For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the samples, also collected during the surgery, were fixed in 2.7% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 0.1 M PBS for two hours, rinsed three times with 0.15 M PBS for one hour each, and postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 0.15 M phosphate buffer. Dehydration was accomplished in an acetone series (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and three times at 100%). Inclusion was made in EMBed-812 epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences), which was polymerized for two days at 60 °C. Ultrathin sections of about 80 nm were cut on a Bromma 8800 ULTRATOME III ultramicrotome (LKB Produckter AB, Stockholm-Bromma, Sweden) with glass knives. The sections were collected on 300-mesh copper grids covered by a thin layer of Formvar (Electron Microscopy Sciences). The sections were double-contrasted with 13% uranyl acetate (Merck, Billerica, MA, USA) for 15 min and with 2.8% lead citrate (Fluka AG, Buchs, Switzerland) for five min and examined with a Jeol JEM-100CX II transmission electron microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Mega View G3 camera (emsis, Münster, Germany). All TEM samples were examined by the same investigator (A.F.).
Jem100cx 2 transmission electron microscope
The JEM100CX-II is a transmission electron microscope (TEM) manufactured by JEOL. It is designed to produce high-resolution images of thin specimens by focusing a beam of electrons through the sample and onto a detector. The JEM100CX-II provides users with the ability to observe and analyze the internal structure and composition of materials at the nanoscale level.
Lab products found in correlation
46 protocols using jem100cx 2 transmission electron microscope
Ultrastructural Analysis of Surgical Samples
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the samples, also collected during the surgery, were fixed in 2.7% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 0.1 M PBS for two hours, rinsed three times with 0.15 M PBS for one hour each, and postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 0.15 M phosphate buffer. Dehydration was accomplished in an acetone series (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and three times at 100%). Inclusion was made in EMBed-812 epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences), which was polymerized for two days at 60 °C. Ultrathin sections of about 80 nm were cut on a Bromma 8800 ULTRATOME III ultramicrotome (LKB Produckter AB, Stockholm-Bromma, Sweden) with glass knives. The sections were collected on 300-mesh copper grids covered by a thin layer of Formvar (Electron Microscopy Sciences). The sections were double-contrasted with 13% uranyl acetate (Merck, Billerica, MA, USA) for 15 min and with 2.8% lead citrate (Fluka AG, Buchs, Switzerland) for five min and examined with a Jeol JEM-100CX II transmission electron microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Mega View G3 camera (emsis, Münster, Germany). All TEM samples were examined by the same investigator (A.F.).
Characterization of Pd Catalysts and Intermediates
were used to characterize the prepared Pd catalysts and their intermediates.
The palladium solutions before and after immobilization were scanned
in the range of 200–600 nm using a Cary 60 UV–vis spectrometer
(Agilent, USA). A TENSOR 27 FT-IR spectroscope (Bruker, Germany) was
used to analyze the Pd nanocatalysts and their intermediates. The
particle size, dispersion, shape, fine structure, and lattice fringes
of the Pd catalysts were observed by a Nanosem 430 scanning electron
microscope (FEI, USA) and a JEM100CXII transmission electron microscope
(JEOL, Japan). A 7404-vibrating sample magnetometer (LakeShore, USA)
was used to detect the magnetic properties of Fe3O4@SiO2–FPBA–DTPA–Pd and silica-coated
iron oxide MNPs (Fe3O4@SiO2). Elemental
analysis of the catalyst was performed using a Tecnai G2 F20 energy-dispersive
spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, USA). TGA was carried out with a TA 550
analyzer (Discovery, USA) under N2 flow at a heating rate
of 10 °C/min ranging from 30 to 800 °C to determine the
weight loss of Fe3O4@SiO2–FPBA–DTPA–Pd
as a function of temperature. The binding energies of Pd catalysts
were characterized by a PHI-1600 X-ray photoelectron spectroscope
(Thermo Fisher, USA). The content of Pd in Fe3O4@SiO2–FPBA–DTPA–Pd was determined
by an ICAP7400 inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer
(Agilent, USA). The reaction products were analyzed using a HPLC-3000
HPLC (Chuangxintongheng, China), and the structures of the reaction
products were identified by a 400 MHz Ascend 400 NMR (Bruker, Germany).
Transmission Electron Microscopy of Myocardium
Ultracentrifugation-based EV Fixation and TEM
Then the sample was placed on a copper grid coated with Pioloform and allowed to air-dry (approximately 30 min). Subsequently, 2% uranyl acetate was added to the grid for 3 min for staining. Excess solution was removed with a filter paper and the sample was analyzed by the JEM 100CXII transmission electron microscope (JEOL) at 80 kV.
Cardiac Muscle Ultrastructure Preparation
Transmission Electron Microscopy of Cell Ultrastructure
Negative Staining for Tomato Virus
Ultrastructural Analysis of Tomato Tissues
Ultrastructural Analysis of Gastric Tissue
Characterization of SiO2–CHO–APBA Composite
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!