The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Suturetape

Manufactured by Arthrex

SutureTape is a surgical suture product designed for wound closure and tissue approximation. It is made from a non-absorbable, braided polyester material. SutureTape provides enhanced tensile strength compared to traditional suture materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using suturetape

1

Arthroscopic Capsular Repair Technique

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position and underwent
diagnostic arthroscopy utilizing a standard posterior viewing portal and an
anterior working portal within the rotator interval. Concomitant pathology was
noted and addressed on a case-by-case basis to include debridement or repair of
the labrum and rotator cuff.
The location of the capsular tear was carefully assessed, taking note of
continuation to either the humeral or glenoid attachment. All tears were found
within the axillary pouch between the anteroinferior and posteroinferior
glenohumeral ligaments (Figure
1A
). Accessory anteroinferior or posteroinferior portals were placed
to facilitate suture passage. Medially based tears were repaired from lateral to
medial in a “baseball stitch” fashion using a nonabsorbable 1.3-mm tape suture
(SutureTape; Arthrex) successively passed between leaflets using an
appropriately curved 25-degree suture shuttling device (SutureLasso; Arthrex)
(Figure 1B). Suture
limbs were tensioned and then secured at the glenoid insertion with a 2.9-mm
knotless anchor (PushLock; Arthrex) (Figure 1C). Laterally based tears were
repaired in a reverse fashion from medial to lateral with eventual fixation into
the humeral insertion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Locking Loop Suture (LLS) for Tendon Repair

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LLS was performed with a 1.3-mm-wide SutureTape reinforced with a 4-0 suture (Arthrex). The LLS was started by wrapping the suture around the tendon, followed by penetration of the center of both the reinforced SutureTape and tendon to make a locking loop at the proximal starting point. For each subsequent throw, a simple wrapping suture was performed and followed by needle penetration of wrapping suture, the reinforced suture tape, and tendon together. Each wrapping throw and locking loop was performed at 5-mm intervals with hand tension to eliminate excess suture material within the loops (Figs. 1B, 2, and 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Anatomic Proximal Hamstring Repair

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After detachment of the proximal hamstring insertion site, a 4.5-mm spade drill tip was utilized to drill 3 anchor tunnel sites perpendicular to the tendon insertion site, and these were subsequently tapped in all specimens. A fully threaded double-loaded 5.5 mm–diameter × 14.7 mm–long anchor (BioComposite Corkscrew; Arthrex) was then inserted into each of the tunnel sites. The suture material consisted of a 1.3 mm–wide ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene nonabsorbable suture (SutureTape; Arthrex). Previous marking of the bone-tendon interface with indelible blue marker allowed us to reapproximate our repair in an anatomic fashion. One limb of each suture pairing was run through the tendon in a Krackow running-locking fashion, and its matching limb was simply passed just proximal to the Krackow pattern in a deep to superficial trajectory to allow the tendon to slide and reduce to its bony insertion site along this suture strand. This was performed at the distal 2 anchor sites before completing the repair with the proximal suture anchor, all with the identical technique (Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!