Software
ATLAS.ti is a qualitative data analysis software that provides a comprehensive set of tools for organizing, analyzing, and visualizing textual, audio, and visual data. It offers features for coding, annotating, and grouping data, as well as for creating networks and exploring relationships within the data. ATLAS.ti is designed to support researchers, analysts, and professionals working with qualitative data in various fields.
35 protocols using software
Thematic Analysis of Interview Transcripts
Qualitative Exploration of Experiences
In-Depth Interviews on HPV Screening
Developing Robust Coding Protocols
Evaluating a Digital Health Intervention
Qualitative interview data was analyzed using Atlas.ti™ software. A qualitative descriptive approach was used, and transcripts were coded using open-coding methods followed by axial coding in which patterns amongst codes were identified, and codes were subsequently categorized into broader themes. Repetitive themes were used to reflect participant perspectives of the overall SavvyHER intervention coupled with perspectives regarding the specific components of the SavvyHER app [18 (link)].
Qualitative Evaluation of Accelerated ART Delivery
Adolescent Mental Health Outcomes Analysis
Qualitative interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and the transcriptions exported into Atlas-ti software (version 7.1) for analysis. Codes were generated a priori based on the research questions plus evidence from literature, as well as inductively as new concepts emerged. The codes were carefully examined for recurring themes. After relevant themes were mapped out, related themes were grouped, leading to the completion of the thematic analysis. Important themes with accompanying quotes were extracted and reported.
Qualitative Content Analysis of Interviews
Constructive Grounded Theory Analysis of Caregiver Networks
Physicians' Decision-Making for Oxycodone Requests
For the active oxycodone requests only (n = 96), subjects took part in a qualitative interview that included two questions about the vignette patient specifically: “Can you tell me about how you made your decision about medications for the patient in the video? What role did the patient’s request have on your decision?” Answers were provided in a “think-aloud” format, allowing for insights into the cognitive reasoning behind the decision-making processes used by the physicians. Probing encouraged respondents to elaborate in directions they viewed as pertinent. Qualitative interviews (n = 95/96; one respondent did not agree to be recorded) were recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription company. ATLAS.ti software (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany) facilitated data organization and coding.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!