Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Poly ethylene glycol methyl ether thiol

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, France
About the product

Poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol is a chemical compound that consists of a polyethylene glycol backbone with a methyl ether group at one end and a thiol (sulfhydryl) group at the other. It is a commonly used reagent in chemical synthesis and biochemical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

21 protocols using «poly ethylene glycol methyl ether thiol»

1

Synthesis and Characterization of Functionalized Nanoparticles

2024
Silver nitrate (≥99%), 1,5-pentanediol (PD, ≥97%), copper(II) chloride (≥98%), poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP, average Mw = 55,000 g mol−1), poly-(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (PEG, average Mw = 6000 g mol−1), 1-hexadecanethiol (C16), 1-octadecanethiol (C18), and 2-naphthalenethiol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. poly-(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (PEG, average Mw = 10,000–30,000 g mol−1) were purchased from Laysan Bio. poly-(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (PEG, average Mw = 54,000 g mol−1) and ω-thiol-terminated poly(styrene), were purchased from Polymer Source. Water used in experiments was obtained from a Millipore water purification system with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Surface Plasmon Resonance Protocol for Biomolecular Interactions

2024
Gold SPR slides (50 nm gold layer thickness) were purchased from Horiba Scientific (Palaiseau, France) (SPR imaging studies) and BioNavis Ltd. (Tampere, Finland) (multi-parametric SPR kinetic studies). DNA and ZNA® oligonucleotide sequences were purchased from Metabion GmbH (Planegg, Germany). A thiolated PNA probe was purchased from Panagene Co., Ltd. (Daejeon, Republic of Korea). The sequences used in this study were as follows:

ligand strand (48 nt.) 5′-NH2-C6-ATC AGT ACT TGT CAA CAC GAG CAG CCC GTA TAT TCT CCT ACA GCA CTA-3′

DNA probe (long) (48 nt.) 5′-SH-C6-TAG TGC TGT AGG AGA ATA TAC GGG CTG CTC GTG TTG ACA AGT ACT GAT-3′

DNA probe (15 nt.) 5′-SH-C6-TAG TGC TGT AGG AGA-3′

PNA probe (15 nt.) 5′-SH-C6-TAG TGC TGT AGG AGA-3′

ZNA® probe (15 nt.) 5′-SH-C6-TAG TGC TGT AGG AGA-(spermine)3-3′

Additionally, 6-mercaptohexanol, poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (average Mn = 800 Da) (referred to as PEG-800), polyclonal goat anti-mouse secondary antibody, polyclonal rabbit IgG antibody, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate and potassium dihydrogen phosphate were from Sigma-Merck (Poznań, Poland). Ammonia (25%), hydrogen peroxide (30%), sulfuric acid (96%), hydrochloric acid (35–37%), glycine and sodium hydroxide were from Chempur (Piekary Śląskie, Poland). ɑ-hydroxy-ω-mercapto PEG (average Mn = 3.0 kDa) (referred to as PEG-3k) was from Rapp Polymere GmbH (Tübingen, Germany). Monoclonal mouse anti-hCRP antibody, clone line 6405 was from Medix Biochemica (Espoo, Finland). SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli was from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Warsaw, Poland). proFIRE® Amine Coupling Kit for proteins (>5 kDa) was from Dynamic Biosensors GmbH (Munich, Germany). All solutions were prepared using deionized (DI) water (conductivity < 0.055 μS/cm at 20 °C, TOC < 1.0 ppb).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Synthesis and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles

2024
Gold (III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O, ≥ 49.0% Au basis), Sodium citrate (C6H5Na3O7, ≥ 98.0%), Sodium phosphate dibasic dihydrate (Na2HPO₄ * 2 H₂O, ≥ 99.0%), Sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate (NaH₂PO₄ * 2 H₂O, ≥ 99.0%), Poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (5000 g/mol), and Bovine serum albumin (BSA, ≥ 98.0%) were purchased by Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All AuNPs solutions were prepared with purified 18 MΩ water. Glassware was cleaned with aqua regia and rinsed thoroughly with deionized water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Protocol

2024
Gold (III) chloride trihydrate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, polyvinylpyrrolidone (molecular weight [M.W.]: 10 000), polyethylene glycol methyl ether thiol (M.W.: 6000), methoxy polyethylene glycol amine (M.W.: 5000), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, sodium borohydride, deoxyribonucleic acid (low molecular weight; obtained from salmon sperm), and L‐ascorbic acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (USA). All cysteine‐tagged DNA‐binding peptides were purchased from Peptron (Daejeon, South Korea). Distilled water was obtained using an Arium Pro Ultrapure Water System (Sartorius, Germany) installed at our laboratory.
Hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride was purchased from TCI (Japan); λ‐DNA from Bioneer (South Korea) and Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA); 1X TE buffer from Biosesang (South Korea). Molecular Weight Cut‐Off (MWCO) filters: 100K, 300K, 1000K, and Minisart Syringe Filters (pore size: 0.45 µm) were purchased from Sartorius (Germany); 50X TAE buffer, 6X gel loading buffer, agarose, and Accupower PCR Premix (50 µL) from Bioneer; Quick Load 1 kb Extend DNA ladder (50 µg mL−1), M13mp18 RF I DNA, and T4 GT7 DNA from New England BioLabs (USA); 6X DNA Loading Dye and ethidium bromide from Thermo Fisher Scientific; and pEGFP‐N3 plasmid (#6080‐1) from Addgene (MA, USA).
DMEM (high glucose, pyruvate), fetal bovine serum (qualified), antibiotic–antimycotic (100×), and trypsin‐EDTA (0.25% – phenol red) were purchased from Gibco (USA). Ultrapure Low Melting Point agarose was obtained from Invitrogen (USA); proteinase K from Enzynomics (South Korea); phage T7 DNA from Bioron (Germany); and QIAquick PCR purification kit from Qiagen (Germany). The TEM grids (Carbon Type‐B, 300 mesh, Copper and Carbon Type‐B, Triple Slot, Copper) used in this study were purchased from Ted Pella (USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Monitoring Crosslinking Kinetics of Hydrogels

2023
The crosslinking kinetics and gel point were studied through microrheology via dynamic light scattering analysis (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS). Monodisperse gold nanoparticles (Au NPs, 40 nm diameter, stabilized suspension in 0.1 mM PBS, reactant free, Sigma) and poly(ethylene glycol)methyl ether thiol (MW = 2000) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. A total of 2 mL of Au NPs was mixed with 54 μg of poly(ethylene glycol)methyl ether thiol (ligand concentration 0.0135 μmol/NPs mL). The solution was stirred at room temperature for two hours and purified with dialysis against deionized water for 24 h (dialysis membrane: Cellu-Sep T1/Nominal MWCO: 3500). After the purification, the PEGylated Au NPs were transferred into vials and stored in a refrigerator. Gelation of the F127DA and F127 TA-HA solutions at target polymer concentrations was obtained as described above. In order to encapsulate the PEGylated Au NPs and to obtain a final gel volume of 1 mL in the DLS cuvette, the curing buffer was premixed with 500 μL of the 10 nm PEGylated Au NPs suspension. The gel crosslinking kinetics were studied by evaluating the increase in the viscosity of the system by measuring via DLS the the diffusion coefficient D of the Au NPs (fixed radius, Rh = 20 nm) dispersed in the reacting solution and applying the Stokes–Einstein equation η=KBT6πRhD to determine the viscosity η (KB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «poly ethylene glycol methyl ether thiol»

1

Functional Plasmonic Nanoparticle Synthesis

Hydrogen tetrachloroaurate trihydrate (HAuCl4; 99%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4; 99%), cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB), silver nitrate (AgNO3; 99%), (3-Mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane (MPTMS), (3-Mercaptopropyl)triethoxysilane (MPTES), (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES), 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUDA), Poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (SH-PEG, Mn ~5,000), poly (sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS, Mw ~70,000), poly (allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, Mw ~58,000), human serum IgG, and goat anti-human IgG were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Glass slides (7 × 50 × 0.7 mm) were from Delta Technologies (Loveland, CO). All the experiments were carried out at room temperature unless otherwise noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Synthesis and Characterization of Nucleolipid-Functionalized Vesicular SNAs

1-Hexadecanol, hexadecyl glycidyl ether, allyl glycidyl ether, SnCl4, potassium (cubes in mineral oil), 2-aminoethanethiol hydrochloride, poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (PEGMET, Mw = 2000 g/mol), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), and cholesterol (Chol), all products of Sigma-Aldrich, were used as received. Hexane (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), 1,4-dioxane (Sigma-Aldrich), methylene chloride (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), toluene (Fisher Scientific), benzene (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), methanol (Sigma-Aldrich), and tetrahydrofuran (Fisher Scientific) were dried with calcium hydride and freshly distilled before use. N,N-Dimethylformamide, (DMF, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, ACS reagent, ≥99.9%) were dried by molecular sieves. Deionized water was obtained by a Millipore MilliQ system and was additionally filtered through a 220 nm PTFE filter and a 20 nm cellulose filter. Thiol-functionalized oligonucleotide (ThiolC6-oligonucleotide) was purchased from Biomers.net GmbH. The sequence and composition as well as characterization data, according to the producer, are presented in Table S1 and Figure S1 of Supplementary Materials. Details for the synthesis and characterization of dihexadecyloxy-propane-2-ol (DHP) and spacer-modified DHP-(AGE)n are given in Supplementary Materials (Figures S2–S4).
Synthesis of the nucleolipid DHP-(AGE)3-oligonucleotide. A total of 491.3 µg (61.4 nmol, 1 eq.) of thiolated oligonucleotide, and 197.4 µg (223 nmol, 3.6 eq.) of DHP-(AGE)3 were dissolved in a 2.5 mL solvent mixture of DMF:DMSO:H2O (v/v 0.45:0.45:0.1) and placed in a round-bottom flask under vigorous stirring, flushed with argon, and wrapped in aluminum foil. The UV light-induced thiol-ene click reaction was carried out for 1 h at 30 °C and the full (4 W) capacity of the UV irradiation device. Detailed information for the device is given in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S5). The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and purified by intense dialysis against a mixture of DMSO:DMF (v/v 1:1) for 2 days using an 8 kDa MWCO membrane. Then the organic dialysis solvent was replaced with ultra-pure MilliQ water followed by ultrafiltration for additional 3 days yielding a clear to slightly opalescent aqueous dispersion of the nucleolipid DHP-(AGE)3-oligonucleotide. Finally, the sample was freeze dried. Yield: 470 µg, 85%.
Preparation of vesicular SNAs. Stock solutions of known concentrations of DPPC and Chol in chloroform and the nucleolipid DHP-(AGE)3-oligonucleotide in methanol were prepared. Predefined amounts of these solutions were placed into glass tubes to achieve 2 mM total lipid concentration, 2:1 DPPC:Chol M ratio, and 2 mol % of nucleolipid as follows: 0.04 µmol (301.90 µg) of nucleolipid, 1.30 µmol (954.2 µg) of DPPC, and 0.65 µmol (251.55 µg) of Chol. The solvent ratio was kept in the 1:9–1:10 range with respect to methanol in order to avoid precipitation. After mixing, the solvents were removed under a gentle stream of argon leaving a thin film. All traces of solvent were removed under a vacuum overnight at room temperature. The dry, thin lipid film was hydrated with 1 mL of MilliQ water and the resulting dispersion was subjected to ten freeze–thaw cycles and then extruded 15 times through polycarbonate filters (100 nm pore size) using a handle-type extruder (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA).
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H-NMR).1H-NMR measurements were conducted on a Bruker Avance II spectrometer operating at 600 MHz using CDCl3, DMSO-d6, or benzene-d₆ at 25 °C.
Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC). SEC analyses were performed on a Shimadzu Nexera HPLC chromatograph equipped with a degasser, a pump, an autosampler, an RI detector, and three columns: 10 μm PL gel mixed-B and 5 μm PL gel 500 Å and 50 Å. tetrahydrofuran was used as the eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1 and temperature of 40 °C. The sample concentration was 1 mg·mL−1, and SEC was calibrated with polystyrene standards.
Light Scattering. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were performed on a Brookhaven BI-200 goniometer with vertically polarized incident light at a wavelength λ = 633 nm supplied by a He–Ne laser operating at 35 mW and equipped with a Brookhaven BI-9000 AT digital autocorrelator. Measurements were made at an angle of 90° and 37 °C. The autocorrelation functions were analyzed using the constrained regularized algorithm CONTIN [31 (link)] to obtain the distributions of the relaxation rates (Γ90). The latter provided distributions of the apparent diffusion coefficient (D90 = Γ90/q2) where q is the magnitude of the scattering vector given by q = (4πn/λ)sin (θ/2), n is the refractive index of the medium, and θ = 90°. The mean hydrodynamic radius was obtained by the Stokes–Einstein equation (Equation (1)):
where k is the Boltzmann constant, and η is the solvent viscosity at temperature T in Kelvin.
Electrophoretic Light Scattering: The electrophoretic light scattering measurements were carried out on a 90Plus PALS instrument (Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, Hosttville, NY, USA), equipped with a 35 mW red diode laser (λ = 640 nm) at a scattering angle (θ) of 15°. ζ potentials were calculated from the obtained electrophoretic mobility at 37 °C by using the Smoluchowski Equation (2):
where η is the solvent viscosity, υ is the electrophoretic mobility, and ε is the dielectric constant of the solvent.
Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy (Cryo-TEM). Cryo-TEM images were obtained using a Tecnai F20 X TWIN microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with a field-emission gun, operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Images were recorded on the Gatan Rio 16 CMOS 4k camera an Eagle 4k HS camera (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) and processed with Gatan Microscopy Suite (GMS) software (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA). Specimen preparation was done by the vitrification of the aqueous dispersions on grids with a holey carbon film (Quantifoil R 2/2; Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH, Großlöbichau, Germany). Prior to use, the grids were activated for 15 s in oxygen plasma using a Femto plasma cleaner (Diener Electronic, Ebhausen, Germany). Cryo-samples were prepared by applying a droplet (3 μL) of the dispersion to the grid, blotting with filter paper and immediate freezing in liquid ethane using a fully automated blotting device Vitrobot Mark IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After preparation, the vitrified specimens were kept under liquid nitrogen until they were inserted into a cryo-TEM holder Gatan 626 (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) and analyzed at −178 °C.
Gel electrophoresis. The completeness of the click coupling reaction was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Gels containing 1% agarose (w/w) were run on an FBSB-710 electrophoresis unit (Fisher Biotech) in 1 × Tris-Borate EDTA (TBE) buffer at room temperature and 50 V. Imaging was carried out by ethidium bromide staining and UV illumination (302 nm). Quick-Load® Purple 1 kb DNA Ladder of BioLabs was used as a marker. Total amounts of 0.6 µg were loaded. The gels were imaged using a gel reader Alpha Innotech.
Fluorescence microscopy. The vesicular SNAs were incubated with Laurdan (Sigma Aldrich) in a final concentration of 25 μM Laurdan in DMSO for 30 min at 37 °C [32 (link)]. For the covalent binding of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, final concentration 5 mM) (Sigma Aldrich) to vesicular SNAs, incubation was performed for 2 h at room temperature [33 ]. After incubation, vesicular SNAs were dialyzed against phosphate buffer pH 7.4 for 2 h at room temperature. Vesicular SNAs were visualized with a fluorescence microscope (GE Delta Vision Ultra Microscopy System) with a 60× immersion objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Multifunctional Copper Sulfide Nanoassemblies for Stem Cell Imaging and Therapy

Materials. All reagents were of analytical purity and used without further purification. Iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl 2 •4H 2 O, 99%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 99.99%), diethylene glycol (DEG, 99%), N-methyldiethanolamine (NMDEA, 99%), nitric acid (HNO 3 , 70%), copper(II) nitrate hemi(pentahydrate) (Cu(NO 3 ) 2 •2.5H 2 O, ≥99.99%), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, M w 55 kDa), poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (PEG-SH, M w 2 kDa) hydrazine hydrate (55%), ammonium sulfide solution ((NH 4 ) 2 S, 20%), sodium cacodylatetrihydrate (≥98%), glutaraldehyde solution (25% in H 2 O), and formalin solution (10%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (France). Iron(III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl 3 •6H 2 O, 99%) and ethanol were obtained from VWR (France). Live-Dead Green dead cell and MitoTracker Red CMXRos were purchased from Life Technologies (Thermo Fisher, Belgium).
Iron Oxide Nanoflower Core. IONFs were synthesized using a modified polyol synthesis as previously described. 50 (link) In brief, the iron precursors were solubilized in a DEG and NMDEA mixture (1:1 v/v) and heated to 220 °C for 2.5 h to obtain the alkaline hydrolysis. The obtained magnetic nanoflowers were cleaned with ethanol and ethyl acetate and treated with 10% nitric acid to complete the oxidation. They were then redispersed in water and mixed with 0.3% PVP (55 kDa) prior to the following step.
Copper Sulfide Assembly. The synthesis of the substoichiometric copper sulfide Cu 2-x S assembly has been carried out in the presence or in the absence of an IONF core using a two-step reaction through a template sacrificial synthesis method, modified from ref 33. In the first step, 10 mg of cupric nitrate, Cu(NO 3 ) 2 , was dissolved in 30 mL of Milli-Q H 2 O and mixed with 0.3 g of PVP (55 kDa) and IONF (if present) at [Fe] = 0.3 mM. After 15 min of shaking at room temperature 100 μL of hydrazine 5.5% was added rapidly in the mixture to induce the formation of Cu 2 O NPs. The obtained product was cleaned by centrifugation at 9000g for 45 min and resuspended in 30 mL of Milli-Q H 2 O. The second step of the reaction consisted in the sulfidation of the Cu 2 O shell previously synthesized using 0.1 M sodium sulfide followed by heating at 50 °C for 2 h. After several washings by centrifugation and resuspension in Milli-Q H 2 O, the surface of the nanoassemblies was PEGylated by shaking the sample overnight in the presence of PEG-SH (final concentration 10 mg/ mL) at 4 °C and subsequent washing by centrifugation. These reactions resulted in the production of copper sulfide nanoassemblies (hollow) or of iron oxide nanoflower-like cores surrounded by copper sulfide nanoassemblies (IONF@CuS) when achieved in the presence of IONF (rattle-like).
Morphological and Optical Characterization. TEM images were obtained using a Hitachi HT 7700 TEM operated at 80 kV (Elexience, France), and images were acquired with a charge-coupled device camera (AMT). UV-vis-NIR characterization was performed with a real-time Avaspec-USB2 spectrometer. Cu and Fe concentration was determined by elemental analysis using ICP-AES (iCAP 6500, Thermo Scientific).
Laser-Induced Thermometric Measurements. Heating profiles of aqueous solutions were obtained by placing 10 μL of CuS or IONF@CuS dispersions at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 40 mM of Cu in a 0.5 mL tube at a 4 cm distance from the laser source. The samples were irradiated with a 1064 nm laser at a power density of 0.3 W cm -2 until equilibrium temperature was reached (typically in 1-2 min, measurements were performed over 5 min to be sure to measure the plateau temperature). The increase in temperature was measured using an FLIR SC7000 infrared thermal camera. The spheroids were analyzed in the same configuration. All values are reported as means of at least three separate experiments.
Cell Culture and Nanoparticle Uptake. Human mesenchymal stem cells were purchased from Lonza and were cultured in hMSCbasal medium at 37 °C, 5% CO 2 , and 95% relative humidity. Human glioblastoma cells U87 were purchased from ATCC and cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) streptomycin, 1% (w/ v) penicillin, and 10% (w/v) FBS. At 90% confluence, cells were incubated with the nanoassemblies diluted in serum-free RPMI medium. The copper concentration in the medium ranged from 0.1 to 1 mM. After 4 h of incubation, the medium was removed and the cells were rinsed and incubated further for 2 h in complete hMSC-basal medium to remove any noninternalized copper nanoassemblies. Then, cells were detached by trypsinization, counted, and immediately analyzed or further processed. To assess the intracellular NP content, 2.5 × 10 5 cells were digested in pure nitric acid for 48 h until total dissolution, diluted up to 2% HNO 3 in ultrapure H 2 O, and analyzed by elemental analysis.
Nanotoxicity Study. For the biocompatibility assays, 1.25 × 10 3 or 2.5 × 10 3 cells per well were seeded in 96-multiwell culture plates at 100 μL total volume and incubated overnight. IONF@CuS or CuS nanoassemblies at the concentrations of 0.04, 0.16, 0.32, 1.6, and 3.2 mM of Cu were dispersed in cell culture media and incubated with hMSC cells for 24 h (2.5 × 10 3 cells) or 72 h (1.25 × 10 3 cells). At the end of the incubation, the media was removed and fresh media was provided containing Live-Dead Green dead cell and MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies Europe, BV, Belgium), after which the cells were further incubated for 30 min in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO 2 . Next, the cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and counterstained with Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain solution (Life Technologies, Belgium). Next, the plates were analyzed using the INCell Analyzer 2000 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Belgium), while 2000 cells per condition were acquired in triplicates using a 20× objective lens for the DAPI/DAPI (Hoechst), FITC/FITC (Live-Dead Green), and TexasRed/TexasRed (Mito-Tracker Red CMXRos) channels. The acquired images were processed using the InCell Investigator software (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Belgium). Cell viability was calculated by segmenting cell nuclei and dead cells (signal crossing the threshold in the green channel overlapping with the nuclei) using the IncCell Developer software (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Belgium). The number of live cells per each condition was calculated as the total number of nuclei counted minus the number of dead cells. The values were then normalized by the control conditions (= 100%). Finally, for mitochondrial stress, the total area of cellular mitochondria was used, while for mitochondrial ROS, the intensity of the mitochondrial stain was determined. The respective channel was segmented using the Hoechst images as seed, and the total size and intensity of the mitochondrial network were determined for each individual cell. These values were than normalized by the respective control conditions (= 100%). Results represent quantitative data for the analysis of a minimum of 2000 cells per condition. Values are presented as mean + SEM (n = 3).
Stem Cell Spheroid Formation and Characterization. A total of 2.5 × 10 5 stem cells were centrifuged (1200 rpm for 5 min) in 15 mL tubes to form a pellet and cultured in order to induce cell differentiation (chondrogenesis). The cells then spontaneously formed a spheroid, which could be kept in culture for months (here up to 3 weeks of spheroid maturation). The differentiation medium was composed of high-glucose DMEM supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 0.1 μM dexamethasone, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 μM L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, 0.35 mM L-proline (Sigma), 1% ITS-Premix (Corning), and 10 ng/mL TGF-β3 (Interchim) and was changed twice a week. For histological analysis, spheroids harvested after 21 days of maturation were fixed overnight in 10% formalin, before paraffin inclusion and cutting. Slices that were 4 μm thick were treated with toluidine blue 0.04% for collagen staining and then analyzed by optical microscopy.
At days 1, 3, 9, and 21, the spheroids were fixed with 4% PFA for 2 h at room temperature and transferred in PBS for photothermal analysis, magnetic characterization, and elemental characterization. For the electron microscopy analysis, other spheroids at the same time points were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 2 h, contrasted with oolong tea extract (OTE) 0.5% in 0.1 M Na cacodylate buffer, postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide containing 1.5% potassium cyanoferrate, gradually dehydrated in ethanol (30% to 100%), and gradually embedded in epoxy resins. Ultrathin slices (70 nm) were collected onto 200 mesh copper grids and counterstained with lead citrate prior to being observed by TEM.
Gene Expression Quantification by qPCR. Total RNA was extracted from spheroids at different maturation times using a NucleoSpin RNA II kit (Macheney-Nagel). Reverse transcription into cDNA was achieved using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) with random hexamers as primers according to the manufacturer's instructions. qPCR was performed with StepOnePlus (Applied Biosystems) using the SYBR Green reagent (Applied Biosystems). The expression of reference gene RPLP0 was used as a housekeeping transcript gene. Each value is obtained by the average of at least two wells gathering a minimum of three independent repetitions. The sequences of primers used are listed in Table S1.
Magnetometry of the Internalized IONF Core by VSM. Cell magnetization right after IONF@CuS nanoassembly incubation and in samples fixed at different spheroid maturation times was measured by magnetometry using a PPMS device equipped with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) option (Quantum Design). The analysis was performed at 300 K, between 0 and 20 000 Oe, and provides the saturation magnetization of the sample (in emu).
XAS/Synchrotron Measurements. XAS measurements were performed on the spheroids pooled in groups of 4 or 5 for each maturation time to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. Measurements were achieved in the XANES regime at the CRG beamline BM25-SpLine of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facilities (ESRF) in Grenoble (France). The spectra were acquired at the Fe K-edge (7112 eV) and Cu K-edge (8980 eV) at room temperature and atmospheric pressure in transmission and fluorescence modes. Metal foils of Fe and Cu elements were measured as energy calibration references. Iron oxides (as maghemite and ferrihydrite) and several copper-based materials (as copper sulfides, copper oxides, and copper sulfates) were chosen as standards. For each condition (at days 1, 3, 9, and 21 of maturation), a group of 3 or 4 multicellular spheroids was measured to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. XANES spectra of IONF, IONF@CuS, and CuS initial solution samples were also evaluated. Data normalization, energy calibration, and analysis of the XAS data were carried out using the Demeter software package (Athena program). 51 (link) Cancer Cell Spheroid Formation and Photothermal Therapy. In the exact same way as for the stem cells, 2.5 × 10 5 U87 cancer cells were pelleted and kept in complete culture medium for 9 days. At days 1, 3, 6, and 9, the spheroids (5 per day) were collected and transferred to 0.5 mL tubes (one spheroid per tube) in 10 μL of culture medium. The tubes were placed in a thermostatic device so that the sample is maintained at a temperature of 37 °C before exposure to the laser. Heating was achieved with the spheroids placed 4 cm away from the laser source (1064 nm), corresponding to a laser power density of 0.3 W cm -2 .
The samples were irradiated for 10 min. The increase in temperature was measured using an FLIR SC7000 infrared thermal camera. After laser treatment, the spheroids were transferred to a 48multiwell plate, and each single spheroid's metabolic activity was measured 24 h later, by the Alamar blue assay, and renormalized by nontreated control spheroid values (5 control spheroids for each measurement day).
Statistical Analysis. All values are reported as means and standard error of the mean. Significant differences were determined using Tukey's test in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). * denotes a p-value < 0.05 (significant result), ** a p-value < 0.01 (very significant), and *** a p-value < 0.001 (highly significant).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Nanoparticle-Mediated Pancreatic Cancer Therapy

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium—high glucose (DMEM), Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS), fetal bovine serum (FBS), glacial acetic acid, gold (III) chloride trihydrate (≥ 99.0%), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (≥ 98%), L-glutamine, phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4), phosphate buffered saline (PBS) tablets, penicillin–streptomycin, silver nitrate (≥ 99.0%), sodium borohydride (99.99%), sodium-1-octane-sulphonate (≥ 99.0%), sodium acetate buffer solution (pH 5.2 ± 0.1), thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (98%), and trisodium citrate dehydrate were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Gemcitabine.HCl (Gem) was purchased from Sequoia Research Products Ltd. All solvents were of high-performance liquid chromatography grade and used without further purification. Distilled water (dH2O) was used for all the experiments. Silicon wafer (single side polished), <100>, P-type, with boron as dopant, diam. × thickness 3 in. × 0.5 mm was purchased from Aldrich. The human epithelia MiaPaCa-2 cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (average Mn = 6000, SH-PEG6000) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Thiol-capped P(PEGMA) polymers of different molecular weights were synthesized in-house by reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer radical polymerization based on previously established protocols (Table S1)26 (link)–29 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using CTAB

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, ≥99.9%), l-ascorbic acid (AA, 100%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, ≥99%), trisodium citrate dihydrate (Na3C6H5O7·2H2O, Na3Cit), gold chloride hydrate (HAuCl4·xH2O, 99.999%) and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (thiolated polyethylene glycol, PEG–SH, average Mn = 2000) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC, ≥98%) was obtained from Wako. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 1 M), anhydrous ethanol (C2H5OH ≥ 99.9%) and dichloromethane (CH2Cl2 ≥99.5%) were obtained from Daejung. 3-Mercaptopropionic acid (MPA ≥ 99%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Si wafers and wet oxidized (300 nm) SiO2/Si wafers were purchased from DASOM RMS. These chemicals were used without further purification with deionized water (Pure Water Corporation). Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO, 8 Ω □−1) was purchased from Wooyang GMS. Titanium dioxide (TiO2), tungsten oxide (WO3) and hematite (α-Fe2O3) were purchased from Kojundo Chemical (grain shape, 99.9%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.