We Dissect Protocols

Ankom 220 fiber analyzer

Manufactured by ANKOM Technology
130 citations
Sourced in United States
About the product

The Ankom 220 Fiber Analyzer is a laboratory equipment designed to measure the fiber content in various samples. It utilizes gravimetric analysis techniques to determine the neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) fractions of the sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The ANKOM 220 Fiber Analyzer is no longer commercially available. ANKOM Technology offers the A2000 Fiber Analyzer as a replacement product, which supports similar fiber analysis capabilities.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

130 protocols using «ankom 220 fiber analyzer»

1

Characterizing Rumen Microbiome Dynamics

2025
The concentrate feed used in this in vitro study was the same as that provided to the rumen fluid donor animals, which consisted of 800 g of barley, 175 g of soybean meal, and 25 g of mineral and vitamin supplements per kg of dry matter (DM). This ensured that the rumen microbiota used in the in vitro gas production assay were acclimated to this specific feed, following the guidelines for in vitro gas production techniques [23 (link)]. The feed was ground using a Retsch mill (Retsch ZM200, Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany), sieved through a 1 mm sieve, and stored in a dark glass bottle in a dry and cool place until the analysis of its chemical composition and in vitro rumen fermentation. The DM (AOAC 930.15), crude protein (CP, AOAC 954.01), and ash content (AOAC 942.05) were determined according to the methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [24 ]. Neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber were analyzed using an ANKOM220 fiber analyzer (ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY, USA) following the methods outlined by Van Soest et al. [25 (link)]. The results of the chemical composition of the concentrate are presented in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detailed Nutrient Composition Analysis Protocol

2025
During the 70-d experimental period and the digestibility study, silage samples were collected three times a week and concentrates were collected weekly. Samples were dried in a forced air oven at 55 °C for 48 h for DM determination using the following formula  (dry weightwet weight)100 . Dried feed and fecal samples were ground in a Foss™ CT 293 Cyclotec™ General Purpose Sample Mill fitted with a 1 mm screen for subsequent chemical analysis (Foss, Nils Foss Allé 1, DK-3400 Hilleroed, Denmark). Starch, acid detergent fiber (ADF), and NDF concentrations were determined as per O’Kiely (2011) . Briefly, the determination of ADF and NDF was conducted using the ANKOM220 Fiber Analyzer (ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY, United States), ADF and NDF were corrected for ash concentration and reported as g/kg DM. Enzymatic starch determination was carried out using the total starch analysis procedure (Amyloglucosidase/α-Amylase Method; Megazyme Ltd., Co. Wicklow, Ireland). Petroleum ether was used for the extraction of ether extract using the Soxtec ST 243 (Foss, Hilleroed, Denmark). No acid hydrolysis was performed before extraction.
Gross energy content was determined using an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (Parr 6300 isoperibol calorimeter; Parr Instruments, IL USA). The concentration of CP (g/kg DM) was determined by obtaining the nitrogen concentration (g/kg DM) of the feed samples using a LECO FP 528 instrument (Leco Instruments UK ltd., Stockport, UK), and multiplying by a nitrogen-protein conversion factor of 6.25 (Mariotti et al., 2008 (link)). Ether extract (Oil A) was measured as determined by Lenehan et al. (2017) (link). Ash concentration (g/kg DM) was determined by complete combustion in a muffle furnace (Nabertherm, GmbH, Lilienthal, Germany) at 550 °C for 5 h. A proximate analysis of each dietary component is reported in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Forage Nutritional Analysis and Digestibility

2025
Forage samples were weighed, cut, and dried at 60 °C to approximately 90% dry matter (DM). They were then ground to pass a 1-mm screen for chemical analyses and a 2-mm screen for in vitro digestibility (IVD) tests. DM, ash, and crude protein (CP) were determined according to standard methods described by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC 2000 ) (methods 930.15, 942.05, and 976.05, respectively). Additionally, ash-free neutral detergent fiber (NDFom) was determined using sodium sulfite in the neutral detergent (ND) following the method of Goeríng and Van Soest (1970 ) with an ANKOM 220 Fiber Analyzer (Ankom Technology Corporation).
In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) were determined using the two-stage pepsin-cellulose method (Pepcel) (Aufrere 1982 ). Digestible energy (DE) was estimated as 0.0185 × IVOMD (NRC 1988 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Rumen Metabolite Analysis

2025
Each sample was analyzed for dry matter (DM; method No. 930.15) by drying at 105°C to a constant weight, ether extract (EE; method No. 989.05) using Soxhlet extraction with diethyl ether and crude protein (CP; method No. 976.05) using the Kjeldahl method with a Buchi Distillation Unit B-324 (Büchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland), as described by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (13 ). Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents were determined according to the Van Soest method (14 (link)) using fiber bags and an ANKOM 220 Fiber Analyzer (ANKOM Technology Company, Macedonia, NY, United States).
Frozen ruminal fluid samples were thawed and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to obtain a clear supernatant. Then, 1 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 0.25 mL of a metaphosphoric acid standard solution (25 g/100 mL) for subsequent analysis. The concentration of ammonia-N (NH3-N) was determined using the phenol-sodium hypochlorite colorimetric method described by Broderick and Kang using a UV spectrophotometer (UV-1801, Beijing Beifen Ruili Analytical Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) (15 (link)). The VFA concentrations were analyzed using gas chromatography according to the method described by Mirzaei-Alamouti et al. (16 (link)). The VFA was quantified using a high-performance gas chromatograph (GC-2014; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) that was equipped with a hydrogen flame detector and capillary column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States; 30 m long, 0.32-mm diameter, 0.50-μm film thickness). The remaining liquid samples were then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, transported to the laboratory, and stored at −80°C for further analysis of microbiota and metabolites. The intermediate products of lactic acid metabolism and lactate metabolic enzyme activity in the rumen fluid were determined based on samples taken at 0 h before feeding and at 1, 3, and 5 h after feeding. Ruminal lactate metabolism intermediates were determined using liquid chromatography (LC-20ADXR; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), and related enzymes were determined using kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rice Straw Composition Analysis

2024
The straw was measured by the gravimetric method after being washed and oven-dried at 80°C to a constant weight. Lignin (LG), soluble substances (SS), cellulose (Cel), and hemicellulose (HC) in the residual rice straw were analyzed using an ANKOM220 fiber analyzer (ANKOM Technologies, USA) as previously described (Guo et al., 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Top 5 most cited protocols using «ankom 220 fiber analyzer»

1

Comprehensive Nutritional Analysis of Ruminant Feeds

Representative samples of silages, concentrate, total mixed ration (TMR) and refusals were taken weekly and frozen at a temperature −25 °C. Thawed samples were dried at 60 °C in Binder dryers, and then ground in a mill (ZM 200, Retsch, Haan, Germany) to a 1 mm particle size. The proximate chemical composition of all feeds was determined by standard methods [25 ]. The content of DM was corrected according to the Porter and Murray method [26 (link)]. Silage samples were also assayed for pH with a pH-meter (HI 8314, Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA) and lactic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC SHIMADZU) in a MetaCarb 67H P/N 5244 column (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and 0.0025 M sulfuric acid as the mobile phase, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. VFAs concentrations were determined using a gas chromatographer Varian 450-GC coupled with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a 25-meter-long capillary column CP-FFAP (the internal diameter was 0.53 mm and the thickness of the coating film was 1.0 μm). The contents of NDF, assayed with heat-stable amylase and expressed exclusive of residual ash, acid detergent fiber (ADF), expressed exclusive of residual ash, and acid detergent lignin (ADL) was determined by the method proposed by Van Soest et al. [27 (link)], using an ANKOM220 fiber analyzer (ANKOM Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA). The content of ammoniacal nitrogen (N-NH3) were determined by direct distillation in a 2100 Kjeltec Distillation unit (FOSS Analytical A/S, Hillerød, Denmark) after increasing the pH of the samples by adding MgO. N protein was determined with the help of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) [28 (link)]. The content of nonprotein nitrogen (NPN) was determined as N total – N protein. In order to estimate the nutritional value of each silage, its in vitro DM digestibility (IVDMD) was determined by keeping a silage sample in a Daisy II incubator (ANKOM Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA) for 48 h with the ruminal fluid, after which extraction in neutral detergent solution was carried out according to the method proposed by Kowalski et al. [29 (link)]. The nutritional value of the silage was finally estimated with the help of the WINWAR software [30 ]. The chemical composition of the silages is specified in Table 2. The fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography (GC) on a VARIAN CP-3800 chromatograph (Varian Analytical Instruments 2700 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598-1675, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMEs) were prepared by the Peisker’s method, as modified by Żegarska et al. [31 ]. The FAMEs were separated using a CP Sil 88 (0.20 μm) capillary column 50 m long and 0.25 mm in diameter. The column temperature was 180 °C. Injector and detector temperatures were both 250 °C. Helium carrier gas flow was 1.2 mL/min at a split ratio of 1:50. The composition of fatty acids in the silages is presented in Table 3.
Apparent total-tract digestibility of DM, CP, NDF, ADF was measured after 20 d of each period, using acid-insoluble ash (AIA) as an internal marker [32 (link)]. For 5 days, samples of feeds, refusals and feces were collected and frozen at a temperature of −25 °C. Fecal samples weighing approximately 100 g each were collected for all each cow from all excreta evacuated between 7:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. This schedule provided five representative samples of feces for each animal. After thawing, all samples from 5 days from a cow were mixed and blended, and then a laboratory sample was taken for determination of N total with the Kjeldahl method. The remaining mass was dried at 60 °C for 72 h, ground to pass a 1-mm screen, and stored for other chemical analyses. Digestibility was calculated from the intake and concentrations of AIA, as well as these components in the diets fed, refusals and in feces, according to this equation:
where AIAd = AIA concentration in the diet actually consumed, AIAf = AIA concentration in the feces, nutrientf = concentration of the nutrient in the feces, and nutrientd = concentration of the nutrient in the diet actually consumed [33 (link),34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

2

Comprehensive Chemical Composition Analysis

DM, crude protein, crude fiber, ether extract, and crude ash were determined according to AOAC [85 ]. Chemicals used in the analysis of crude protein, lipids, and crude fiber were purchased from Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland. To determine dry matter, samples were dried at 105 °C to constant weight. Crude protein (N × 6.25) was identified by the Kjeldahl method, using a Büchi Scrubber B414 unit and a Büchi 324 distillation set (Büchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland). Crude fat content was assigned using traditional Soxhlet extraction method with diethyl ether. Crude fiber was determined as the residue after sequential treatment with 1.25% H2SO4 and with 1.25% NaOH using an ANKOM220 Fiber Analyzer (ANKOM Technology, New York, NY, USA). Crude ash was measured by burning in a muffle furnace at 580 °C for 8 h. NFE content of each diet was calculated on the basis of the assessed chemical composition. The results are expressed in g per 100 g DM.
On the basis of identified chemical composition, ME (kcal/100 g DM) of the foods was calculated, according to the equation provided by the NRC [4 ], using Atwater factors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : West Pomeranian University of Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow

3

Analyzing Pig Digestive Dynamics

The initial 5 days of the 10-day experimental period were allowed for pigs to adapt to the diets. Fecal samples were collected via grab sampling from d 6 to 7. On d 8 and d 10 of this experimental period, Whirl-Pak® bags (NASCO, Fort Atkinson, WI, USA) containing 10 mL of 10% formic acid were attached to the T-cannulas to collect ileal digesta from 08:30 h to 16:30 h. The attached bags were inspected every 30 min and the filled bags were changed. Fecal and ileal digesta samples were stored at −20 °C immediately after collection. At the end of the collection, samples of fecal and ileal digesta from each pig were thawed and mixed evenly. Then, the fecal samples were dried at 65 °C for 72 h, and the ileal digesta samples were freeze-dried. Experimental diets, ingredients, fecal samples, and ileal digesta samples were ground to pass through a 0.5 mm screen before analysis.
Dry matter (DM) [20 (link)], crude protein (CP) [21 (link)], ether extract (EE; method 996.01; AOAC [22 ]), and ash (method 942.15; AOAC [22 ]) of all samples were analyzed. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents of samples were analyzed using an Ankom-220 fiber analyzer with filter bag techniques (F57) based on the procedure offered by the instrument company (method 6 and method 7, ANKOM Technology, Fairport, NY, USA) [23 (link)]. Total carbohydrate (CHO) content was calculated as the following equation: CHO = DM − (CP + EE + ash) [24 (link)]. Starch was determined using the Megazyme Total Starch Assay Procedure (Megazyme International Ireland Ltd., Wicklow, Ireland) based on thermostable α-amylase and amyloglucosidase. The content and composition of soluble non-starch polysaccharides (SNSP) and insoluble non-starch polysaccharides (INSP) were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Agilent 7890A-5975C equipped with DB-225 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm), Agilent J&W Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the method described by Theander et al., [25 (link)] with minor modification in our research group. The content and composition of total non-starch polysaccharides (TNSP) were the sums of the INSP and SNSP contents. Gross energy (GE) was analyzed by an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (model 6400; Parr Instrument, Moline, IL, USA). The concentrations of AA in diets and ileal digesta samples were analyzed (method 982.30 E (a, b); AOAC [22 ]). The method of Fenton and Fenton was used to determine chromic oxide content of diets, ileal digesta, and fecal samples [26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

4

Detailed Nutrient Composition Analysis

Feed in pellet form and water were provided ad libitum throughout the trial. Gross energy of the experimental diets was analyzed using an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (Model 1356, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA). Dry matter, ash, and CP were determined following methods 934.01, 942.05, and 2001.11, respectively, of the Association of Official Analytical Collaboration (AOAC) International [12 ]. Ether extract was analyzed using the Am 5-04 procedure of the American Oil Chemists’ Society [13 ]. Neutral detergent fiber was determined with an ANKOM220 Fiber Analyzer (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA) as described by Mertens [14 (link)]. Starch content was analyzed enzymatically using a commercial kit (Total Starch Assay Kit K-TSTA 07/11, Megazyme, Bray, Wicklow, Ireland). The AA profile was determined in an external laboratory (Ofice S.L., Castellgalí, Barcelona, Spain) using high-performance liquid chromatography–fluorescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza

5

Apparent Total Tract Digestibility Determination

For the calculation of apparent total tract digestibility, faecal samples were weighed and dried in a forced air oven (UF 750 plus, Memmert GmbH, Schwabach, Germany) at 60 °C for 72 h. Prior to analysis, feed and faecal samples were ground through a 1-mm screen in a laboratory mill (CT 293 Cyclotec, Foss, Hilleroed, Denmark). Routine procedures of AOAC [27 ] were used for ash (7.009) to calculate OM, DM (7.007), and EE (7.063) in feed and faecal samples. Crude fiber was determined using the filter bag system (ANKOM 220 Fiber Analyzer; ANKOM Technology, New York, NY, USA). The CP was determined as 6.25×Kjeldahl nitrogen, using a Kjeltec autoanalyzer unit (Foss, Hilleröd, Sweden). Titanium dioxide was determined in feed and faeces according to Myers et al. [28 (link)]. All analyses were performed in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Agricultural University of Athens

The spelling variants listed above correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.