Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

25 protocols using «sodium sulphite»

1

Synthesis and Characterization of Organic Compounds

2024
Trisodium citrate dihydrate
(99%+), thioacetamide (99%+), acetonitrile (CH3CN), and
1,2-dibenzoyl-1,4-butanedione (DB-one) were purchased from Fisher
Scientific International, Inc. 2-Phenoxy-1-phenylethanol (PP-ol) and
2-phenoxyacetophenone (PP-one) were purchased from Fluorochem Ltd.
5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO), Cd(NO3)2·4H2O (98%), phenol, acetophenone, sodium sulfide
nonahydrate (98%+), sodium persulfate (99%), sodium sulphite (98.5%),
D-mannitol, (3-Bromopropyl) trimethoxysilane (BPTMOS), TEA and Sodium
hydrosulfide hydrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co., Ltd. 2-(2-Methoxyphenoxy)-1-phenylethanol
(MP-ol), 2-phenoxy-1-phenylpropane-1,3-diol (PPP-ol), 1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)propane-1,3-diol
(DMP-ol), and Phenethoxybenzene (PEB) was purchased from BLD Pharmatech
Ltd. Ethylene glycol (EG) was purchased from VWR International, LLC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Evaluation of Antioxidant Compounds

2023
Acetone (99.9%), glacial acetic acid (99.8%), acetonitrile (99.9%), absolute ethanol, methanol (LC-MS grade), HCl (37%), chloroform, and sodium hydroxide were obtained from PanReac (Barcelona, Spain). Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, ABTS•+ (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl), gallic acid, quercetin, cyanidin-3 glucoside, β-carotene, aluminium chloride, potassium bromide, potassium persulfate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium borate, sodium sulphate, sodium sulphite, cetrimonium bromide, citric acid, malic acid, and PMP (1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone) were acquired from Merck (Madrid, Spain). Pure compounds for the identification of monosaccharides, enzymes and electrolytes for in vitro digestion were also purchased from Merck. Bacterial strains Lactobacillus casei CECT 475 and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis CECT 185, as well as their respective culture media, were obtained from the Spanish Type Culture Collection (CECT) and PanReac, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Isolation and Characterization of Ficus nekbudu Bark

2023
The ficus nekbudu bark was obtained from Mbinga district in southern Tanzania. The bark was peeled from the stem of the ficus nekbudu tree and then packed in a plastic bag for transportation to laboratory for further processes. Analytical grade chemicals used such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH), acetic acid (CH3COOH), sulphuric acid, dichloromethane, ethanol, sodium sulphite, sulphuric acid, hydrogen peroxide and xylene were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
Equipment: Microbalance (Metter Toledo density balance) with accuracy of ±0.0001 g/cm 3
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Breast Cancer Cell Line Cultivation

2023
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) powder with high glucose (without sodium bicarbonate) and DMEM liquid were procured from Sigma (USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin-ethylene diamine tetra acetate (Trypsin–EDTA) and penicillin–streptomycin were purchased from Gibco BRL (California, USA); sodium bicarbonate, sodium sulphite, calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2.2H2O), dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reagent were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). The plasmids encoding BRCA1 (catalog no. 61586) and BRCA2 (catalog no. 16245) tumor suppressor genes were ordered from ‘Addgene’ (USA), where pcBRCA1-385 was a gift from Lawrence Brody and pCIN BRCA2 WT was a gift from Mien-Chie Hung41 ,42 . The antibiotic, ampicillin (Fisher Scientific), Luria Bertani (LB) agar from Merck (Germany) and LB broth were procured from Laboratorios CONDA (Spain). Two human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231, one mouse breast cancer cell line 4T1 were obtained from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA). For Western Blotting, Tween-20 and Pierce ECL Western blot detection reagents were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Hercules, CA, USA). Dithiothreitol (DTT) (Bio-Rad), bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Merck, USA), protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail were obtained from Sigma. Monoclonal IgG primary antibodies raised in rabbit for phospho-MAPK, total MAPK, GAPDH, and the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody were from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Enzymatic Assays for Cellulase and Xylanase Activities

2023
Enzymatic assays were performed on enzymatic extracts to determine both cellulase and xylanase activities of every isolated fungal strain, using the DNS method [75 (link)]. Briefly, this method allows the measurement of reducing sugar production by enzymatic extract from a substrate of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and wheat arabinoxylan (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) for cellulase- and xylanase-assays, respectively. Both substrates, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and arabinoxylan, were prepared at 1% in 0.05 M pH 5.3 sodium citrate buffer (citric acid 21 g/L, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium, and sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate 29.6 g/L, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). A solution of DNS 1% was prepared (DNS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 1%; Phenol, Fluka, Honeywell, Charlotte, NC, USA, 0.2%; sodium sulphite, Sigma-Aldrich, 0.05%; NaOH, Fluka, 1%). Commercial enzymatic solutions were used as control, being solutions of 1% cellulase and 1% xylanase from T. longibrachiatum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Reaction consisted of mixing 1.8 mL of substrate solution with 200 µL of enzymatic solution (fungal extract or control), heating this mix at 50 °C during 5 min, adding 3 mL of 1% DNS solution, heating the mix at 100 °C during 15 min, and reading the OD at 540 nm (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) after a cooling step of tubes in cold water. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme allowing the release of 1 µmol of product (xylose for xylanase and glucose for cellulase) per minute in the assay condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «sodium sulphite»

1

Hyaluronic Acid Cross-Linking for Biomaterial Development

Hyaluronic acid (MW 60 kDa) was purchased from Lifecore Biomedical (Chaska, MN). 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), cystamine dihydrochloride (Cys), dithiotheritol (DTT), glycine, sodium sulphite, sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The FF and RSM experiments were designed using Design-Expert® software, version 7, Stat-Ease (Minneapolis, MN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Isolation and Analysis of Mouse Chromosome 21

Chromosomes were prepared as described previously [35] (link) and stained overnight with Hoechst (HO, Sigma) and chromomycin A3 (CA3, Sigma). The stained chromosomes were treated overnight to a final concentration of 25 mM sodium sulphite (Sigma) and 10 mM sodium citrate (Sigma) before flow analysis and sorting.
Stained chromosome suspensions were analyzed on a flow cytometer (Mo-Flo®, Beckman Coulter) equipped with two water-cooled lasers (Coherent, Innova 300 series) as described previously [35] (link). The fluorescence of HO, CA3, forward scatter (FSC) and pulse width parameters were collected. A gated region was set on the plot of linear FSC versus linear pulse width to exclude clumps and debris (Fig. S1a), and the bivariate plot of HO versus CA3 fluorescence was gated on this region (Fig. S1b). A total of 100,000 events were acquired and analyzed using Summit analysis software. This is the first published flow karyogram for the Tc1 mouse (Fig. S1b).
The stained chromosome suspension was flow sorted at a data rate of 8,000–10,000 events per sec as described previously [36] (link). 250,000 copies of chromosome 21 were flow sorted in chromosome sheath buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM sodium azide) into a sterile UV treated 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes with a final volume of 250 µl.
DNA was extracted by incubation with 6/100 volume 0.25 M EDTA/10% sodium lauroyl sarcosine and 1/100 volume proteinase K (20 mg/ml) overnight at 42°C. This was followed by incubation with 1/100 volume phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF, 4 mg/ml) for 40 minutes at room temperature. The DNA was then precipitated with the addition of 4/100 volume of NaCl (5 M), 8/1000 volume of pellet paint (Novagen) and 3 volume of 100% ethanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Synthesis of Quinoline Derivatives

Perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic dianhydride 97% (PTCDA), 2-ethyl-1-hexylamine 98%, bromine ≥99.99%), fuming nitric acid >90%, 4-styryl boronic acid ≥95%, phenyl boronic acid ≥97%, magnesium sulphate anhydrous >99.5% (MgSO4), sodium sulphite >98% Na2SO3 were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, 64293, Germany). Tetrahydrofuran was purchased also from Merck and was freshly distilled with benzophenone and metallic sodium (THF (dry)). All other solvents and reagents were purchased from Aldrich or Alfa Aesar and were used without further purification unless otherwise stated. 4-(2-tetrahydropyranyloxy) phenylboronic acid [41 (link)], 6-Bromo phenyl-(2-perfluorophenyl)-4-phenyl-quinoline (Br5FQ) [32 (link)], 6-phenyl-(2-perfluorophenyl)-4-phenyl-quinoline (Ph-5FQ) [33 (link)] 6-bromo-(2-pyridinyl)-4-phenyl-quinoline (Br-QPy) [35 (link)] and the catalyst palladium (II) tetrakis triphenyl2phosphine [Pd (PPh3)4] [47 ] were synthesized according to published procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Synthesis of Dicationic Surfactants

The synthesis of dichain surfactants has been described before. 19 The materials used were 2,2-Dimethyl-1-propanol (Aldrich 99%), (Trimethylsilyl)Methanol (Aldrich 98%), 3,3-Dimethyl-1butanol (Aldrich 98%) 2-(Trimethylsilyl)ethanol (Aldrich 99%) and 3-(Trimethylsilyl)-1-propanol (Aldrich 97%), Dimethylaniline (Aldrich 99%), Fumaryl chloride (Aldrich 95%), Tetrahydrofuran (Aldrich 99%+ anhydrous), Hexane (Aldrich 98 %), Ethyl acetate (Aldrich; 99.8%+ anhydrous), Hydrochloric acid (Aldrich 98%), Diethyl ether (VWR Chemicals; 95%), Methanol (Aldrich; 99.8%+ anhydrous), Anhydrous magnesium sulfate (VWR Chemcials 65/70%), Sodium hydrogen carbonate (Aldrich 98%), Sodium metabisulfite (Aldrich 98%), Sodium sulphite (Aldrich 98%) and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tetrasodium salt hydrate (Aldrich 98%)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Detailed Analytical Procedures for Ruminant Nutrition

Feed refusals were weighed daily to estimate feed intake. Representative samples of hay, concentrate and CBS used in the trial were collected at the beginning of the adaptation period. They were ground with a cutting mill to pass a 1 mm screen sieve (Pulverisette 15-Fritsch GmbH, Idar-Oberstein, Germany). AOAC International procedures (40 ) were used to determine DM (method no. 930.15), ash (method no. 942.05), crude protein (CP, method no. 984.13), acid detergent fiber and acid detergent lignin (ADFom and ADL, method no. 973.18). Ether extract (EE, method no. 2003.05) was analyzed according to AOAC International (41 ). Neutral detergent fiber (aNDFom) was analyzed according to Mertens (42 (link)); α-amylase (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and sodium sulphite (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were added, and results were corrected for residual ash content.
Rumen degradable protein (RDP) was analyzed according to Licitra et al. (43 (link)).
The energetic value of feeds was expressed as net energy for lactation (NEL) and was estimated using National Research Council equations (39 ).
The FA composition of hay, concentrate and CBS was assessed using a combined direct transesterification and solid-phase extraction method as reported in Dabbou et al. (44 (link)). Separation, identification, and quantification of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were performed as described by Renna et al. (45 (link)). The results were expressed as g/kg DM. The daily intake (g/head) of each individual FA and groups of FA from the diet was estimated considering the daily intake and the analytically determined FA composition of each feedstuff.
The contents of total extractable phenols (TEP) and different polyphenol fractions (non-tannin phenols, NTP; condensed tannins, CT) in CBS, were assessed as detailed in Iussig et al. (46 (link)). Briefly, polyphenols were extracted twice with aqueous acetone (70:30 v/v) and subjected to ultrasonic treatment for 20 min at room temperature in an ultrasonic water bath (Bransonic-21, Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT, USA). Polyvinyl-polypyrrolidone was used to separate NTP and total tannins (TT), according to a modified Folin-Ciocalteu method. The butanol-HCl-iron method was used to determine CT. The absorbance was recorded at 725 nm (TEP and NTP, expressed as gallic acid equivalents) and 550 nm (CT, expressed as leucocyanidin equivalents) using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UVmini-1240, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Total tannins (TT) were computed as the difference between TEP and NTP. Hydrolysable tannins (HT) were estimated as the difference between TT and CT (47 (link)). The amounts of phenolic compounds daily ingested by the goats belonging to the CBS group was estimated based on the analyzed phenolic composition of CBS and the determined intake of concentrate.
All the analyses were performed in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.