We Dissect Protocols

Pvdf membrane

Manufactured by Merck Group
35 159 citations
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, United Kingdom, Ireland, Morocco, France, Japan, Canada, Italy, Switzerland, Spain, India, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium, Hong Kong, Denmark, Netherlands, Macao, Sao Tome and Principe, Sweden, Poland, Austria, Israel
About the product

PVDF membranes are a type of laboratory equipment used for a variety of applications. They are made from polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), a durable and chemically resistant material. PVDF membranes are known for their high mechanical strength, thermal stability, and resistance to a wide range of chemicals. They are commonly used in various filtration, separation, and analysis processes in scientific and research settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Merck Group's Immobilon™-FL and Immobilon™-P PVDF membrane products are currently available for purchase through authorized distributors. Pricing varies depending on the specific product and location, but generally falls within a range of $243.50 to $668.00 in the United States and around €530.00 in Europe.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

35 159 protocols using «pvdf membrane»

1

Western Blot Analysis of Exosomal Markers

2025
Cells were lysed and protein concentrations were determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Equal amounts of protein were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Merck Millipore, Germany). Membranes were blocked and then incubated with a primary antibody against DLL3 (Abclonal, China, A18108), CD63 (Abclonal, China, A19023), CD81 (Abclonal, China, A4863), TSG101 (Abclonal, China, A1692), Calnexin (Abclonal, China, A4846). Following primary incubation, membranes were treated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Abclonal, China, AS014). Protein bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Meilunbio, China) and quantified with image analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of PD-L1 Expression

2025
The No-inf, Pg-inf, and ΔKDP-inf macrophage cells were harvested into lysis buffer, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and then transferred onto PVDF membranes (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Primary antibodies included a PD-L1 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500, 405.9A11, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and β-actin (1:1000, 3700 S, Cell Signaling Technology, USA). Following incubation with primary antibodies overnight, membranes were washed with TBST for 30 min at room temperature and subsequently incubated with an anti-mouse IgG HRP-linked secondary antibody (1:10000, #7076, Cell Signaling Technology) for 45 min at room temperature. Finally, signals were detected using Western Blot Chemiluminescence HRP Substrate (WBLUF0100; Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Densitometric analysis of the bands was performed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Signaling Pathways

2025
Cell lysates from U251 and U87 lines were obtained through brief sonication within a modified RIPA solution (Biosharp, China), enhanced with inhibitors for proteinases and phosphatases. Protein levels within these lysates were quantified employing a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China), adhering to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Following this, protein separation was achieved through 10% SDS-PAGE, with the proteins then being transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 2 hours and was then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (anti-γ-H2A.X HL1299, GeneTex; anti-GAPDH 60004-1-Ig, anti-Erk1/2 11257-1-AP, anti-pErk1/2 28733-1-AP and anti- TSPAN13, 18974-1-AP, ProteinTech, China; anti-JAK2 #3230, anti-pJAK2 #3774, anti-STAT3 #12640, anti-pSTAT3 #9145, CST). After three washes with 1 × TBST, the membrane was incubated with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (SA0001-1 or SA0001-2, ProteinTech, China) for 2 hours. The immunoreactions were visualized using ECL reagent, and the immunoblots were developed to detect the target proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Markers

2025
Western blotting was performed as described in previous studies [32 (link)]. Cell samples were collected and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail (ThermoFisher Scientific) ice bath for half an hour, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method. Equal amounts of proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore, MA), sealed by 10% skimmed milk for 2 h at room temperature, primary antibody was incubated overnight at 4 °C, and washed three times with TBST. The secondary antibody was then incubated for 2 h at room temperature, washed three times with TBST, and ECL chemiluminescence imaging. The antibodies used were as follows: IRAK1 antibody (#10478-2-AP; 1:1000 dilution, Proteintech, China), N-cadherin antibody (#22018-1-AP; 1:2000 dilution, Proteintech), SNAI2 antibody (#12129-1-AP; 1:5000 dilution, Proteintech), secondary antibodies rabbit IgG (#A0208; 1:1000 dilution, Beyotime, China) and mouse IgG (#A0216; 1:1000 dilution, Beyotime), and GAPDH antibody (#HC301; 1:1000 dilution, TransGen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Assay for CYP2W1 Protein

2025
Western blot assays were conducted following a standard protocol. Briefly, 40 µg of protein extracted from each primary STS and adjacent non-tumor tissue sample was loaded per lane. Proteins of CYP2W1-transfected 293T cells (sc-158417; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) were used as a positive control. Proteins were separated on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.5% Tween-20 at room temperature for 1 h. The membranes were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with a commercially available, validated polyclonal anti-CYP2W1 antibody (1:1000; ab113910, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Antigen–antibody complexes were detected using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Life Science, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, UK). Membranes were stripped and re-probed with an anti-β-actin antibody (1:3000; ab115777, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «pvdf membrane»

1

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

The same number of cells (25,000-35,000) from each population to be analyzed were sorted into Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and adjusted to a final concentration of 10% TCA. Extracts were incubated on ice for 15 minutes and spun down for 10 minutes at 16.1 rcf at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and the pellets were washed with acetone twice then dried. The protein pellets were solubilized with Solubilization buffer (9 M Urea, 2% Triton X-100, 1% DTT) before adding LDS loading buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Proteins were separated on a Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Antibodies were anti-Lkb1 (#3047), anti-phospho-AMPKα (Thr172) (#2535), anti-AMPKα (#2532), anti-phospho-Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (Ser79) (#3661), anti-phospho-S6 (#2215), anti-phospho-4EBP1 (#2855), anti-phospho-eIF4G (#2441) (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) and anti-ß-actin (A1978, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

2

Oral Infection of Deer with Chronic Wasting Disease

All fawns were tested for CWD by tonsil biopsy; all tested negative. The deer were housed individually in concrete rooms that had not been previously used for TSE studies. This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the School of Veterinary Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Wisconsin (Permit Number: V910). Bucal swabs were obtained from each deer and the PRNP genes amplified and sequenced as described previously [4] (link).
The deer were dosed daily, for five consecutive days, with 20 ml 10% (w/v) pooled brain homogenate. The pooled brain homogenate was prepared from obex brain samples obtained from two CWD-positive Wisconsin hunter-harvested deer. These deer were both wt/wt with respect to PRNP genotype and were histologically scored as stage 4 positive in the obex [4] (link). The inoculum was prepared in phosphate-buffered saline and was mixed with two cups deer pellet feed and fed to the deer. Additional feed was withheld from the deer for the five days of oral infection to ensure the complete consumption of inoculum.
Brains from each animal were homogenized (20% w/v) in cold PBS (DNase I 250 µg/ml) in a blender and then passed through different size needles. Aliquots of brain homogenate from each genotype were digested with proteinase K (50 µg/ml) for 30 minutes at 37°C, reactions were stopped by boiling in SDS sample buffer at 95°C for 10 minutes. The samples were resolved by western blot, using 12% NuPAGE Bis-tris gels (Invitrogen, CA) and PVDF membrane (Millipore). Blocking was performed in 5% milk in 0.1% TBS-T for 1 h at room temperature. Incubation with primary antibody, 8G8 1∶5000 (Cayman Chemical), was performed overnight at 4°C and HRP secondary antibody was used at 1∶10,000. Images were captured in a Typhoon system after ECL substrate addition (Pierce).
Obex immunohistochemistry was performed as described [4] (link). Briefly, samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (5 µm thick) were cut and placed on positively charged slides. Slides were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed by hydrated autoclaving in retrieval buffer. The tissue sections were exposed to anti-PrP mAb 6H4 (Prionics, Switzerland). Primary antibody was detected using a biotinylated secondary anti-mouse antibody, followed by horseradish peroxidase–streptavidin conjugate, chromagen substrate and hematoxylin counterstain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Wisconsin–Madison, University of Alberta, University of Wisconsin System

3

Western Blot Protein Expression Analysis

Western blot was performed referring to our previous articles 24 (link)-26 (link). In brief, proteins from cultured cells or homogenized left ventricles were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and were electrophoretically transferred onto PVDF membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA; No. IPFL00010). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 60min at room temperature, and were subsequently probed with indicating primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed with the secondary antibodies at 37°C for 1 hour. The bands were scanned and quantified by Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA), and protein expressions were normalized to total proteins or GAPDH. Nuclear and cytosolic protein fractions were separated by a commercial kit as our previously described 9 (link), 21 (link). Proteins from cytosolic lysates were normalized to GAPDH, whereas proteins from nuclear lysates were normalized to PCNA.
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol according to our previous studies and reverse transcribed with Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA)27 (link). The expression level of each individual transcript was normalized to Gapdh.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University

4

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Interactions

CGNs, SH-SY5Y cells or brain slices treated with the appropriate stimuli were lysed with lysis buffer (200 mM NaCl [pH 7.4], 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 0.3 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, and protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche Diagnostics]). Aliquots of 40 µg of protein from each treatment were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore). After blocking with 10% instant nonfat dry milk for 1 h, membranes were incubated with specific antibodies overnight at 4°C followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG at the appropriate dilutions) for 1 h at room temperature. Antibody binding was detected with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (Amersham Biosciences). Western blot results were quantified by using Image J software (NIH) after normalization to their individual loading controls. For IP, aliquots of 700 µg of proteins from each sample were precleared by incubation with 20 µl of protein A/G Sepharose (beads) (Amersham) for 1 h at 4°C. Pre-cleared samples were incubated with specific antibodies in lysis buffer overnight at 4°C. 30 µl of protein A/G beads were added and the samples were incubated for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were washed five times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (4°C) and once with lysis buffer, boiled, separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto a PVDF membrane followed by Western blotting analysis as described above. 40 µg of protein from each treatment was also utilized for Western blot as input controls. All blots are representative of at least three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Brown University, Soochow University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Marche Polytechnic University, University of Rhode Island, Dartmouth College, Wayne State University, Michigan United

5

Acid Extraction of Histones

Histones were acid-extracted according to a published protocol [21 (link)]. One microgram of each sample was used for Western blot analysis with 15% SDS-PAGE gels and PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore) as described above using antibodies listed in Additional file 1. Histone H3 was used as a histone loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.