Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Pixcell iie

Manufactured by Arcturus
Sourced in United States
About the product

The PixCell IIe is a laser-based microdissection system designed for precise and efficient cell isolation. It features a high-precision laser capture mechanism that allows for the selective extraction of targeted cells or tissue samples from heterogeneous samples. The PixCell IIe is a laboratory instrument used for micromanipulation and microscale sample preparation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

24 protocols using «pixcell iie»

1

Laser Capture Microdissection of Cartilage Zones for Gene Expression Analysis

2021
In the analysis, human cartilage tissues were precisely divided into cartilage zones using an LCM device (PixCell IIe; Arcturus, Mountain View, CA, USA), and the gene expression was determined in respective zones. Cartilage obtained from 16 OA knees and 9 control knees was used for this analysis. In OA knees, cartilage samples were harvested from both macroscopically intact areas (preserved areas) and areas showing various degrees of cartilage degeneration (degenerated areas). In control knees, cartilage samples were obtained at 1–3 sites in each knee from the femoral condyles, confirming that the areas showed little sign of cartilage degeneration. At each site, approximately 20 mm × 5 mm of cartilage was obtained in full thickness above the tide mark. The tissue was immediately embedded in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek Japan, Tokyo, Japan), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C.
For analyses, cryosections were prepared from the OCT-embedded cartilage tissues, and cartilage zones were separated by LCM as described previously [3 (link), 20 (link)]. In detail, the cryosections were cut into 20- to 40-mm-thick slivers, and first treated with 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8.0) for 3 minutes, before being dehydrated with graded concentrations of ethanol, and clarified with xylene. All reagents were RNase-free, and the entire process was completed within 30 minutes to minimize RNA degradation. The sections were then placed on glass slides, set on an LCM device, and divided into cartilage zones by LCM based on their histological features [22 ] (Fig. 1). Immediately after LCM, RNA was extracted from the respective cartilage zones using an RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hiden, Germany) with the routine use of DNase I (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using Sensiscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen). The gene expression was evaluated quantitatively by qPCR on a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), using gene-specific primers and probes. SYBR® Premix Ex Taq® Perfect Real Time (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) or Premix Ex Taq® Perfect Real Time (Takara Bio) was used for PCR. The cDNA levels were normalized by the expression of GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Analyzing Breast Cancer Transcriptomes

2019
Results described in these investigations were collected previously from de‐identified primary breast cancer carcinomas obtained from 1988 to 1996, in IRB‐approved studies and stored in de‐identified databases of the Hormone Receptor Laboratory, which holds CLIA and Commonwealth of Kentucky licenses.37, 38, 39, 40, 41 Selection and examination of the patient population were performed using REMARK criteria1 as described previously.37, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 Patients were treated with standard of care at time of diagnosis. Patient‐related characteristics and tissue‐based properties (Table 1), stored as de‐identified parameters in our unique comprehensive databases, were explored to determine relationships between relative gene expression and clinical parameters.
Briefly, tissue sections of frozen de‐identified tissue biopsies were processed previously for laser capture microdissection (LCM) with a PixCell IIe™ Instrument (Arcturus/Thermo Fisher), as described previously.34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 As reported earlier,38, 45, 46 total RNA was extracted from LCM‐procured cells and amplified before microarray as described earlier. Relative expression levels of each of 20 000 genes obtained from microarray uniquely represented only those mRNA species of breast carcinoma cells.34, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Laser Capture Microdissection of Osteoarthritic Cartilage

2019
For LCM, cartilage tissues were obtained from 16 OA knees and 9 control knees, at 3–5 sites per knee. OA cartilage samples were harvested from both the macroscopically intact areas (preserved areas) and the areas showing various degrees of cartilage degeneration (degenerated areas). At each site, approximately 20 mm × 5 mm of cartilage was obtained in full thickness above the tide mark. The separation of cartilage zones by LCM was performed following a previously described method [5 (link), 24 (link)]. In brief, cryosections were prepared from the cartilage tissues in a plane vertical to the joint surface, which were separated into three cartilage zones using an LCM device (PixCell IIe; Arcturus, Mountain View, CA, USA) based on the histological features.
Immediately after LCM, RNA was extracted from the respective cartilage zones using an RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hiden, Germany) with routine use of DNase I (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using Sensiscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen). The gene expression was evaluated quantitatively by real-time PCR on a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), using gene-specific primers and probes (Additional file 1: Table S1). SYBR® Premix Ex Taq® Perfect Real Time (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) or Premix Ex Taq® Perfect Real Time (Takara Bio) was used for PCR. The cDNA levels were normalized by the expression of GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Transcriptomic Analysis of Chlorine-Exposed Mouse Trachea

2018
Frozen sections were prepared from distal trachea collected from five mice 4 days after chlorine exposure and from five unexposed mice. Laser capture microdissection with an Arcturus PixCell IIe instrument was used to isolate subepithelial tissue from hematoxylin and eosin-stained frozen sections from chlorine-exposed and unexposed mice based on published methods (Andres and Wittliff, 2011 (link)). Tissue was dissected from 10 sections per mouse. RNA was prepared from dissected tissue using an Arcturus® PicoPure® extraction kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and analyzed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Santa Clara, CA). For transcript expression analysis by microarray, 250 ng of total RNA from each sample was amplified and labeled according to the GeneChip® WT PLUS Reagent kit protocol from Affymetrix (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA), followed by hybridization to Affymetrix Mouse Gene 2.0 ST® arrays. The arrays were processed following the manufacturer recommended wash and stain protocol on an Affymetrix FS-450 fluidics station and scanned on an Affymetrix GeneChip® 7G scanner using Command Console 4.0. Gene expression data from the microarray analysis were submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository with accession number GSE109365.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Laser Capture of IPMN Cells for Mitochondrial DNA Analysis

2016
FFPE specimens of IPMN slides (n=4) were subjected to laser capture micro-dissection. After evaluation for Ki-67 positivity, cells were captured using Arcturus PixCell IIe (Arcturus, CA, USA). In each patient, 3–4 lesions were selected. Ten to 30 cells were captured and their DNA extracted using QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen). The extracted DNA was amplified using a Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Kit (WGA4; Sigma). DNA was further amplified by PCR reaction using 6 overlapping primer pairs for the D-loop of the mitochondrial genome (Supplemental Table 2). PCR products were cleaned by ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix), followed by bidirectional Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.