Statistical analysis was done using GB-STAT version 6.5 software (Dynamic Microsystems, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA) and SAS Software, version 9.2 of the SAS software for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The number of subjects (cells or coverslips) required for comparison was estimated using power analysis (set 80% and α = 0.05) and guided by our previously published work [16 (link),17 (link),19 (link),23 (link)]. Some groups deviated from normality based on Shapiro-Wilk or D’Agostino-Pearson tests for normality. Consequently, all the data are reported as median with interquartile range (IQR) and nonparametric statistics were used. To test the difference between the 2-h and 2-day time points in the vitality assay, the two groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U-test. For all the other experiments, the multiple independent groups were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA followed by Dunn’s test (significance established at p < 0.05).
Sas software version 9.2 of the sas software for windows
Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States
SAS Software, version 9.2 for Windows, is a comprehensive software suite that provides advanced analytics and data management capabilities. It is designed to help organizations efficiently collect, manage, and analyze large and complex data sets. The software includes a range of tools and features that enable users to perform various tasks, such as data manipulation, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
2 protocols using sas software version 9.2 of the sas software for windows
1
Statistical Analysis of Cellular Vitality
2
Statistical Analysis of Cellular Vitality
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analysis was done using GB-STAT version 6.5 software (Dynamic Microsystems, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA) and SAS Software, version 9.2 of the SAS software for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The number of subjects (cells or coverslips) required for comparison was estimated using power analysis (set 80% and α = 0.05) and guided by our previously published work [16 (link),17 (link),19 (link),23 (link)]. Some groups deviated from normality based on Shapiro-Wilk or D’Agostino-Pearson tests for normality. Consequently, all the data are reported as median with interquartile range (IQR) and nonparametric statistics were used. To test the difference between the 2-h and 2-day time points in the vitality assay, the two groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U-test. For all the other experiments, the multiple independent groups were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA followed by Dunn’s test (significance established at p < 0.05).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!