Sonics, Sonics & Materials, Inc.) for 5 minutes and then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Before analysis, 1 µ L of the supernatant was placed on a MALDI target plate and allowed to dry at room temperature. Then, 1 µ L of HCCA (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) was added to the MALDI target plate and also allowed to dry at room temperature. The MALDI target plate was analyzed using an auto-flex max within an hour.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Sonication of Biomaterial with Raloxifene

2025
The sonification of the biomaterial followed a prior protocol [11 (link)]. For the preparation of the biomaterial, the CBS and CBRS groups underwent a sonication. The 20% proportion of raloxifene to the CBRS group was determined based on our previous studies [10 (link),11 (link),12 (link)]. Thus, for every 0.8 g of CB, 0.2 g of solid raloxifene was added, ensuring the homogeneous incorporation of raloxifene into the CB biomaterial, as previously validated [11 (link)]. The sonication was performed using the Sonics® VCX-750 device for approximately 15 min. The sonication parameters adopted were power of 750 W; frequency of 20 kHz; and 40% of the nominal amplitude of the equipment.
To achieve a homogeneous system and reduce the particle size, ultrapure Milli-Q® water was used. The ultrapure Milli-Q® water allowed the cavitation bubbles to have greater solvent vapor, thus accelerating the effect of acoustic cavitation. During this process, a probe ultrasound was used, oscillating at a fixed frequency and variable potential. The rapid oscillation of this probe produced a high-energy field in the fluid. The ultrapure Milli-Q® water used in this experiment served as a solvent for the solutes. Once this processing was completed, the samples were left to dry at 60 °C for a period of 8 h. A sterilization process was conducted using ultraviolet light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Synthesis of Silica-TiO2 Nanocomposite

2025
Silica nanostructures (60 mg) derived from Pennisetum glaucum residues and TiO2 nanoparticles (40 mg) were mixed with 200 mL of 5% gum arabic aqueous solution. Next, the mixture was sonicated at 750 W at 20 kHz for 30 min using a probe ultrasonicator (VCX-750, Sonics, Newtown, CT, USA). The obtained colloid was dried at 60 °C. Following that, the obtained material was used for further studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Purification of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

2025
2.0 mg of the SWCNTs was added to a vial containing 2.5 mL of aqueous 1.0 wt % SC (≥98 %). The mixture was sonicated for 3 h at an amplitude of 20 % (Sonics VCX 750 ultrasonic processor equipped with tapered microtip). The resulting dispersion was centrifuged at 210,000 g for 1 h in a high‐speed centrifuge equipped with an angle rotor (S58 A, Koki Holdings Co., Ltd.; micro ultracentrifuge CS 100FNX). Then, 2.0 mL of aqueous 2.0 wt % sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; ≥97 %) was added to the supernatant solution, followed by separation via high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The separation was performed using a JASCO ChromNAV system equipped with a JASCO LC‐Net II interface, a JASCO PU‐2089i gradient inert pump, a JASCO MD‐4010 photodiode array detector, a CO‐4060 column oven (23 °C), and a column (φ10 mm×200 mm) filled with gel (Sephacryl S‐200, Cytiva). The flow rate was 2.0 mL min−1 and the SWCNT dispersion sample injection volume was 3 mL. The eluent was an aqueous solution containing 0.5 wt % SC +0.5 wt % SDS +X wt % sodium deoxycholate (DOC) (>96 %). Fractions were collected at 5 mL intervals using a fraction collector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Microplastic-Induced Cytotoxicity Quantification

2025
The effect of different concentrations of PS microplastics on LDH release was measured using the CyQUANT LDH Cytotoxicity assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. After incubation for 24 h, 50 μl of the supernatant was added to a 96-well plate. For maximum LDH release, 108 CFU/ml cells were lysed in an ice bath using a tip sonicator (VCX 750, Sonics & Materials, Inc., USA) at a duty cycle of 16.7% (10 s sonication and 50 s rest) for 20 min. The sonicated sample was added to a 96 well-plate, followed by addition of 50 μl of the substrate mixture and incubation without agitation at ambient temperature in the dark for 30 min. Then, 50 μl of the stop solution was added, absorbance was acquired with a spectrophotometer at 490 nm and 680 nm (background), and the difference in absorbance at these two wavelengths was determined. The LDH release was calculated using the LDH activity of the PS-treated sample (LDHT), spontaneous LDH activity (LDHS), and maximum LDH activity (LDHM):
LDH(%)=LDHTLDHSLDHMLDHS×100
The LDH release of each sample (LDHSample) was then expressed relative to the negative control (LDHNC) that had no microplastics:
Relative LDH(%)=LDHSampleLDHNC×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «vcx 750»

1

Quantification of Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Planktonic and Biofilm Cultures

The EPS was extracted using a modification of the sonication method described previously [45 (link),46 ]. This modification was based on the work of Vandevivere and Kirchman [47 (link)]. Briefly, planktonic samples were prepared using 5 mL overnight culture of PA14 cells (OD at 595 nm, ~1.5) with appropriate concentrations of ginger (1~10%). The cultured cells were then harvested via centrifugation at 8,000 × g and resuspended in 10 mL 0.01 M KCl. Biofilm samples, on the other hand, were prepared by also using the overnight culture. The aliquot was diluted with fresh AB medium (1:20) with appropriate amounts of ginger extract. Then, 3 ml of the dilution were aliquoted into borosilicate bottles and incubated at 37°C for 24 h without agitation. The suspended cultures were measured by spectrophotometer at OD 595 nm then discarded. The bottles were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (pH = 7.2) to remove any remaining suspended cells. Biofilm cells on the wall were removed by vortexing and scraping after addition of 3 ml 0.01 M KCl. The next steps in processing were the same for both planktonic and biofilm cells and are as follows. The cells were disrupted with a sonicator (VCX 750, SONICS, Newtown, CT, USA) for 4 cycles of 5 s of operation and 5 s of pause at a power level of 3.5 Hz. The sonication method did not result in significant cell lysis. This was confirmed by conducting a cell counting experiment in which the number of dead cells after sonication was less than 10% (Figure S1). The sonicated suspension was centrifuged (4,000 × g, 20 min, 4°C), and the supernatant was then filtered through a 0.22-µm membrane filter (Millex® filter, Carl Roth). The amounts of protein and carbohydrate in the filtrate were analyzed. For the analysis of protein, 40µL filtrate was aliquoted onto a 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate, and 200 µL Lowry reagent (L3540, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was added to the aliquots. After 10 min of incubation at room temperature, 20 µL Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (L3540, Sigma Aldrich) was added to the mixture. After another 30 min of incubation at room temperature, absorbance at 750 nm was measured using the iMark microplate reader. The amount of protein was quantified by dividing OD at 750 nm by OD at 595 nm.
Carbohydrate was analyzed in a manner similar to that used to quantify protein. Fifty microliters of the filtrate were aliquoted in a 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate, and 150 µL 99.9% sulfuric acid was added to the aliquots. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature, 5% phenol was added to the mixture. After another 5 min of incubation at 90°C in the water bath, absorbance at 490 nm was measured using the iMark microplate reader. The amount of carbohydrate was quantified by dividing OD at 490 nm by OD at 595 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Ultrasound-Assisted Nanoemulsion Formulation

Nanoemulsions were prepared by ultrasound treatment with EPS as an emulsifier, PEG400 as a co-emulsifier, liquid paraffin oil as an oil phase, and NYS as the drug. EPS was dissolved in distilled water, then PEG400 was added and vortexed (QL-901, China, Aomen) for 5 min. NYS was weighed and dissolved in liquid paraffin oil, and added into the EPS solution and vortexed for 5 min to obtain raw EPS/NYS emulsions. The emulsions were ultrasonicated (SONICS, VCX750) using a 3 mm diameter probe and an interval time of 5 s on, 5 s off. Throughout the ultrasound treatment, the container containing the sample was in an ice bath, and temperature difference in the system was less than 20°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Synthesis of mPEGylated Lipid-based Micelles

The DTX-loaded LsbMDDs was prepared following previously reported procedures with minor modifications to introduce mPEGylation with DSPE-PEG2K or DSPE-PEG5K into the outer shell portion of micelles (Chen et al., 2015 (link); Su et al., 2018 (link)). In brief, a fixed drug (DTX)/amphiphilic polymer (DSPE-PEG2K) ratio of 1:5 with the addition of an appropriate amount of TPGS as an antioxidant was first dissolved in methanol, and a thin film was formed after evaporation (Rotavapor R124; Buchi, Flawil, Switzerland) of the organic solvent. Soybean lecithin (S100) at 1000 and 375 mg of DSPE-PEG5K (or DSPE-PEG2K) were suspended in 25 mL of deionized water and then subjected to ultrasonication (VCX 750, 20 kHz, Sonics and Materials, Market Harborough, United Kingdom) to form a lecithin/DSPE-PEG (2K or 5K) nanosuspension. Then 1 mL of the lecithin/DSPE-PEG (2K or 5K) nanosuspension was used to hydrate the thin film obtained above, and the reconstituted mixture was further subjected to ultrasonication at full power for at least 5 min while maintaining a constant temperature to form lecithin-stabilized NCs in the solution. Any unencapsulated drug was discarded by filtering this NC solution through a 0.22-μm membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). An appropriate amount of an anti-freeze agent was added to the filtrate and then freeze-dried to obtain the dry powder form of NCs. Two amphiphilic polymers of DSPE-PEG2K and DSPE-PEG5K with different PEG chain lengths were used to formulate the DTX-loaded mPEGylated LsbMDDs, respectively, designated DTX-loaded LsbMDDs(2K) and DTX-loaded LsbMDDs(5K). To prepare the DIO (green fluorescence for in vitro assays)-loaded or DIR (near-infrared fluorescence for in vivo imaging)-loaded LsbMDDs, we followed the same procedure as that for the DTX-loaded LsbMDDs except that the DTX was replaced with either DIO or DIR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Sonochemical Synthesis of SbSI Nanowires

SbSI nanowires were prepared via a sonochemical method [42 (link)] from the constituents, i.e., the elements—antimony, sulfur, and iodine weighed in the stoichiometric ratio. The component mixture was immersed at room temperature and ambient pressure in ethanol. The reagents were put into a polyethylene/polypropylene cylinder. The vessel was closed during the experiment to prevent volatilization of the precipitant during the longer test times. The cylinder was partly submerged in water in a cup-horn ultrasonic reactor (750 Watt ultrasonic processor VCX-750 with a sealed VC-334 converter (Sonics & Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA)). The reagents were irradiated by ultrasounds with 20 kHz frequency and 565 W/cm2 power density for 2 h. The temperature of sonolysis was 323 K. Further experimental details of the applied procedure are described in previous works [42 (link),43 (link)]. When the sonochemical process was completed, the ethanol was evaporated off giving a SbSI xerogel.
The structure of individual SbSI nanowire was analyzed using a high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). These investigations were completed at 300 kV accelerating voltage on a JEOL-JEM 3010 microscope (Peabody, MA, USA) with point-to-point resolution of 0.17 nm. The procedure of sample preparation was the same as described in [42 (link),43 (link)]. The morphology of aligned SbSI nanowires was studied at acceleration voltage of 10 kV on Phenom Pro X (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) scanning electron microscope (SEM).
The optical diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) was carried out using the apparatus described in [42 (link)]. DRS spectra were recorded at 296 K in the wavelength range from 350 to 1000 nm. The diffuse reflectance values Rd were converted to the Kubelka–Munk function (FK–M) [44 ], known to be proportional to the absorption coefficient α.
The procedure of the FE-PV device preparation can be summarized as follows. Alumina chip #103 (Electronics Design Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA) was used as substrate. It was equipped with platinum interdigitated electrodes separated by a gap of 250 μm. A substrate with platinum electrodes was chosen due to the fact that the energy level of the Pt electrode is close to Fermi energy in the p-type SbSI semiconductor [45 (link),46 (link)], which should influence a relatively high zero-bias photocurrent [38 (link)]. Symmetric electrodes were used to eliminate the effects of different work functions and asymmetric Schottky-Ohmic contacts on the photovoltaic properties of SbSI. In the first step of device preparation, SbSI xerogel was dispersed uniformly in toluene using the ultrasonic reactor IS-UZP-2 (InterSonic, Olsztyn, Poland). Then a droplet of dispersed solution was placed onto the #103 chip using an insulin syringe equipped with a 31 G needle. The direct current (DC) electric field of 5∙× 105 V/m was applied to the electrodes during the deposition of SbSI sol in order to align the nanowires perpendicularly to the electrodes. Each single coating process was followed by sample drying for toluene evaporation. It was realized at room temperature for 5 min in 830-ABC/EXP glove box (Plas-Labs Products). The steps from sol deposition to sample drying were repeated 15 times. The SbSI FE-PV device, prepared according to the procedure mentioned above, had lateral architecture, in which a photocurrent could be measured along the polarization direction.
Dark current and the photocurrent were detected by a Keithley 6430 Sub-Femtoamp Remote SourceMeter equipped with a low noise probe station (Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR, USA). The acquisition of the data was realized using a PC computer with a GPIB (General Purpose Interface Bus) and an appropriate program in LabView (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). All electrical measurements were performed in a test chamber in a vacuum (p = 2·× 10−3 Pa) produced by TW70H turbomolecular vacuum pump (Prevac, Rogow, Poland) in order to eliminate the influence of humidity [47 (link)] and gas adsorption [2 (link),7 (link)] on electrical properties of SbSI nanowires. A constant operating temperature T = 268 K of the SbSI FE-PV device was maintained using a HAAKE DC30 thermostat with a Kessel HAAKE K20 circulator (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and Pt-100 sensor with 211 temperature controller (Lake Shore, Columbus, OH, USA). Measurements of photocurrent were carried out under illumination with monochromatic light (λ = 488 nm) from Reliant 50 s argon laser (Laser Physics, Milton Green, UK), which covered the whole sample area between the electrodes. The neutral filters UV–NIR-FILTER-250–2000 nm (Quartzglas-Substrate, Oriel) were applied to change the optical power density (Popt). The values of Popt were determined using S-2387 silicon photodiode (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) in a short-circuit regime with a Keithley 6517A electrometer. Prior to the photocurrent measurements, the SbSI FE-PV device was poled by cooling from 320 to 268 K under an external electric field of ±106 V/m to align the polarization in one direction, hereafter indicated as positive (+P) or negative poling (−P).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Optimized Expression and Purification of Pernisine Enzyme

The purified expression vectors were transformed into the competent BL21(DE3) E. coli strain. In addition, the pernisinewt-containing vectors were transformed into the BL21(DE3)pLysE, BL21(DE3)pMAGIC [FompT hsdS(rBmB) dcm+Tetrgal λ(DE3) endA Hte] and BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)RIL [FompT hsdS(rBmB) dcm+Tetrgal λ(DE3) endA Hte [argU ileY leuW Camr]
E. coli strains and plated in the appropriate selection medium. The selected transformants were grown as a mini-scale batch (10 ml LB medium) and the plasmids were purified using GenElute plasmid miniprep kits (Sigma). The DNA was sequenced (Macrogene), and the transformants with confirmed pernisine DNA were used for large-scale expression (4.0 L LB medium).
A single colony was cultivated overnight at 37°C in 25 ml LB medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic, under constant agitation at 240 rpm. The next day, 475 ml fresh LB medium containing the appropriate antibiotic was added to 25 ml of the overnight culture. When the cells reached an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.6 to 0.8, expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside. The culture growth times after this induction ranged from 1 h to 4 h, as optimised initially by the detection of pernisine on dot blots. The cells were centrifuged (6,000x g, 20 min, 4°C) and resuspended in 25 ml lysis buffer (30 mM Tris-HCl, 0.3 M NaCl, 1 mg ml-1 lysozyme, pH 7.5). The cells were then lysed by sonication (amplitude 40%; 10 s on, 10 s off; 120 s; VCX 750 by Sonics), and centrifuged (19,000x g, 20 min, 4°C). The supernatants were used for analysis and purification of pernisine. The pellets were resuspended in 4 M urea and subjected to SDS-PAGE, for determination of the insoluble pernisine fraction.
N-terminal His6-tagged pernisine was purified using Ni2+-Sepharose 6 FF columns (GE Healthcare), followed by size exclusion chromatography using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 preparative grade column (GE Healthcare). The unbound samples were washed out with 20 column volumes of binding buffer (20 mM Na2HPO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.4), and the bound samples were eluted with the same buffer containing 500 mM imidazole. The eluted proteins were applied directly onto the size exclusion column, which was equilibrated with 30 mM Tris HCl, 0.3 M NaCl, pH 7.4. The pernisine fractions were collected, dialysed (SPECTRA/POR, MWCO 8–10 kDa) in 10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, for 4 h, and lyophilised (Christ alpha 1-2LD Plus, Germany). All of the purification procedures were performed at 4°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.