β mercaptoethanol
β-mercaptoethanol is a reducing agent commonly used in biochemical applications. It is a clear, colorless liquid with a characteristic odor. β-mercaptoethanol is used to break disulfide bonds in proteins and peptides, and to maintain a reducing environment in biological samples.
Market Availability & Pricing
β-Mercaptoethanol is a chemical product commercially available from Merck Group and its authorized distributors. Pricing typically ranges from $76.00 to $106.00, depending on the supplier and packaging size.
Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.
Is this product still available?
Get pricing insights and sourcing optionsLab products found in correlation
6 301 protocols using «β mercaptoethanol»
Protein Expression Analysis in Cell Lines
Chickpea-based Milk Analogue Production
Fresh chickpea seeds were ground, and chickpea protein was isolated using isoelectric precipitation as described in a previous study [11 (link)]. A total of 100 g of milled chickpea flour was suspended in distilled water (DW) at a 1:10 ratio (w/v). The pH of mixture was adjusted to 9 using 2M NaOH and it was stirred at 500 rpm for 90 min at room temperature. The resulting suspension was centrifuged at 4500× g for 20 min at 4 °C using a Thermo Scientific™ Sorvall™ LYNX 4000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the supernatant was subsequently collected. The pellet was resuspended in DW at a ratio of 1:5 (w/v). Then, again the suspension was adjusted to pH 9 and centrifuged under the same conditions at 4500× g for 20 min at 4 °C. Both supernatants were pooled and adjusted to the isoelectric point (pH 4.6) with 1 M HCl, in order to precipitate the protein fraction. Afterwards, the mixture was centrifuged at 8000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discharged, and the precipitate was dissolved in distilled water and adjusted to pH 7. The samples were dialyzed against water and freeze-dried. Total protein was evaluated by the Bradford method [20 (link)] and was in the range of 84–88%.
The oil-in-water emulsions resembling milk (3% fat, 3% protein) were produced using chickpea protein and canola oil, with or without the addition of enzyme TG. Four percent (w/w) of chickpea protein was dissolved overnight in distilled water at 4 °C under constant stirring. The following day, the protein dispersion was centrifuged at 1000× g/5 min/room temperature to remove large protein aggregates. The supernatant was adjusted to a protein concentration of 3% (w/w) and used for subsequent experiments. The soluble chickpea protein solution was heat treated at 85 °C/20 min to simulate the high-pasteurization process and ensure the death of most vegetative microorganisms [21 (link)]. Based on the previous study [14 (link)], with some modification, the enzyme concentration and incubation conditions were chosen. After cooling, the enzyme TG was added (50 U/g TG per protein weight) and incubated at 37 °C/3 h. A control sample without TG addition was produced under identical conditions. Canola oil in 3% (w/w) was added to the protein solution, and the mixture was homogenized using a shear dispersing unit (Pro200, Pro-Scientific Inc., Oxford, CT, USA) for 1 min at 35,000 rpm to produce a coarse emulsion. Fine emulsions were produced using high-pressure homogenization (EmulsiFlex-C3, Avestin Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada) with 4 passes at 20 kPsi. The enzyme inactivation for both emulsions was carried out at 90 °C for 5 min. The commercial soymilk, serving as a reference, and the chickpea-based milk analogues were stored at room temperature (RT) for over a month to assess visual stability. Additionally, the plant-based milk analogues were stored at 4 °C for a month to facilitate all analytical evaluations.
The ζ-potential of the samples was measured using Zetasizer Ultra (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, WR14 1XZ, UK) following the method described previously [22 (link)]. Chickpea-based milk analogues and soymilk samples were diluted 1000-fold in distilled water and the particle surface charge potential was calculated using the Smoluchowski model.
Particle size was analyzed using MasterSizer 3000 laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, Worcestershire, WR14 1XZ, UK) equipped with a wet sample dispersion unit (Malvern Hydro MV, Worcestershire, WR14 1XZ, UK). The background and sample integration times were set to 20 and 10 s, respectively. The optical properties were defined with a refractive index of 1.46 for canola oil and 1.330 for the dispersant (water), along with an absorption index of 0.001.
Dynamic viscosity of the emulsions was measured using a Discovery Hybrid Rheometer (DHR-2, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) equipped with parallel plates (d = 60 mm). Chickpea-based milk analogous, and soymilk were placed between parallel plates at a controlled temperature of 25 °C, with a plate gap of 1.0 mm. The sample temperature was regulated via the lower plate, and excess material was removed prior to measurements. The rheometer was operated using the Trios Express software (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA)
Images were acquired and processed using the ZEN lite image analysis software (Zeiss)
All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was conducted using the SigmaPlot software package (Version 11.0, Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) with a primary focus on paired sample t-tests under the assumption of equal variances. A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was applied.
Transgenic mESC Line with GFP-TH Expression
] mESC were expanded on a mEF‐feeder layer and the utilized medium was DMEM GlutaMAX, 10% FBS, 1x Nucleosides (Millipore, USA), 2 mM L‐glutamine (Life Technologies, USA), 1% Penicillin‐Streptomycin and 0.1 mM β‐mercaptoethanol (Sigma, USA), supplemented with leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF; 1:1 000; Millipore, USA).
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Immunization Protocol
Murine NIT-1 β Cell Culture
Top 5 most cited protocols using «β mercaptoethanol»
Differentiation of Murine Bone Marrow Cells
Corresponding organizations : National Institutes of Health
Efficient Differentiation of hPSCs into BMECs
Corresponding organizations : University of Wisconsin–Madison, University of Iowa
Primed and Naive Human Stem Cell Culture
Corresponding organizations : Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Genetic Manipulation of Cell Death Pathways
Corresponding organizations : The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Directed Differentiation of Human Stem Cells into Motor Neurons
Corresponding organizations : Columbia University, Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Spelling variants (same manufacturer)
Similar products (other manufacturers)
The spelling variants listed above correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!