Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods
Sourced in United States, Israel
About the product

The CCD camera is a core imaging device used in advanced microscopy techniques. It converts light signals into digital data, allowing for high-quality image capture and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

27 protocols using «ccd camera»

1

Lung Tissue Fixation and Transmission Electron Microscopy

Lungs were gravity inflation–fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde, and 0.1% calcium chloride in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2, followed by immersion fixation with fresh fixative at 4°C overnight. Lung lobes were cut into 1–2 mm blocks and processed for transmission electron microscopy as previously described (66 (link)). Images were digitally acquired by an H-7650 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High Technologies) equipped with a CCD camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques) at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Ultrastructural Analysis of Regadenoson-Treated bEnd.3 Cells

2021
bEnd.3 cells were grown in a 6-well plate and treated with vehicle or regadenoson. Cells were washed with PBS before incubation for one hour at room temperature in electron microscopy (EM) fixative buffer containing 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer. Cells were dehydrated in 100% ethanol, embedded in situ in a pure epoxy resin, and cured in 55°C oven. The resin blocks were examined under inverted light microscope. Area of interest for thin-sectioned EM analysis were cut off by a jewelry saw and glue on a blank block. Thin sections (80nm) were made from the selected areas and mounted on 150-meshed copper grids. The grids were stained with aqueous uranyl acetate (0.5% w/v) and Reynold’s lead citrate and examined in H7650 (Hitachi) electron microscope equipped with a CCD camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp). Quantification of distance in cell gap and cell-cell junction lengths was made by measuring 100 distances of triplicates using prints of digital EM images. Distances were measured with a measuring device (American Map Corp) and converted to nanometers or micrometers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of bEnd.3 Cells

2021
bEnd.3 cells were grown in a 6-well plate and treated with vehicle or regadenoson. Cells were washed with PBS before incubation for 1 hour at room temperature in electron microscopy (EM) fixative buffer containing 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L cacodylate buffer. Cells were dehydrated in 100% ethanol, embedded in situ in a pure epoxy resin, and cured in 55°C oven. The resin blocks were examined under inverted light microscope. Areas of interest for thin-sectioned EM analysis were cut off by a jewelry saw and glued on a blank block. Thin sections (80 nm) were made from the selected areas and mounted on 150-meshed copper grids. The grids were stained with aqueous uranyl acetate (0.5% w/v) and Reynold's lead citrate and examined in H7650 (Hitachi) electron microscope equipped with a CCD camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp). Quantification of distance in cell gap and cell–cell junction lengths was made by measuring 100 distances of triplicates using prints of digital EM images. Distances were measured with a measuring device (American Map Corp) and converted to nanometers or micrometers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Negative Staining of Hybrid Nanoparticles

2021
HNPs (1 mg/ml) in a volume of 5 µL were placed on a grid (Nisshin EM, Tokyo, Japan) and dried with a stream of warm air 3 times. Then, each sample was negatively stained with 10 µL of 1 w/v% ammonium molybdate for 1 min and imaged with an HT7700 TEM System (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). The images were recorded with a CCD camera at 1024 × 1024 pixels (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, Woburn, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Visualizing Virus-Like Particles by Electron Microscopy

2021
The construction of VLPs was conducted as described in the previous study [11 (link)]. VLPs were based on a recombinant Baculovirus (rBV) expressing system using the HPAI H5N1 virus (A/chicken/Egypt/121/2012) [15 ]. In this study, we additionally explore the morphology and the size of the generated VLPs using Electron microscopy. VLP samples were adsorbed onto freshly discharged 400 mesh carbon parlodion-coated copper grids (Poly-Sciences, Warrington, PA USA). The grids were rinsed with buffer containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and 120 mM KCl and negatively stained with 1% phosphotungstic acid, then dried by aspiration. VLPs were visualized on a Hitachi H-7600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High Technologies America, Schaumburg, IL USA) operating at 80 kV and digitally captured with a CCD camera at 1 kx1 k resolution (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp., Danvers, MA, USA) [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «ccd camera»

1

Electron Microscopy of Mouse Lungs

Mouse lungs were inflation-fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde [Electron Microscopy Sciences (EMS)], 2% glutaraldehyde (EMS), 0.1% calcium chloride (Fisher Scientific) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (EMS) buffer (SCB), pH 7.2, under 25 cm pressure, followed by immersion fixation with fresh fixative at 4 °C overnight. Lung lobes were cut into 1–2 mm blocks and processed for transmission electron microscopy as previously described52 (link). 90 nm mouse lung sections were viewed, and images were digitally acquired by a Hitachi H-7650 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High Technologies USA) equipped with a CCD camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques) at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Visualizing Virus-Like Particles by TEM

VLP samples were adsorbed onto a freshly discharged 400 mesh carbon parlodion-coated copper grids (Poly-Sciences, Warrington, PA). The grids were rinsed with buffer containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and 120 mM KCl and negatively stained with 1% phosphotungstic acid, then dried by aspiration. VLPs were visualized on a Hitachi H-7600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High Technologies America, Schaumburg, IL) operating at 80 kV and digitally captured with a CCD camera at 1k×1k resolution (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp., Danvers, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Visualization of SARS-CoV-2 Virus-Like Particles

Chimeric SARS VLPs were adsorbed for 2 min by flotation onto a freshly discharged 400 mesh carbon parlodion-coated copper grid (Poly-Sciences, Warrington, PA). The grids were rinsed with 20mM Tris, pH 7.4, and 120mM KCl, negatively stained with 1% phosphotungstic acid, then dried by aspiration. VLPs were visualized on a Hitachi H-7600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High Technologies America, Schaumburg, IL) operating at 80 kV and digitally captured with a CCD camera at 1K×1K resolution (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp., Danvers, MA). For immunoelectron microscopy (Immuno EM), rabbit anti-SARS S antibody (Imgnex) was used as primary antibody and 6 nm colloidal gold-affinity pure goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA) was used as secondary antibody as described previously [46 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Visualizing SARS Virus-Like Particles

Chimeric SARS VLPs were adsorbed for 2 min by flotation onto a freshly discharged 400 mesh carbon parlodion-coated copper grid (Poly-Sciences, Warrington, PA). The grids were rinsed with 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and 120 mM KCl, negatively stained with 1% phosphotungstic acid, then dried by aspiration. VLPs were visualized on a Hitachi H-7600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High Technologies America, Schaumburg, IL) operating at 80 kV and digitally captured with a CCD camera at 1K × 1K resolution (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp., Danvers, MA). For immunoelectron microscopy (Immuno EM), rabbit anti-SARS S antibody (Imgnex) was used as primary antibody and 6 nm colloidal gold-affinity pure goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA) was used as secondary antibody as described previously [46] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Immunoelectroscopic Analysis of Hippocampal GR

Immunoelectroscopic analysis was performed essentially as described elsewhere (Hojo et al., 2004 (link); Mukai et al., 2007 (link); Ooishi et al., 2012b (link)). Rat hippocampus was frozen and sliced coronally. Freeze substitution and low-temperature embedding of the specimens was performed as described previously (Roberson et al., 1999 (link)). The samples were immersed in uranyl acetate in anhydrous methanol (-90°C). The samples were infiltrated with Lowicryl HM20 resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA) and polymerization was performed with ultraviolet light. Ultrathin sections were cut using a Reichert-Jung ultramicrotome. For immunolabeling, sections were incubated with primary antibody for GR (Morimoto et al., 1996 (link); diluted to 1/3000) overnight, and incubated with secondary gold-tagged (10 nm) Fab fragment in Tris buffered saline (TBS). Sections were counterstained with 1% uranyl acetate, and viewed on a JEOL 1200EX electron microscope (Japan). Images were captured using a CCD camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, USA). The antibody is specific to GR in the hippocampus as shown with Western blot (Komatsuzaki et al., 2005 (link); Ooishi et al., 2012b (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.